-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2017 11:38:34 +
Source: libtest-www-mechanize-perl
Binary: libtest-www-mechanize-perl
Architecture: source
Version: 1.48-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Perl Group
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2017 14:40:23 +0100
Source: wine-development
Binary: wine-development wine32-development wine64-development
wine32-development-preloader wine64-development-preloader
wine32-development-tools wine64-development-tools
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2017 15:36:09 +0100
Source: qtwebengine-opensource-src
Binary: qtwebengine5-dev libqt5webengine5 libqt5webenginecore5
libqt5webenginewidgets5 libqt5webengine-data qml-module-qtwebengine
qtwebengine5-examples
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2017 15:30:08 +0100
Source: netcfg
Binary: netcfg netcfg-static
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1.140
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2017 09:19:31 -0400
Source: company-mode
Binary: elpa-company
Architecture: source
Version: 0.8.12-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Emacs addons team
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2017 15:31:00 +0200
Source: aghermann
Binary: aghermann
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1.1.2-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Med Packaging Team
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2017 13:50:13 +0100
Source: nagios-plugins-contrib
Binary: nagios-plugins-contrib
Architecture: source i386
Version: 19.20170104
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Nagios Maintainer Group
On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 12:53:12PM +, Simon McVittie wrote:
> Joking aside, the attempts I've seen at managing SRPMs in a version
> control system have either not tracked upstream source at all (Fedora), or
> invented a layout that is actually a lot like Debian's but with packaging/
> instead
On Wed, 04 Jan 2017 at 02:10:56 +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Michael Biebl writes ("Re: "not authorised" doing various desktoppy things"):
> > Check if your session is marked as active and local
> > $ loginctl show-session $XDG_SESSION_ID
>
> I see (amongst other things):
>
> Remote=no
>
On Wed, 04 Jan 2017 at 13:59:26 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 1:30 PM, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
> > But I am not sure if a package structure like
> >
> > mypkg/upstream/*
> > mypkg/debian/*
> > mypkg/patches/* (?)
> >
> > would have any *practical* benefits over the current
Niels Thykier writes ("Re: Migration despite an RC bug?"):
> An exception in my experience: In process is cheaper when the
> (de)compressor is available in the PerlIO Layer as native C code.
> Notable example being libperlio-gzip-perl where you use "open(my $fd,
> '<:gzip', $file)".
> At least
On Tue, 03 Jan 2017 at 22:17:33 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Usually what I have to do (and I think this is a pretty common use case
> for anyone who customizes Debian packages) is that I need to start from a
> package from unstable (or at least newer than stable, or oldstable, or
> ancient
On January 4, 2017 6:23:23 AM EST, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>Quoting Vincent Bernat (2017-01-04 08:12:08)
>> ❦ 4 janvier 2017 04:52 GMT, Scott Kitterman
> :
>>
>> >>> It's surprisingly awkward, and, at least for me, it turns out
>that
>> >>> externalizing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2017 19:53:22 +0800
Source: repsnapper
Binary: repsnapper
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 2.4a0-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Ying-Chun Liu (PaulLiu)
Changed-By: Ying-Chun
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2017 17:00:59 +0200
Source: 389-adminutil
Binary: libadminutil-dev libadminutil0 libadminutil-data
Architecture: source
Version: 1.1.23-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian 389ds Team
Package: tweetnacl
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Yashashree Kolhe
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: node-tweetnacl
Version : 0.14.5
Upstream Author : TweetNaCl-js contributors
* URL : https://tweetnacl.js.org
* License
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2017 13:01:14 +0100
Source: libweb-mrest-cli-perl
Binary: libweb-mrest-cli-perl
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.283-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Perl Group
Nikolaus Rath writes ("Re: Converting to dgit"):
> I still haven't really made up my mind if I want to use git-maint-merge
> or git-dpm. Russ recently raised a valid point with the Debian
> modifications over-time becoming all tangled up and impossible to
> separate. I thought I could solve this
Russ Allbery writes ("Re: Feedback on 3.0 source format problems"):
> Even if we never used tarballs, and instead our unit of operation was the
> upstream Git repository plus Debian branches, I would maintain a rebased
> branch of Debian changes to upstream
I think this is definitely the right
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2017 11:42:56 +0100
Source: open-infrastructure-container-tools
Binary: open-infrastructure-container-tools
Architecture: source all
Version: 20170101-1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Daniel Baumann
Hello,
On Tue, Jan 03, 2017 at 04:33:39PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Curating a patch series is only 5% slower than commiting directly to the
> Git repository to me. I just have to remember to gbp pq import before
> making new changes, gbp pq export when I'm done, and once in a great while
> I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2017 20:10:14 +0900
Source: birdfont
Binary: birdfont
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 2.17.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Fonts Task Force
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Nupur Malpani
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: node-delegates
Version : 1.0.0
Upstream Author : TJ Holowaychuk
* URL :
Quoting Vincent Bernat (2017-01-04 08:12:08)
> ❦ 4 janvier 2017 04:52 GMT, Scott Kitterman :
>
> >>> It's surprisingly awkward, and, at least for me, it turns out that
> >>> externalizing my rebased branch as a patch series solves many of
> >>> problems surprisingly well.
