Le lundi 2 mars 2009 19:35:02 Roland Mas, vous avez écrit :
Subject: Publication du Cahier de l'admin Debian Etch
Erf...
Mais je me réjouis de le lire. :)
--
Didier Raboud, proud Debian user.
CH-1802 Corseaux
did...@raboud.com
signature.asc
Salutation à l'équipe Debian french ;)
Suite au message envoyé par Roland Mas, et après avoir visité la page de
Raphael, je me suis dit que c'était le moment que je m'inscrive, et que je
m'investisse un peu sur le projet Debian. En espérant que je pourrais
apporter ma pierre à l'édifice!
Donc me
Bonjour,
On Mon, 02 Mar 2009, Olivier Lange wrote:
Donc me voici parmis vous... Maintenant, la question qui tue... Que puis-je
faire pour donner un coup de main à l'équipe Debian? Ce n'est pas claire
pour moi! Je me permets donc de vous donner quelques infos sur mes
compétences, passion,
On Mon, 2009-03-02 at 03:19 +0100, Sylvain Rochet wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sylvain Rochet grada...@gradator.net
* Package name: mydns
Version : 1.2.8.26
Upstream Author : Howard Wilkinsin how...@cohtech.com
* URL : http://mydns.pl/
*
Steve Langasek wrote:
On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 06:32:45PM +0100, Giacomo Catenazzi wrote:
Hmmm. I partially agree, but then we have an unnecessary exception:
such virtual packages must have only one provider, or else there
will be problems (IIRC) on dpkg, apt or ddbuild, if such dependency
is
On Sun, Mar 01, 2009 at 08:25:38PM +0100, Carsten Hey wrote:
Among the problems we try to deal with the proposed solutions is, as
Daniel wrote in 494422e7.2060...@debian.org, that apt (and/or
aptitude) take the alphabetically first package which provides foo and
installs that to fulfill the
On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 03:12:09PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
On Sat, 28 Feb 2009, Julien BLACHE wrote:
Raphael Hertzog hert...@debian.org wrote:
debian/shlibs.local should help for that.
Except symbols files have priority over shlibs and there's no
symbols.local.
I sense a
Le dimanche 01 mars 2009 à 22:25 -0800, Bill Unruh a écrit :
The issue is one of the users. They do not give a damn if Schilling is a
difficult and arrogant SOB or if the Debian people put principle above all
else. They just want good software, which works, not just on the most popular
brands
Michelle Konzack wrote:
I have over 16 GByte of coredumps: OpenOffice, Iceweasel, mutt, pidgin,
FvwmForm, mimedecode, gimp, mc, ...
Some are here: http://devel.debian.tamay-dogan.net/coredumps/ and I
can not more upload since I am on GSM and ma sped and traffic is limited
Use gdb, get
Le lundi 02 mars 2009 à 02:56 +0100, Michelle Konzack a écrit :
I have over 16 GByte of coredumps: OpenOffice, Iceweasel, mutt, pidgin,
FvwmForm, mimedecode, gimp, mc, ...
Some are here: http://devel.debian.tamay-dogan.net/coredumps/ and I
can not more upload since I am on GSM and ma
On Sun, 01 Mar 2009, Steve Langasek wrote:
shlibs.local was initially a poor solution for a less than ideal
dpkg-shlibdeps that couldn't cope with shlibs just produced by the
packages being built.
Are you sure this was the reason? shlibs.local support was added to
dpkg-shlibdeps in
Josselin Mouette wrote:
The only thing for which you’ll need Schily-based software in Debian is
for burning CDs. For DVDs and Blu-Rays, we have dvd+rw-tools already.
What about libburn + cdrskin and similar tools?
--
Bernd Zeimetz Debian GNU/Linux Developer
GPG
On Mon, Mar 02, 2009 at 02:56:19AM +0100, Michelle Konzack wrote:
I wish I had at least a STM-1 at home, I would you send you all 300
coredumps since the release weekend of Lenny...
