Il giorno sab, 08/11/2014 alle 21.15 +0100, Marco d'Itri ha scritto:
On Nov 08, Jonathan McDowell nood...@earth.li wrote:
Back in August I sent notification[0] about the fact that we will be
removing all keys less than 2048 from our keyrings at the end of the
year (31st December 2014).
Ciao!
On 2014-11-10 at 12:18 (CET), Andrea Capriotti wrote:
Ciao a tutti,
io sono nella lista e ho bisogno ancora di 1 firma sulla nuova chiave.
Se qualcuno passa nei dintorni di Bologna si faccia sentire.
Se vieni allo Ubuntu-it Meeting del 22 Novembre al Ramada Encore[1],
ci trovi in
On Nov 10, 2014 12:28 PM, Matteo F. Vescovi m...@debian.org wrote:
Se vieni allo Ubuntu-it Meeting del 22 Novembre al Ramada Encore[1],
ci trovi in tanti per una firmetta... reciproca ;-)
Che c'è scritto Ubuntu ma manca poco che ci siano più (prospective) DD
che altro ;p
On Sun, 09 Nov 2014, John Goerzen wrote:
Debian is a making-the-world-better project, a caring for people
project, a freedom-spreading project. Free Software is our tool.
[...]
My plea is that we each may get angry at what matters, and let go of the
smaller frustrations in life; that we may
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Even if it ends as impractical for usage I do support that you package it. Its
your joy to work on it and I think that at least many people would have fun and
laugh when they cross it in our big archive (I know I would, I mean its xkcd
afterall).
Hi Faidon,
On Sat, Nov 08, 2014 at 11:46:57AM +0200, Faidon Liambotis wrote:
Extremely sad to read this, Joey.
+1
I personally feel like loosing a friend. If I imagine myself to leave
Debian I would leave a major part of my life and I guess its similar for
Joey and that the decision was
Just installed debian on an old amd32 platform, it booted in 4-5 seconds !:)
debian + GNU base, love it
debian is one of the last dists to create a no fuzz installer, only installer
that is tolerable to me
so I hope the baseinstall will be made even more non-gui in the future
and perhaps
Hi all !
(Sorry for my English, I'm no native speaker, hope I'll not make too many
mistakes and my
message will be understandable)
I did not know who to write to about this and how to contact as many of you as
possible,
so here it is. I hope it will not interfere too much with what this list
Dear Nathael,
This is off-topic for -devel. Please consider debian-user or the offtopic list.
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 09:57:50AM +0100, Nathael Pajani wrote:
You certainly heard about debianfork (http://debianfork.org/) and from a
user point of view this is a tragedy.
snip
When a (big ?) pool
Good morning,
On Montag, 10. November 2014, John Goerzen wrote:
Good afternoon,
[...]
May you each find that airplane to soar freely in the skies, to lift
your soul so that the joy of using Free Software to make the world a
better place may still be here, regardless of what /sbin/init is.
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 09:57:50AM +0100, Nathael Pajani wrote:
You certainly heard about debianfork (http://debianfork.org/) and from a
user point of
view this is a tragedy.
Don't worry, this is a joke.
When a (big ?) pool of users is not happy to the point of suggesting to fork
There is
On 9 November 2014 18:36, Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote:
On 2014-11-09 9:23, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
See the debian-devel archives from mid-Fenruary 2014. According to Neil
McGovern, the code name shall be zurg.
https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2014/02/msg00905.html
On 10.11.2014 10:55, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
i am disappoint. =( will second the motion on debian-vote to go for zurg.
There is a ongoing GR proposal waiting for seconds, see
https://lists.debian.org/debian-curiosa/2014/11/msg3.html which I
fully support!
--
with kind regards,
Arno
If there was a choice in the installer for Init system and boot loader there
would be nobody complaining.
People only complain when there isn't a choice and they are forced to use
something new.
I.e.
forced to use ext4 instead of ext3
forced to use grub instead of lilo
forced to use systemX
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ghislain Antony Vaillant ghisv...@gmail.com
* Package name: nufft
Version : 1.3.3
Upstream Author : Leslie Greengard greeng...@cims.nyu.edu
* URL : http://www.cims.nyu.edu/cmcl/nufft/nufft.html
* License : BSD
[adding bugreport as recipient]
Quoting Ben Finney (2014-11-10 00:33:52)
Simon McVittie s...@debian.org writes:
Does [xkcdpass] have significant advantages over pwqgen, in the
passwdqc package?
