On Sun, Jan 3, 2016 at 6:17 PM, Iustin Pop wrote:
> On 2016-01-03 12:59:01, Tom H wrote:
>>
>> I don't like usr-merge because it goes against my historical
>> expectation that "/{,s}bin" be separate from their /usr namesakes and
>> contain binaries required for boot.
>
> OK, so
On Sun, 2016-01-03 at 21:34 +0100, Eric Valette wrote:
> > > > This is not true: you just need to use an initramfs.
> > > Ok, so it should warn that this setup will soon require to use an
> > > initramfs.
> > It is the Debian default, there is no need to do this.
>
> Being debian installer
On 01/03/2016 04:23 AM, Martinx - ジェームズ wrote:
> This "UseMerge" just brings more insanity into Debian. What is wrong
> with you guys?! For God's sake...
Even if you disagree with something, please don't call it insanity.
> It violates the FHS 2.3 standards.
Sure, if you mean the sentence that
I'm confused why you think anything will break. There would obviously be
symlinks, so anything that's currently in /bin will continue to work if
invoked with an absolute /bin path.
I consider linking across file system a very bad practice because if
/usr gets errors all the symlinks may be
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 00:02:25 +0100
Source: caja
Binary: caja caja-common libcaja-extension1 libcaja-extension-dev gir1.2-caja
caja-dbg libcaja-extension1-dbg
Architecture: source all amd64
Version: 1.12.2-1
Distribution: unstable
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 00:07:57 +0100
Source: mate-themes
Binary: mate-themes
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.12.2+gtk3.18-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: MATE Packaging Team
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 03 Jan 2016 16:45:53 +0300
Source: minidlna
Binary: minidlna
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1.1.5+dfsg-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Alexander GQ Gerasiov
Changed-By: Alexander GQ
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 02 Jan 2016 00:00:47 +0100
Source: regina-normal
Binary: regina-normal regina-normal-dev regina-normal-mpi regina-normal-doc
Architecture: source
Version: 4.96-2.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Ben Burton
On 01/04/2016 12:39 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sun, 2016-01-03 at 21:35 +0100, Christian Seiler wrote:
> [...]
>>
>> Well, just for the heck of it I wrote a braindead-simple initrd
>> implementation in just 300 LOC:
>>
>> https://gist.github.com/chris-se/e0fbc073fcbd9ac2d7ae
> [...]
>
> Neat.
On 01/03/2016 12:03 PM, Daniel Reurich wrote:
> On 03/01/16 23:18, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>
>>> Then why is it that since the introduction of systemd is having /usr on
>>> a separate partition suddenly considered evil and systemd complains
>>> loudly about it. It always has worked and does work
On 03/01/2016 22:10, Russ Allbery wrote:
Eric Valette writes:
The problem of getting /usr mounted before things start using it is mostly
separate from the question of whether we want to merge it with /bin and
/lib. This thread is more about the latter than the former.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 03 Jan 2016 13:14:02 +0100
Source: node-moment
Binary: node-moment libjs-moment
Architecture: source
Version: 2.11.0+ds-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Javascript Maintainers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 03 Jan 2016 20:51:54 +0100
Source: pa-ounit
Binary: libpa-ounit-camlp4-dev
Architecture: source
Version: 113.00.00-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian OCaml Maintainers
On Sun, Jan 3, 2016, at 18:35, Christian Seiler wrote:
> Well, just for the heck of it I wrote a braindead-simple initrd
> implementation in just 300 LOC:
>
> https://gist.github.com/chris-se/e0fbc073fcbd9ac2d7ae
Oho! Cool!
> My question would be: would those people here who have separate
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 03 Jan 2016 20:59:44 +0100
Source: pipebang
Binary: libpipebang-camlp4-dev
Architecture: source
Version: 113.00.00-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian OCaml Maintainers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2015 14:51:37 +0100
Source: mate-notification-daemon
Binary: mate-notification-daemon mate-notification-daemon-common
mate-notification-daemon-dbg
Architecture: source all amd64
Version: 1.12.1-1
Distribution: unstable
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 03 Jan 2016 21:45:59 +0100
Source: python-slimmer
Binary: python-slimmer python3-slimmer
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.1.30-7
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Janos Guljas
Changed-By:
On Sun, Jan 3, 2016, at 19:59, Christian Seiler wrote:
> On 01/03/2016 10:53 PM, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 3, 2016, at 18:35, Christian Seiler wrote:
> >> My question would be: would those people here who have separate /usr
> >> and aren't using initrd be willing to put up
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 03 Jan 2016 23:39:20 +0100
Source: sng
Binary: sng
Architecture: source
Version: 1.0.6-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Reiner Herrmann
Changed-By: Reiner Herrmann
>This is not true: you just need to use an initramfs.
