]] Ivan Shmakov
> > Hans-Christoph Steiner writes:
>
> > Package: dpkg-dev
>
> > More and more packages are adding unicode files
>
> I assume you mean “UTF-8 filenames” here (per below), right?
>
> > as unicode support has become more reliable and available.
>
> What are
On Sat, Sep 02, 2017 at 12:58:54AM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> What's the problem?
> ---
>
> UNIX time_t is 31 bits (signed), counting seconds since Jan 1,
> 1970. It's going to wrap.. It's used *everywhere* in UNIX-based
> systems. Imagine the effects of Y2K, but worse.
> Glib
On Sat, 02 Sep 2017, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> Massive numbers of libraries are going to need updates, possibly more
> than people realise. Anything embedding a time_t will obviously need
> changing. However, many more structures will embed a timeval or
> timespec and they're also broken. Almost anyt
Hi folks,
As promised, here's a quick summary of what was discussed at the 2038
BoF session I ran in Montréal.
Thanks to the awesome efforts of our video team, the session is
already online [1]. I've taken a copy of the Gobby notes too,
alongside my small set of slides for the session. [2]
We ha
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Kyle Fazzari
* Package name: core-moos
Version : 10.0.2.a
Upstream Author : Paul Michael Newman
* URL :
http://www.robots.ox.ac.uk/~mobile/MOOS/wiki/pmwiki.php/Main/HomePage
* License : GPL-2+
Programming Lang: C++
Hi,
>> Are you willing to step in?
> no, not really but I would like to see it built against openssl1.1 :)
The code changes for that are now part of master, trying to get a new
x.4.5 release next week which should add this support
Johnny
]] "Dr. Bas Wijnen"
> On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 11:16:36AM +0200, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
> > python-digitalocean, ruby-azure*, waagent, twittering-mode,
> > probably HBCI clients, python3-googleapi,
> > python3-pyicloud, python-yowsup, youtube-dl,
> > libgfbgraph-0.2-dev
>
> Thank you for this li
On Fri, Sep 01, 2017 at 06:31:57PM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> and ensure that if the user fails to specify a locale, C.UTF-8 is used.
Fun thing: build the attached program with glibc then with musl.
glibc:
"C.UTF-8" iswalpha: 1 (want 1), mbtowc: 2 (want 2)
"C" iswalpha: 0 (want 1
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Andreas Tille
* Package name: nanook
Version : 1.26+dfsg-1
Upstream Author : Richard M. Leggett
* URL : https://documentation.tgac.ac.uk/display/NANOOK/NanoOK
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: Java
Description :
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Owner: jbi...@ubuntu.com
Package Name: gtksourceview4
Version: 3.99.4
Upstream Author : Ignacio Casal Quinteiro,
Jesse van den Kieboom, Paolo Borelli, Sébastien Wilmet and others
License : LGPL-2.1+ except for a few GPL
> Hans-Christoph Steiner writes:
> Package: dpkg-dev
> More and more packages are adding unicode files
I assume you mean “UTF-8 filenames” here (per below), right?
> as unicode support has become more reliable and available.
What are the use cases for such filenames?
On Fri, Sep 01, 2017 at 07:18:58PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Andrey Rahmatullin writes ("Re: source-only uploads"):
> > On Fri, Sep 01, 2017 at 12:47:41PM +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> > > Just yesterday I completely broke a key package used to build
> > > many Java packages, and I couldn't even
I dropped Marek from Cc because the email delivery times out.
On 2017-09-01 13:41:18 [+0200], Thomas Girard wrote:
> hello,
Hi,
> I don't have much time for ACE packaging and I don't use it anymore. I should
> probably remove myself from uploaders.
Okay.
> Are you willing to step in?
no, not r
Hans-Christoph Steiner writes ("make dpkg-buildpackage default locale UTF-8"):
> More and more packages are adding unicode files as unicode support has
> become more reliable and available. The package building process is not
> guaranteed to happen in a unicode locale since the Debian default loca
Andrey Rahmatullin writes ("Re: source-only uploads"):
> On Fri, Sep 01, 2017 at 12:47:41PM +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> > Just yesterday I completely broke a key package used to build
> > many Java packages, and I couldn't even rebuild it to fix the issue.
>
> Why? Does it B-D on itself?
And, i
On Fri, 2017-09-01 at 12:43 +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> Whatever point you were trying to make around NEW, your argument is not
> very convincing. I think Holger is right here: Where the package is
> built should not matter. Presence of .buildinfo and reproducibility
> does.
Appollogies if this
On Fri, Sep 01, 2017 at 10:23:59AM +0200, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> More and more packages are adding unicode files as unicode support has
> become more reliable and available. The package building process is not
> guaranteed to happen in a unicode locale since the Debian default locale
> is
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Kartik Kulkarni
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: node-immediate
Version : 3.2.3
Upstream Authors : Donavon West, Domenic Denicola, Brian Cavalier
* URL : https://github.com/calvinmetcalf/immediate
* Lic
On Fri, Sep 01, 2017 at 12:47:41PM +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Just yesterday I completely broke a key package used to build
> many Java packages, and I couldn't even rebuild it to fix the issue.
Why? Does it B-D on itself?
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: ro...@debian.org
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: node-stream-splicer
Version : 2.0.0
Upstream Author : James Halliday (http://substack.net)
* URL : https://github.com/substack/stream-splicer
* License
> and after someone
> has implemented a solution for that there is no blocker left for
> allowing only source-only uploads from maintainers.
I'm all for source-only uploads and I adopted them recently, but I hope
this restriction won't happen, or at least not without a derogation
mechanism. Just
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Christoph Biedl
* Package name: libluksmeta
Version : 7
Upstream Author : Nathaniel McCallum https://github.com/npmccallum
* URL : https://github.com/latchset/luksmeta
* License : LGPL-2.1+
Programming Lang: C
Descrip
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Christoph Biedl
* Package name: libjose
Version : 9
Upstream Author : Nathaniel McCallum https://github.com/npmccallum
* URL : https://github.com/latchset/jose
* License : Apache-2.0
Programming Lang: C
Description
hello,
I don't have much time for ACE packaging and I don't use it anymore. I should
probably remove myself from uploaders.
Are you willing to step in?
Unless Pau has some time for it the package should be RFA'ed. I can find time
to sponsor an upload though.
Regards,
Thomas
Le 1 septembre
Hi,
I am trying to figure out if someone knows about the whereabouts of the
Debian ACE packaging team. Johnny Willemsen contacted me because he had
problems to get in touch with the ACE team[0]. He is part of the upstream
team and is interested in getting the package in shape again. It
currently s
On Fri, Sep 01, 2017 at 11:07:17AM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> The problem with maintainer-built binaries around NEW is that if they
> wait in the NEW queue for (let's say) 1 month, then by the time they
> reach the archive, they were built with a 1 month old toolchain and
> build-dependencies,
On Fri, Sep 01, 2017 at 09:43:54AM +, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 01, 2017 at 09:34:53AM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 23, 2015 at 12:48:50PM +0200, Chris Lamb wrote:
> > >...
> > > However, based on an informal survey at DebConf (and to reflect the
> > > feeling towards soft
On Fri, 01 Sep 2017 at 09:40:25 +, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 01, 2017 at 09:26:44AM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > AFAIK the only place where we currently still need binary packages that
> > have been built on a maintainer machine is for [...]
>
> the fun part is that once a package
On Fri, Sep 01, 2017 at 09:34:53AM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 23, 2015 at 12:48:50PM +0200, Chris Lamb wrote:
> >...
> > However, based on an informal survey at DebConf (and to reflect the
> > feeling towards software reproducibility in the free software community
> > in general) unles
On Fri, Sep 01, 2017 at 09:26:44AM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> AFAIK the only place where we currently still need binary packages that
> have been built on a maintainer machine is for [...]
the fun part is that once a package builds bit by bit identically, it doesnt
matter anymore where it's bee
Hi!
On Fri, 2017-09-01 at 09:26:44 +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> AFAIK the only place where we currently still need binary packages that
> have been built on a maintainer machine is for NEW, and after someone
> has implemented a solution for that there is no blocker left for
> allowing only source
Control: forcemerge -1 843776
Hi!
On Fri, 2017-09-01 at 10:23:59 +0200, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> Package: dpkg-dev
>
> More and more packages are adding unicode files as unicode support has
> become more reliable and available. The package building process is not
> guaranteed to happen i
Package: dpkg-dev
More and more packages are adding unicode files as unicode support has
become more reliable and available. The package building process is not
guaranteed to happen in a unicode locale since the Debian default locale
is LC_ALL=C, which is ASCII not UTF-8. Reading UTF-8 filename
Hi,
On Thu, 24 Aug 2017, shirish शिरीष wrote:
> As far as fact-checking goes, can anybody share about Debian and Kali
> Linux relationship in bit more detail. AFAIK Raphaël Hertzog is one of
> the main developers and there has been lot of symbiotic relationship
> between the two projects but how m
34 matches
Mail list logo
