Re: multi-arch et compression de changelog

2012-04-18 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Ludovic Rousseau ludovic.rouss...@gmail.com (18/04/2012): Par contre je ne contrôle pas la version de gzip sur les machines de build Debian. Si gzip n'est pas à jour, ce que je suspecte, je suis cuit. Pinguer les buildd maintainers pour leur demander explicitement de mettre à jour tous leurs

Re: Diversity statement for the Debian Project

2012-04-18 Thread David Prévot
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi, Le 12/04/2012 12:34, David Prévot a écrit : If the issue is only for non native readers, an other way to address the concern is to help proofreading translations in every language we understand, in order to make sure the statement will be

Re: debootstrap loading both libept1 AND libept1.4.12, .. and fails!

2012-04-18 Thread Mike Gabriel
Package: libept1.4.12 Version: 1.0.6.1 Severity: Important Hi Oliver, hi Enrico, hi all, On Di 17 Apr 2012 17:29:53 CEST olivier sallou wrote: 2012/4/17 olivier sallou olivier.sal...@gmail.com Hi, I cannot get debootstrap working anymore in sid since libept update. There is an open bug

Re: debootstrap loading both libept1 AND libept1.4.12, .. and fails!

2012-04-18 Thread Niels Thykier
On 2012-04-18 08:06, Mike Gabriel wrote: Package: libept1.4.12 Version: 1.0.6.1 Severity: Important Hi Oliver, hi Enrico, hi all, Hi, I am closing this bug #669203 as not a bug, because ... On Di 17 Apr 2012 17:29:53 CEST olivier sallou wrote: [...] libept1 depends on

Re: debootstrap loading both libept1 AND libept1.4.12, .. and fails!

2012-04-18 Thread olivier sallou
2012/4/18 Mike Gabriel mike.gabr...@das-netzwerkteam.de Package: libept1.4.12 Version: 1.0.6.1 Severity: Important Hi Oliver, hi Enrico, hi all, On Di 17 Apr 2012 17:29:53 CEST olivier sallou wrote: 2012/4/17 olivier sallou olivier.sal...@gmail.com Hi, I cannot get debootstrap

Intend to transition openjpeg 1.5

2012-04-18 Thread Mathieu Malaterre
Dear all, I would like to start working on the future openjpeg 1.5 transition. openjpeg 1.5 has been uploaded to experimental: https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=openjpegsuite=experimental I would like to now `mass-bug` on all packages that build-dep on libopenjpeg-dev, namely:

Re: The future of non-dependency-based boot

2012-04-18 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Roger Leigh rle...@codelibre.net writes: On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 12:13:09PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: Roger Leigh rle...@codelibre.net writes: As a side note I have a use case at work where static order seems to be needed. We build boot images for network boot of clusters. During

Re: The future of non-dependency-based boot

2012-04-18 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Petter Reinholdtsen p...@hungry.com writes: [Sven Joachim] I beg to disagree, it is already unsupportable because the only way to test it is to set up a lenny system, create some local init script without LSB headers to prevent migration to dependency based boot, and then upgrade all the way

Re: The future of non-dependency-based boot

2012-04-18 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Raphael Geissert geiss...@debian.org writes: Goswin von Brederlow wrote: 3) Aborting the upgrade because dependency boot ordering fails will be a major issue for users. You already mentioned 2 issues and on my system at home I get an error about a dependency loop. Dependency based boot

Re: what to do is maintainer is lacking? (was: wine-unstable in Debian)

2012-04-18 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 04/18/2012 08:27 AM, Steve McIntyre wrote: If a maintainer isn't (capable of) doing the necessary work on a package themselves, then after a while the best thing they can do is admit that and cede control to others. It's not an easy thing to admit failure like this, but it's better to do it

Re: what to do is maintainer is lacking? (was: wine-unstable in Debian)

2012-04-18 Thread Jon Dowland
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 04:57:14PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote: what can we do if the maintainer doesn't admit his lack of time or his lack of skills/knowledge? My understanding is that in Debian, we are stuck, right? I believe that was the message of Chris: we don't really have procedures to

Re: what to do is maintainer is lacking? (was: wine-unstable in Debian)

2012-04-18 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 10:16:56AM +0100, Jon Dowland wrote: On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 04:57:14PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote: what can we do if the maintainer doesn't admit his lack of time or his lack of skills/knowledge? My understanding is that in Debian, we are stuck, right? I believe