Ok, so it should warn that this setup will soon require to use an initramfs.
It is the Debian default, there is no need to do this.
Being debian installer default does not mean any debian users
1) really has any benefit of using it
Eric Valette writes:
> But could you elaborate a bit on "mounting /usr early, something we
> *already do*" if you do not implicitly refer to initramfs solution.
There are other people who know a lot more about the machinery here than I
do, but my understanding is that we
We may never know what Ian the man actually wrote, or what
sort of influence he was under when he wrote it.
The only way we begin to know is if Ian's family, the executor
of his estate, the police, and administrators of Twitter come
forward and tell the story of what they have observed.
One
On 01/02/2016 06:42 PM, Geert Stappers wrote:
> To me is this "TheUsrMerge" something like among
> * "it is hard too to explain to have /sbin/fsck and not /usr/sbin/fsck"
> * "there was a question about /bin/kill and /usr/bin/killall being
> inconsequent"
> * "we could not agree if
On Sun, Jan 3, 2016, at 16:43, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> I just have not found yet how to determine if the system was booted
> using an initramfs or not. Does anybody have any hint?
I don't think there is any source for that information that one can
really trust ATM, AFAIK.
We could add it in
Eric Valette writes:
> If it is just to close once for all the right location philosophical
> debate, I would say it will be over priced: changing executable PATH
> will just breaks million scripts people have written themselves on top
> of original debian install to
❦ 3 janvier 2016 22:30 +0100, Eric Valette :
>> The problem of getting /usr mounted before things start using it is mostly
>> separate from the question of whether we want to merge it with /bin and
>> /lib. This thread is more about the latter than the former.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 03 Jan 2016 23:43:44 +0100
Source: node-ws
Binary: node-ws
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1.0.0+ds1.e6ddaae4-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Javascript Maintainers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 03 Jan 2016 23:28:33 +0100
Source: tree-style-tab
Binary: xul-ext-treestyletab
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.16.2015122501-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Mozilla Extension Maintainers
On Sun, 2016-01-03 at 21:35 +0100, Christian Seiler wrote:
[...]
>
> Well, just for the heck of it I wrote a braindead-simple initrd
> implementation in just 300 LOC:
>
> https://gist.github.com/chris-se/e0fbc073fcbd9ac2d7ae
[...]
Neat. It should probably implement 'ro', 'rw' and 'rootdelay',
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 03 Jan 2016 19:26:12 -0400
Source: dh-elpa
Binary: dh-elpa
Architecture: source
Version: 0.0.18
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Emacs addons team
Changed-By:
ed behaviour sanitizer
libubsan0-powerpc-cross - UBSan -- undefined behaviour sanitizer
libubsan0-ppc64el-cross - UBSan -- undefined behaviour sanitizer
Changes:
gcc-6-cross (1) experimental; urgency=medium
.
* Build using 6-20160103-1.
Checksums-Sha1:
82c629916610fcb4a1e00d21d8bd5e925e588ff8 24229 g
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 01:11:11 +0100
Source: elki
Binary: elki elki-dev
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.7.0-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Erich Schubert
Changed-By: Erich Schubert
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 02:16:04 +0100
Source: sexplib310
Binary: libsexplib-camlp4-dev
Architecture: source
Version: 113.00.00-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian OCaml Maintainers
Hi,
On 03.01.2016 23:32, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> An initramfs is mandatory if using the standard kernel packages, as I
> think most people do.
Not on embedded systems. While we do have the advantage there that the
people putting the system together are generally clueful, it should
still remain
On Sun, 2016-01-03 at 19:43 +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Jan 03, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
>
> > First, it would be nice to have a preinst check if the system has any
> > running services that uses ProtectSystem and offer a choice to stop
> > (and restart) them in case
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 01/03/2016 07:15 PM, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Jan 03, Simon Richter wrote:
>
>>> "I have always done this in a different way" is not a valid use
>>> case, sorry.
>> "Compatibility" is a very valid use case. Debian is famous
On 2016-01-03 22:22:16, Tom H wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 3, 2016 at 6:17 PM, Iustin Pop wrote:
> > On 2016-01-03 12:59:01, Tom H wrote:
> >>
> >> I don't like usr-merge because it goes against my historical
> >> expectation that "/{,s}bin" be separate from their /usr namesakes and
>
On Sun, 2016-01-03 at 21:21 +0100, Simon Richter wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 03.01.2016 19:15, Marco d'Itri wrote:
[...]