Please report bugs in the appropriate forum, e.g. the BTS. debian-devel
is not for general complaints.
On Monday 02 March 2009, Michelle Konzack wrote:
Am 2009-03-02 06:23:26, schrieb Goswin von Brederlow:
Since everything seems to be dumping core on your system have you
thought about the possibility that it might be your system that is at
fault? Such a widespread range of coredumps usualy
Josselin Mouette j...@debian.org wrote:
If you don???t publish this email, we will simply not believe you, that???s
all.
Using majestetis pluralis in this relation seems to be a bit absurd.
Jörg
--
EMail:jo...@schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
Quoting Josselin Mouette j...@debian.org:
Le dimanche 01 mars 2009 à 22:25 -0800, Bill Unruh a écrit :
The issue is one of the users. They do not give a damn if Schilling is a
difficult and arrogant SOB or if the Debian people put principle above all
else. They just want good software, which
Howdy all,
I'm having a conversation with a Debian packager regarding a manpage
that, currently, is a mere placeholder saying “please see foocommand
--help”, giving none of the useful information normally found in a
manpage.
I would like the specific package to remain anonymous at the moment
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Josselin Mouette j...@debian.org wrote:
If you don???t publish this email, we will simply not believe you,
that???s all.
Using majestetis pluralis in this relation seems to be a bit absurd.
Jörg
If you don't publish this email, I will not believe you, that's
Hi,
I plan to ask the removal of gnomeicu that neither Sebastien
or me are using. I saved it for lenny, but I don't think it's worth
keeping for Squeeze. Hence I will request its removal in a few days
unless someone pops up and adopts it.
http://gnomeicu.sourceforge.net
Ben Finney ben+deb...@benfinney.id.au writes:
I'm having a conversation with a Debian packager regarding a manpage
that, currently, is a mere placeholder saying “please see foocommand
--help”, giving none of the useful information normally found in a
manpage.
...
I have submitted a manpage
On Sun, Mar 01, 2009 at 09:44:41PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
You have a case here where the user has managed to run a complete
system for a non-negligible period of time without ever installing an
MTA (long enough to either configure oldstable in their sources.list,
or for the version of
On Fri, 27 Feb 2009, Enrico Zini wrote:
The way I see it, the last thread on sections has opened a bit of a can
of worms: now first everyone will want a section for their favourite
topic, then there is going to be a fight on which one to pick in case
packages that could belong to more than one
Bill Unruh un...@physics.ubc.ca writes:
On Mon, 2 Mar 2009, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Memnon Anon gegendosenflei...@gmail.com writes:
But, on the other hand, please do not try to stress that the debian
fork is as good as Schillings. It is not necessary, the
non-free argument is enough!
Holger Levsen holger at layer-acht.org writes:
On Freitag, 27. Februar 2009, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
ISTR (some of) -legal@ saying not DFSG-compliant,
some people on -legal will always disagree, what counts more is the (rough)
consenus...
Sure, but I thought we had an explicit consensus
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Krzysztof Krzyżaniak (eloy) e...@debian.org
* Package name: libtest-www-mechanize-catalyst-perl
Version : 0.50
Upstream Author : Ash Berlin a...@cpan.org (current maintiner)
* URL :
On Sun, 1 Mar 2009, Russ Allbery wrote:
Bill Unruh un...@physics.ubc.ca writes:
The license issue is problematic, especially since copyright laws differ
in different countries. Derivative works is an especially tricky concept
since it is so poorly defined in law, and the courts have been all
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 02, 2009 at 02:02:08AM -0600, William Pitcock wrote:
What does this have over PowerDNS?
Probably nothing, else that I am using it and packaging it for my own
and thought that it would be a good idea to contribute to Debian, is
redundancy a problem ?
Sylvain
signature.asc
On Sun, Mar 01, 2009 at 03:59:46PM +0100, Carsten Hey wrote:
On Sun, Mar 01, 2009 at 01:01:49PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Sun, 2009-03-01 at 02:42 +0100, Carsten Hey wrote:
Deborphan needs a way to detect shared libraries ...
