Steve Langasek wrote:
Let's not forget that Al Capone was convicted not for murder, racketeering,
or bootlegging, but for tax evasion; and that the US tax code specifies
where on your tax form you are required to report income from the sale of
illegal drugs. It would be ironic for a dissident to
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 04:27:14PM -0700, Howard Chu wrote:
> >That's not the point. The purpose of the Dissident Test is to demonstrate
> >that distribution channels for software are not necessarily symmetric; it
> >may be very easy for you to distribute the software, but very
> >hard/expensive/d
The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested
through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the
last week.
Total number of orphaned packages: 492 (new: 3)
Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 148 (new: 1)
Total number of packages request
Steve Langasek wrote:
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 12:53:01PM -0700, Howard Chu wrote:
Sure, but that doesn't make it DFSG free (hint: it's likely not)[1][2]
[1]: The Dissident test
[2]: The Desert Island test
Sure, but #2 is stupid. We didn't say "must send changes back
immediately." Nor would
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 5:15 PM, Daniel Leidert wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, den 11.07.2013, 15:33 +0200 schrieb Bill Allombert:
> JFTR: The file secring.gpg can be avoided using
> --secret-keyring=/dev/null but I don't know how to suppress the creation
> of trustdb.gpg.
Note that you can't use that f
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 12:53:01PM -0700, Howard Chu wrote:
> >Sure, but that doesn't make it DFSG free (hint: it's likely not)[1][2]
> >[1]: The Dissident test
> >[2]: The Desert Island test
> Sure, but #2 is stupid. We didn't say "must send changes back
> immediately." Nor would we wish any suc
]] Howard Chu
[...]
> >>> If not, then
> >>> what is the point of the AGPL? To protect C-R-U?
> >>>
> >>> I am not suggesting that this is absolutely not modification by Company A.
> >>> However, to a non-lawyer like me, it sure _looks_ like a big hole.
>
> I don't see any hole. If C-R-U did th
Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 12:19:47PM -0700, Howard Chu wrote:
Right, I want to understand AGPL's motivations is all.
I used to put similar terms on my code, back before the GPL existed.
Essentially: If you modify this code, you must send your
modifications back to me (the
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 12:19:47PM -0700, Howard Chu wrote:
> >Right, I want to understand AGPL's motivations is all.
>
> I used to put similar terms on my code, back before the GPL existed.
> Essentially: If you modify this code, you must send your
> modifications back to me (the original author)
Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Richard Fontana's message of 2013-07-11 10:45:00 -0700:
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 08:27:31AM -0700, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Richard Fontana's message of 2013-07-11 06:55:12 -0700:
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 03:12:39PM +0200, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
I'm no
Excerpts from Richard Fontana's message of 2013-07-11 10:45:00 -0700:
> On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 08:27:31AM -0700, Clint Byrum wrote:
> > Excerpts from Richard Fontana's message of 2013-07-11 06:55:12 -0700:
> > > On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 03:12:39PM +0200, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
> > > > > I'm no exp
Hi Arief,
Arief M Utama writes:
> Ever since after Wheezy released, with gnome-3 and systemd, I still can't
> suspend my laptop by closing the lid like it used to be.
Note that wheezy does not use systemd by default. Are you 100% sure you
are using systemd? Check “ps auxf” to see if systemd is yo
El 11/07/13 13:33, Ian Jackson escribió:
Scott Leggett writes ("Re: Pepper Flash for Chromium"):
>Specifically, downloading the chrome .deb from google and doing
>anything other than simply installing it (like extracting the flash
>plugin and copying it elsewhere) would be creating a derivative
Scott Leggett writes ("Re: Pepper Flash for Chromium"):
> Specifically, downloading the chrome .deb from google and doing
> anything other than simply installing it (like extracting the flash
> plugin and copying it elsewhere) would be creating a derivative work
> and is thus forbidden.
We could c
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 08:27:31AM -0700, Clint Byrum wrote:
> Excerpts from Richard Fontana's message of 2013-07-11 06:55:12 -0700:
> > On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 03:12:39PM +0200, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
> > > > I'm no expert but that would be my interpretation. Also when I asked
> > > > about the b
Hi all,
Ever since after Wheezy released, with gnome-3 and systemd, I still can't
suspend my laptop by closing the lid like it used to be.
I remember there's a workaround that make the Suspend option in the User
menu works... but that is not very comfortable.
