Re: Bug#668556: ITP: dparser -- a scannerless GLR parser generator

Dear Debian developers, On 04/15/2012 04:15 AM, Miles Bader wrote: > In my experience, "EBNF" and "LL"/"SLR"/"LALR" are widely known (they > are "classic compiler terms"), for the type of person who might be > interested in parser generators, but "GLR" isn't. Thank you all for your feedback on th

Re: usefulness of ITPs (Re: mosh ITP not done, just package name taken over)

I'd lke to see the ITP be MUST but the ITP template be SHOULD. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120415221713.GA24051@debian

Re: wine-unstable in Debian

On Sunday, April 15, 2012 09:32:53, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 01:18:28PM +0200, Petr Baudis wrote: > > I am rather dazzled that while there is working source package > > > > of wine-1.5 ready, other people are working on gradually packaging > > wine-1.1.x releases; > >

Bug#668917: ITP: libio-lcdproc-perl -- Perl extension to connect to a LCD display through lcdproc

Package: wnpp Owner: Dominique Dumont Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org,debian-p...@lists.debian.org,jcmul...@gmail.com * Package name: libio-lcdproc-perl Version : 0.037 Upstream Author : Juan C. Muller * URL : http://search.cpan.org/di

Re: [pkg-lighttpd] Changing the default document root for HTTP server

Hi, On 15.04.2012 12:29, Olaf van der Spek wrote: > I'd use ht instead of html. Not every ht file is a html file. I have no strong opinion on the actual name, as long as it is another subdirectory. We could equally use /var/www/default, /var/www/htdocs or whatever we feel like. I only proposed /

Re: Changing the default document root for HTTP server

On 15.04.2012 04:23, Russ Allbery wrote: > I'd like us to consider switching to /var/lib/www for FHS compliance. > This does have the significant drawback of breaking backward compatibility > to at least some extent, but it's FHS-compliant (or at least is as good as > we're going to get for a defau

Re: [pkg-lighttpd] Changing the default document root for HTTP server

]] Olaf van der Spek > FHS says /srv contains site-specific data which is served by this system. > Besides, it's the admin that's going to populate the space, so if it's > not enough, he can change the location. You're going to end up with some packages creating directories in /srv with the wron

Re: wine-unstable in Debian

On Sun, 2012-04-15 at 19:32 +0600, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 01:18:28PM +0200, Petr Baudis wrote: > > I am rather dazzled that while there is working source package > > of wine-1.5 ready, other people are working on gradually packaging > > wine-1.1.x releases; > I'm sur

Re: wine-unstable in Debian

On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 01:18:28PM +0200, Petr Baudis wrote: > I am rather dazzled that while there is working source package > of wine-1.5 ready, other people are working on gradually packaging > wine-1.1.x releases; I'm surprised that not everyone involved is such dazzled. > Also, it seems

Re: Changing the default document root for HTTP server

On 04/15/2012 07:21 PM, Olaf van der Spek wrote: > That's what you get with silly partitioning. :p I'm not sure if this is supposed to be a joke, but if it is, it's not really funny (because it's been re-occurring so many times). Each time there's a change proposed that will affect people with a

config files, ucf and dpkg (was: Re: The future of non-dependency-based boot)

Le 15/04/2012 11:34, Petter Reinholdtsen a écrit : > > [James Cloos] >> Manually choosing the order remains a reasonable choice for many >> servers. The upstream dependencies are not always sufficiently detailed >> and edits to the init files can be lost when upgrading. > > Your assumptions are

Re: [pkg-lighttpd] Changing the default document root for HTTP server

On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 1:12 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote: >> I'd use ht instead of html. Not every ht file is a html file. >> >> We should consider vhosts as well. Lighttpd defaults to >> /srv//htdocs (for mod simple vhost). ht instead of htdocs might >> be better. >> >> We could use /srv/default/ht

Re: wine-unstable in Debian

Hi! On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 11:23:47PM +0200, Kai Wasserbäch wrote: > I'm going to be brief: > (short version of > my motivation behind those packages). I have read that post originally, it explained well why you created the package

Re: [pkg-lighttpd] Changing the default document root for HTTP server

On 04/15/2012 06:29 PM, Olaf van der Spek wrote: > On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 2:25 AM, Arno Töll wrote: > >> Thus, to summarize once again: I'd like to change the default directory >> served by web servers from /var/www to /var/www/html along with >> remaining web servers in Debian. >> >> Comments

Re: Changing the default document root for HTTP server

On 04/15/2012 08:25 AM, Arno Töll wrote: > Thus, to summarize once again: I'd like to change the default directory > served by web servers from /var/www to /var/www/html along with > remaining web servers in Debian. > > Comments? > I support this. Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-dev

Re: [pkg-lighttpd] Changing the default document root for HTTP server

On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 6:29 PM, Olaf van der Spek wrote: > We should consider vhosts as well. Lighttpd defaults to > /srv//htdocs (for mod simple vhost). ht instead of htdocs might > be better. > > We could use /srv/default/ht as the default doc root. > FHS: /srv : Data for services provided by t

Re: [pkg-lighttpd] Changing the default document root for HTTP server

On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 2:25 AM, Arno Töll wrote: > Thus, to summarize once again: I'd like to change the default directory > served by web servers from /var/www to /var/www/html along with > remaining web servers in Debian. > > Comments? I'd use ht instead of html. Not every ht file is a html fi

Re: Changing the default document root for HTTP server

On Apr 15, Daniel Baumann wrote: > packages should have a debconf question for the document root, No, because this would require making every package significantly more complex. Not just because of asking the question, but the configuration files would not be conffiles anymore. And it would be

Re: Results for Debian Project Leader 2012 Election

On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 12:00:55AM +, devo...@vote.debian.org wrote: > The winners are: >Option 3 "Stefano Zacchiroli" By a large margin, too. Congrats! \o/ Kind regards Philipp Kern signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: The future of non-dependency-based boot

[James Cloos] > Manually choosing the order remains a reasonable choice for many > servers. The upstream dependencies are not always sufficiently detailed > and edits to the init files can be lost when upgrading. Your assumptions are wrong. You do not have to edit the init.d files themselves to

Re: The future of non-dependency-based boot

Three notes: Manually choosing the order remains a reasonable choice for many servers. The upstream dependencies are not always sufficiently detailed and edits to the init files can be lost when upgrading. Such servers generally start only a few services and hand-tuning the order is easy and obv

Bug#668870: RFH: golang

Package: wnpp Severity: normal Hi, I am looking for co-maintainers (DMs are welcome). I don't use Go myself, so the prospective co-maintaner should be a person who is involved in Go more than I am. Ondrej -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "u