Buat segala keputusan bisnis Anda jadi lebih mudah detik ini juga!

2017-04-21 Thread Bisnis Dengan Ralali
Segala Jenis Kebutuhan Bisnis Bisa Anda dapatkan di sini | Ralali.com * [1] Butuh bantuan? Hubungi: (021) 3005 2777 i...@ralali.com [2] | Browser View [3] [4] [5] [6] JANGAN T

Bug#860901: ITP: imexam -- Simple interactive astronomical image examination and plotting

2017-04-21 Thread Ole Streicher
Package: wnpp Owner: Ole Streicher Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-as...@lists.debian.org * Package name: imexam Version : 0.7.1 Upstream Author : Megan Sosey * URL : http://imexam.readthedocs.io/imexam/index.html * License

VMware contact list

2017-04-21 Thread dolores . kim
Hi, Would you be interested in acquiring VMware contact list for marketing or email campaign? We can segment Industry List & Technology Users List by C-level, VP-level, Director-Level and Manager Level as per your requirements. We also have alternative Technology such as: Hyper-V, XenSe

Re: Debian Hurd installer fixed since 2014?

2017-04-21 Thread Jonathan de Boyne Pollard
Samuel Thibault: > Memory management is being worked on and there have been > various fixes, yes. Jonathan de Boyne Pollard: > I'll give it another go when I get the time, then. As promised, I have given it another go, with your latest DVD image dated January 2017. The good news is that the i

Re: 132 packages with several sources for stretch in the archive… (Re: Bug#860608: [pkg-golang-devel] Bug#860608: golang: FTBFS: Go version is "go1.6.1", ignoring -next /<>/api/next.txt)

2017-04-21 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 21/04/17 at 14:15 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote: > Hi, > > On 21-04-17 14:10, Holger Levsen wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 01:44:40PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote: > >> I don't think this number is bad per-se (assuming this extra_source_only > >> just meant it has "Build-Using"). The bad thing in my

Re: 132 packages with several sources for stretch in the archive… (Re: Bug#860608: [pkg-golang-devel] Bug#860608: golang: FTBFS: Go version is "go1.6.1", ignoring -next /<>/api/next.txt)

2017-04-21 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi, On 21-04-17 14:10, Holger Levsen wrote: > On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 01:44:40PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote: >> I don't think this number is bad per-se (assuming this extra_source_only >> just meant it has "Build-Using"). The bad thing in my opinion is when >> multiple version are kept around for a

Re: 132 packages with several sources for stretch in the archive… (Re: Bug#860608: [pkg-golang-devel] Bug#860608: golang: FTBFS: Go version is "go1.6.1", ignoring -next /<>/api/next.txt)

2017-04-21 Thread Holger Levsen
On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 01:44:40PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote: > I don't think this number is bad per-se (assuming this extra_source_only > just meant it has "Build-Using"). The bad thing in my opinion is when > multiple version are kept around for a long time. I consider the life time of stretch t

Re: 132 packages with several sources for stretch in the archive… (Re: Bug#860608: [pkg-golang-devel] Bug#860608: golang: FTBFS: Go version is "go1.6.1", ignoring -next /<>/api/next.txt)

2017-04-21 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi, On 21-04-17 13:29, Holger Levsen wrote: > On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 01:00:20PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: >> FYI, that's the number of additional copies of source packages in >> stretch, per source package: >> >> udd=> select source, count(*) from sources where release='stretch' and >> compone

Bug#860608: Info received (132 packages with several sources for stretch in the archive… (Re: Bug#860608: [pkg-golang-devel] Bug#860608: golang: FTBFS: Go version is "go1.6.1", ignoring -next /<

2017-04-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other interested parties for their attention; they will rep

132 packages with several sources for stretch in the archive… (Re: Bug#860608: [pkg-golang-devel] Bug#860608: golang: FTBFS: Go version is "go1.6.1", ignoring -next /<>/api/next.txt)

2017-04-21 Thread Holger Levsen
On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 01:00:20PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > FYI, that's the number of additional copies of source packages in > stretch, per source package: > > udd=> select source, count(*) from sources where release='stretch' and > component='main' and extra_source_only group by source ord

Re: Bug#860368: installer: create network bridges by default?

2017-04-21 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
On Thu, 2017-04-20 at 07:48 +0200, Daniel Pocock wrote: > > I used to have a similar setup but eventually migrated to a systemd > > based setup with systemd-networkd. With s-networkd, I have an > > independent bridge, which serves KVM/Libvirt, User Mode Linux and > > systemd-nspawn. > > > > Could

Re: Bug#761348: ftp.debian.org: need machine-readable metadata about suites & repositories

2017-04-21 Thread Michael Stapelberg
Thanks for the details, everyone. I’ll have a look at updating manpages.d.o to use the ftp-master API and will report back on how that goes. On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 9:55 AM, Paul Wise wrote: > On Fri, 2017-04-21 at 09:28 +0200, Michael Stapelberg wrote: > > > pabs, what’s the current status on t

Re: Bug#761348: ftp.debian.org: need machine-readable metadata about suites & repositories

2017-04-21 Thread Paul Wise
On Fri, 2017-04-21 at 09:28 +0200, Michael Stapelberg wrote: > pabs, what’s the current status on this? Mostly at the 'collecting information' stage; about what hard-coding exists and what requirements there might be etc. > AFAICT, you mentioned you wanted to come up with a spec on the > Reposit

Re: Bug#761348: ftp.debian.org: need machine-readable metadata about suites & repositories

2017-04-21 Thread Ansgar Burchardt
Hi, On Fri, 2017-04-21 at 09:28 +0200, Michael Stapelberg wrote: > pabs, what’s the current status on this? AFAICT, you mentioned you > wanted to come up with a spec on the RepositoryFormat wiki page. I > don’t > see that on the RepositoryFormat wiki page yet. > > Is there any way to help? > > I

Re: Bug#761348: ftp.debian.org: need machine-readable metadata about suites & repositories

2017-04-21 Thread Michael Stapelberg
Hey, pabs, what’s the current status on this? AFAICT, you mentioned you wanted to come up with a spec on the RepositoryFormat wiki page. I don’t see that on the RepositoryFormat wiki page yet. Is there any way to help? I’m also interested in this issue due to hardcoding in manpages.d.o, which I’