On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 07:46:56AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 06/09/10 at 20:32 +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote:
On Lu, 06 sep 10, 17:52:17, Ian Jackson wrote:
Alexander Reichle-Schmehl writes (Backports service becoming official):
Because of limitations in the Debian Bug Tracking
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 1:46 PM, Lucas Nussbaum lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net wrote:
Now that backports are becoming official, I think that it is the right
time to reconsider
Some other possibilities;
Move *-backports (and *-volatile) into the main archive like they are in Ubuntu.
Merge the
On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 07:46:56AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Now that backports are becoming official, I think that it is the right
time to reconsider the maintenance model of backports. I would
personally prefer if we had the same rules of packages ownership as for
normal packages (normal
Andrea Colangelo wrote, Tuesday 07 September 2010
* URL : http://www.home.unix-ag.org/simon/
http://www.home.unix-ag.org/simon/woof.html
Josselin Mouette wrote, Tuesday 07 September 2010:
Oh yeah. We didn’t have enough webservers in the archive.
Joss, you could even be right,
On Sep 07, Andrea Gasparini ga...@yattaweb.it wrote:
Brian, it lacks the long description, right, we'll provide one asap.
Though, it serves just one file a given number of times, and then shutdown.
It's something useful for distributing file in a LAN, if you don't want to
install and setup
Are we in danger of making the best the enemy of the good? Packaging
winetricks as-is would be helpful: making it a part of the packaging system,
keeping it up-to-date, maybe adding a man page.
Massive integration of distributable libraries into wine, and/or the
creation of a wine-nonfree
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Christian Pohl w...@pohlcity.de
* Package name: webhoneypot
Version : 0.1.123
Upstream Author : Johannes Ulrich
* URL : http://sites.google.com/site/webhoneypotsite
* License : GPLv2
Programming Lang: PHP
Description
* Chris Carr (ranting...@gmail.com) [100907 10:20]:
Are we in danger of making the best the enemy of the good? Packaging
winetricks as-is would be helpful: making it a part of the packaging system,
keeping it up-to-date, maybe adding a man page.
Massive integration of distributable
On Tuesday 07 September 2010 00:22:26 brian m. carlson wrote:
We have a lot of web servers in Debian. Could you provide a long
description for the package that helps an adminstrator decide why she
might want to install woof instead of some other lightweight web
server?
I maintain a similar
On 2010-09-07, Lucas Nussbaum lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net wrote:
Now that backports are becoming official, I think that it is the right
time to reconsider the maintenance model of backports. I would
personally prefer if we had the same rules of packages ownership as for
normal packages (normal
Why have you CCed debian-devel? The rest of the thread is not on there. Please
stop cluttering -devel with separate mails on this topic. We have a bug number,
that's where discussion can take place, should any be necessary.
--
Jon Dowland
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 09:20:21AM +0100, Chris Carr wrote:
If the new winetricks package were to be called wine-nonfree, that would lay
the foundations for later efforts ...
Except that it would be a serious misnomer.
First, many of the packages there are free software. 29 out of 120, by my
Le mardi 07 septembre 2010 à 10:25 +0200, Salvo Tomaselli a écrit :
I maintain a similar package (weborf), but yet with some differences.
Weborf uses a basedirectory param while woof can use a directory or a file.
Weborf will not limit the number of connections.
Woof would tar a directory
On Tuesday 07 September 2010 10:10:22 Marco d'Itri wrote:
Installing lighttpd or something like it requires much less time than
learning the existence of this one.
Not really.
The default installation of lighttpd would put itself in the autostart, maybe
i just wanted to share a file and it
On Tuesday 07 September 2010, Adam Borowski wrote:
On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 09:20:21AM +0100, Chris Carr wrote:
If the new winetricks package were to be called wine-nonfree, that
would
lay the foundations for later efforts ...
Except that it would be a serious misnomer.
First, many of
On Tuesday 07 September 2010 10:47:08 Josselin Mouette wrote:
Oh, please. If you want to setup such schemes, why would you not want to
spend 5 minutes to configure apache or lighttpd instead of spending at
least the same time to configure such an obscure piece of software?