> > Anyway, if you think that the merged /usr scheme is about systemd then
> > you are automatically disqualified from taking part in this discussion
> > because you are not
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 09:58:37 +1100
Source: django-tables
Binary: python-django-tables2 python3-django-tables2 python-django-tables2-doc
django-tables
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.0.7-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2015 23:38:41 -0500
Source: twinkle
Binary: twinkle
Architecture: source
Version: 1:1.9.0+dfsg-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Peter Colberg
Changed-By: Peter Colberg
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2015 10:55:04 -0800
Source: kaccounts-integration
Binary: libkaccounts1 libkaccounts-dev qml-module-org-kde-kaccounts
kaccounts-integration kaccounts-integration-dbg
Architecture: source
Version: 15.08.3-1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 03 Jan 2016 17:47:55 -0600
Source: digikam
Binary: digikam-private-libs digikam showfoto digikam-data digikam-doc
kipi-plugins kipi-plugins-common
Architecture: source
Version: 4:4.14.0-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency:
Note that mounting /usr early, something we *already do*, is separate from
actually merging /usr with /bin and /lib. Once you mount /usr early, it's
rather less important whether you actually merge the file systems. While
it does let you do some interesting things, I see it as more of a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 01 Jan 2016 15:49:30 +0100
Source: engrampa
Binary: engrampa engrampa-common engrampa-dbg
Architecture: source all amd64
Version: 1.12.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: MATE Packaging Team
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2015 10:41:07 +0100
Source: entr
Binary: entr
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 3.4-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Otto Kekäläinen
Changed-By: Yuri D'Elia
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 03 Jan 2016 20:43:36 +0100
Source: t-prot
Binary: t-prot
Architecture: source all
Version: 3.4-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Rhonda D'Vine
Changed-By: Rhonda D'Vine
On Sun, 2016-01-03 at 23:42 +0100, Simon Richter wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 03.01.2016 23:32, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>
> > An initramfs is mandatory if using the standard kernel packages, as I
> > think most people do.
>
> Not on embedded systems.
Sure.
> While we do have the advantage there that the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 03:01:51 +0300
Source: homesick
Binary: homesick
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.1.3-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Ruby Extras Maintainers
Florian Lohoff writes:
> On Sun, Jan 03, 2016 at 10:14:14AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> No. Debian has basically given up on this; there are way too many
>> packages and way too much stuff that would have to be moved to /bin and
>> /lib in order to preserve the traditional
On 01/03/2016 10:53 PM, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 3, 2016, at 18:35, Christian Seiler wrote:
>> My question would be: would those people here who have separate /usr
>> and aren't using initrd be willing to put up with something like that?
>
> I don't know if they will, but
On 01/03/2016 11:06 PM, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 3, 2016, at 19:59, Christian Seiler wrote:
>> On 01/03/2016 10:53 PM, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
>>> On Sun, Jan 3, 2016, at 18:35, Christian Seiler wrote:
My question would be: would those people here who have
On Sun, 2016-01-03 at 13:10 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Eric Valette writes:
>
> > But could you elaborate a bit on "mounting /usr early, something we
> > *already do*" if you do not implicitly refer to initramfs solution.
>
> There are other people who know a lot more
On Sun, 2016-01-03 at 18:10 +0100, Iustin Pop wrote:
> On 2016-01-03 17:03:02, Simon McVittie wrote:
> > […] For
> > instance, /bin -> /usr/bin is needed because otherwise #!/bin/sh would
> > stop working, […]
>
> This brings to mind—I wonder if the performance impact of having /bin/sh
> be read
On Mon, 2016-01-04 at 00:55 +0100, Christian Seiler wrote:
[...]
