Re: Switch to OpenJDK 7

On Sat, Aug 03, 2013 at 09:47:59AM +1000, Gerry Butler wrote: > Good morning Sylvestre > > Might I be impacted by the switch to OpenJDK7? > > (1) I am still using squeeze as, for various reasons, I am not yet ready to > move to wheezy. > > (2) I am using OpenJDK6 with the latest updates. > > (3

Re: Switch to OpenJDK 7

Good morning Sylvestre Might I be impacted by the switch to OpenJDK7? (1) I am still using squeeze as, for various reasons, I am not yet ready to move to wheezy. (2) I am using OpenJDK6 with the latest updates. (3) I am using Netbeans 6.0.1 from the release prior to squeeze, as squeeze did not

Re: new hashes (SHA512, SHA3) in apt metadata and .changes files?

On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 6:33 PM, Ondřej Surý wrote: > On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 2:52 PM, Paul Wise wrote: > So, yeah let's drop MD5, but don't introduce neither SHA512 nor SHA-3 > unless there's a cryptographical need (there isn't at the moment). Actually, it might be less controversial to drop SHA1

Missing Maintainer?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi All, Sorry to bother you all with a non-technical post. I have been trying to help out a little with bugs on the Gramps package in Debian, and I have noticed that James A Treacy (the Maintainer) has not been active over the last year or so, and has

Bug#718591: ITP: octoprint -- Responsive web interface for 3D printers

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Tonnerre Lombard * Package name: octoprint Version : 0.0.20130801 Upstream Author : Gina Häußge * URL : http://www.octoprint.org/ * License : AGPL-3 Programming Lang: Python Description : Responsive web interface

Bug#718589: ITP: python-tornadio2 -- Socket.io 0.7+ server implementation on top of Tornado

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Tonnerre Lombard * Package name: python-tornadio2 Version : 0.0.4 Upstream Author : Serge S. Koval * URL : https://github.com/MrJoes/tornadio2 * License : Apache-2.0 Programming Lang: Python Description : Socket.

Re: new hashes (SHA512, SHA3) in apt metadata and .changes files?

On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 2:52 PM, Paul Wise wrote: > I noted[1] that some derivatives have introduced SHA512 into their > Release files (and probably Packages/etc). I was wondering if it is > time to drop or deprecate MD5 from the apt metadata and replace it > with SHA512 and or SHA-3. Thoughts? >

Bug#718580: ITP: mayan -- Django-based Electronic Document Management System (EDMS)

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: "Matteo F. Vescovi" * Package name: mayan Version : 0.13.1 Upstream Author : Roberto Rosario * URL : http://www.mayan-edms.com/ * License : GPL-3+ Programming Lang: Python Description : Django-based Electronic Do

Re: new hashes (SHA512, SHA3) in apt metadata and .changes files?

On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 2:52 PM, Paul Wise wrote: > If so, here is the list of software that probably needs updating: > > dak > apt/apt-ftparchive > reprepro > launchpad > dpkg-dev > devscripts > derivatives census (c)debootstrap Also, apt-get is forcing MD5 in --print-uris by default because not

Re: new hashes (SHA512, SHA3) in apt metadata and .changes files?

On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 3:29 PM, Guillem Jover wrote: > Adding stronger hashes support seems in general like a good idea, but > I've never quite understood the urge to remove weaker ones in case > these get accumulated instead of replaced, as more hashes should also > in general imply a harder time

Re: new hashes (SHA512, SHA3) in apt metadata and .changes files?

Hi! On Fri, 2013-08-02 at 14:52:33 +0200, Paul Wise wrote: > I noted[1] that some derivatives have introduced SHA512 into their > Release files (and probably Packages/etc). This will increase those files (Packages, Sources, etc) by quite a bit, at least 128 bytes per entry. Is that something we w

new hashes (SHA512, SHA3) in apt metadata and .changes files?

I noted[1] that some derivatives have introduced SHA512 into their Release files (and probably Packages/etc). I was wondering if it is time to drop or deprecate MD5 from the apt metadata and replace it with SHA512 and or SHA-3. Thoughts? If so, here is the list of software that probably needs upda

ITP: skype4py, can somebody sponsor it for me?

Hi developers, I write here since I don't know if there are any problems into the ITP bug I would like to reintroduce skype4py into unstable, since it is maintained again and is working well. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=717337 http://packages.qa.debian.org/s/skype4py.htm

Bug#718560: ITP: nbdkit -- toolkit for creating NBD servers

Package: wnpp Owner: Hilko Bengen Severity: wishlist * Package name: nbdkit Version : 1.1.2-1 Upstream Author : Richard W.M. Jones * URL or Web page : https://github.com/libguestfs/nbdkit * License : BSD 3 clause Description : toolkit for creating NBD servers --

Re: Status of deb(5) format support in Debian

On 2013-07-31 18:24, Guillem Jover wrote: Due to bug 718295, and in preparation to add non-gzip compression support for control.tar, I've tried to get an accurate view of the current deb(5) format support in software present in Debian. The resulting table looks pretty bad:

Bug#718555: ITP: python-flask-principal -- Identity management for flask

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Tonnerre Lombard * Package name: python-flask-principal Version : 0.4.0 Upstream Author : Matt Wright * URL : https://github.com/mattupstate/flask-principal * License : Expat Programming Lang: Python Description

Bug#718554: ITP: python-flask-login -- User session management for Flask

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Tonnerre Lombard * Package name: python-flask-login Version : 0.2.6 Upstream Author : Matthew Frazier * URL : https://github.com/maxcountryman/flask-login * License : Expat Programming Lang: Python Description :