On Mon, 2012-04-02 at 19:39 +0200, David Weinehall wrote:
> So, I'm curious here: why would you need a non-copyleft license for a
> *test suite*?
Consider the case where a legal department was worried about the code
repository becoming "tainted" with uncontrolled or ill-considered GPL
obligations
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Matt Zagrabelny
* Package name: milter-regex
Version : 1.9
Upstream Author : Daniel Hartmeier
* URL : http://www.benzedrine.cx/milter-regex.html
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: C
Description : sendmail milter p
]] Andrey Rahmatullin
> What I meant is: it is a common knowledge that you need to write an
> initscript for each specific distro even though most of them use sysvinit,
> but does this apply to systemd unit files too?
It's an explicit goal from systemd upstream that it should be possible
to use
]] Samuel Thibault
> Andrey Rahmatullin, le Mon 02 Apr 2012 19:21:59 +0600, a écrit :
> > On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 05:14:25PM +0400, Игорь Пашев wrote:
> > > > And the third advantage of it, is that upstream people is starting to
> > > > ship
> > > > systemd unit files.
> > > It is not advantage.
On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 06:49:24PM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On 02/04/12 18:03, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> > What I meant is: it is a common knowledge that you need to write
> > an initscript for each specific distro even though most of them use
> > sysvinit, but does this apply to systemd un
> > * Package name: dedupdedup
>
> Is it recommended to sing the name of this package in a Frank Sinatra
> impression?
In fact when I first read that I automatically read "dedupdedupdedup".
But apparently the last part has been deduplicated already ;-)
Olaf
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debi
> > Though I guess we could support both, and define an interchange format
> > for exchanging data between our two systems.
>
> Is there not a risk that they would dedupe each other ?
Not to mention the risk which any program which finds programs with
generalized duplicate-finder function inflicts
On 02/04/12 18:03, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> What I meant is: it is a common knowledge that you need to write
> an initscript for each specific distro even though most of them use
> sysvinit, but does this apply to systemd unit files too?
dbus has a different init script for each distro, but one
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 08:02:32PM +1100, Peter Miller wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> I'm looking for a Standard C Library compliance test suite. I'd prefer
> an open source one, preferably with a license more liberal than GPL,
> e.g. BSD or MIT, which is why I can't just use the tests in the glibc
> sou
I am alive and well. Strange that the forwards to p...@debian.org are
bouncing... I'll have to see what to do about that.
Peter
On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 1:14 PM, Neil Williams wrote:
> I was investigating #633893 and tried to contact the maintainer but the
> @debian.org email address bounced. I c
On Monday, April 02, 2012 06:54:32 PM Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 11:00:11PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> > Nevertheless, facts such as protein sequences are not copyrightable.
> > This is somewhat confirmed by the UniProt consortium itself on their
> > website (http://www.unipr
On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 03:23:21PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > > > And the third advantage of it, is that upstream people is starting to
> > > > ship
> > > > systemd unit files.
> > > It is not advantage. it is crap. I believe no one can write and support
> > > init/systemd/whatsoever script
On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 11:00:11PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
>
> Nevertheless, facts such as protein sequences are not copyrightable. This is
> somewhat confirmed by the UniProt consortium itself on their website
> (http://www.uniprot.org/help/license), and my conclusion is that, in isolation
Samuel Thibault writes:
> Andrey Rahmatullin, le Mon 02 Apr 2012 19:21:59 +0600, a écrit :
>> That's right, nobody can write initscripts for all distros because they
>> are incompatible. Isn't this problem solved by systemd?
> No, it was mentioned previously that systemd does not aim at being a
Hi there!
On Sun, 01 Apr 2012 19:14:50 +0200, Neil Williams wrote:
> Packages concerned:
> emacs-goodies-el
I am an heavy user of three of its binaries (devscripts-el, debian-el
and dpkg-dev-el) and I already contributed in the past, so in case it is
orphaned I will be glad to adopt it.
Thx, bye
Charles Plessy writes ("Non-copyrightable work with non-free license."):
> in at least two of my packages, bioperl and emboss, the test suite contains
> protein sequence files from the UniProt database, which is distributed under
> the non-free CC Attribution-NoDerivs license. Through a private di
On Saturday, March 31, 2012 05:19:02 PM John D. Hendrickson and Sara Darnell
wrote:
> While cygwin may have a "suite" they are a private company I wouldn't bet to
> dl and use it without a lawyer reading any "corporate provided license"
> they've wrote, my personal preference that is.