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Saurabh Agrawal
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: node-assert-plus
Version : 1.0.0
Upstream Author : Mark Cavage
* URL :
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Rushikesh Bhadane
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: node-stringstream
Version : 0.0.5
Upstream Author : Michael Hart (
http://github.com/mhart)
* URL
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: akshay kemekar
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: node-asn1
Version : 0.2.3
Upstream Author : Mark Cavage
* URL : https://github.com/mcavage/node-asn1
*
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Aditya Neralkar
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: node-asynckit
Version : 0.4.0
Upstream Author : Alex Indigo
* URL :
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Shirish Togarla
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: node-fn-name
Version : 2.0.1
Upstream Author : Sindre Sorhus (
http://sindresorhus.com)
* URL :
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Gaurav Juvekar
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: node-is-obj
Version : 1.0.1
Upstream Author : Sindre Sorhus
(sindresorhus.com)
* URL :
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Srushti Chaudhari
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: node-aws-sign2
Version: 0.6.0
Upstream Author: Mikeal Rogers (
http://www.futurealoof.com)
* URL
Ansgar Burchardt writes ("Re: "not authorised" doing various desktoppy things
[and 1 more messages]"):
> Ian Jackson writes:
> > In fact I didn't have libpam-systemd installed for some strange
> > reason, but installing it hasn't helped. (All the symptoms I report
> > above are with it
Hey,
On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 01:04:12AM +0100, Toni Mueller wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 31, 2016 at 01:07:44PM -0500, Harlan Lieberman-Berg wrote:
> > Unfortunately, we don't build ansible off of the git repository, but
> > rather from the released tarballs.
>
> I found them only on PyPI. Did you find
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Tejas Nayak
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: node-onetime
Version : 2.0.0
Upstream Author : Sindre Sorhus (sindresorhus.com
)
* URL :
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Aarti Kashyap
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: node-is-generator-fn
Version : 1.0.0
Upstream Author : Sindre Sorhus (sindresorhus.com
)
* URL :
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Tushar Agey
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: node-aproba
Version : 1.0.4
Upstream Author : Rebecca Turner
* URL : https://github.com/iarna/aproba
* License
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Siddhesh Rane
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: node-ci-info
Version : 1.0.0
Upstream Author : Thomas Watson Steen (
https://twitter.com/wa7son)
* URL :
Package: node-buf-compare
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Nikhil Gawande
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: node-buf-compare
Version : 1.0.1
Upstream Author : Sindre Sorhus (sindresorhus.com
)
* URL
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Vinay Desai
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: node-aws4
Version : 1.5.0
Upstream Author : Michael Hart (
http://github.com/mhart)
* URL :
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Yogiraj Kulkarni
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: node-has-unicode
Version : 2.0.1
Upstream Author : Rebecca Turner
* URL :
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Pratham
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: node-clean-yaml-object
Version : 0.1.0
Upstream Author : James Talmage (
github.com/jamestalmage)
* URL :
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Vivek
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: node-binary-extensions
Version : 1.8.0
Upstream Author : Sindre Sorhus (sindresorhus.com)
* URL :
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sumedh Pendurkar
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: node-slice-ansi
Version : 0.0.4
Upstream Author : David Caccavella
* URL :
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Roshan Nalawade
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: node-tough-cookie
Version : 2.3.2
Upstream Author : Jeremy Stashewsky
* URL :
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ameya Apte
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: node-common-path-prefix
Version : 1.0.0
Upstream Author : Mark Wubben (https://novemberborn.net/)
* URL :
Quoting Jérémy Lal (2017-01-04 10:12:44)
> 2017-01-04 10:04 GMT+01:00 Andrey Rahmatullin :
>> On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 09:54:34AM +0100, Jérémy Lal wrote:
>>> i really think it would be best to have nodejs 6.9 in next debian release.
