Quoting Steve Langasek (vor...@debian.org):
> > On the other hand, is it really necessary a new group? Can't adm or
> > operator
> > be overloaded with this new functionality? (think Ockham's razor).
>
> No. Both of those groups also have other meanings.
How about the "root" group?
sign
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 09:48:58AM +0200, Jesús M. Navarro wrote:
> On Tuesday 19 October 2010 08:15:56 Josselin Mouette wrote:
> [...]
> > Le mardi 19 octobre 2010 à 02:12 +0200, Jesús M. Navarro a écrit :
> > > What about the old-fashioned "wheel" group[1]?
> > This would be an even worse disas
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 09:48:58AM +0200, Jesús M. Navarro wrote:
[...]
> On the other hand, is it really necessary a new group? Can't adm
> or operator be overloaded with this new functionality? (think
> Ockham's razor).
Maybe similarly overloaded, but I've used the built-in "staff" group
for th
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I request assistance with maintaining the cryptsetup package.
Cryptsetup is the commandline frontend to dm-crypt, the device
encryption implemented in the linux kernel. The package contains a lot
of scripts and wrappers in order to manage encrypted devices. A key
fe
This one time, at band camp, Thomas Hochstein said:
> Josselin Mouette schrieb:
> > I find it disappointing to see this posted, and in bad taste.
>
> It would be much more interesting to learn _why_ you feel so (and not
> just that you do) - particularly as I'm sure I'm not the only one ;)
> who h
unsubscribe
On 19 October 2010 22:23, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> I'm happy to announce that Enrico Zini has joined the Debian Account
> Manager (DAM) team! This means that DAM is now composed of 3 people:
>
> - Christoph Berg
> - Enrico Zini
> - Joerg Jaspert
>
> Below you can find a comprehens
On Mon, 2010-10-18 at 20:02 -0500, David Rios wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-10-19 at 00:31 +0200, Benjamin Drung wrote:
> > Am Montag, den 18.10.2010, 17:26 -0500 schrieb David Rios:
> > > Hi.
> > >
> > > I want to package a XUL-based application which isn't in Debian
> > > Repository yet. I've read many
Josselin Mouette schrieb:
> Le dimanche 17 octobre 2010 à 21:25 +0200, Christian PERRIER a écrit :
>> So, for the third time, a small contest has been set up. The principle
>> is very simple: please place a bet (one per person) about the day bugs
>> #70 and #100 will be reported.
>
> I fin
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jan Hauke Rahm
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
* Package name: enum
Version : 1.0
Upstream Author : Sebastian Pipping ,
Jan Hauke Rahm
* URL : https://fedorahosted.org/enum/
* License
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Vincent Caron
* Package name: phptop
Version : 0.5.2
Upstream Author : Vincent Caron
* URL : http://forge.bearstech.com/trac/wiki/PhpTop
* License : GPL v3
Programming Lang: Perl
Description : php resource stati
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Alessio Treglia
* Package name: autotalent
Version : 0.2
Upstream Author : Thomas A. Baran
* URL : http://web.mit.edu/tbaran/www/autotalent.html
* License : GPL, BSD
Programming Lang: C
Description : LADSPA plug
Le mardi 19 octobre 2010 à 11:28 +0200, Holger Levsen a écrit :
> On Dienstag, 19. Oktober 2010, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > I find it disappointing to see this posted, and in bad taste.
> > I’m sure I’m not alone.
> > `--- J???rg Schilling
>
> On the internet, you'll always find the co
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: NeuroDebian Team
* Package name: nitime
Version : 0.1.0
Upstream Author : Nipy Developers
* URL : http://nipy.org/nitime
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: Python
Description : timeseries analysis for neuroscienc
On Mon, 18 Oct 2010, David Rios wrote:
On Tue, 2010-10-19 at 00:31 +0200, Benjamin Drung wrote:
Am Montag, den 18.10.2010, 17:26 -0500 schrieb David Rios:
Hi.
I want to package a XUL-based application which isn't in Debian
Repository yet. I've read many tutorials, including "Debian New
Mainta
Quoting Christian PERRIER (bubu...@debian.org):
> Sorry if that annoyed you, that was definitely not the intent.
