Hi,
On 28.12.2016 12:08, Samuel Thibault wrote:
>> Does iproute work on Non-Linux kernels?
> No, but net-tools doesn't work on non-Linux either :)
> inetutils tools do, however.
As long as there is still a way to have working "netstat" and "ifconfig"
commands, that is fine.
I often work in mi
On Wed, 28 Dec 2016 12:16:08 +0100, Johannes Schauer wrote:
> Quoting Adam Borowski (2016-12-27 17:56:59)
> > Current procedure of subscribing to a bug is an abomination: you need FOUR
> > mails for something that could be done by default.
> I feel you. This is why I long stopped subscribing to bu
Russ Allbery writes:
> I will file a bug against reportbug on your behalf.
I think this bug may have been introduced in the Python 2 to Python 3
conversion, if I am understanding it correctly. Bug report is here:
https://bugs.debian.org/849586
--
Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org)
TOMAS MARTIŠIUS writes:
> Thanks for solving this problem, bus I am not expert of all these
> encodings too, so I simply need working reportbug package and I really
> don't know in which point the problem is: in packege or in mailing
> system, which must accept bug report. But if both encodings c
FWIW, I don't think any of the dput-ng hackers particularly mind if it
changes, changing API could just happen for both together, at the same
time. Or maybe just consolidate :)
Paul
On Dec 28, 2016 4:34 PM, "Ian Jackson"
wrote:
> Ben Finney writes ("dput: Call for feedback: What should change?
Tomas,
On 28 December 2016 at 18:52, TOMAS MARTIŠIUS wrote:
> Thanks for solving this problem, bus I am not expert of all these encodings
> too,
> so I simply need working reportbug package and I really don't know in which
> point the problem is: in packege or in mailing system, which must accep
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Paolo Greppi
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: node-graceful-readlink
Version : 1.0.1
Upstream Author : zhiyelee
* URL : https://github.com/zhiyelee/graceful-readlink
* License : Expat
Programm
Ben Finney writes ("dput: Call for feedback: What should change? What should
stay the same?"):
> So I'm now familiar enough, but still fresh enough, that feedback from
> people with different experiences is particularly valuable.
Thanks a lot for seeking input. I'm not a very advanced user of dp
Hello,
Ian Jackson, on Wed 28 Dec 2016 20:03:11 +, wrote:
> Even with auto-subscription by default, maintainers would still have
> to mail NNN-submitter to ask for moreinfo,
Yes. The only way to really fix the issue starting the thread is to
change nnn@'s behavior, and possibly change bots to
Russ Allbery writes ("Re: HEADSUP: mails sent to n...@bugs.debian.org are NOT
sent to the submitter"):
> I agree in the abstract, but I do think it's also worth noting that
> basically every other bug reporting system I'm aware of defaults to
> sending all updates to the bug reporter. So while a
Hi there,
On 12/28/2016 06:18 AM, Afif Elghraoui wrote:
> but the dput
> command from dput-ng does some spurious checks that fail and I've never
> found worth the time to investigate.
I only use dput-ng, but because of the extra checks that has already
saved me from performing a wrong upload; the
On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 11:11:02PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Ben Finney writes:
> > What does ‘dput’ do that you think really should not be changed?
> > What does ‘dput’ do that you wish it would stop doing?
> > What do other tools do better than ‘dput’? Do you think that ‘dput’
> > should c
Thanks for solving this problem, bus I am not expert of all these
encodings too,
so I simply need working reportbug package and I really don't know in
which point the problem is: in packege or in mailing system, which must
accept bug report. But if both encodings can be used (as says some
diff
Niels Thykier wrote:
> Andreas Metzler:
[...]
>> No, the encoding was not correct. Compare how you (your MUA) just did it in
>> this message with the rejected one.
>> From: =?UTF-8?Q?TOMAS_MARTI=c5=a0IUS?=
>> From: =?utf-8?b?VG9tYXMgTWFydGnFoWl1cyA8dG9tYXNAcHVnYS52ZHUubHQ+?=
[...]
> Hi,
>
On 28 December 2016 at 17:14, Niels Thykier wrote:
> Niels Thykier:
>> Andreas Metzler:
>>> [...]
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> No, the encoding was not correct. Compare how you (your MUA) just did it in
>>> this message with the rejected one.
>>>
>>> From: =?UTF-8?Q?TOMAS_MARTI=c5=a0IUS?=
>>>
>>> F
On 28/12/16 17:02, Niels Thykier wrote:
Note the difference between "=?UTF-8?Q?" vs. "=?UTF-8?b?" (Q vs. b). I
presume the "b" is for "binary" or/and "Base64 encoded" vs. Q which
would be "quoted printed" or something like that.
I am not an expert on permitted ways of quoting UTF-8 in mail h
Niels Thykier:
> Andreas Metzler:
>> [...]
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> No, the encoding was not correct. Compare how you (your MUA) just did it in
>> this message with the rejected one.