>>> That version is currently in experimental
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2017 11:28:12 +0200
Source: yabasic
Binary: yabasic
Architecture: source
Version: 1:2.77.3-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Graham Inggs
Changed-By: Graham Inggs
On Tue, Jan 03, 2017 at 07:01:22PM -0800, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
> When talking about percentages, I think it's worth keeping in mind the
> 1000% longer that it takes to comprehend a diff of two patches-unapplied
> trees (as gbp produces them) over a diff of two patches-applied trees
> (as git-dpm
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2017 19:14:53 +0900
Source: tomoyo-tools
Binary: tomoyo-tools libtomoyotools3
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 2.5.0-20170102-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Hideki Yamane
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2017 10:54:57 +0100
Source: sogo
Binary: sogo sogo-common
Architecture: source all amd64
Version: 3.2.4-0.2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Jeroen Dekkers
Changed-By: Jordi Mallach
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2017 10:44:49 +0100
Source: doxygen
Binary: doxygen doxygen-latex doxygen-doc doxygen-gui doxygen-dbg
Architecture: source
Version: 1.8.13-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Matthias Klose
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2017 09:36:34 +
Source: pyro
Binary: pyro pyro-gui pyro-doc pyro-examples
Architecture: source all
Version: 1:3.14-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Alastair McKinstry
On 04.01.2017 00:23, Christoph Biedl wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> as the stretch freeze approaches, I'm getting concerned about the
> status of logrotate, most notably #734688. The maintainer (CC'ed)
> hasn't shown any sign of activity for a while, also no response to a
> private message (I admit, it's
2017-01-04 10:04 GMT+01:00 Andrey Rahmatullin :
> On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 09:54:34AM +0100, Jérémy Lal wrote:
>> i really think it would be best to have nodejs 6.9 in next debian release.
>> That version is currently in experimental and i was about to upload it
>> to unstable, but
On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 09:54:34AM +0100, Jérémy Lal wrote:
> i really think it would be best to have nodejs 6.9 in next debian release.
> That version is currently in experimental and i was about to upload it
> to unstable, but i tried to do things right and prepared the addons
> that need to be
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2017 06:49:37 +0100
Source: preseed
Binary: preseed-common network-preseed file-preseed initrd-preseed env-preseed
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.77
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Install
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2017 08:56:19 +0100
Source: openbios
Binary: openbios-ppc openbios-sparc
Architecture: source
Version: 1.1.git20161120-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian QEMU Team
Hi,
i really think it would be best to have nodejs 6.9 in next debian release.
That version is currently in experimental and i was about to upload it
to unstable, but i tried to do things right and prepared the addons
that need to be rebuilt and binNMUed, then opened a transition bug
#849505.
No
Ian Jackson writes:
> Michael Biebl writes ("Re: "not authorised" doing various desktoppy things"):
> I'm not sure I need "logind integration" in my X server but perhaps I
> do ?
Only if you want to start X as non-root.
> Simon McVittie writes ("Re: "not authorised" doing various desktoppy
101 - 159 of 159 matches
Mail list logo