Re: what to do is maintainer is lacking? (was: wine-unstable in Debian)

2012-04-18 Thread Moray Allan
On Wed, 2012-04-18 at 10:16 +0100, Jon Dowland wrote: We have hijacks, we have the tech committee: weapons of last resort. I was thinking about the same issue before this thread. My feeling is that over the same time period in which we've moved towards team maintenance, and moved to a lower

Bug#669232: ITP: lv2 -- LV2 audio plugin specification

2012-04-18 Thread Alessio Treglia
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Alessio Treglia ales...@debian.org * Package name: lv2 Version : 1.0.0 Upstream Author : David Robillard d...@drobilla.net * URL : http://lv2plug.in/ * License : ISC Programming Lang: C Description : LV2 audio

Re: Intend to transition openjpeg 1.5

2012-04-18 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Mathieu Malaterre ma...@debian.org, 2012-04-18, 09:40: I would like to start working on the future openjpeg 1.5 transition. openjpeg 1.5 has been uploaded to experimental: https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=openjpegsuite=experimental I would like to now `mass-bug` on all

Re: Intend to transition openjpeg 1.5

2012-04-18 Thread Mathieu Malaterre
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 1:44 PM, Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org wrote: * Mathieu Malaterre ma...@debian.org, 2012-04-18, 09:40: I would like to start working on the future openjpeg 1.5 transition. openjpeg 1.5 has been uploaded to experimental:

Re: Intend to transition openjpeg 1.5

2012-04-18 Thread Simon McVittie
On 18/04/12 12:51, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: Intention to do what? Move the package from experimental once buildd are ok to unstable and then testing... This is a transition. Before starting a transition, open a release.debian.org bug asking the release team to schedule it, and wait for an OK

Shanghai BSP on the 29 and 30th of April at Peoople Squared

2012-04-18 Thread Thomas Goirand
Hey folks! As already announced on the DPN (Debian Project News from April 16th, 2012), we will have a Debian BSP (Bug Squashing Party) event on the 29th and 30th of April 2012. That's in a little bit more than a week, so it's more than time to send the announcement! All the practical details

Re: Social Networking Servers

2012-04-18 Thread Antonio Terceiro
Russell Coker escreveu isso aí: Is there any progress being made on packaging these systems? Are there other social networking systems released under free licenses that we can package? I am upstream for Noosfero (http://noosfero.org/), and we provide packages for Debian stable as part of our

Bug#669251: ITP: anet -- Ada networking library

2012-04-18 Thread Reto Buerki
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Reto Buerki r...@codelabs.ch -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 * Package name: anet Version : 0.1 Upstream Author : codelabs.ch * URL : http://www.codelabs.ch/anet/ * License : GPL-2+ with Ada exception

Bug#664257: multiarch tuples are not documented/defined

2012-04-18 Thread Matthias Klose
severity 664257 important thanks On 18.04.2012 05:16, Jonathan Nieder wrote: Hi Matthias, Steve McIntyre wrote: I've updated http://wiki.debian.org/Multiarch/Tuples with lots more information such as links to external ABI specs where I could find them. I think the Multiarch/Tuples

Processed: Re: Bug#664257: multiarch tuples are not documented/defined

2012-04-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: severity 664257 important Bug #664257 [general] multiarch tuples are not documented/defined Severity set to 'important' from 'serious' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 664257:

Re: what to do is maintainer is lacking? (was: wine-unstable in Debian)

2012-04-18 Thread Chris Knadle
On Wednesday, April 18, 2012 04:57:14, Thomas Goirand wrote: On 04/18/2012 08:27 AM, Steve McIntyre wrote: If a maintainer isn't (capable of) doing the necessary work on a package themselves, then after a while the best thing they can do is admit that and cede control to others. It's not an

Bug#669259: ITP: dssp -- protein secondary structure assignment based on 3D structure

2012-04-18 Thread Laszlo Kajan
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Laszlo Kajan lka...@rostlab.org * Package name: dssp Version : 2.0.4 Upstream Author : Maarten L. Hekkelman m.hekkel...@cmbi.ru.nl * URL : http://www.cmbi.ru.nl/dssp/ * License : Boost-1.0 Programming Lang: C++

Re: what to do is maintainer is lacking? (was: wine-unstable in Debian)

2012-04-18 Thread Neil Williams
On Wed, 18 Apr 2012 11:05:38 +0100 Moray Allan mo...@sermisy.org wrote: On Wed, 2012-04-18 at 10:16 +0100, Jon Dowland wrote: We have hijacks, we have the tech committee: weapons of last resort. I was thinking about the same issue before this thread. My feeling is that over the same time

Bug#669260: ITP: pygrib -- python library for reading/writing GRIB files

2012-04-18 Thread Alastair McKinstry
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Alastair McKinstry mckins...@debian.org * Package name: pygrib Version : 1.9.3 Upstream Author : Jeff Whittaker jeffrey.s.whita...@noaa.gov * URL : https://pygrib.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/docs/index.html * License : BSD

Re: what to do is maintainer is lacking? (was: wine-unstable in Debian)

2012-04-18 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 10:00:43AM -0400, Chris Knadle wrote: Debian has NMUs (Non-Maintainer Uploads) -- however this is mainly meant for uploading critical bug fixes without having to resort to hijacking the package, and AFAIK not to be used to upload new versions of the software. Before

Re: what to do is maintainer is lacking? (was: wine-unstable in Debian)

2012-04-18 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Wednesday, April 18, 2012 04:57:14 PM Thomas Goirand wrote: On 04/18/2012 08:27 AM, Steve McIntyre wrote: If a maintainer isn't (capable of) doing the necessary work on a package themselves, then after a while the best thing they can do is admit that and cede control to others. It's not

Re: what to do is maintainer is lacking? (was: wine-unstable in Debian)

2012-04-18 Thread Michael Gilbert
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 10:21 AM, Stefano Zacchiroli z...@debian.org wrote: On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 10:00:43AM -0400, Chris Knadle wrote: Debian has NMUs (Non-Maintainer Uploads) -- however this is mainly meant for uploading critical bug fixes without having to resort to hijacking the package,

Re: what to do is maintainer is lacking?

2012-04-18 Thread Russ Allbery
Michael Gilbert michael.s.gilb...@gmail.com writes: Is it reasonable to do an NMU that has a debdiff equivilent of around 500 upstream git commits (the size of ever new upstream wine release)? I don't think it's possible to answer that question with a firm yes or no. It depends heavily on the

Re: what to do is maintainer is lacking? (was: wine-unstable in Debian)

2012-04-18 Thread Chris Knadle
On Wednesday, April 18, 2012 10:21:45, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 10:00:43AM -0400, Chris Knadle wrote: Debian has NMUs (Non-Maintainer Uploads) -- however this is mainly meant for uploading critical bug fixes without having to resort to hijacking the package, and

Re: what to do is maintainer is lacking? (was: wine-unstable in Debian)

2012-04-18 Thread Jon Dowland
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 11:28:33AM -0400, Chris Knadle wrote: The way section 5.11 is written, it implies NMUs are for bug fixes only. It literally states Fixing cosmetic issues or changing the packaging style in NMUs is discouraged. Nowhere in the section is it implied that NMUs can be

Processed: Re: multiarch tuples are not documented/defined

2012-04-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: retitle 664257 multiarch tuples are not in the FHS Bug #664257 [general] multiarch tuples are not documented/defined Changed Bug title to 'multiarch tuples are not in the FHS' from 'multiarch tuples are not documented/defined' tags 664257 +

Re: what to do is maintainer is lacking? (was: wine-unstable in Debian)

2012-04-18 Thread Chris Knadle
On Wednesday, April 18, 2012 11:42:33, Jon Dowland wrote: On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 11:28:33AM -0400, Chris Knadle wrote: The way section 5.11 is written, it implies NMUs are for bug fixes only. It literally states Fixing cosmetic issues or changing the packaging style in NMUs is

Re: what to do is maintainer is lacking? (was: wine-unstable in Debian)

2012-04-18 Thread Joey Hess
Neil Williams wrote: Equally, take a care about which packages your packages depend upon because if there are optional components which bring in dependencies on shoddy code, you may need to quickly back away from those dependencies or face your own package being removed. This conflates the

Volunteer-initiated team maintenance as a solution for packages with low activity

2012-04-18 Thread Michael Gilbert
Hi, I would like to throw out an idea for constructively combating low activity in strongly maintained packages. Across the Debian package ecosystem team maintainership has been seen as the strongest antidote for package stagnation. This process just works because as one team member becomes

Re: what to do is maintainer is lacking? (was: wine-unstable in Debian)

2012-04-18 Thread Philipp Kern
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 12:20:51PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: Package removal frequently causes collatoral damage, and in my experience, those doing the removals rarely consider it, and are happy wasting other people's time. Sometimes not removing a package causes collatoral damage and wastes

Re: The future of non-dependency-based boot

2012-04-18 Thread Philipp Kern
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 11:00:00AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: Petter Reinholdtsen p...@hungry.com writes: [Sven Joachim] I beg to disagree, it is already unsupportable because the only way to test it is to set up a lenny system, create some local init script without LSB headers to

Bug#669275: ITP: mkgltempdir -- Utility to create a directory owned by the gLExec target user

2012-04-18 Thread Dennis van Dok
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Dennis van Dok denni...@nikhef.nl * Package name: mkgltempdir Version : 0.0.3 Upstream Author : Nikhef Grid Security Middleware Team grid-mw-secur...@nikhef.nl * URL : http://wiki.nikhef.nl/grid/GLExec_TransientPilotJobs *

Re: The future of non-dependency-based boot

2012-04-18 Thread Roger Leigh
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 07:15:48PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 11:00:00AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: Petter Reinholdtsen p...@hungry.com writes: [Sven Joachim] I beg to disagree, it is already unsupportable because the only way to test it is to set up a

Re: what to do is maintainer is lacking? (was: wine-unstable in Debian)

2012-04-18 Thread Christian PERRIER
Quoting Chris Knadle (chris.kna...@coredump.us): for lowering of severity level. [And realistically at least in the general case I don't think another DD is going to do an NMU if a bug is not RC.] Have you seen the gazillion of localization NMUs I'm doing for about 4-5 years now? :-) As

Re: Bug#669275: ITP: mkgltempdir -- Utility to create a directory owned by the gLExec target user

2012-04-18 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Wed, 2012-04-18 at 19:26 +0200, Dennis van Dok wrote: * Package name: mkgltempdir Version : 0.0.3 Upstream Author : Nikhef Grid Security Middleware Team grid-mw-secur...@nikhef.nl * URL : http://wiki.nikhef.nl/grid/GLExec_TransientPilotJobs The link to the

Re: Volunteer-initiated team maintenance as a solution for packages with low activity

2012-04-18 Thread Moray Allan
On Wed, 2012-04-18 at 13:10 -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote: So anyway, enough explanation, on to my proposed solution. Seeing as team spirit has been a quite effective antidote to stagnation, lets go ahead and use that again. I agree with the general intention, but not with the details of the

Re: wine-unstable in Debian

2012-04-18 Thread Simon McVittie
On 15/04/12 15:04, Ben Hutchings wrote: On Sun, 2012-04-15 at 19:32 +0600, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 01:18:28PM +0200, Petr Baudis wrote: I am rather dazzled that while there is working source package of wine-1.5 ready, other people are working on gradually packaging

Re: what to do is maintainer is lacking?

2012-04-18 Thread Chris Knadle
On Wednesday, April 18, 2012 11:19:39, Russ Allbery wrote: snipping to here because I believe the below stands well on its own ... When we're talking about packaging significant new upstream releases, I think NMUs are dodging the problem in a somewhat unuseful way, and we really need to sort

Re: Volunteer-initiated team maintenance as a solution for packages with low activity

2012-04-18 Thread Michael Gilbert
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 2:12 PM, Moray Allan wrote: On Wed, 2012-04-18 at 13:10 -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote: So anyway, enough explanation, on to my proposed solution.  Seeing as team spirit has been a quite effective antidote to stagnation, lets go ahead and use that again. I agree with

Re: Volunteer-initiated team maintenance as a solution for packages with low activity

2012-04-18 Thread Colin Watson
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 01:10:42PM -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote: So anyway, enough explanation, on to my proposed solution. Seeing as team spirit has been a quite effective antidote to stagnation, lets go ahead and use that again. Here is my suggested process: Nowhere in this process seems

Re: Volunteer-initiated team maintenance as a solution for packages with low activity