If all you care
[ adding back the ITP to Cc: ]
On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 10:56:15AM +0200, Salvo Tomaselli wrote:
The default installation of lighttpd would put itself in the autostart, maybe
i just wanted to share a file and it would take time for me to change the
configuration for avoiding autostart and
apt-cache show sendfile gerstensaft
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Hi,
On Dienstag, 7. September 2010, Sune Vuorela wrote:
On 2010-09-07, Lucas Nussbaum lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net wrote:
Now that backports are becoming official, I think that it is the right
time to reconsider the maintenance model of backports. I would
personally prefer if we had the same
Le 07/09/2010 11:37, Holger Levsen a écrit :
apt-cache show sendfile gerstensaft
It seems to use its own protocol and needs special software on both
sides. On the other hand, wget or curl is installed on all systems...
and HTTP works also for non-Linux systems.
--
Stéphane
--
To
On 07/09/2010 11:17, Salvo Tomaselli wrote:
On Tuesday 07 September 2010 10:47:08 Josselin Mouette wrote:
Oh, please. If you want to setup such schemes, why would you not want to
spend 5 minutes to configure apache or lighttpd instead of spending at
least the same time to configure such an
2010-09-07, Stefano Zacchiroli:
[ adding back the ITP to Cc: ]
On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 10:56:15AM +0200, Salvo Tomaselli wrote:
The default installation of lighttpd would put itself in the autostart,
maybe
i just wanted to share a file and it would take time for me to change the
On Tuesday 07 September 2010 12:02:38 Jean-Christophe Dubacq wrote:
What about using nc ?
nc -l /etc/passwd
http://localhost:/ = bingo.
We will probably not convince you, but there are way too many
alternatives to make the packaging effort worth the time.
you convinced me, and i
On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 12:27:14PM +0200, Salvo 'LtWorf' Tomaselli wrote:
On Tuesday 07 September 2010 12:02:38 Jean-Christophe Dubacq wrote:
What about using nc ?
nc -l /etc/passwd
http://localhost:/ = bingo.
We will probably not convince you, but there are way too many
On Tuesday 07 September 2010 12:02:38 Jean-Christophe Dubacq wrote:
What about using nc ?
nc -l /etc/passwd
http://localhost:/ = bingo.
We will probably not convince you, but there are way too many
alternatives to make the packaging effort worth the time.
you convinced
Dear Hans-J.,
I'm the maintainer of Skanlite (I assume you meant Skanlite). Skanlite is
(AFAIK) the standalone replacement for Kooka, which uses libksane for
accessing scanners. I started maintaining Skanlite, when I was missing Kooka
from Squeeze (Kooka is the KDE 3.x standalone scanning
On Tuesday 07 September 2010 12:54:37 Michael Tautschnig wrote:
mich...@apple[12:50]:~$ uname -o
Darwin
mich...@apple[12:50]:~$ which nc
/usr/bin/nc
And, well, even a Windows version exists, see
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Netcat#Variants
Have you considered how many windows and mac users
On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 07:46:30AM +1000, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 02:20:48PM -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote:
attached is a patch for lib64bz2-1.0 also.
best wishes,
mike
Thank you. I already knew it. Your patch is already in bzip2_1.0.5-5.
I'm working on it as it
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Al Nikolov cl...@debian.org
* Package name: drupal6-mod-lightbox2
Version : 1.9
Upstream Author : Stella Power (http://drupal.org/user/66894)
* URL : http://drupal.org/project/lightbox2
* License : GPL
Programming
Hi,
On Tue, 07 Sep 2010, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Now that backports are becoming official, I think that it is the right
time to reconsider the maintenance model of backports. I would
personally prefer if we had the same rules of packages ownership as for
normal packages (normal backport
On Tue, 07 Sep 2010, Sune Vuorela wrote:
I'm not planning to ever provide backports of any of my packages, and
while others are welcome to do it, I do not in any way want to be
bothered by their bugs or upload emails or anything.
Which would call for filtering, not for keeping the bad
Le mardi 07 septembre 2010 à 11:17 +0200, Salvo Tomaselli a écrit :
On Tuesday 07 September 2010 10:47:08 Josselin Mouette wrote:
Oh, please. If you want to setup such schemes, why would you not want to
spend 5 minutes to configure apache or lighttpd instead of spending at
least the same
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Al Nikolov cl...@debian.org
* Package name: drupal6-mod-imagecache
Version : 2.0~beta10
Upstream Author : Andrew Morton (http://drupal.org/user/34869)
* URL : http://drupal.org/project/imagecache
* License : GPL
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Al Nikolov cl...@debian.org
* Package name: drupal6-mod-imageapi
Version : 1.8
Upstream Author : Andrew Morton (http://drupal.org/user/34869)
* URL : http://drupal.org/project/imageapi
* License : GPL
Programming Lang:
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 04:34:25PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
Gerrit Pape writes (Re: dash Debian package - RC bugs):
I can't help, I don't understand. I yesterday followed up to a mail
that was additionally addressed to the debian-c...@lists.debian.org
mailing list and got an automatic
* Gerrit Pape p...@smarden.org:
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 04:34:25PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
Gerrit Pape writes (Re: dash Debian package - RC bugs):
I can't help, I don't understand. I yesterday followed up to a mail
that was additionally addressed to the debian-c...@lists.debian.org
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Al Nikolov cl...@debian.org
* Package name: drupal6-mod-imagecache-actions
Version : 1.7
Upstream Author : Dan Morrison (http://drupal.org/user/33240)
* URL : http://drupal.org/project/imagecache_actions
* License : GPL
Am Dienstag, 7. September 2010 schrieb Kai Wasserbäch:
Dear Hans-J.,
I'm the maintainer of Skanlite (I assume you meant Skanlite). Skanlite is
(AFAIK) the standalone replacement for Kooka, which uses libksane for
accessing scanners. I started maintaining Skanlite, when I was missing
Kooka
On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 11:40:09AM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
That I dont think it is. I think you not wanting t be bothered by
backports of your packages is quite an exception,
I don't think it is. I have no problem with people backporting any of my
packages that are useful to them, but I
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Steffen Moeller steffen_moel...@gmx.de
* Package name: paml
* URL : http://abacus.gene.ucl.ac.uk/software/paml.html
* License : academics only
Description : Phylogenetic Analysis by Maximum Likelihood
PAML is a package of
On 09/06/2010 10:46 PM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Now that backports are becoming official, I think that it is the right
time to reconsider the maintenance model of backports. I would
personally prefer if we had the same rules of packages ownership as for
normal packages (normal backport
On 09/07/2010 05:57 PM, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 11:40:09AM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
That I dont think it is. I think you not wanting t be bothered by
backports of your packages is quite an exception,
I don't think it is. I have no problem with people backporting any
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 02:38:32PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
On Tue, 07 Sep 2010, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Now that backports are becoming official, I think that it is the right
time to reconsider the maintenance model of backports. I would
personally prefer if we had the same rules
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: yanone-kaffeesatz
Version : 2010-05-26
Upstream Author : Jan Gerner
* URL or Web page : http://www.yanone.de/typedesign/kaffeesatz/
* License : SIL OFL 1.1 (previously CC-BY 2.0)
Description : TTF and OTF font in four
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 7:35 AM, Mike Hommey m...@glandium.org wrote:
On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 12:27:14PM +0200, Salvo 'LtWorf' Tomaselli wrote:
On Tuesday 07 September 2010 12:02:38 Jean-Christophe Dubacq wrote:
What about using nc ?
nc -l /etc/passwd
http://localhost:/ = bingo.
Hi!
* Simon McVittie s...@debian.org [2010-09-06 19:33:34 CEST]:
On Mon, 06 Sep 2010 at 17:52:17 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
What are the BTS limitations ?
I assume the relevant limitation is that in the BTS' data model, each source
package has a single maintainer, whereas the
Lucas Nussbaum schrieb am Tuesday, den 07. September 2010:
Hi,
Alexander Reichle-Schmehl writes (Backports service becoming official):
Because of limitations in the Debian Bug Tracking System, any bugs
relevant to backported packages still have to be reported to the
On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 08:35:05PM +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
I really would like to see us trying to work together more effectively
instead of objecting to things right ahead without even knowing wether
it is such a big relevant deal to make a fuzz about. IMHO it isn't, far
from it.