[...]
There is already a role::plugin which should apply
On Sun, Mar 01, 2009 at 09:18:05AM +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
I don't know the mechanism by which ‘foofacet::TODO’ triggers creation
of a new tag, but the meaning is clearer at least.
There is currently no such trigger, but it's easy to produce[1] a
package list for such a tag and check if there
On Mon, 2 Mar 2009, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Bill Unruh un...@physics.ubc.ca writes:
On Mon, 2 Mar 2009, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
...
No they are NOT irrelevant. For the users, that is the key. And surely it is
the users ( the customers) who should be the prime consideration.
I
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: clam-networkeditor
Version : 1.4.0~svn
Upstream Author : CLAM Team c...@iua.upf.edu
* URL : http://clam.iua.upf.edu
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C++
On Monday 02 March 2009 19:59:00 Bill Unruh wrote:
--cut--
Agreed, both sides have to come to the conclusion that they are operating
legally. On the plus side, Schilling would like to have his software
distributed in the distros. He is also strongly of the opinion that there
is no legal
On Sun, Mar 01 2009, Carsten Hey wrote:
On Sun, Mar 01, 2009 at 04:55:23PM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote:
We could have a exim4 upload implementing in sid this rather quickly
after receiving a go.
In general I much prefer a virtual package over a real one but I think
we should wait a bit
Simon Josefsson dijo [Mon, Mar 02, 2009 at 11:22:52AM +0100]:
How about submitting a patch to use help2man instead?
http://www.gnu.org/software/help2man/
Then the man page will be kept up to date with --help output.
Possibly the document around the man page requirement could point to
Bill Unruh un...@physics.ubc.ca writes:
On Sun, 1 Mar 2009, Russ Allbery wrote:
Bill Unruh un...@physics.ubc.ca writes:
The license issue is problematic, especially since copyright laws
differ in different countries. Derivative works is an especially
tricky concept since it is so poorly
On Mon, Mar 02, 2009 at 11:22:52AM +0100, Simon Josefsson wrote:
How about submitting a patch to use help2man instead?
http://www.gnu.org/software/help2man/
Then the man page will be kept up to date with --help output.
help2man is a fine starting point for a manpage, but unless the help
* brian m. carlson [Mon, 02 Mar 2009 19:45:22 +]:
help2man is a fine starting point for a manpage, but unless the help
messages are very verbose, it is not sufficient. A manpage needs to
explain all the possibilities and interactions between different
options that are usually not
At Mon, 2 Mar 2009 13:29:06 -0600,
Gunnar Wolf wrote:
Hmh, this could even be promoted as a best packaging practice. Many
authors do ship properly-formatted --help entries, and our
hand-generated manpages can often linger behind the truth. Any strong
opinions against?
Not to rehash an old
On Thu, Feb 26 2009, Harald Braumann wrote:
But there are 3 possible situations here:
1. value has been changed between the last and the new maintainer
version
2. value was modified locally
3. both of the above
Well, a complete analysis of the situations ucf faces are at [0]
and
On Mon, Mar 02 2009, Bill Unruh wrote:
Agreed, both sides have to come to the conclusion that they are
operating legally. On the plus side, Schilling would like to have his
software distributed in the distros. He is also strongly of the
opinion that there is no legal impediment to that
On Mon, Mar 02 2009, Adeodato Simó wrote:
Many times the problem is that upstreams do provide such adequate
documentation... in other formats than man pages. What should the
packager do in that case? Create a dummy man page pointing out to eg.
/usr/share/doc/foopkg/html/fooprog.html? Copy
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
Hi,
I'm orphaning uucp, the unix to unix copy program.
I haven't had a UUCP setup it in a few years now, and I therefore
haven't had any chance to ensure stuff is continuing to work.