Significant advantages:
* ‘xkcdpass’ provides an implementation of a much-discussed scheme
Hi,
Arno Töll:
On 10.11.2014 10:55, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
i am disappoint. =( will second the motion on debian-vote to go for zurg.
There is a ongoing GR proposal waiting for seconds, see
https://lists.debian.org/debian-curiosa/2014/11/msg3.html which I
fully support!
Don't we
Hi,
On Montag, 10. November 2014, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
Don't we all love people playing games with our mailing lists.
no.
To: debian-vote debian-curi...@lists.debian.org
So it's not been formally posted to -vote AFAICT. On the other hand, we
desperately need some levity there, so …
On 09/11/14 08:38, Ralf Treinen wrote:
On Fri, Nov 07, 2014 at 06:11:45PM +, Simon McVittie wrote:
On 07/11/14 16:15, Ralf Treinen wrote:
There is only one package in the each category, and this is a false
positive due to multiarch: lib32nss-mdns, which exists only on amd64
(this is why
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Thomas Goirand z...@debian.org
* Package name: python-rudolf
Version : 0.3
Upstream Author : John J. Lee j...@pobox.com
* URL : https://github.com/bitprophet/rudolf
* License : ZPL-2.1
Programming Lang: Python
This one time, at band camp, Nathael Pajani said:
You certainly heard about debianfork (http://debianfork.org/) and
from a user point of view this is a tragedy.
Debian welcomes forks - we have had dozens in the past, and I hope we'll
have many more in the future. Each one adds something to the
On 10/11/14 02:59, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote:
I vaguely remember PolicyKit being involved in the daemon situation,
when mpd tries to talk to a pulseaudio server which magically gets
spawned
PolicyKit is typically (only?) used when a less-privileged process,
typically a user interface,
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Thomas Goirand z...@debian.org
* Package name: python-invoke
Version : 0.9.0
Upstream Author : Jeff Forcier j...@bitprophet.org
* URL : https://pypi.python.org/pypi/invoke/0.9.0
* License : BSD-2-clause
Programming
On 10/11/14 10:15, Michael Ole Olsen wrote:
If there was a choice in the installer for Init system
and boot loader there would be nobody complaining.
If I had to choose an init system and a boot loader during the normal
installation flow, I'd complain. Options have a cost, forcing a user to
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Thomas Goirand z...@debian.org
* Package name: python-invocations
Version : 0.6.2
Upstream Author : Jeff Forcier j...@bitprophet.org
* URL : https://pypi.python.org/pypi/invocations
* License : BSD-2-clause
Programming
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Thomas Goirand z...@debian.org
* Package name: python-fabric
Version : 1.10.0
Upstream Author : Jeff Forcier j...@bitprophet.org
* URL : https://pypi.python.org/pypi/Fabric
* License : BSD-2-clause
Programming Lang:
On 2014-11-10 11:40, Thomas Goirand wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Thomas Goirand z...@debian.org
* Package name: python-fabric
Version : 1.10.0
Upstream Author : Jeff Forcier j...@bitprophet.org
* URL : https://pypi.python.org/pypi/Fabric
* License
Quoting Simon McVittie (2014-11-10 12:31:10)
On 10/11/14 10:15, Michael Ole Olsen wrote:
If there was a choice in the installer for Init system and boot
loader there would be nobody complaining.
If I had to choose an init system and a boot loader during the normal
installation flow, I'd
Hi,
Jonas Smedegaard:
If we had the *option* of init system choice at install time (even if
completely hidden from default UI only activated by a commandline
option), I believe that would radically limit complaints.
I doubt that, given the history of this discussion. :-/
In any case,
Quoting Matthias Urlichs (2014-11-10 12:51:50)
Jonas Smedegaard:
If we had the *option* of init system choice at install time (even if
completely hidden from default UI only activated by a commandline
option), I believe that would radically limit complaints.
I doubt that, given the
On 11/10/2014 at 04:37 AM, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
Dear Nathael,
This is off-topic for -devel. Please consider debian-user or the
offtopic list.