Well
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@eds.org
* Package name: pd-libdir
Version : 1.9
Upstream Author : Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@eds.org
* URL : http://puredata.info/
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: C
Description :
On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 07:05:29PM +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
On 09/07/2010 05:57 PM, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 11:40:09AM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
That I dont think it is. I think you not wanting t be bothered by
backports of your packages is quite an exception,
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@eds.org
* Package name: pd-ekext
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Ed Kelly morph_2...@yahoo.co.uk
* URL : http://puredata.info/
* License : GPL-3+
Programming Lang: C, Pd
Description :
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@eds.org
* Package name: pd-comport
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Winfried Ritsch, Institute for Electronic Music - Graz
* URL : http://puredata.info/
* License : LGPL-2.1+
Programming
On 2010-09-07, Bernd Zeimetz be...@bzed.de wrote:
On 09/07/2010 05:57 PM, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 11:40:09AM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
That I dont think it is. I think you not wanting t be bothered by
backports of your packages is quite an exception,
I don't think it
On Tue, 07 Sep 2010, Steve Langasek wrote:
But when someone takes my package and uploads it somewhere other
than the main Debian archive, they incur *all* the responsibilities
of maintaining that package, including the responsibility of
appropriately triaging bug reports and forwarding them to
Bernd Zeimetz be...@bzed.de writes:
On 09/07/2010 05:57 PM, Steve Langasek wrote:
I don't think it is. I have no problem with people backporting any of
my packages that are useful to them, but I shouldn't have to read bug
mail for them. I have enough bugs of my own.
Chances are good that
Gerfried Fuchs rho...@deb.at writes:
To me the solution is to see the person who does the backport as a part
of the packaging team. There is the need for having a communication
channel between the people anyway. Actually more and more packages are
moved into team maintenance and I'm pretty
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 12:46:12PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
An alternative solution is to just have reportbug mail the backport
bug reporting mailing list, and have people bounce messages as
appropriate to the BTS.
Imho, this is the most sensible approach for now. The number of bugs
On Tue, 7 Sep 2010 21:56:21 +0200, Sebastian Harl wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 12:46:12PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
An alternative solution is to just have reportbug mail the backport
bug reporting mailing list, and have people bounce messages as
appropriate to the BTS.
Imho,
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 04:18:48PM -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote:
On Tue, 7 Sep 2010 21:56:21 +0200, Sebastian Harl wrote:
On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 12:46:12PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
An alternative solution is to just have reportbug mail the backport
bug reporting mailing list, and
On Tue, 7 Sep 2010 22:27:47 +0200, Sebastian Harl wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 04:18:48PM -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote:
On Tue, 7 Sep 2010 21:56:21 +0200, Sebastian Harl wrote:
On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 12:46:12PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
An alternative solution is to just have
On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 04:18:48PM -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote:
Doing a quick look at the backports mailing list archive, there are less
than 10 bugs reported per month on average. That is for hundreds of
packages. Doing some fuzzy math, if you have a package that got
backported, you may see
Steve Langasek vor...@debian.org writes:
For the package in question, the backports are done by a fellow
comaintainer, so I'm not complaining about the bug traffic; but that
doesn't mean it's *right* for that traffic to be going to the BTS by
default.