Apparently something in lenny broke in.uucpd (see #517726). I should
have
Bill Unruh un...@physics.ubc.ca wrote:
Agreed, both sides have to come to the conclusion that they are operating
legally. On the plus side, Schilling would like to have his software
distributed in the distros. He is also strongly of the opinion that there is
no legal impediment to that happening.
On Mon, 2 Mar 2009, Bernd Schubert bernd.schub...@fastmail.fm wrote:
Since the release of Lenny, I have installed arround 60 Workstaions, but
making tararchives of the original installation and reinstalled Lenny
from scratch, using the first binary DVD and the rest over Net.
Nearly
Le lundi 02 mars 2009 à 09:59 -0800, Bill Unruh a écrit :
without legal impediment). Now the question is, is there some way of clearing
out the underbrush so that both sides agree that there is no impediment.
What you mean is: “Both sides should agree that Jörg Schilling is
right”. How do you
On Mon, Mar 02, 2009 at 04:42:19PM +0100, Sylvain Rochet wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 02, 2009 at 02:02:08AM -0600, William Pitcock wrote:
What does this have over PowerDNS?
Probably nothing, else that I am using it and packaging it for my own
and thought that it would be a good idea to
On Tue, 3 Mar 2009, Russ Allbery r...@debian.org wrote:
If Red Hat wants to pay someone to put up with it, that's their call; it's
a lot easier to be polite in the face of an unending stream of personal
abuse if you're getting a paycheck for doing it.
If Red Hat was to do this, then it would
On Tue, 03 Mar 2009, Russell Coker wrote:
Bernd, I (with my DD or upstream developer hat on) understand your
sentiment. But I also (with my consultant or end-user hat on) find
it impossible to implement.
It's not that it's impossible to implement, it's just that the
resources that could
[Piotr Ożarowski, 2009-02-18]
[...] it's time however to decide which one will be my
winner - I'll decide that in next weeks (maybe months, but it
will happen sooner than later
Since nobody is interested in having the tools binary compatible[1]
(and, to be honest, I cared about opinion of two
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: clam-chordata
Version : 1.0.0~svn
Upstream Author : CLAM Team c...@iua.upf.edu
* URL : http://clam-project.org
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C++
Description
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Per Andersson avtob...@gmail.com
* Package name: oneswarm
Version : 0.5
Upstream Author : Tomas Isdal et al.
* URL : http://oneswarm.cs.washington.edu/
* License : GPLv2, LGPL, Apache, nc-sa3, CPLv1
Programming Lang:
On Mon, Mar 02, 2009 at 09:10:21PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Mon, Mar 02, 2009 at 02:02:08AM -0600, William Pitcock wrote:
What does this have over PowerDNS?
Probably nothing, else that I am using it and packaging it for my own
and thought that it would be a good idea to
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 4:17 PM, Piotr Ożarowski pi...@debian.org wrote:
[Piotr Ożarowski, 2009-02-18]
[...] it's time however to decide which one will be my
winner - I'll decide that in next weeks (maybe months, but it
will happen sooner than later
Since nobody is interested in having the
* Ben Hutchings [Mon, 02 Mar 2009 21:10:21 +]:
On Mon, Mar 02, 2009 at 04:42:19PM +0100, Sylvain Rochet wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 02, 2009 at 02:02:08AM -0600, William Pitcock wrote:
What does this have over PowerDNS?
Probably nothing, else that I am using it and packaging it for my
On Mon, 2 Mar 2009, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On Mon, Mar 02 2009, Bill Unruh wrote:
Agreed, both sides have to come to the conclusion that they are
operating legally. On the plus side, Schilling would like to have his
software distributed in the distros. He is also strongly of the
opinion
William Pitcock neno...@sacredspiral.co.uk writes:
What does this have over PowerDNS?
AFAIUI it is a dependency of ispconfig3 (which is not packaged yet).
--
Gruesse/greetings,
Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Pierre Neyron pierre.ney...@free.fr
* Package name: libio-socket-socks-perl
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Ryan Eatmon reat...@mail.com
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/~reatmon/IO-Socket-Socks-0.1/
* License : Same as
(Gunnar, and others, please don't send individual responses that you
also send to the mailing list.)
Gunnar Wolf gw...@gwolf.org writes:
Hmh, this could even be promoted as a best packaging practice.
Many authors do ship properly-formatted --help entries, and our
hand-generated manpages can
This one time, at band camp, Bill Unruh said:
All I am saying is that the two sides are NOT far apart on their
goals. Both would like to distribute cdrtools, both want it to be open
source and to allow people to make changes.
That may have been true in 2004. I doubt it is any longer. If I
Again, let us separate out the ill feelings from the issues under dispute. I
realise that it is very hard to forget history but since both sides believe
that it is the user that is most important, that is whom we should keep our
attention on.
Schilling here says that all of cdrtools, except
On Monday 02 March 2009, Russell Coker wrote:
On Mon, 2 Mar 2009, Bernd Schubert bernd.schub...@fastmail.fm wrote:
Since the release of Lenny, I have installed arround 60 Workstaions,
but making tararchives of the original installation and reinstalled
Lenny from scratch, using the
Hi
Dne Mon, 2 Mar 2009 22:17:52 +0100
Piotr Ożarowski pi...@debian.org napsal(a):
Since nobody is interested in having the tools binary compatible[1]
(and, to be honest, I cared about opinion of two guys only: Matthias
voted no by not agreeing to use /usr/lib/pyshared and Joss expressed
his
Hello,
Joerg Jaspert, le Fri 27 Feb 2009 09:02:11 +0100, a écrit :
Maybe it could be interesting to open an accessibility section?
Maybe, maybe not. What packages would you put into it?
Just a quick rough list (90 bin packages):
accerciser
at-spi
at-spi-doc
big-cursor
brltty
brltty-flite
On Mon, Mar 02, 2009 at 09:04:39PM +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
The response from the maintainer (who is also the upstream author) so
far is, essentially, “Patches welcome, but I'm not interested in
maintaining manpages”.
I have submitted a manpage as a patch. However, that response pretty
Hi,
On Montag, 2. März 2009, Russell Coker wrote:
There is the alien program to convert an RPM to a .deb. Is there a way
of also automatically tracking the upstream (Fedora or CentOS) version of
the package and downloading a new version (with signature checks) when it
becomes available?
On Mon, Mar 02, 2009 at 02:41:54PM -0800, Bill Unruh wrote:
Thus, is it correct that the issue centers around mkisofs, a program which is
under the GPL2 license and is linked with libscg, a CDDL licensed library? Is
this where the dispute lies?
If so, exactly what is the nature of the legal
The upstream maintainers decided that in the future the files in
/etc/modprobe.d/ will be processed only if they have a .conf suffix.
The latest module-init-tool release complains loudly for each one and
still processes them, but this will change.
Please update your packages at the time of your
Josselin Mouette j...@debian.org wrote:
If you did try to disallow GPLd programs to link against independent
non-GPL
libraries, you would make _any_ GPLd program undistributable in binary form.
This is absolute bullshit. Of course it is forbidden to link GPL
programs against
Bill Unruh un...@physics.ubc.ca wrote:
Again, let us separate out the ill feelings from the issues under dispute. I
realise that it is very hard to forget history but since both sides believe
that it is the user that is most important, that is whom we should keep our
attention on.
On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 01:43:53AM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
The upstream maintainers decided that in the future the files in
/etc/modprobe.d/ will be processed only if they have a .conf suffix.
What is the point of this change, except to force an annoying transition on
people?
--
Steve
On Mon, 2 Mar 2009, James Vega wrote:
On Mon, Mar 02, 2009 at 02:41:54PM -0800, Bill Unruh wrote:
Thus, is it correct that the issue centers around mkisofs, a program which is
under the GPL2 license and is linked with libscg, a CDDL licensed library? Is
this where the dispute lies?