2012-04-18 Thread Michael Gilbert
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 2:51 PM, Colin Watson wrote: Nowhere in this process seems to be the notion that you should contribute actual effort first before adding yourself as an uploader.  I think that's important, particularly in the many situations where it's not lack of packaging of a new

Re: Volunteer-initiated team maintenance as a solution for packages with low activity

2012-04-18 Thread Tollef Fog Heen
]] Colin Watson alioth is just a Debian-specific hosting site, not a general gateway to package maintenance. We're not set up for them to be dispute resolution for the whole of Debian, and they have no constitutional authority to do that anyway. De-emphasising the role of alioth

Re: Volunteer-initiated team maintenance as a solution for packages with low activity

2012-04-18 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Michael Gilbert wrote: Plus I don't have to find hosting for my work elsewhere, which is kind of a pain and unwanted. This at least is easy to address. Alioth automatically notices per-user git repositories under ~/public_git[1]. Something similar works for other version

Re: Bug#669275: ITP: mkgltempdir -- Utility to create a directory owned by the gLExec target user

2012-04-18 Thread Dennis van Dok
Op 18-04-12 20:10, Adam D. Barratt schreef: On Wed, 2012-04-18 at 19:26 +0200, Dennis van Dok wrote: * Package name: mkgltempdir Version : 0.0.3 Upstream Author : Nikhef Grid Security Middleware Team grid-mw-secur...@nikhef.nl * URL :

Re: what to do is maintainer is lacking? (was: wine-unstable in Debian)

2012-04-18 Thread Steve Langasek
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 10:16:56AM +0100, Jon Dowland wrote: On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 04:57:14PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote: what can we do if the maintainer doesn't admit his lack of time or his lack of skills/knowledge? My understanding is that in Debian, we are stuck, right? I believe

Re: wine-unstable in Debian

2012-04-18 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
On 12-04-18 at 07:17pm, Simon McVittie wrote: I hesitate to suggest this if there's a possibility that the main wine package can come up to date before we freeze, but one way to have Wine 1.4 (and/or 1.2) in the distribution without NMUs/hijacks would be a parallel wine-1.4 source package

Re: what to do is maintainer is lacking?

2012-04-18 Thread Russ Allbery
Chris Knadle chris.kna...@coredump.us writes: I think the above is reasonable and fits the Debian do-acracy methodology. At the same time, I also understand that this is a tough call to make. Removing the current maintainer if they're not totally MIA may not seem right -- it may feel

Re: what to do is maintainer is lacking? (was: wine-unstable in Debian)

2012-04-18 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 10:00:43AM -0400, Chris Knadle a écrit : But what I'm seeing is that there are in-between states, where there doesn't seem to be any correct action to take. If a maintainer is not completely MIA but is going to not have any time for maintainership for 6 months,

Re: what to do is maintainer is lacking?

2012-04-18 Thread Russ Allbery
Charles Plessy ple...@debian.org writes: If somebody foresees he can not maintain his packages for the next six months, I think that he should really consider mark his inactivity by proposing the package for adoption, arranging co-maintenance in a team, switching on the vacation flag on the

Re: what to do is maintainer is lacking?

2012-04-18 Thread Chris Knadle
On Wednesday, April 18, 2012 04:04:49 PM Russ Allbery wrote: Chris Knadle chris.kna...@coredump.us writes: I think the above is reasonable and fits the Debian do-acracy methodology. At the same time, I also understand that this is a tough call to make. Removing the current maintainer

Accepted q4wine 0.121-3 (source amd64)

2012-04-18 Thread Boris Pek
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2012 01:08:47 +0300 Source: q4wine Binary: q4wine Architecture: source amd64 Version: 0.121-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Boris Pek tehnic...@mail.ru Changed-By: Boris Pek tehnic...@mail.ru

Accepted dh-ocaml 1.0.5 (source all)

2012-04-18 Thread Stéphane Glondu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 07:51:55 +0200 Source: dh-ocaml Binary: dh-ocaml Architecture: source all Version: 1.0.5 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian OCaml Maintainers debian-ocaml-ma...@lists.debian.org Changed-By:

Accepted unison 2.40.65-2 (source amd64)

2012-04-18 Thread Stéphane Glondu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2012 18:02:55 +0200 Source: unison Binary: unison unison-gtk Architecture: source amd64 Version: 2.40.65-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian OCaml Maintainers debian-ocaml-ma...@lists.debian.org

