On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 09:57:13AM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 11:07:29PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> > Every relevant Linux distribution requires udev, and so do many
> > important features of Debian systems. Anything not compatible with udev
> > is a toy which wastes
Le vendredi 20 mars 2009 à 08:28 +, Sune Vuorela a écrit :
> If anyone wants to actually try working with copyright files for one of
> those "bigger" packages, Mike O'Connor helpfulyl just opened #520485 to
> track one of them. Patches are welcome.
How thoughtful of his.
Hint: you can open su
On Mar 20, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> It is still possible to install and run Lenny without the use of udev,
> and many people do so.
popcon shows that the number is trivial. Definitely not "many".
> Whether you agree that this is useful or a 'toy'
> setup is beside the point; fact is that it happ
Hi all,
I had some talks with Eduard Bloch (the author of svn-buildpackage) and
Eddy Petrisor (as a contributor listed in its uploaders field) and it
seems that both of them lost their interest in svn-bp and/or are too
busy to take care of current development. Some time ago I started fixing
some o
[Transferred to -devel as suggested. Please follow-up there].
Le Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 04:40:33PM +, Sune Vuorela a écrit :
> http://wiki.debian.org/Proposals/CopyrightFormat
>
> It is a too complex, overengineered solution to a very minor issue.
> It is not easy readables for humans
> It is u
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 09:09:53AM +, Roger Leigh
wrote:
> Mike Hommey wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 11:02:48PM -0700, Daniel Moerner wrote:
>>> On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 10:19 PM, Mike O'Connor wrote:
To me, it seems like since one has to go through all of the source files
anywa
Mike Hommey wrote:
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 11:02:48PM -0700, Daniel Moerner wrote:
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 10:19 PM, Mike O'Connor wrote:
To me, it seems like since one has to go through all of the source files
anyway, creating a list of copyright holders while you are doing it is a
trivial ta
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 09:05:53AM +0100, Bjørn Mork wrote:
> Ben Hutchings writes:
> > You can do this with ethtool now, and more cleanly:
> >
> > link-speed 100
> > link-duplex full
>
> Yes, I know. But that means that existing working configurations have
> to be modified.
Which shoul
On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 11:07:29PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Mar 15, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> > Being able to rename an interface without messing with udev is a
> > feature, not a bug.
> Every relevant Linux distribution requires udev, and so do many
> important features of Debian systems. Any
Sune Vuorela writes:
> On 2009-03-20, Ben Finney wrote:
> > All of what you've demonstrated is part of what Mike covered with
> > ???one has to go through all of the source files anyway???, is it
> > not? The point I got from his message is that, having *already*
> > accepted the burden of going
pe, 2009-03-20 kello 04:00 +0100, Romain Beauxis kirjoitti:
> Was there any intent of writting such a tool at some point ?
> Most of the specifications also deduce from an actual implementation, which
> also helps people who don't want to follow the multiple revisions to check
> and convert their
On 2009-03-20, Ben Finney wrote:
> All of what you've demonstrated is part of what Mike covered with
> ???one has to go through all of the source files anyway???, is it not?
> The point I got from his message is that, having *already* accepted
> the burden of going through all the files, one can t
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 01:28:09AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 20 2009, Mike O'Connor wrote:
>
> >>
> >> Why is this list needed?
> >
> > Often the license requires it. For instance the BSD license says,
> > "Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright".
>
101 - 113 of 113 matches
Mail list logo