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 09:57:50AM +0100, Nathael Pajani wrote:
Other distributions may have chosen the easy single init way, but
Debian is
On 11/09/2014 07:52 PM, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
Our release managers chose the following codenames for future
releases:
* Debian 9 Stretch
* Debian 10 Buster
Thanks *A LOT* for choosing one more name in advance, so that we don't
have to file unblocks during the freeze to just add
Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
But GNU/Linux is NOT uniformity. It is choice. It is alternatives. It
is options.
http://islinuxaboutchoice.com/
Oh, the famous web site, crafted by the gnome dev Bassi,
https://wiki.gnome.org/EmmanueleBassi, with which, BTW that IBM ad (
Hi,
The Wanderer:
Unfortunately, as far as I can tell, no one seems to be remotely
interested in trying to address or discuss that disagreement directly...
The problem is that, apparently, any 'support' short of remove systemd
from Debian NOW will not shut up the most vocal detractors.
The
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Daniel Stender deb...@danielstender.com
* Package name: pyuca
Version : 1.0
Upstream Author : James Tauber jtau...@jtauber.com
* URL : https://github.com/jtauber/pyuca
* License : Expat, Unicode-TOU
Programming Lang:
On 11/10/2014 04:15 AM, Michael Ole Olsen wrote:
If there was a choice in the installer for Init system and boot loader there
would be nobody complaining.
But here my point is to put it in perspective. Somebody isn't going to
get their way on this, whether it be the system they prefer as
Hey Joey,
On Sun, Nov 09, 2014 at 06:12:13PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
Please take that message with a pound of salt. I was upset when I wrote
it, it's probably not accurate, and I've left[1] for reasons that are
much more broadly structural, and are certianly not the fault of the
technical
Quoting Matthias Urlichs (2014-11-10 14:34:33)
The Wanderer:
Unfortunately, as far as I can tell, no one seems to be remotely
interested in trying to address or discuss that disagreement
directly...
The problem is that, apparently, any 'support' short of remove
systemd from Debian NOW
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 12:51:50PM +0100, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
Hi,
Jonas Smedegaard:
If we had the *option* of init system choice at install time (even if
completely hidden from default UI only activated by a commandline
option), I believe that would radically limit complaints.
Hi all,
after unsubscribing from debian-vote, I had a bit of a thought about
debian-devel, which is hard to follow now, and suddenly I saw something very
clear. This year's freeze seems of an excellent quality and promises to be
brief. Is that thanks to debian-devel ? Not much. Excellent work
On Sun, 9 Nov 2014 17:20:42 +0100
Adrian Knoth a...@drcomp.erfurt.thur.de wrote:
2012/10/11 - Hideki started working on a 3.0.1 package using dh style
instead of cdbs, but it was declined because of Jonas' wish to stick
with cdbs
I'm sorry, if I was familiar with cdbs, its result would be
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Faidon Liambotis parav...@debian.org
* Package name: geoipupdate
Version : 2.1.0
Upstream Author : MaxMind, Inc.
* URL : https://github.com/maxmind/geoipupdate
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C
Description :
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 11:25:35PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
Hi all,
after unsubscribing from debian-vote, I had a bit of a thought about
debian-devel, which is hard to follow now, and suddenly I saw something very
clear. This year's freeze seems of an excellent quality and promises to
Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk (2014-11-10):
If we had the *option* of init system choice at install time (even if
completely hidden from default UI only activated by a commandline
option), I believe that would radically limit complaints.
We already have, Simon mentioned one way to do it.
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 11:31:10AM +, Simon McVittie wrote:
If you have sufficiently specialized requirements that our recommended
default is unsuitable, that's a good time to look into the expert
installer mode, pre-seeding, or installing with the default
init/bootloader/etc. and
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Filippo Giunchedi fili...@debian.org
* Package name: carbon-c-relay
Version : 0.36
Upstream Author : Fabian Groffen
* URL : https://github.com/grobian/carbon-c-relay
* License : Apache 2
Programming Lang: C
Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
So you still could (and perhaps should[0]) reconsider not to leave
Debian.
Guess you've read the lists and saw how many people were emotionally
hit and upset about this.
Joey, I beg you too. Please reconsider.
Still, if it's not fun anymore by all means run
Hi!
On Sun, 2014-11-09 at 17:18:10 +0100, Johannes Schauer wrote:
Quoting Ralf Treinen (2014-11-09 15:58:15)
Interesting, I did not know this. Is this documented somewhere? I just
looked
through apt-get(1) man page and couldn't find it there.
it should definitely be documented in
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 02:34:33PM +0100, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
The Wanderer:
Unfortunately, as far as I can tell, no one seems to be remotely
interested in trying to address or discuss that disagreement directly...
The problem is that, apparently, any 'support' short of remove systemd
Hi,
Jonas Smedegaard:
Quoting Matthias Urlichs (2014-11-10 14:34:33)
The problem is that, apparently, any 'support' short of remove
systemd from Debian NOW will not shut up the most vocal detractors.
And shut up the most vocal detractors is only way to address or
discuss this?
s/shut
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Dmitry Bogatov kact...@gnu.org
* Package name: hsenv
Version : 0.5
Upstream Author : Bartosz Ćwikłowski
Taylor Hedberg t...@tmh.cc
* URL : https://github.com/tmhedberg/hsenv
* License : BSD
On 11/10/2014 at 08:34 AM, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
Hi,
The Wanderer:
Unfortunately, as far as I can tell, no one seems to be remotely
interested in trying to address or discuss that disagreement
directly...
The problem is that, apparently, any 'support' short of remove
systemd from
On 14Nov10:2325+0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
With most of the work done on topic mailing lists, trolls lose the lever
effect
they have when feasting on debian-devel or debian-vote. Let's make our
project
stronger by reducing thr attack surface for troublemakers.
But weaker by becoming
Quoting Cyril Brulebois (2014-11-10 15:57:06)
Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk (2014-11-10):
If we had the *option* of init system choice at install time (even if
completely hidden from default UI only activated by a commandline
option), I believe that would radically limit complaints.
We
On Thu, Nov 06, 2014 at 04:12:20PM +0100, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
On Thu, Nov 06, 2014 at 04:10:13PM +0100, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 11:53:43PM +, Neil McGovern wrote:
- - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
On Sun, Nov 09, 2014 at 10:23:01AM +0100, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
Hi,
Osamu Aoki:
I thought usually this type of announcement comes with next release
name.
I was going to update web site (later) and debian-reference package (in
November) in proper timing. Did I miss some
I would assume the way to go forward would be to report a bug on this?
I have a faint memory of there already being one, but I couldn't find it
anywhere. Also, my last bug report got closed - and I'm not even sure
what to report it against (base?).
Perhaps someone else would be more competent at
Neil McGovern writes (Re: REISSUED CfV: General Resolution: Init system
coupling):
Indeed, unfortunately so. Given the rather rushed nature though, it
would be nice to try and work out a way of avoiding having to do this
manual action in future. I'm currently working from
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 06:12:46PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
I have a half-written series to make it cope with lettered, rather
than numbered, options. Would it be worth my while finishing that off
(in my CFT) ?
The voting process is already complex enough. If it is going to be like this:
GR
* John Goerzen jgoer...@complete.org, 2014-11-09, 19:09:
14 years ago, I proposed what was, until now anyhow, one of the most
controversial GRs in Debian history.
For people who are curious but too lazy^H^H^H^Hbusy to comb through
debian-vote archives: John is most likely referring to this:
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 06:12:46PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
Neil McGovern writes (Re: REISSUED CfV: General Resolution: Init system
coupling):
Indeed, unfortunately so. Given the rather rushed nature though, it
would be nice to try and work out a way of avoiding having to do this
manual
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 06:12:46PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
Neil McGovern writes (Re: REISSUED CfV: General Resolution: Init system
coupling):
Indeed, unfortunately so. Given the rather rushed nature though, it
would be nice to try and work out a way of avoiding having to do this
manual
Hi,
Neil McGovern:
Also, please see the footnote in my mail above.
Indeed.
Some lies become truths if repeated often enough.
This one, apparently, was not.
Too bad, really.
But no matter. Zurg's time will come. :-P
--
-- Matthias Urlichs
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
David == David L Craig dlc@gmail.com writes:
David On 14Nov10:2325+0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
With most of the work done on topic mailing lists, trolls lose the lever
effect
they have when feasting on debian-devel or debian-vote. Let's make our
project
stronger by
Hi Jonathan,
On Sun, Nov 09, 2014 at 11:52:31AM +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
Release notes
=
We seek patches and editors for the release notes. We identified
the following topics as being particularly important:
- init system changes
- How to choose (before
[re-adding -devel@]
On Mon, 2014-11-10 at 21:20 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Mon, 2014-11-10 at 13:08 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
Hi Jonathan,
On Sun, Nov 09, 2014 at 11:52:31AM +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
[...]
- i486 support dropped
I'm rather certain that i486
On 14Nov10:2154+0100, Gergely Nagy wrote:
You do realize topic lists are public too, right?
Yes, but most Debian users don't even know about
them nor do they need to since the traditional
lists have been doing their jobs for quite a
while. If you shut them down, I expect most of
the public
On Monday, November 10, 2014 04:55:20 PM David L. Craig wrote:
On 14Nov10:2154+0100, Gergely Nagy wrote:
You do realize topic lists are public too, right?
Yes, but most Debian users don't even know about
them nor do they need to since the traditional
lists have been doing their jobs for
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 09:33:07PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
[re-adding -devel@]
On Mon, 2014-11-10 at 21:20 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Mon, 2014-11-10 at 13:08 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
Hi Jonathan,
On Sun, Nov 09, 2014 at 11:52:31AM +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
On 2014-11-10 22:01, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 09:33:07PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
[re-adding -devel@]
On Mon, 2014-11-10 at 21:20 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Mon, 2014-11-10 at 13:08 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
Hi Jonathan,
On Sun, Nov 09, 2014 at
* Steve Langasek (vor...@debian.org) [141110 23:06]:
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 09:33:07PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
[re-adding -devel@]
On Mon, 2014-11-10 at 21:20 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Mon, 2014-11-10 at 13:08 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
Hi Jonathan,
On Sun, Nov
On 11/10/2014 02:13 AM, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
On Sun, 09 Nov 2014, John Goerzen wrote:
Debian is a making-the-world-better project, a caring for people
project, a freedom-spreading project. Free Software is our tool.
[...]
My plea is that we each may get angry at what matters, and let go
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 09:57:50AM +0100, Nathael Pajani wrote:
You certainly heard about debianfork (http://debianfork.org/) and from a
user point of
view this is a tragedy.
Not really. Forking is good, and should be encouraged. In fact, Debian
is one of the most forked projects, ever,
Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk writes:
[adding bugreport as recipient]
Thanks. I need to be more careful in accessing Debian discussion
forums; I usually do so via via NNTP.
curious questions for your xkcdpass tool:
* Does it handle alternate dictionaries (e.g. danish)?
* Does it
On 10-Nov-2014, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Crypt::XkcdPassword by default uses the most commonly used words in
film scripts and television shows, and documents examples of
adaptations at https://metacpan.org/pod/Crypt::XkcdPassword::Examples.
Thank you, it's good to know these exist.
I don't
On 2014-11-10 18:20, David L. Craig wrote:
On 14Nov10:2325+0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
With most of the work done on topic mailing lists, trolls lose the
lever effect
they have when feasting on debian-devel or debian-vote. Let's make
our project
stronger by reducing thr attack surface for
On 14Nov11:0036+0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
On 2014-11-10 18:20, David L. Craig wrote:
But weaker by becoming more non-public? At what point
is the Social Contract undermined? What about transforming
those lists into readable by all but open only to
certain responsible posters instead?
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 10:21:33AM +, Ghislain Antony Vaillant wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ghislain Antony Vaillant ghisv...@gmail.com
* Package name: nufft
Version : 1.3.3
Upstream Author : Leslie Greengard greeng...@cims.nyu.edu
* URL :
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jordan Metzmeier jmetzmeie...@gmail.com
* Package name: puppet-module-puppetlabs-vcsrepo
Version : 1.2.0
Upstream Author : Bruce Williams brwco...@gmail.com
* URL : https://forge.puppetlabs.com/puppetlabs/vcsrepo
* License
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Kartik Mistry kar...@debian.org
* Package name: apertium-apy
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Universidad de Alicante / Prompsit Language Engineering S.L.
* URL : http://apertium.org/
* License : GPL-2+
Programming Lang:
Hi,
Philipp Kern:
Discussions should move to the appropriate venues (like bugs and focussed
lists for subprojects, maintainance lists) instead of providing a soapbox of
anger.
Hmm. We already have a bunch of focused lists for subprojects.