Accepted knot 1.0.3-1 (source amd64)

2012-04-18 Thread Ondřej Surý
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 09:06:57 +0200 Source: knot Binary: knot knot-dbg Architecture: source amd64 Version: 1.0.3-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Ondřej Surý ond...@debian.org Changed-By: Ondřej Surý ond...@debian.org

Accepted ocfs2-tools 1.6.4-1 (source amd64)

2012-04-18 Thread Jeremy Lainé
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 09:16:18 +0200 Source: ocfs2-tools Binary: ocfs2-tools ocfs2-tools-cman ocfs2-tools-dev ocfs2-tools-pacemaker ocfs2console Architecture: source amd64 Version: 1.6.4-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer:

Accepted adblock-plus-element-hiding-helper 1.2.2-1 (source all)

2012-04-18 Thread Fabrizio Regalli
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 09:50:58 +0200 Source: adblock-plus-element-hiding-helper Binary: xul-ext-adblock-plus-element-hiding-helper Architecture: source all Version: 1.2.2-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Mozilla

Accepted colorhug-client 0.1.8-1 (source amd64)

2012-04-18 Thread Michal Čihař
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 09:49:15 +0200 Source: colorhug-client Binary: colorhug-client libcolorhug1 libcolorhug-dev Architecture: source amd64 Version: 0.1.8-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Michal Čihař ni...@debian.org

Accepted golang 2:1-6 (source all amd64)

2012-04-18 Thread Ondřej Surý
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 09:53:30 +0200 Source: golang Binary: golang-go golang-src golang-doc golang-dbg golang golang-mode kate-syntax-go vim-syntax-go Architecture: source amd64 all Version: 2:1-6 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low

Accepted haskell-cabal-install 0.14.0-1 (source amd64)

2012-04-18 Thread Joachim Breitner
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 10:16:22 +0200 Source: haskell-cabal-install Binary: cabal-install Architecture: source amd64 Version: 0.14.0-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Haskell Group

Accepted mpg123 1.13.8-1 (source amd64)

2012-04-18 Thread Miguel A. Colón Vélez
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 04:28:00 -0400 Source: mpg123 Binary: mpg123 libmpg123-0 libmpg123-dev Architecture: source amd64 Version: 1.13.8-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Multimedia Maintainers

Accepted xjadeo 0.6.3-1 (source amd64)

2012-04-18 Thread Alessio Treglia
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 10:48:58 +0200 Source: xjadeo Binary: xjadeo Architecture: source amd64 Version: 0.6.3-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Multimedia Maintainers

Accepted haskell-cabal-install 0.14.0-2 (source amd64)

2012-04-18 Thread Iain Lane
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 10:08:34 +0100 Source: haskell-cabal-install Binary: cabal-install Architecture: source amd64 Version: 0.14.0-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Haskell Group

Accepted icicles 23.0+20110910-2 (source all)

2012-04-18 Thread Sebastien Delafond
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 11:35:25 +0200 Source: icicles Binary: icicles Architecture: source all Version: 23.0+20110910-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Sebastien Delafond s...@debian.org Changed-By: Sebastien Delafond

Accepted ctorrent 1.3.4.dnh3.3.2-4 (source amd64)

2012-04-18 Thread Andrea Veri
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2012 16:25:59 +0200 Source: ctorrent Binary: ctorrent Architecture: source amd64 Version: 1.3.4.dnh3.3.2-4 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Andrea Veri a...@debian.org Changed-By: Andrea Veri

Accepted phpmyadmin 4:3.4.11-1 (source all)

2012-04-18 Thread Thijs Kinkhorst
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 10:27:56 + Source: phpmyadmin Binary: phpmyadmin Architecture: source all Version: 4:3.4.11-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Thijs Kinkhorst th...@debian.org Changed-By: Thijs Kinkhorst

Accepted pcp 3.6.2 (source i386 all)

2012-04-18 Thread Nathan Scott
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 20:23:05 +1000 Source: pcp Binary: pcp libpcp3-dev libpcp3 libpcp-gui2-dev libpcp-gui2 libpcp-mmv1-dev libpcp-mmv1 libpcp-pmda3-dev libpcp-pmda3 libpcp-trace2-dev libpcp-trace2 libpcp-import1-dev libpcp-import1

