Ivan Shmakov writes:
> While not a full-scale ad-hominem attack, I’d say that the two
> differences I know of between the vrms operation and the
> official FSF position amount to a misrepresentation at best.
> Are we going to drop that package, too?
I don't particularly c
> While not a full-scale ad-hominem attack, I’d say that the two
> differences I know of between the vrms operation and the
> official FSF position amount to a misrepresentation at best.
> Are we going to drop that package, too?
If you apt-cache show vrms, you will see the
> Axel Wagner writes:
[…]
> I don't think Lennart personally would care, no, but I think *we*
> should care to paint the Opensource community as better than this.
As a member of the said community, I think that, however the
presence of either of the packages in Debian pain
Package: wnpp
Owner: Johan Van de Wauw
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: python-cligj
Version : 0.1.0
Upstream Author : Sean Gillies
* URL : https://github.com/mapbox/cligj
* License : BSD-3-Clause
Programming Lang
Hi,
Ben Hutchings writes:
> Practically, it's more important to maintain good relations with Lennart
> Poettering than with Bill Gates.
fwiw I don't think Lennart Poettering personally would care very
much. He has a thick skin and has more than once poked fun at people for
poking fun at him.
I
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ross Gammon
* Package name: netcdf-fortran
Version : 4.4.1
Upstream Author : University Corporation for Atmospheric Research/Unidata
* URL : http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/software/netcdf/
* License : NetCDF
Programming La
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ross Gammon
* Package name: netcdf-cxx
Version : 4.2.1
Upstream Author : University Corporation for Atmospheric Research/Unidata
* URL : http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/software/netcdf/
* License : NetCDF
Programming Lang:
On Fri, 2015-01-16 at 16:48 +0300, Dmitry Yu Okunev wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Is it really necessary to discuss this on debian-devel@? IMHO, it's
> local issue, yet… And also please sorry for my English skills.
>
> On 01/16/2015 03:48 PM, Ben Armstrong wrote:
> > On 16/01/15 08:15 AM, Stephan Seitz wro
Mathieu,
I'm writing to express my increasing frustration at activities you've
instigated surrounding the tbb package that I maintain.
Over the Christmas period a bug report was raised:
#773359 "package tbb_4.2~20140122-4 FTBFS on mips and mipsel"
and answered by yourself:
"While I do understand
On 01/16/2015 06:34 PM, Markus Koschany wrote:
> [...]
> On 16.01.2015 14:48, Dmitry Yu Okunev wrote:
>>> I'd also object on the technical grounds that we already have xbill and
>>> the changes in xlennart don't truly justify a fork.
>>
>> This could be easily solved by merging xbill with xlennart
On 16/01/15 11:34 AM, Markus Koschany wrote:
> My personal opinion is that both XBill and xlennart are mildly
> entertaining and it is rather immature to depict living people as a
> "virus". The message is either silly or offensive.
While we're talking about personal opinions, and clarifying for D
Hi,
On 16.01.2015 14:48, Dmitry Yu Okunev wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Is it really necessary to discuss this on debian-devel@? IMHO, it's
> local issue, yet… And also please sorry for my English skills.
You are welcome to discuss this game on our dedicated Debian Games
mailing list, debian-devel-ga...@l
Dmitry,
On 16/01/15 09:48 AM, Dmitry Yu Okunev wrote:
> Is it really necessary to discuss this on debian-devel@? IMHO, it's
> local issue, yet… And also please sorry for my English skills.
It's an ITP, so it goes to debian-devel by default to discuss amongst
ourselves whether a package is suitabl
Hello.
On 01/16/2015 05:46 PM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Dmitry Yu Okunev, le Fri 16 Jan 2015 16:48:09 +0300, a écrit :
>>> I'd also object on the technical grounds that we already have xbill and
>>> the changes in xlennart don't truly justify a fork.
>>
>> This could be easily solved by merging xb
Dmitry Yu Okunev, le Fri 16 Jan 2015 16:48:09 +0300, a écrit :
> > I'd also object on the technical grounds that we already have xbill and
> > the changes in xlennart don't truly justify a fork.
>
> This could be easily solved by merging xbill with xlennart to "xperson"
> with collection of this p
Hello.
Is it really necessary to discuss this on debian-devel@? IMHO, it's
local issue, yet… And also please sorry for my English skills.
On 01/16/2015 03:48 PM, Ben Armstrong wrote:
> On 16/01/15 08:15 AM, Stephan Seitz wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 07:32:41AM +1100, Riley Baird wrote:
>>> (
On 16/01/15 08:15 AM, Stephan Seitz wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 07:32:41AM +1100, Riley Baird wrote:
>> (Also, in any case, don't you think that this game is going a little too
>> far? It's fine to be opposed to systemd, but don't do to Lennart
>
> Well, do you see a difference to the original
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ole Streicher
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@liska.ath.cx, debian-as...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: psfex
Version : 3.17.1
Upstream Author : Emmanuel Bertin
* URL : http://www.astromatic.net/software/psfex
* License : G
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 07:32:41AM +1100, Riley Baird wrote:
(Also, in any case, don't you think that this game is going a little too
far? It's fine to be opposed to systemd, but don't do to Lennart
Well, do you see a difference to the original game with Bill Gates?
Stephan
--
| Steph
On 01/16/2015 08:36 AM, Riley Baird wrote:
> On 16/01/15 12:40, Paul Wise wrote:
>> ITP submitters aren't necessarily subscribed to debian-devel, please
>> CC the submitter and their bug.
>
> Sorry, will do. I just hit the "Reply List" button in Thunderbird
> without checking the addresses.
I mad
Ben Finney writes:
> Where is a good authoritative source of such words, by frequency, for
> various natural languages, suitable for inclusion in Debian as a data
> package?
The package ‘scowl’ https://packages.debian.org/sid/scowl> looks
like a good candidate already in Debian. I will investiga
21 matches
Mail list logo