I wonder if we could apply some logic
On Tue, 7 Sep 2010 13:48:09 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 04:18:48PM -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote:
Doing a quick look at the backports mailing list archive, there are less
than 10 bugs reported per month on average. That is for hundreds of
packages. Doing some fuzzy
On Tue, 7 Sep 2010 10:13:15 +0100, David Goodenough
david.goodeno...@btconnect.com wrote:
On Tuesday 07 September 2010, Adam Borowski wrote:
Then, in the usual Debian parlance, nonfree usually suggests
proprietary gratis distributable things. Winetricks includes a mix of
distributable,
Michael Gilbert michael.s.gilb...@gmail.com writes:
Doing a quick look at the backports mailing list archive, there are less
than 10 bugs reported per month on average. That is for hundreds of
packages. Doing some fuzzy math, if you have a package that got
backported, you may see an
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Tiago Bortoletto Vaz ti...@debian.org
* Package name: tinyeartrainer
Version : 0.1.0
Upstream Author : Jonas Wagner veers at gmx dot ch
* URL : http://29a.ch/tinyeartrainer
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: Python
[sean finney]
1) split out the c++ libraries, make the c++ library conflict with the older
version of libxmlrpc-c3 (conflicting files) make the -dev package
depend on both libraries, and hope that a half dozen binNMU's fix the
problem quickly enough.
2) do (1) but also fake an
* Stephen Kitt (st...@sk2.org) [100907 23:27]:
I agree, I don't think it would be appropriate to try to package the
DFSG-free Windows software installable via winetricks (such as 7-zip); in any
case, packaging winetricks needn't involve shipping random free software for
Windows inside Debian.
On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 05:13:14PM -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote:
Backports has now been declared officially supported by the project
as a whole. That made it the collective responsibility of all
Debian Developers whether or not individuals in particular like it or
not.
False.
So
On Tuesday 07 September 2010 15:18:26 Josselin Mouette wrote:
No. gnome-user-share does not need root permissions.
I use kde. After installing your gnome-user-share it i couldn't find how to
start it. I found a configuration window but netstat -l doesn't show anything
listening.
Also no man
On Tue, 7 Sep 2010 15:03:56 -0700 Steve Langasek wrote:
On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 05:13:14PM -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote:
Backports has now been declared officially supported by the project
as a whole. That made it the collective responsibility of all
Debian Developers whether or not
On Tue, 07 Sep 2010, Sebastian Harl wrote:
Just to make that clear: I did not talk about any burden for the
package maintainers but the burden for the BTS
maintainers/developers to add support for bpo. Whether or not the
infrastructure for that (in the BTS) might be useful nonetheless is
a
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 3:52 AM, Russ Allbery r...@debian.org wrote:
If there's any complexity in the backport, that's probably true. But I'll
note here that for all the backports I do for my packages, all the changes
in the backport are mechanical (and automated) and maintaining that in a
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ray Wang wanglei1...@gmail.com
* Package name: mono-uia-atspi
Version : 2.1
Upstream Author : Mono Accessibility mono-a...@forge.novell.com
* URL : http://www.mono-project.com/Accessibility
* License : MIT/X
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 06 Sep 2010 18:10:06 +0200
Source: apt
Binary: apt apt-doc libapt-pkg-dev libapt-pkg-doc apt-utils apt-transport-https
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 0.8.2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: APT Development
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 21 Aug 2010 13:49:16 +0200
Source: scribble
Binary: scribble
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.10-2+nmu1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Brian White bcwh...@pobox.com
Changed-By: Andreas Metzler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2010 03:12:01 +0800
Source: tiled-qt
Binary: tiled
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.5.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Ying-Chun Liu (PaulLiu) paul...@debian.org
Changed-By: Ying-Chun Liu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2010 09:27:20 +0100
Source: taoframework
Binary: taoframework-examples libtaoframework-opengl3.0-cil
libtaoframework-opengl-cil-dev libtaoframework-openal1.1-cil
libtaoframework-openal-cil-dev
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2010 09:58:00 +0200
Source: josm
Binary: josm
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.0.svn3514-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian GIS Project pkg-grass-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Changed-By: David
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2010 12:54:01 +0200
Source: initramfs-tools
Binary: initramfs-tools
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.98.2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Debian kernel team debian-ker...@lists.debian.org
Changed-By:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 13:32:00 +0100
Source: lazarus