>>
>> From: =?UTF-8?Q?TOMAS_MARTI=c5=a0IUS?=
>>
>> From: =?utf-8?b?VG9tYXMgTWFydGnFoWl1cyA8dG9tYXNAcHVnYS52ZHUubHQ+?=
On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 04:02:00PM +, Niels Thykier wrote:
> I am not an expert on permitted ways of quoting UTF-8 in mail headers,
> but the base64 method does not seem entirely inconceivable for some RFC
> to support that (especially not considering you can encode the body with
> base64).
Yo
Andreas Metzler:
> [...]
>
> Hello,
>
> No, the encoding was not correct. Compare how you (your MUA) just did it in
> this message with the rejected one.
>
> From: =?UTF-8?Q?TOMAS_MARTI=c5=a0IUS?=
>
> From: =?utf-8?b?VG9tYXMgTWFydGnFoWl1cyA8dG9tYXNAcHVnYS52ZHUubHQ+?=
>
Hi,
The latter i
On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 9:08 PM, Wookey wrote:
I am (vaguely) aware of
> something caled 'ip' which does a similar job but have no idea how to
> use it.
Here are the few sub-commands I use regularly. Their abbreviated form
and unabridged form, and the legacy command:
ip a
ip address show
ifconf
On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 12:16:08PM +0100, Johannes Schauer wrote:
> 3. or an "autosubscribe to all submitted bugs" or "autosubscribe to all bugs
> one contributed to" feature which prevents spam by only subscribing me to
> bugs that I write signed emails to
Even if other ideas are rejecte
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
On 28 December 2016 at 02:14, Jason.katcom wrote:
> Package: general
> Severity: normal
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> *** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
>
>* What led up to the situation?
>* What exactly did you do (or not d
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 moreinfo
Bug #849511 [general] general: java and javac can't run , it said "java: error
while loading shared libraries: libjli.so",
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
849511: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=849511
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contac
On Wed, 28 Dec 2016 12:08:06 +0100, Samuel Thibault
wrote:
>Marc Haber, on Wed 28 Dec 2016 11:33:13 +0100, wrote:
>> On Mon, 26 Dec 2016 14:50:50 +0100, m...@linux.it (Marco d'Itri) wrote:
>> >With this post I want to encourage fellow maintainers to stop depending
>> >on net-tools, which is obsol
On 14534 March 1977, Ian Jackson wrote:
>> If everybody agrees that
>> - new versions of packages shall be only uploaded to experimental
>> - uploads to testing will only be done on request of the RT or with
>> really new packages
>> - everything else can be rejected
>> processing would b
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ghislain Antony Vaillant
* Package name: python-coards
Version : 1.0.5
Upstream Author : Roberto De Almeida
* URL : http://code.dealmeida.net/coards
* License : Expat
Programming Lang: Python
Description : COARDS
Hi,
Quoting Adam Borowski (2016-12-27 17:56:59)
> Current procedure of subscribing to a bug is an abomination: you need FOUR
> mails for something that could be done by default.
I feel you. This is why I long stopped subscribing to bugs I file. The
ping-pong is too bothersome for me. Now I just k
Marc Haber, on Wed 28 Dec 2016 11:33:13 +0100, wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Dec 2016 14:50:50 +0100, m...@linux.it (Marco d'Itri) wrote:
> >With this post I want to encourage fellow maintainers to stop depending
> >on net-tools, which is obsolete software and has been replaced long ago
> >by iproute.
>
>
On 2016-12-28 TOMAS MARTIŠIUS wrote:
> 2016.12.28 09:09, Andreas Metzler rašė:
>> On 2016-12-27 TOMAS MARTIŠIUS wrote:
>>> Why I can't report bug using reportbug command? After reporting I get back
>>> e-mail with this message:
[...]
>> The From header does not look too good:
>>> From: =?utf-8?b
On 28 December 2016 at 10:08, TOMAS MARTIŠIUS wrote:
> Hello,
>
> But I am not only english speaking man, so there are UTF-8 chars in my last
> name. Thats why subject
> is encoded. And it is encoded in standard way, using reportbug command.
>
> It seams that if someone using UTF-8 in his name and
On Mon, 26 Dec 2016 14:50:50 +0100, m...@linux.it (Marco d'Itri) wrote:
>With this post I want to encourage fellow maintainers to stop depending
>on net-tools, which is obsolete software and has been replaced long ago
>by iproute.
Does iproute work on Non-Linux kernels?
Greetings
Marc
--
-
Op 26-12-16 om 23:44 schreef Paul Wise:
> On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 12:35 AM, Paul van der Vlis wrote:
>
>> I use a script on a few servers to realize this, it's not perfect:
>> http://vandervlis.nl/files/updateafter
>
> It might be interesting to contribute this to unattended-upgrades.
I use the
Hello,
But I am not only english speaking man, so there are UTF-8 chars in my
last name. Thats why subject
is encoded. And it is encoded in standard way, using reportbug command.
It seams that if someone using UTF-8 in his name and wants report bug -
it has a problems.
I think this is total
33 matches
Mail list logo