> Btw. initramfs-tools (via switch_root from util-linux) recursively
> deletes the files in the initramfs in a forked-off process right
> before exec()ing init. Is that really necessary? Shouldn't the
> kernel loose the data of the
On Sun, Jan 03, 2016 at 10:14:14AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Daniel Reurich writes:
>
> > Ah, so it's actually packages that don't separate device configuration
> > logic from the application or daemons properly that has caused the
> > brokenness. Can we identify and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 03 Jan 2016 22:20:59 +0100
Source: libregf
Binary: libregf-dev libregf1 libregf-dbg libregf-utils python-libregf
Architecture: source
Version: 20151223-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Forensics
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 02 Jan 2016 12:05:51 +0100
Source: mate-indicator-applet
Binary: mate-indicator-applet mate-indicator-applet-common
mate-indicator-applet-dbg
Architecture: source all amd64
Version: 1.12.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 03 Jan 2016 20:39:30 +0100
Source: hercules
Binary: hercules
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 3.12-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Philipp Kern
Changed-By: Philipp Kern
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 03 Jan 2016 22:27:15 +0100
Source: libolecf
Binary: libolecf-dev libolecf1 libolecf-dbg libolecf-utils python-libolecf
Architecture: source
Version: 20151223-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 17:32:15 +1100
Source: etcd
Binary: etcd golang-etcd-server-dev
Architecture: source amd64 all
Version: 2.2.3+dfsg-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: pkg-go
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 05:12:46 +0100
Source: usrmerge
Binary: usrmerge
Architecture: source all
Version: 4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Marco d'Itri
Changed-By: Marco d'Itri
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 15:56:55 +1100
Source: litecoin
Binary: litecoind litecoin-qt
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.10.4.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Bitcoin Packaging Team
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 03 Jan 2016 21:20:57 -0800
Source: ktp-accounts-kcm
Binary: kde-config-telepathy-accounts kde-config-telepathy-accounts-dbg
Architecture: source
Version: 15.08.3-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 13:57:17 +1100
Source: libdvd-pkg
Binary: libdvd-pkg
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.4.0-1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Multimedia Maintainers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 03 Jan 2016 18:30:58 -0800
Source: jedit
Binary: jedit
Architecture: source all
Version: 5.3.0+dfsg-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Java Maintainers
On Sun, Jan 3, 2016 at 7:35 AM, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> Discussing infrastructure changes like what you're proposing (which I
> have no advice about) should usually be done through our mailing
> lists,
Which one would be the appropriate list?
I thought general would fit,
Philippe Cerfon:
> On Sun, Jan 3, 2016 at 7:35 AM, Christian PERRIER wrote:
>> Discussing infrastructure changes like what you're proposing (which I
>> have no advice about) should usually be done through our mailing
>> lists,
> Which one would be the appropriate list?
>
> I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 00:45:27 +
Source: linux
Binary: linux-source-4.3 linux-support-4.3.0-1 linux-doc-4.3 linux-manual-4.3
linux-libc-dev linux-headers-4.3.0-1-all linux-headers-4.3.0-1-all-alpha
Daniel Reurich writes:
...
> Because systemd doesn't work without /usr on the root partition isn't a
> good reason either.
You are right ... it is a poor reason, because it is pure fantasy.
> That just means systemd is broken by design and needs to be fixed.
If what
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 03 Jan 2016 13:30:31 +0530
Source: ruby-activerecord-session-store
Binary: ruby-activerecord-session-store
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.1.1-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Ruby Extras
What is the "upgrade path" for an older system that has /usr split
off? Will it just stop being bootable after upgrading?
It just needs to use an initramfs.
A standalone /usr without an initramfs IS ALREADY NOT SUPPORTED by
systemd.
This is not relevant for merged /usr.
What is the "upgrade
On Sun, Jan 03, 2016 at 11:40:34AM +0100, Eric Valette wrote:
> The debian installer should first loudly warn that having a separated / and
> /usr may break things in the future
ITYM "already breaks things"
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 03 Jan 2016 11:17:07 +0100
Source: dose3
Binary: libdose3-ocaml-dev libdose3-ocaml dose-distcheck dose-builddebcheck
dose-extra apt-cudf
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 4.0.2-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 12:15:46 +0100
Source: mate-desktop
Binary: mate-desktop mate-desktop-common libmate-desktop-2-17
libmate-desktop-dev libmate-desktop-doc mate-desktop-dbg
libmate-desktop-2-17-dbg gir1.2-mate-desktop
On 03/01/16 23:18, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>> Then why is it that since the introduction of systemd is having /usr on
>> a separate partition suddenly considered evil and systemd complains
>> loudly about it. It always has worked and does work fine for me with
>> sysvinit
>
> systemd complains if
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2015 15:41:23 +0100
Source: libmatekbd
Binary: libmatekbd4 libmatekbd-common libmatekbd-dev libmatekbd4-dbg
gir1.2-matekbd
Architecture: source amd64 all
Version: 1.12.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2015 14:27:21 +0100
Source: mate-menus
Binary: mate-menus libmate-menu2 libmate-menu-dev gir1.2-mate-menu
python-mate-menu libmate-menu2-dbg python-mate-menu-dbg