Binary: lazarus lazarus-src lazarus-ide lazarus-ide-gtk2 lazarus-ide-qt4 lcl
lcl-utils lcl-units lcl-nogui lcl-gtk2 lcl-qt4 lazarus-doc
Architecture: source amd64 all
Version:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2010 12:09:58 +0200
Source: python-gevent
Binary: python-gevent-dbg python-gevent-doc python-gevent
Architecture: source amd64 all
Version: 0.13.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Örjan Persson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 22 Aug 2010 15:12:23 +0100
Source: pymongo
Binary: python-pymongo python-gridfs
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 1.8.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Federico Ceratto federico.cera...@gmail.com
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2010 15:44:29 +0200
Source: evolution-mapi
Binary: evolution-mapi libexchangemapi-1.0-0 libexchangemapi-1.0-dev
evolution-mapi-dbg
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.30.3-1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2010 14:37:43 +0200
Source: libibumad
Binary: libibumad-dev libibumad1
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1.2.3-20090314-1.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: OFED and Debian Developement and Discussion
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 05 Sep 2010 17:57:28 -0400
Source: xpdf
Binary: xpdf xpdf-reader xpdf-utils
Architecture: source amd64 all
Version: 3.02-11
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Michael Gilbert michael.s.gilb...@gmail.com
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2010 15:28:41 +0200
Source: apt
Binary: apt apt-doc libapt-pkg-dev libapt-pkg-doc apt-utils apt-transport-https
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 0.8.3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: APT Development
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2010 13:55:49 +0200
Source: gtk2-engines-magicchicken
Binary: gtk2-engines-magicchicken
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.1.1-8
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Group packa...@qa.debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2010 16:17:35 +0200
Source: terminal.app
Binary: terminal.app
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.9.4+cvs20051125-6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Gürkan Sengün gur...@phys.ethz.ch
Changed-By: Gürkan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2010 10:31:31 -0500
Source: ocaml-cry
Binary: libcry-ocaml-dev
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.1.5-1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian OCaml Maintainers debian-ocaml-ma...@lists.debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2010 09:22:36 -0400
Source: gcalcli
Binary: gcalcli
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.4-6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Yaroslav Halchenko deb...@onerussian.com
Changed-By: Yaroslav Halchenko
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2010 18:25:01 +0200
Source: openjdk-6
Binary: openjdk-6-jdk openjdk-6-jre-headless openjdk-6-jre openjdk-6-jre-lib
openjdk-6-demo openjdk-6-source openjdk-6-doc openjdk-6-dbg icedtea6-plugin
icedtea-6-jre-cacao
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2010 19:13:25 +0200
Source: mpfr4
Binary: libmpfr4 libmpfr-dev libmpfr-doc lib32mpfr4 lib32mpfr-dev
Architecture: source all amd64
Version: 3.0.0-4
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Laurent Fousse
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2010 17:47:32 +0200
Source: samba
Binary: samba samba-common-bin samba-common samba-tools smbclient swat
samba-doc samba-doc-pdf libpam-smbpass libsmbclient libsmbclient-dev winbind
samba-dbg libwbclient0
Architecture:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2010 12:22:42 -0600
Source: sudo
Binary: sudo sudo-ldap
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.7.4p4-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Bdale Garbee bd...@gag.com
Changed-By: Bdale Garbee bd...@gag.com
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2010 20:43:01 +0200
Source: hostapd
Binary: hostapd
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1:0.7.3-1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/Ubuntu wpasupplicant Maintainers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2010 20:37:34 +0200
Source: kdenlive
Binary: kdenlive kdenlive-data kdenlive-dbg
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 0.7.7.1+svn4858-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Patrick Matthäi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2010 21:52:54 +0300
Source: asterisk
Binary: asterisk asterisk-h323 asterisk-doc asterisk-dev asterisk-dbg
asterisk-sounds-main asterisk-config
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 1:1.6.2.9-2
Distribution: unstable
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2010 18:49:45 +0200
Source: chromium-browser
Binary: chromium-browser chromium-browser-dbg chromium-browser-l10n
chromium-browser-inspector
Architecture: source all amd64
Version: 6.0.472.53~r57914-3
Distribution:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2010 22:13:09 +0200
Source: coinor-cbc
Binary: coinor-libcbc0 coinor-libcbc-dev coinor-libcbc-doc coinor-libcbc0-dbg
Architecture: source all amd64
Version: 2.5.0-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer:
1 - 100 of 118 matches
Mail list logo
