On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 11:15:57PM +0100, Jon Dowland wrote:
> A closer reading of the DEP-5 wording clears this up for me:
> However it makes for easier reading if the copyright
> file lists the “main” license first: the one matching
> the “top level” of the work, with others li
On Sun, Sep 13 2009, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Both libreadline-dev (>= 6.0) and libreadline6-dev are now available
> in unstable and testing. If possible, please replace the
> libreadline5-dev build dependency with libreadline-dev, so that in
> future changes of the libreadline soname binNMU's can
Le Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 11:38:47PM -0400, Felipe Sateler a écrit :
>
> A lot has been said about CCing submitters, but what about other
> contributors? Is there any reason someone would want to comment on a bug
> report and _not_ be notified of further messaging on it?
Hi all,
during last year
Le Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 11:15:57PM +0100, Jon Dowland a écrit :
>
> So as it stands, no inheritance is possible, and every Files: line must be
> accompanied by a Copyright: and a License: line.
Hi again,
to my knowledge, nobody proposed inheritance before you, probably because most
people see th
Am Sonntag, den 13.09.2009, 23:58 +0100 schrieb Jon Dowland:
> Most of the examples given in DEP-5 containing the path
> character will not work, either, e.g.
>
> Files: debian/*
>
> Assuming they are passed into a find(1) invocation like so
>
> find . -path 'debian/*'
>
> (note the pre
Given that DEP-5 is supposed to be about machine-
readability, I thought it would be worthwhile trying to
write something to parse the proposed format. Please find
attached a short python script that I have written based on
the current text of DEP-5 at dep.debian.net[1].
It's designed to be run f
On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 09:08:19PM +0900, Charles Plessy
wrote:
> In this simple example there is no ambiguity, but only
> because it is assumed that the package is licensed
> entirely under one license.
That wasn't the assumption I was making...
> The easiest alternative source is the the stanza
(sending to -devel, -perl and #545904, followups to -perl)
A change in the ExtUtils::MakeMaker module between Perl 5.10.0 and Perl
5.10.1 (currently in experimental) makes 246 packages fail to build
from source.
See #545904 for details; the summary is to use either of
make install DESTDIR=$(TM
On Sat, 12 Sep 2009, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> A lot has been said about CCing submitters, but what about other
> contributors? Is there any reason someone would want to comment on a
> bug report and _not_ be notified of further messaging on it?
That's not really the reason why we don't already noti
Hi,
Matthias Klose wrote:
> Both libreadline-dev (>= 6.0) and libreadline6-dev are now available in
> unstable and testing. If possible, please replace the libreadline5-dev
> build dependency with libreadline-dev, so that in future changes of the
> libreadline soname binNMU's can be used for this
On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 06:43:24PM +, Florian Weimer wrote:
> The reason is that more and more libc features depend on availability
> of /proc. This means that you have to mount /proc within the chroot,
> which somewhat defeats the exercise of chrooting.
Yes. You also might need /sys and /de
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Nozzy Nozzy
* Package name: xmris
Version : 4.0.5
Upstream Author : Nathan Sidwell
* URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/xmris/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C
Description : A version of the Mr Do video ar
On Sun, 2009-09-13 at 14:28 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Both libreadline-dev (>= 6.0) and libreadline6-dev are now available in
> unstable
> and testing. If possible, please replace the libreadline5-dev build
> dependency
> with libreadline-dev, so that in future changes of the libreadline s
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 03:16:59PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-09-10 at 17:23 +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> > Conceptually, what "we" want is trivial: we want submitter to be
> > subscribed (in the sense of "bts subscribe") by default. If they want,
> > they are free to opt uns
Both libreadline-dev (>= 6.0) and libreadline6-dev are now available in unstable
and testing. If possible, please replace the libreadline5-dev build dependency
with libreadline-dev, so that in future changes of the libreadline soname
binNMU's can be used for this kind of update.
Sending email
15 matches
Mail list logo