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1.12.0-1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2015 16:50:48 +0100
Source: mate-icon-theme-faenza
Binary: mate-icon-theme-faenza
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.12.0+dfsg1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: MATE Packaging Team
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2015 15:58:59 +0100
Source: mate-icon-theme
Binary: mate-icon-theme
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.12.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: MATE Packaging Team
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 01 Jan 2016 15:10:54 +0100
Source: mate-control-center
Binary: mate-control-center mate-control-center-common libmate-window-settings1
libmate-window-settings-dev libmate-window-settings1-dbg libmate-slab0
libmate-slab-dev
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2015 16:43:28 +0100
Source: mate-backgrounds
Binary: mate-backgrounds
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.12.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: MATE Packaging Team
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 11:45:15 +0100
Source: marco
Binary: marco marco-common marco-dbg libmarco-private0 libmarco-private0-dbg
libmarco-dev
Architecture: source amd64 all
Version: 1.12.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2015 15:45:38 +0100
Source: libmatemixer
Binary: libmatemixer0 libmatemixer-common libmatemixer-doc libmatemixer-dev
libmatemixer0-dbg
Architecture: source all amd64
Version: 1.12.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2015 15:50:21 +0100
Source: libmateweather
Binary: libmateweather1 libmateweather-common libmateweather-dev
libmateweather1-dbg
Architecture: source all amd64
Version: 1.12.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 02 Jan 2016 13:19:18 +0100
Source: pluma
Binary: pluma pluma-common pluma-dev pluma-dbg pluma-doc
Architecture: source all amd64
Version: 1.12.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: MATE Packaging Team
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 02 Jan 2016 12:02:58 +0100
Source: mozo
Binary: mozo
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.12.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: MATE Packaging Team
Changed-By: Mike
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 02 Jan 2016 08:51:03 +0100
Source: python-caja
Binary: python-caja python-caja-common python-caja-dbg
Architecture: source all amd64
Version: 1.12.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: MATE Packaging Team
The debian installer should first loudly warn that having a separated / and
/usr may break things in the future but not forbid it. With that in place,
This is not true: you just need to use an initramfs.
Ok, so it should warn that this setup will soon require to use an
initramfs. I just
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 03 Jan 2016 16:25:28 +0900
Source: fonts-ipafont
Binary: fonts-ipafont fonts-ipafont-mincho fonts-ipafont-gothic
Architecture: source all
Version: 00303-16
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Fonts Task
On 3 January 2016 at 03:52, ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬) wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 03, 2016 at 01:23:14AM -0200, Martinx - ジェームズ wrote:
>> It violates the FHS 2.3 standards.
>>
>> http://refspecs.linuxfoundation.org/FHS_2.3/fhs-2.3.html
>
> Can you cite the requirement in FHS 2.3 which is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 03 Jan 2016 16:49:29 +0900
Source: fonts-arphic-bkai00mp
Binary: fonts-arphic-bkai00mp
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.10-15
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Fonts Task Force
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 03 Jan 2016 09:50:43 +0100
Source: creepy
Binary: creepy
Architecture: source
Version: 1.4.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian GIS Project
Changed-By: Petter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 03 Jan 2016 11:00:05 +0100
Source: libdvbpsi
Binary: dvbpsi-utils libdvbpsi-dev libdvbpsi10
Architecture: source
Version: 1.3.0-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Multimedia Maintainers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 03 Jan 2016 10:01:51 +
Source: poppler-sharp
Binary: libpoppler-cil libpoppler-cil-dev monodoc-poppler-manual
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.0.3-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian CLI
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 03 Jan 2016 10:43:05 +0100
Source: calibre
Binary: calibre calibre-bin
Architecture: source amd64 all
Version: 2.48.0+dfsg-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Miriam Ruiz
Changed-By:
On Sun, 2016-01-03 at 23:04 +1300, Daniel Reurich wrote:
> On 03/01/16 22:33, Philip Hands wrote:
> > Daniel Reurich writes:
> >
> > ...
> > > Because systemd doesn't work without /usr on the root partition isn't a
> > > good reason either.
> >
> > You are right ... it
On Sun, 03 Jan 2016 23:04:20 +1300, Daniel Reurich
wrote:
>On 03/01/16 22:33, Philip Hands wrote:
>> Daniel Reurich writes:
>>
>> ...
>>> Because systemd doesn't work without /usr on the root partition isn't a
>>> good reason either.
>>
>> You
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 03 Jan 2016 11:34:21 +0100
Source: python-spur
Binary: python-spur python3-spur
Architecture: source
Version: 0.3.15-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Python Modules Team
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 03 Jan 2016 11:27:52 +0100
Source: cppcheck
Binary: cppcheck cppcheck-gui
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1.71-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Joachim Reichel
Changed-By: Joachim
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 25 Dec 2015 22:16:39 +0100
Source: golang-github-pierrec-lz4
Binary: golang-github-pierrec-lz4-dev
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.0~git20151216.222ab1f-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Go
1 - 100 of 230 matches
Mail list logo