Accepted elza 1.4.3-16 (source all)

2012-04-18 Thread Sebastien Delafond
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 14:34:53 +0200 Source: elza Binary: elza Architecture: source all Version: 1.4.3-16 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Sebastien Delafond s...@debian.org Changed-By: Sebastien Delafond s...@debian.org

Accepted paros 3.2.13-7 (source all)

2012-04-18 Thread Sebastien Delafond
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 12:59:31 +0200 Source: paros Binary: paros Architecture: source all Version: 3.2.13-7 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Sebastien Delafond s...@debian.org Changed-By: Sebastien Delafond s...@debian.org

Accepted libnet-socks-perl 0.03-13 (source all)

2012-04-18 Thread Sebastien Delafond
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 15:18:25 +0200 Source: libnet-socks-perl Binary: libnet-socks-perl Architecture: source all Version: 0.03-13 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Sebastien Delafond s...@debian.org Changed-By: Sebastien

Accepted ohai 0.6.12-1 (source all)

2012-04-18 Thread Antonio Terceiro
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 22:56:56 -0300 Source: ohai Binary: ohai libohai-ruby libohai-ruby1.8 ohai-doc Architecture: source all Version: 0.6.12-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Ruby Extras Maintainers

Accepted dracut 018-1 (source all)

2012-04-18 Thread Thomas Lange
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 13:30:05 +0200 Source: dracut Binary: dracut dracut-network Architecture: source all Version: 018-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Thomas Lange la...@debian.org Changed-By: Thomas Lange

Accepted libjira-client-perl 0.35-1 (source all)

2012-04-18 Thread Angel Abad
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 13:25:50 +0200 Source: libjira-client-perl Binary: libjira-client-perl Architecture: source all Version: 0.35-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Perl Group

Accepted grfcodec 6.0.0-1 (source amd64)

2012-04-18 Thread Matthijs Kooijman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 13:01:58 +0200 Source: grfcodec Binary: grfcodec Architecture: source amd64 Version: 6.0.0-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Matthijs Kooijman matth...@stdin.nl Changed-By: Matthijs Kooijman

Accepted leafnode 1.11.8-3 (source amd64)

2012-04-18 Thread Robert Grimm
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 08:15:46 +0200 Source: leafnode Binary: leafnode Architecture: source amd64 Version: 1.11.8-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Michael Banck mba...@debian.org Changed-By: Robert Grimm r...@robgri.de

Accepted meta-gnome3 1:3.0+8 (source all amd64)

2012-04-18 Thread Jordi Mallach
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 14:34:08 +0200 Source: meta-gnome3 Binary: gnome-core gnome gnome-desktop-environment gnome-platform-devel gnome-core-devel gnome-devel gnome-dbg gnome-api-docs Architecture: source all amd64 Version: 1:3.0+8

Accepted openttd 1.2.0-1 (source all amd64)

2012-04-18 Thread Matthijs Kooijman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 13:50:28 +0200 Source: openttd Binary: openttd openttd-dbg openttd-data Architecture: source amd64 all Version: 1.2.0-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Matthijs Kooijman matth...@stdin.nl Changed-By:

Accepted octave-ga 0.10.0-1 (source all)

2012-04-18 Thread Sébastien Villemot
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 13:08:31 + Source: octave-ga Binary: octave-ga Architecture: source all Version: 0.10.0-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Octave Group pkg-octave-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org Changed-By:

Accepted ttf-wqy-zenhei 0.9.45-4 (source all)

2012-04-18 Thread Osamu Aoki
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 22:31:49 +0900 Source: ttf-wqy-zenhei Binary: ttf-wqy-zenhei Architecture: source all Version: 0.9.45-4 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Fonts Task Force pkg-fonts-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org

Accepted dbskkd-cdb 1:2.00-4 (source i386)

2012-04-18 Thread Tatsuya Kinoshita
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 22:54:06 +0900 Source: dbskkd-cdb Binary: dbskkd-cdb Architecture: source i386 Version: 1:2.00-4 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Tatsuya Kinoshita t...@debian.org Changed-By: Tatsuya Kinoshita

Accepted debianbuttons 1.8-1 (source all)