The problem with splitting it all up and disbanding
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 00:21:43 -0800
Source: exaile
Binary: exaile exaile-plugin-contextinfo exaile-plugin-ipod
exaile-plugin-moodbar
Architecture: source all
Version: 3.4.2-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Vincent
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 00:31:31 -0800
Source: cherrytree
Binary: cherrytree
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.35.4-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Python Applications Packaging Team
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2014 13:09:43 +0100
Source: gst-libav1.0
Binary: gstreamer1.0-libav gstreamer1.0-libav-dbg
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1.4.4-1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Maintainers of GStreamer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2014 12:44:20 +0100
Source: gst-plugins-base1.0
Binary: gstreamer1.0-plugins-base-apps gstreamer1.0-plugins-base-doc
libgstreamer-plugins-base1.0-0 libgstreamer-plugins-base1.0-dev
gstreamer1.0-alsa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2014 12:56:37 +0100
Source: gst-plugins-bad1.0
Binary: gstreamer1.0-plugins-bad-doc gstreamer1.0-plugins-bad
gstreamer1.0-plugins-bad-dbg libgstreamer-plugins-bad1.0-0
libgstreamer-plugins-bad1.0-dev
Architecture:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2014 12:40:45 +0100
Source: gstreamer1.0
Binary: libgstreamer1.0-0 libgstreamer1.0-0-dbg libgstreamer1.0-dev
gstreamer1.0-doc gstreamer1.0-tools gir1.2-gstreamer-1.0
Architecture: source all amd64
Version: 1.4.4-1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2014 12:47:03 +0100
Source: gst-plugins-good1.0
Binary: gstreamer1.0-plugins-good-doc gstreamer1.0-pulseaudio
gstreamer1.0-plugins-good gstreamer1.0-plugins-good-dbg
Architecture: source all amd64
Version: 1.4.4-1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2014 13:02:56 +0100
Source: gst-plugins-ugly1.0
Binary: gstreamer1.0-plugins-ugly-doc gstreamer1.0-plugins-ugly
gstreamer1.0-plugins-ugly-dbg
Architecture: source all amd64
Version: 1.4.4-1
Distribution: experimental
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 00:41:28 -0800
Source: rfc5766-turn-server
Binary: rfc5766-turn-server
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 3.2.5.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian VoIP Team
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 13:41:33 +0800
Source: scim
Binary: scim libscim8c2a libscim-dev scim-gtk-immodule scim-qt-immodule
scim-clutter-immodule scim-im-agent scim-modules-socket scim-dev scim-dev-doc
Architecture: source i386 all
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 09 Nov 2014 16:29:31 +0100
Source: gdb
Binary: gdb gdb-python2 gdb-minimal gdb64 gdb-multiarch gdbserver gdb-source
gdb-dbg
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 7.8.1-1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: medium
Maintainer:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 13:13:11 +0100
Source: cssutils
Binary: python-cssutils python3-cssutils
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.0-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Python Modules Team
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 12:36:20 +0100
Source: distro-info-data
Binary: distro-info-data
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.24
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Benjamin Drung bdr...@debian.org
Changed-By: Benjamin Drung
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 13:59:29 +0100
Source: intel-vaapi-driver
Binary: i965-va-driver i965-va-driver-dbg
Architecture: source
Version: 1.4.1-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Multimedia Maintainers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 11:44:56 +0200
Source: webkit2gtk
Binary: libjavascriptcoregtk-4.0-18 libjavascriptcoregtk-4.0-dev
libjavascriptcoregtk-4.0-18-dbg libjavascriptcoregtk-4.0-bin
gir1.2-javascriptcoregtk-4.0 libwebkit2gtk-4.0-37
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 09 Nov 2014 10:28:47 -0400
Source: manpages-fr-extra
Binary: manpages-fr-extra
Architecture: source all
Version: 20141109
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Nicolas FRANCOIS (Nekral)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 21:22:51 +0800
Source: python-requests-kerberos
Binary: python-requests-kerberos python3-requests-kerberos
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.5-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: PKG OpenStack
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 14:49:22 +
Source: designate
Binary: python-designate designate-common designate designate-api
designate-central designate-agent designate-sink designate-doc
Architecture: source all
Version: 2014.2-2
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 03:49:41 +0100
Source: acpi-support
Binary: acpi-support acpi-support-base acpi-fakekey
Architecture: source all amd64
Version: 0.142-6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Acpi Team
1 - 100 of 136 matches
Mail list logo