I feel the duty to mention that Piotr and I had a brief exchange
privately and that he made clear he had no specific "anger" towards me
or my announcement. He rather wanted to express
base-passwd documents sudo as "Members of this group do not need to type their
password when using sudo", which is no longer true. I've opened a bug.
On Tue, 19 Oct 2010 at 09:48:58 +0200, Jesús M. Navarro wrote:
> On the other hand, is it really necessary a new group? Can't adm or operator
> be
Am Dienstag, den 19.10.2010, 08:15 +0200 schrieb Josselin Mouette:
> Le mardi 19 octobre 2010 à 00:38 +0200, Michael Biebl a écrit :
-Snipp-
> > So, I'm wondering if we shouldn't pick a more neutral name without a
> > previous
> > history in Debian.
> > One suggestion is to use group "admin". Ubu
Greetings,
This message is an automated, unofficial publication of vote results.
Official results shall follow, sent in by the vote taker, namely
Debian Project Secretary
This email is just a convenience for the impatient.
I remain, gentle folks,
Your humble servant,
De
Hi,
On Dienstag, 19. Oktober 2010, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le dimanche 17 octobre 2010 à 21:25 +0200, Christian PERRIER a écrit :
> > So, for the third time, a small contest has been set up. The principle
> > is very simple: please place a bet (one per person) about the day bugs
> > #70 and
On Tue, 19 Oct 2010 00:38:41 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Bdale went ahead and added the following to /etc/sudoers:
>
> # Allow members of group sudo to not need a password
> # (Note that later entries override this, so you might need to move
> # it further down)
> %sudo ALL=(ALL) ALL
Ah yes -
Le mardi 19 octobre 2010 à 09:58 +0100, Philip Hands a écrit :
> > For PolicyKit, I can now simply ship a file, say
> > /etc/polkit-1/localauthority.conf.d/51-debian-sudo.conf which contains:
> >
> > [Configuration]
> > AdminIdentities=unix-group:sudo
>
> I would object to 'sudo' being a group of
Le mardi 19 octobre 2010 à 09:49 +0200, Fabian Greffrath a écrit :
> Since this group would be Debian-specific, how about "Debian-admin" or
> "Debian-sudo" (as in "Debian-gdm" or "Debian-exim")?
The Debian-exim and Debian-gdm names are system users that are meant to
never conflict with existing,
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
--- Please fill out the fields below. ---
Package name: xul-ext-cacheviewer
Version: 0.6.3
Upstream Author: Tiny BENKI
URL: https://addons.mozilla.org/ru/firefox/addon/2489/?src=api
License
I definitely agree that we need to get this change into squeeze and that we need
to be careful to not get into bikeshedding about names.
On the other hand, choosing a group for a purpose like this should imho be done
carefully as changing the name later is hard if not impossible.
Since this gro
Hi, Josselin:
On Tuesday 19 October 2010 08:15:56 Josselin Mouette wrote:
[...]
> Le mardi 19 octobre 2010 à 02:12 +0200, Jesús M. Navarro a écrit :
> > What about the old-fashioned "wheel" group[1]?
>
> This would be an even worse disaster than “admin”, for similar reasons.
> Users of the “wheel
Le dimanche 17 octobre 2010 à 21:25 +0200, Christian PERRIER a écrit :
> So, for the third time, a small contest has been set up. The principle
> is very simple: please place a bet (one per person) about the day bugs
> #70 and #100 will be reported.
I find it disappointing to see this post
join
On 19.10.2010 08:15, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le mardi 19 octobre 2010 à 00:38 +0200, Michael Biebl a écrit :
>> 1/ The sudo group in previous Debian releases had a different meaning:
>> Members
>> of groups sudo could run sudo without needing a password.
>
> Did it exist in previous releases?
On Mon, 18 Oct 2010 17:45:55 -0700
Russ Allbery wrote:
> Jon Dowland writes:
>
> > I intended to come up with a recommendation which would support my
> > working practices[1] to the release team.
>
> > [1] which, back of the envelope, top-of-my-head, would be something
> > like: a minimum gap
hi,
2010/10/19 Michael Biebl :
> Hi,
> Bdale went ahead and added the following to /etc/sudoers:
>
> # Allow members of group sudo to not need a password
> # (Note that later entries override this, so you might need to move
> # it further down)
> %sudo ALL=(ALL) ALL
First of all: YES! Thanks! I
30 matches
Mail list logo
