Re: jquery debate with upstream

2014-03-14 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 03/13/2014 04:57 AM, Jakub Wilk wrote: > * Philipp Kern , 2014-03-12, 21:11: >> I still think it should be acceptable given that it's an open source >> project, it's clearly versioned from which source it comes and we >> check by not using the file that no changes have been done to the >> minifi

Re: jquery debate with upstream

2014-03-14 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 11:47:44AM +0800, Paul Wise a écrit : > > I note that the ftpmasters currently reject packages that are missing > source for non-programmatic works (REJECT-FAQ explicitly mentions > PS/PDF documentation). So the current archive requirements are in > practice stricter than t

Re: jquery debate with upstream

2014-03-14 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 11:24:19AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 11:02 AM, Steve Langasek wrote: > > That was a conscious decision on the part of the project to revise the text > > of the Social Contract. That vote did *not* replace the use of the word > > "program" in DFSG#2

Re: jquery debate with upstream

2014-03-14 Thread Paul Wise
On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 11:29 AM, Russ Allbery wrote: > Paul Wise writes: > >> As far as I can tell, not modifying the DSFG at the same time was an >> oversight. Fixing that mistake was attempted in a later GR but that was >> blocked with a narrow margin. > >> https://www.debian.org/vote/2006/vote_

Re: jquery debate with upstream

2014-03-14 Thread Russ Allbery
Paul Wise writes: > As far as I can tell, not modifying the DSFG at the same time was an > oversight. Fixing that mistake was attempted in a later GR but that was > blocked with a narrow margin. > https://www.debian.org/vote/2006/vote_004 That GR proposal does not require source for non-program

Re: jquery debate with upstream

2014-03-14 Thread Paul Wise
On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 11:02 AM, Steve Langasek wrote: > That was a conscious decision on the part of the project to revise the text > of the Social Contract. That vote did *not* replace the use of the word > "program" in DFSG#2 with the word "software". It is incorrect to infer from > this vot

Re: jquery debate with upstream

2014-03-14 Thread Russ Allbery
Steve Langasek writes: > On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 10:50:13AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: >> I guess you are referring to the GR that clarified the Social Contract >> to read "work" instead of "software". >> https://www.debian.org/vote/2004/vote_003 > That was a conscious decision on the part of the

Re: jquery debate with upstream

2014-03-14 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 10:50:13AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 10:20 AM, Steve Langasek wrote: > > A PNG is not a program. > Depends on your definition of program. Yes. If you use the English definition of the word "program", then it's not a program. But I guess if you ma

Re: jquery debate with upstream

2014-03-14 Thread Paul Wise
On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 10:20 AM, Steve Langasek wrote: > A PNG is not a program. Depends on your definition of program. PNG files are programs that run in a PNG decoder. ELF binaries aren't programs, they are just data interpreted by CPUs. > There is no source required for a PNG under DFSG #2

Re: jquery debate with upstream

2014-03-14 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 03/13/2014 11:45 PM, Vincent Bernat wrote: > ❦ 12 mars 2014 22:26 CET, Ben Finney : > >>> The javascript world is difficult to deal with. They like embedded >>> copies, they may not really care about API/ABI stability, even for big >>> projects. Those are difficulties that we already have to

Re: jquery debate with upstream

2014-03-14 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 10:07:22AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 8:02 PM, Craig Small wrote: > > FWIW, I think the concept of a graphic needing its source is also bogus. > > It means that the upstream have to hang onto some script they might of > > used once years ago for.. wha

Bug#741658: ITP: tuskar-ui -- control how and where OpenStack services are deployed - horizon plugin

2014-03-14 Thread Thomas Goirand
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Thomas Goirand * Package name: tuskar-ui Version : 0.0.9 Upstream Author : OpenStack Development Mailing List * URL : https://github.com/openstack/tuskar-ui/ * License : Apache-2.0 Programming Lang: Python Descripti

Re: jquery debate with upstream

2014-03-14 Thread Paul Wise
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 8:02 PM, Craig Small wrote: > FWIW, I think the concept of a graphic needing its source is also bogus. > It means that the upstream have to hang onto some script they might of > used once years ago for.. what reason? > To give you a concrete example, I made the SPI logo (an

Bug#741646: ITP: libcofoja-java -- Java API providing annotating code with contracts

2014-03-14 Thread Diane Trout
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org --- Please fill out the fields below. --- Package name: libcofoja-java Version: 1.1-r150 Upstream Author: 2010-2011 Google, Inc. 2010-2011, 2013 Nhat Minh Lê 2007 Johannes Rie

Bug#741640: ITP: vcmi -- Free implementation of the Heroes of Might and Magic 3 game engine

2014-03-14 Thread Johannes Schauer
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Johannes Schauer * Package name: vcmi Version : 0.95 Upstream Author : Micha³ Urbañczyk aka Tow Ivan Savenko Tom Zielinski aka Warmonger AVS Benjamin Gentner