2012/7/27 Bart Martens :
> On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 10:01:08AM +0200, Alessio Treglia wrote:
>> > I intend to orphan zynaddsubfx. Before doing that I invite two additional
>> > DD's
>> > to confirm that they agree with this intent with ma...@debian.org in cc.
>>
>> the D-Multimedia-M team is alre
On 07/27/2012 11:08 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-07-27 at 15:42 -0400, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
>> On Fri, 27 Jul 2012, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>>> bug - "reportbug release.debian.org" and selecting the "unblock" option
>>> will set the correct usertags for you.
>>
>> what is the diffe
On Fri, 2012-07-27 at 15:42 -0400, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Jul 2012, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > bug - "reportbug release.debian.org" and selecting the "unblock" option
> > will set the correct usertags for you.
>
> what is the difference between those two user tags and if there is a
]] Svante Signell
> I have tried several times and I can give you a recent example, see
> #610209 and especially #669368. I have tried to contribute, but to no
> avail (at least in this case).
None of them are particularly relevant for the release, AFAICS? As for
packaging them in experimental,
On Fri, 27 Jul 2012, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> bug - "reportbug release.debian.org" and selecting the "unblock" option
> will set the correct usertags for you.
what is the difference between those two user tags and if there is any should I
retag freeze-exception ones as unblock?
3 freeze-exceptio
]] Michael Gilbert
> True. Part of the problem is appropriate terminology. This is a case
> of what I would call an "undermaintained" package. Even though the
> maintainer is still around, and may be quite active elsewhere, this
> package has not gotten any attention in 2 years (even though mu
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 10:01:08AM +0200, Alessio Treglia wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 7:58 AM, Bart Martens wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I intend to orphan zynaddsubfx. Before doing that I invite two additional
> > DD's
> > to confirm that they agree with this intent with ma...@debian
> The Fungi writes:
> On 2012-07-26 14:29:14 +0100 (+0100), Ian Jackson wrote:
>> We also need a general word for "someone involved with Debian in a
>> positive way". "Participant" is clumsy; "member of the community"
>> even more so. "Person" might do but word with a more positive s
Cyril Brulebois writes ("Re: Modified http://wiki.debian.org/DebianDeveloper to
mention non-packagers (Re: [CTTE #614907] Resolution of node/nodejs conflict)"):
> Ian Jackson (26/07/2012):
> > Uploaders needs to be abolished in favour of multiple
> > Maintainers. In wheezy perhaps ?
On Vi, 27 iul 12, 09:52:41, Svante Signell wrote:
>
> OK, I'll try to help with Wheezy. Where can I find the complete list of
> RC bugs?
You could start with rc-alert (in devscripts) and then continue with
http://bugs.debian.org/release-critical/
Hope this helps,
Andrei
--
Offtopic discussions
On Fri, 27 Jul 2012 09:52:41 +0200
Svante Signell wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-07-27 at 08:24 +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
> > Look at the list of RC bugs and see if you can come up with anything
> > useful about the problem. There are enough of them, everyone should be
> > able to do something about som
Hi,
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 7:58 AM, Bart Martens wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I intend to orphan zynaddsubfx. Before doing that I invite two additional
> DD's
> to confirm that they agree with this intent with ma...@debian.org in cc.
the D-Multimedia-M team is already on it.
Cheers!
--
Alessio Treg
On Fri, 2012-07-27 at 08:24 +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Jul 2012 01:20:24 +0200
> Svante Signell wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 2012-07-26 at 15:58 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> > > Michael Gilbert writes:
> > > > On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 6:09 PM, Russ Allbery wrote:
> > ...
> > > > This would
On Fri, 27 Jul 2012 01:20:24 +0200
Svante Signell wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-07-26 at 15:58 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> > Michael Gilbert writes:
> > > On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 6:09 PM, Russ Allbery wrote:
> ...
> > > This would be a case where I think liberal NMUing would certainly be
> > > appropri
On Thu, 26 Jul 2012 19:51:58 -0400
Michael Gilbert wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 6:58 PM, Russ Allbery wrote:
> >> True. Part of the problem is appropriate terminology. This is a case
> >> of what I would call an "undermaintained" package. Even though the
> >> maintainer is still around, an
15 matches
Mail list logo
