On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 01:16:47AM +0100, Norbert Preining wrote:
> Besides that that snippet is broken? It made me nuts that quilt people
> are changing that snippet and breaking many packages, like all of mine.
> It should be:
> build-stamp: $(QUILT_STAMPFN)
> ...
> and as far as I see:
>
Gerfried Fuchs writes:
> Hi!
>
> Some few comments.
>
> * Raphael Hertzog [2009-11-21 16:54:36 CET]:
>> * even if you don't have any upstream patch right now, next time that
>>someone must NMU your package, they can cleanly add a patch (with a
>>proper DEP-3 header) without havin
On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 03:41:39AM +0200, Dmitri Vorobiev wrote:
> Currently no package exists that would allow installation of all
> utilities specified by the POSIX `Shell and utilities' volume:
>
> http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/idx/utilities.html
>
> It is considered useful to
Package: general
Severity: wishlist
Currently no package exists that would allow installation of all
utilities specified by the POSIX `Shell and utilities' volume:
http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/idx/utilities.html
It is considered useful to have such a package, and one such
pack
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Cristian Greco
* Package name: gummi
Version : 0.4.2
Upstream Author : Alexander van der Mey
* URL : http://gummi.midnightcoding.org
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: Python
Description : simple latex editor wr
]] Mike Hommey
| On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 01:33:29PM -0200, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote:
| > On Fri, 2009-11-20 at 15:23 +0100, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
| > > Ack. People which use computers which did not came with a DVD reader
built in
| > > are probably not able to play nexuiz anyway as it needs a
On Sa, 21 Nov 2009, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> Heavy modification? What's so heavy on three entries there?
>
> include /usr/share/quilt/quilt.make
>
> clean:
> [...]
> unpatch
>
> build-stamp: patch
Besides that that snippet is broken? It made me nuts that quilt people
are changing th
* Raphael Hertzog [2009-11-21 20:51:51 CET]:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, 21 Nov 2009, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> > * Raphael Hertzog [2009-11-21 16:54:36 CET]:
> > > * even if you don't have any upstream patch right now, next time that
> > >someone must NMU your package, they can cleanly add a patch (wi
On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 08:51:51PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Currently a package without a patch system needs heavy modifications in
> debian/rules to setup the patch system. So when you want to add a patch in
> debian/patches and not in the .diff.gz, you have to choose a patch system
> in pl
Hi,
On Sat, 21 Nov 2009, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> * Raphael Hertzog [2009-11-21 16:54:36 CET]:
> > * even if you don't have any upstream patch right now, next time that
> >someone must NMU your package, they can cleanly add a patch (with a
> >proper DEP-3 header) without having to modify
Hi!
Some few comments.
* Raphael Hertzog [2009-11-21 16:54:36 CET]:
> * even if you don't have any upstream patch right now, next time that
>someone must NMU your package, they can cleanly add a patch (with a
>proper DEP-3 header) without having to modify the build system
Thi
I demand that Jens Peter Secher may or may not have written...
> 2009/11/21 Goswin von Brederlow :
>> Jens Peter Secher writes:
>>> As I see it, there is no need for using Mercurial Queues (mq) with
>>> mercurial-buildpackage because dpkg-source format "3.0 (quilt)" has
>>> the same purpose as mq
Hi,
I would like to help fluxbox as I do have some experience in writing code and
developing applications in various languages etc. Could you give me some
pointers to hit on or any good/easy hacks you use?
Sincerely ,
Andreas Marschke.
On Sunday 25 October 2009 16:22:53 Dmitry E. Oboukhov wr
Jens Peter Secher writes:
> 2009/11/21 Goswin von Brederlow :
>> pristine-tar does not put the tarball into the repository. It only
>> stores the delta between taring up the upstream branch and the actual
>> upstream orig.tar.gz. That way you can clone a repository and build
>> without first havi
2009/11/21 Goswin von Brederlow :
> Jens Peter Secher writes:
>> As I see it, there is no need for using Mercurial Queues (mq) with
>> mercurial-buildpackage because dpkg-source format "3.0 (quilt)" has
>> the same purpose as mq, namely to wrap around quilt to achieve
>> automatic patch handling.
Steve Langasek writes:
> On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 05:41:11AM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> >> I detected 1063 possible violations with some percentage of false
>> >> positives. Since those are too many to go through by hand I filtered a
>> >> bit for the location of the violating files:
>
Quoting "Michal Čihař" :
Hi
Dne Sat, 21 Nov 2009 15:10:54 +0600
Mikhail Gusarov napsal(a):
Twas brillig at 03:00:27 21.11.2009 UTC+01 when ni...@debian.org
did gyre and gimble:
>> There are probably more references total than can be sensibly removed,
>> but perhaps it would be worth a
Hi
Dne Sat, 21 Nov 2009 15:10:54 +0600
Mikhail Gusarov napsal(a):
>
> Twas brillig at 03:00:27 21.11.2009 UTC+01 when ni...@debian.org did gyre and
> gimble:
>
> >> There are probably more references total than can be sensibly removed,
> >> but perhaps it would be worth adding some targeted
Twas brillig at 03:00:27 21.11.2009 UTC+01 when ni...@debian.org did gyre and
gimble:
>> There are probably more references total than can be sensibly removed,
>> but perhaps it would be worth adding some targeted lintian checks to warn
>> about
>> uses in places, like libraries, where it p
19 matches
Mail list logo