2012-04-18 Thread Damyan Ivanov
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 17:56:35 +0300 Source: debianbuttons Binary: xul-ext-debianbuttons Architecture: source all Version: 1.8-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Mozilla Extension Packaging Team

Accepted libjxp-java 1.6.1-2 (source all)

2012-04-18 Thread gregor herrmann
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 17:06:56 +0200 Source: libjxp-java Binary: libjxp-java Architecture: source all Version: 1.6.1-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: gregor herrmann gre...@debian.org Changed-By: gregor herrmann

Accepted vino 3.4.1-1 (source amd64)

2012-04-18 Thread Michael Biebl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 16:58:00 +0200 Source: vino Binary: vino Architecture: source amd64 Version: 3.4.1-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian GNOME Maintainers pkg-gnome-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org

Accepted libmicroba-java 1:0.4.4.3-3 (source all)

2012-04-18 Thread gregor herrmann
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 17:31:50 +0200 Source: libmicroba-java Binary: libmicroba-java libmicroba-java-doc Architecture: source all Version: 1:0.4.4.3-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: gregor herrmann gre...@debian.org

Accepted vinagre 3.4.1-1 (source amd64)

2012-04-18 Thread Michael Biebl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 17:20:01 +0200 Source: vinagre Binary: vinagre Architecture: source amd64 Version: 3.4.1-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian GNOME Maintainers pkg-gnome-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org

Accepted gvfs 1.12.1-1 (source all amd64)

2012-04-18 Thread Michael Biebl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 17:41:59 +0200 Source: gvfs Binary: gvfs gvfs-daemons gvfs-libs gvfs-common gvfs-fuse gvfs-backends gvfs-bin gvfs-dbg Architecture: source all amd64 Version: 1.12.1-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low

Accepted libspin-java 1.5+dfsg-4 (source all)

2012-04-18 Thread gregor herrmann
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 17:49:04 +0200 Source: libspin-java Binary: libspin-java libspin-java-doc Architecture: source all Version: 1.5+dfsg-4 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: gregor herrmann gre...@debian.org Changed-By:

Accepted openttd-opengfx 0.4.4-1 (source all)

2012-04-18 Thread Matthijs Kooijman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 16:59:46 +0200 Source: openttd-opengfx Binary: openttd-opengfx Architecture: source all Version: 0.4.4-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Matthijs Kooijman matth...@stdin.nl Changed-By: Matthijs

Accepted openttd-opensfx 0.2.3-3 (source all)

2012-04-18 Thread Matthijs Kooijman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 17:35:12 +0200 Source: openttd-opensfx Binary: openttd-opensfx Architecture: source all Version: 0.2.3-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Matthijs Kooijman matth...@stdin.nl Changed-By: Matthijs

Accepted gnome-terminal 3.4.1.1-1 (source all amd64)

2012-04-18 Thread Michael Biebl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 17:57:12 +0200 Source: gnome-terminal Binary: gnome-terminal gnome-terminal-data Architecture: source all amd64 Version: 3.4.1.1-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian GNOME Maintainers

Accepted libgphoto2 2.4.14-1 (source i386 all)

2012-04-18 Thread David Paleino
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 17:45:07 +0200 Source: libgphoto2 Binary: libgphoto2-2-dev libgphoto2-dev-doc libgphoto2-port0 libgphoto2-2 libgphoto2-l10n Architecture: source i386 all Version: 2.4.14-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low

Accepted mono-upnp 0.1.1-2 (source all)

2012-04-18 Thread Chow Loong Jin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 15:45:39 +0800 Source: mono-upnp Binary: mono-upnp-bin libmono-upnp-cil libmono-upnp-cil-dev monodoc-mono-upnp-manual Architecture: source all Version: 0.1.1-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian

Accepted procserv 2.6.0-1 (source amd64)

2012-04-18 Thread Ralph Lange
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 16:04:21 +0200 Source: procserv Binary: procserv Architecture: source amd64 Version: 2.6.0-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Ralph Lange ralph.la...@gmx.de Changed-By: Ralph Lange ralph.la...@gmx.de

Accepted gnome-nettool 3.2.0-1 (source amd64)

2012-04-18 Thread Jordi Mallach
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 18:09:01 +0200 Source: gnome-nettool Binary: gnome-nettool Architecture: source amd64 Version: 3.2.0-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian GNOME Maintainers

  1   2   >