If so,
On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 01:31:36AM +0100, Joerg Schilling wrote:
I asked Eben Moglen:
The way I read the GPLv2, the system exception in section 3 only
gives you the permission to omit the system parts from the complete
source. Where do you see additional differences to other code
On Tue, 03 Mar 2009, Joerg Schilling wrote:
The OS exception in the GPL just allows you to omit things like
libc from the complete source. The The OS exception in the GPL
does not allow you to treat license compatibility between GPL code
and system libraries different from license
On Mon, Mar 02, 2009 at 09:38:20PM +0100, Joerg Schilling wrote:
The current state of Eduard Bloch at Debian is suspended.
No, it isn't.
When will the state of Eduard Bloch be changed from suspended to
thrown out?
It won't. He is still a member in good standing of the Debian community,
and
On Mon, 2 Mar 2009, Don Armstrong wrote:
On Tue, 03 Mar 2009, Joerg Schilling wrote:
The OS exception in the GPL just allows you to omit things like
libc from the complete source. The The OS exception in the GPL
does not allow you to treat license compatibility between GPL code
and system
Manoj Srivastava dijo [Mon, Mar 02, 2009 at 02:22:57PM -0600]:
Hmh, this could even be promoted as a best packaging practice. Many
authors do ship properly-formatted --help entries, and our
hand-generated manpages can often linger behind the truth. Any strong
opinions against?
On Mar 03, Steve Langasek vor...@debian.org wrote:
On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 01:43:53AM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
The upstream maintainers decided that in the future the files in
/etc/modprobe.d/ will be processed only if they have a .conf suffix.
What is the point of this change, except to
On Tue, 3 Mar 2009, Bill Unruh un...@physics.ubc.ca wrote:
libschilly as distributed by Debian is not a System Library, because
it is part of the cdrtools work, does not implement a Standard
Interface, nor is it included in the normal form of packaging a Major
component, nor does it serve
Russell Coker russ...@coker.com.au writes:
If libschilly met the criteria for being a System Library then it
probably have been packaged for use by other programs. If you want to
make a case for including libschilly as a System Library then please
provide a list of some of the other programs
On Mon, 02 Mar 2009, Bill Unruh wrote:
On Mon, 2 Mar 2009, Don Armstrong wrote:
The fact that Debian does not currently distribute libschilly
further indicates that it isn't a System Library.
This is a bit of chicken and egg isn't it?
No, because unlike the chicken and the egg,[0] if we take
On Tue, 3 Mar 2009, Russell Coker wrote:
On Tue, 3 Mar 2009, Bill Unruh un...@physics.ubc.ca wrote:
libschilly as distributed by Debian is not a System Library, because
it is part of the cdrtools work, does not implement a Standard
Interface, nor is it included in the normal form of packaging
On Mon, 2 Mar 2009, Don Armstrong wrote:
On Mon, 02 Mar 2009, Bill Unruh wrote:
On Mon, 2 Mar 2009, Don Armstrong wrote:
.
I believe that you mean the above to apply to mkisofs, not to
cdrtools, which is a bunch of different program. The programs which
are purely CDDL I assume you have
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Carlo Segre se...@debian.org
* Package name: libchemistry-formula-perl
Version : 1.0.1
Upstream Author : Bruce Ravel bra...@bnl.gov
* URL : http://cars9.uchicago.edu/svn/libperlxray
* License : Artistic
Programming
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Carlo Segre se...@debian.org
* Package name: libxray-absorption-perl
Version : 2.0.1
Upstream Author : Bruce Ravel bra...@bnl.gov
* URL : http://cars9.uchicago.edu/svn/libperlxray
* License : Artistic
Programming Lang:
ma, 2009-03-02 kello 14:19 -0600, Manoj Srivastava kirjoitti:
Then, every few revisions, I would resync the man page. I
consider this just one of the things that Debian maintainedrs
ought to do -- I mean, we are not just glorified packagers.