Newlib is f
Dear all,
in at least two of my packages, bioperl and emboss, the test suite contains
protein sequence files from the UniProt database, which is distributed under
the non-free CC Attribution-NoDerivs license. Through a private discussion I
had with their helpdesk, my understanding of their positi
Andrey Rahmatullin, le Mon 02 Apr 2012 19:21:59 +0600, a écrit :
> On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 05:14:25PM +0400, Игорь Пашев wrote:
> > > And the third advantage of it, is that upstream people is starting to ship
> > > systemd unit files.
> > It is not advantage. it is crap. I believe no one can write
On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 05:14:25PM +0400, Игорь Пашев wrote:
> > And the third advantage of it, is that upstream people is starting to ship
> > systemd unit files.
> It is not advantage. it is crap. I believe no one can write and support
> init/systemd/whatsoever scripts sutable for many distributi
2012/4/2 Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez
> And the third advantage of it, is that upstream people is starting to ship
> systemd unit files.
It is not advantage. it is crap. I believe no one can write and support
init/systemd/whatsoever scripts sutable for many distributions and their
versions.
All
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Dennis van Dok
* Package name: lcmaps-plugins-scas-client
Version : 0.3.4-1
Upstream Author : Nikhef Grid Middleware Security Team
* URL : https://wiki.nikhef.nl/grid/Site_Access_Control
* License : Apache 2
Programmi
On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 02:18:17PM +0200, Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote:
> On 21/03/12 16:52, YunQiang Su wrote:
> > It' said that the 2 main advantage of systemd are parallel and
> > much simpler configuration file.
> >
>
> And the third advantage of it, is that upstream people is starting to
On 21/03/12 16:52, YunQiang Su wrote:
> It' said that the 2 main advantage of systemd are parallel and
> much simpler configuration file.
>
And the third advantage of it, is that upstream people is starting to ship
systemd unit files.
> Is it possible to implement an init system for kFreeBSD an
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Dennis van Dok
* Package name: xacml
Version : 1.1.1-1
Upstream Author : Nikhef Grid Security Middleware Team
* URL :
http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/tc_home.php?wg_abbrev=xacml
* License : Apache 2
Programming
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sascha Girrulat
* Package name: automatic-save-folder
Version : 1.0.4
Upstream Author : Cyan
* URL : http://asf.mangaheart.org/
* License : GPL2
Programming Lang: Java-Script
Description : Open the File Browser a
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Alexander Wirt
* Package name: irpe
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Icinga Team
* URL : https://dev.icinga.org/projects/irpe
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C
Description : Icinga Remote Plugin Executor Server
Hello,
m...@linux.it (Marco d'Itri) writes:
> On Apr 02, Michael Welle wrote:
>
>> In life I tend to look for role models above me, not below me. Why
>> imitate people or companies that do a bad job? We can do better. And of
>> course, to come back to my initial email, I doubt that using the
>>
On Apr 02, Michael Welle wrote:
> In life I tend to look for role models above me, not below me. Why
> imitate people or companies that do a bad job? We can do better. And of
> course, to come back to my initial email, I doubt that using the
> blacklist service makes anything easier for Debian.
N
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 10:33, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> http://docs.python.org/release/1.5.1/lib/module-regex.html
> The module was removed in Python 2.5.
so for the supported python versions is a "safe" name. Sorry, but I'm
not going to change that name (if you install a third-party module,
you should
* Sandro Tosi , 2012-04-02, 10:06:
This sounds like a bad name, since there used to be a regex module in
the standard distribution a few years back and there's therefore a
fair amount of documentation warning against using it.
that's the upstream name, and infact I've renamed the also source t
On 2012-03-31 05:42:41 +0200, Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote:
> On 31/03/12 01:03, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > On 2012-03-30 19:43:48 +0200, Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote:
> >> Check that you don't have GLAN/WLAN or something like that enabled on
> >> /proc/acpi/wakeup
> >
> > xvii:~> cat /pro
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 09:58, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> ]] Sandro Tosi
>
>> For testing and comparison with the current 're' module the new
>> implementation
>> is in the form of a module called 'regex'.
>
> This sounds like a bad name, since there used to be a regex module in
> the standard dis
On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 09:35:53AM +0200, Michael Welle wrote:
> > So comparing Debian to a commercial organisation doesn't support your case
> > at
> > all. Commercial organisations are more than willing to reject some
> > customers
> > if it makes things easy for them.
>
> In life I tend to
]] Sandro Tosi
> For testing and comparison with the current 're' module the new
> implementation
> is in the form of a module called 'regex'.
This sounds like a bad name, since there used to be a regex module in
the standard distribution a few years back and there's therefore a fair
amount o
Hello,
Russell Coker writes:
> On Mon, 2 Apr 2012, Michael Welle wrote:
>> I agree only partly with that. Losing a bug report or two is one
>> thing. Imagine a potential or actual customer sending an email to a
>> company and getting a response like: 'Well, we don't know on which data
>> we for
36 matches
Mail list logo