Any workarounds on this (for suspen
Excerpts from Richard Fontana's message of 2013-07-11 06:55:12 -0700:
> On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 03:12:39PM +0200, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
> > > I'm no expert but that would be my interpretation. Also when I asked
> > > about the basis of the network part of the AGPL during the GPLv3 talk
> > > at D
Am Donnerstag, den 11.07.2013, 15:33 +0200 schrieb Bill Allombert:
[use gpg but don't write to root/.gnupg]
> Below is the code in /etc/cron.daily/popularity-contest
>
> GPG=/usr/bin/gpg
> if [ "$ENCRYPT" = "yes" ] && [ -x "$GPG" ]; then
> POPCONGPG="$POPCON.gpg"
> rm -f "$POPCONGPG"
> $GPG
On Thursday, July 11, 2013 12:26:47 PM Joachim Breitner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am Donnerstag, den 11.07.2013, 17:48 +0800 schrieb Paul Wise:
> > On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 5:41 PM, Lars Meyser wrote:
> > > This is also my personal reading of the license, I would like to hear
> > > others opinions before I
Hi,
Am Donnerstag, den 11.07.2013, 13:41 + schrieb Jeremy T. Bouse:
> I would find
> having the Debian package install a tarball that could be linked to and
> downloadable from the end user to be unnecessary duplication if all that
> would be needed would be a link then why not just have th
Hi,
On Donnerstag, 11. Juli 2013, Jeremy T. Bouse wrote:
> My understanding though that if Debian is the one making the
> modification then Debian is the one responsible for making the source
> available.
I think this is done already, since roughly 20 years, have a look at
ftp.debian.org
c
On 11.07.2013 09:12, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
On 07/11/2013 14:15, Paul Wise wrote:
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 6:29 PM, Lars Meyser wrote:
No I did not miss that, but I'm not entirely sure of the
implications. So if I
use a packaged version of a program which has been modified (e.g.
by Debian
pat
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 03:12:39PM +0200, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
> > I'm no expert but that would be my interpretation. Also when I asked
> > about the basis of the network part of the AGPL during the GPLv3 talk
> > at DebConf10 in NYC, Bradley said the AGPL was specifically based on
> > modificat
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 11:36:02PM +0200, Daniel Leidert wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, den 10.07.2013, 16:14 +0200 schrieb Bill Allombert:
> > On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 11:27:12PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 05:08:08PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > > > Dear Debian people,
>
On 07/11/2013 14:15, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 6:29 PM, Lars Meyser wrote:
>> No I did not miss that, but I'm not entirely sure of the implications. So if
>> I
>> use a packaged version of a program which has been modified (e.g. by Debian
>> patches) I am not obliged to make the s
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Granger Anthony
Package name: libpoppler-qt5-dev
Version : 1.0.0
URL : http://poppler.freedesktop.org/
License : GPL
Programming Lang: C, C++
Description : PDF rendering library -- development files (Qt 5 inte
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 6:29 PM, Lars Meyser wrote:
> No I did not miss that, but I'm not entirely sure of the implications. So if I
> use a packaged version of a program which has been modified (e.g. by Debian
> patches) I am not obliged to make the source available?
I'm no expert but that would
Package: wnpp
Owner: KURASHIKI Satoru
* Package name: rt-extension-calendar
Version : 0.16
Upstream Author : Nicolas Chuche
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/RTx-Calendar/
* License : Artistic
Programming Lang: Perl
Description : Calendar for Request
Scott Kitterman wrote:
On Saturday, July 06, 2013 01:52:59 PM Howard Chu wrote:
Florian Weimer wrote:
* Howard Chu:
LMDB doesn't need dirty tricks to look good. (And at only 6KLOCs of
source, there's nowhere to hide any tricks anyway.)
Okay, I found a snag: the 511 bytes limit on the key siz
- Original Message -
> From: Paul Wise
> To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
> Cc:
> Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2013 11:48 AM
> Subject: Re: AGPLv3 Compliance and Debian Users
>
> On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 5:41 PM, Lars Meyser wrote:
>
>> It is not that simple, Debian itself complies with t
Hi,
Am Donnerstag, den 11.07.2013, 17:48 +0800 schrieb Paul Wise:
> On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 5:41 PM, Lars Meyser wrote:
> > This is also my personal reading of the license, I would like to hear others
> > opinions before I start filing bugs.
>
> Perhaps you missed "if you modify the Program" in i
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 5:41 PM, Lars Meyser wrote:
> It is not that simple, Debian itself complies with the license and users
> installing the package comply with the license as long as the network-facing
> service is not accessible to other users. To stay with my example, I am in
> compliance wi
- Original Message -
> From: Arto Jantunen
> To: "debian-devel@lists.debian.org"
> Cc:
> Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2013 11:02 AM
> Subject: Re: AGPLv3 Compliance and Debian Users
>
> ...
> By default installing into a state that isn't compliant with the license
> seems like an obvious b
Kurt has filed a new bug report against eglibc
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15726
which draws the developers' attention to RFC3493 which specifies the return
values
of getaddrinfo(). These should be as follows.
> - Things work as expected: return 0
> - The nameserver repli
Lars Meyser writes:
> An example that recently came to my attention is Debian's owncloud package,
> there seems to be no configuration option to easily add a link to all pages,
> so
> in order to comply with the AGPLv3 I guess I would have to create my own theme
> that displays a link to the sour
Hi,
with the recent discussion about the AGPLv3 I am wondering what the
implications for users of Debian packages are. Debian packages often contain
modifications in the form of patches, since the Debian project is only a
distributor it complies to the license by making available the sources of th
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Thomas Bechtold
* Package name: python-scripttest
Version : 1.2
Upstream Author : Ian Bicking
* URL : https://pypi.python.org/pypi/ScriptTest/
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: Python
Description : Helper to test
37 matches
Mail list logo