We could aid this process by having a tool
Thought this would be a good opportunity to remind y'all
about dh_installmodules(1), which can handle
modprobe.d files in addition to kernel modules. Most packages
shipping files in modprobe.d seem to generate the files via
echo statements in debian/rules, rather than using it.
dh_installmodules
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Carlo Segre se...@debian.org
* Package name: libxray-scattering-perl
Version : 0.2.2
Upstream Author : Bruce Ravel bra...@bnl.gov
* URL : http://cars9.uchicago.edu/svn/libperlxray
* License : Artistic
Programming Lang:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Carlo Segre se...@debian.org
* Package name: libxray-spacegroup-perl
Version : 0.1.1
Upstream Author : Bruce Ravel bra...@bnl.gov
* URL : http://cars9.uchicago.edu/svn/libperlxray
* License : Artistic
Programming Lang:
On Tue, 3 Mar 2009, Bill Unruh un...@physics.ubc.ca wrote:
Also please note that there is nothing stopping you from building your
own packages of any software you like that isn't in Debian and hosting
them on your own web server. It's really not difficult to do.
Bill, you could become
Bill Unruh un...@physics.ubc.ca writes:
He certainly does claim to be the copyright holder and as having the
right to license them under CDDL, and I think barring solid evidence to
the contrary, one should accept him at his word.
Given the evidence that's been presented in the past that
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Julián Hernández Gómez julianhernan...@gmail.com
* Package name: yasnippet
Version : 0.5.10
Upstream Author : pluskid plus...@gmail.com
* URL : http://code.google.com/p/yasnippet/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: Emacs
On Mon, 02 Mar 2009, Bill Unruh wrote:
He certainly does claim to be the copyright holder and as having the
right to license them under CDDL, and I think barring solid evidence
to the contrary, one should accept him at his word.
TPMDIR=$(mktemp -d);
cd $TMPDIR;
wget -O-
On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 03:09:52AM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
On Mar 03, Steve Langasek vor...@debian.org wrote:
On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 01:43:53AM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
The upstream maintainers decided that in the future the files in
/etc/modprobe.d/ will be processed only if they
On Mon, Mar 02, 2009 at 10:02:11PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
winge
Insert the typical winge here about dpkg conffile renaming code
being deployed via cut-n-paste from a wiki page instead of any
of our better technologies, such as a utility, with a man page,
in a single package.
/winge
It
Le Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 12:10:09AM +, Roger Leigh a écrit :
crap maintainer
bloody lazy.
I thought I was doing something good when writing manpages, now I realise what
I am for not writing enough : « responsable de merde putain de feignant »
(translated in my language). Thank you for
Ben Finney wrote:
Wording and tone aside, is that expectation reasonable?
Yes.
What course of
action is open to a user of the package, with a maintainer who has
made it plain they're not interested in following (this part of)
policy?
There's nothing direct you can do as user. As a
On Mon, 2 Mar 2009, Don Armstrong wrote:
On Mon, 02 Mar 2009, Bill Unruh wrote:
He certainly does claim to be the copyright holder and as having the
right to license them under CDDL, and I think barring solid evidence
to the contrary, one should accept him at his word.
TPMDIR=$(mktemp -d);
On Mon, Mar 02, 2009 at 08:01:42PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
It would of course have to be in an Essential: yes package, since conffile
renaming has to be handled in the package preinst and we wouldn't want
conffile handling to involve lots of extra Pre-Depends. dpkg itself is the
most
Stefano Zacchiroli z...@debian.org writes:
On Mon, Mar 02, 2009 at 08:01:42PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
It would of course have to be in an Essential: yes package, since
conffile renaming has to be handled in the package preinst and we
wouldn't want conffile handling to involve lots of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 01 Mar 2009 18:58:54 +0100
Source: php-openid
Binary: php-openid
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.1.2-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jan Hauke Rahm i...@jhr-online.de
Changed-By: Jan Hauke Rahm
1 - 100 of 191 matches
Mail list logo
