On Sat, Sep 08, 2018 at 06:07:43PM -0300, David Bremner wrote:
> Andrey Rahmatullin writes:
>
> > Last upload of ax25-node was in 2008, in 2009 it was effectively orphaned,
> > the TC bug was filed in 2011 and resolved in 2012, in 2015 ax25-node was
> > removed with "ROM; no activity, open securi
Hi!
On Sat, 2018-09-08 at 20:18:10 +0200, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
> Le 08/09/2018 à 18:39, Sean Whitton a écrit :
> > On Fri 07 Sep 2018 at 10:10PM +0200, Ruben Undheim wrote:
> > > However, I think the policy gives us a lot of freedom to choose (it
> > > is not very strict in this case).
> >
> >
Paride Legovini writes:
> However, there are clearly cases where renaming binaries makes several
> people unhappy (most likely: the package maintainers, upstream, people
> writing scripts, users of different distributions), while not making a
> single user happier. This is especially true with lo
> Hello,
>
> On Sat 08 Sep 2018 at 07:31PM +0200, Ruben Undheim wrote:
>
>> Yes, you are right, when I read it again. What I have been "reading" before
>> is.
>>
>> "Two different packages must not install programs with different
>> functionality
>> but with the same filenames if they do not
Sean Whitton - 08.09.18, 21:03:
> My understanding is that there are quite deep social reasons for the
> current policy (please note, though, that I was not involved in Debian
> when this piece of policy was created; neither was I involved during
> the nodejs TC decision).
>
> The current policy p
Andrey Rahmatullin writes:
> Last upload of ax25-node was in 2008, in 2009 it was effectively orphaned,
> the TC bug was filed in 2011 and resolved in 2012, in 2015 ax25-node was
> removed with "ROM; no activity, open security issues, de facto orphaned"
> (the status that was true when the TC bug
> stupid idea:
>
> do these scripts (and other consumers of the netgen binaries) actually
> use the fully qualified "/usr/bin/netgen" or just an unqualified "netgen"?
>
> if the latter, you might just put the unchanged names into something
> like /usr/share/netgen/bin/ and tell users to add to th
Hi David,
> I may have missed it, but it looks like you didn’t ask directly the
> netgen maintainers (or explicitly CC them during this discussion). Maybe
> a first good step is to communicate with them and ask what is their take
> on that matter
If there is no way to actually share a file name w
Hello Sean,
Sean Whitton wrote on 08/09/2018:
> Hello Sylvestre,
>
> On Sat 08 Sep 2018 at 08:18PM +0200, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
>
>> Renaming binaries is a big pain, it is confusing for the user, making the
>> life of the maintainer
>> harder, the documentations won't reflect the Debian-realit
Hi,
> > Renaming binaries is a big pain, it is confusing for the user, making the
> > life of the maintainer
> > harder, the documentations won't reflect the Debian-reality.
> >
> > The wording should be changed from "must" to "should":
> > ---
> > Two different packages should not install progra
On Sat, Sep 08, 2018 at 12:03:18PM -0700, Sean Whitton wrote:
> My understanding is that there are quite deep social reasons for the
> current policy (please note, though, that I was not involved in Debian
> when this piece of policy was created; neither was I involved during the
> nodejs TC decisi
Hello Sylvestre,
On Sat 08 Sep 2018 at 08:18PM +0200, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
> Renaming binaries is a big pain, it is confusing for the user, making the
> life of the maintainer
> harder, the documentations won't reflect the Debian-reality.
>
> The wording should be changed from "must" to "shoul
On Sun, Sep 9, 2018 at 2:29 AM Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Le 08/09/2018 à 18:39, Sean Whitton a écrit :
> > Hello,
> >
> > On Fri 07 Sep 2018 at 10:10PM +0200, Ruben Undheim wrote:
> >
> >> However, I think the policy gives us a lot of freedom to choose (it is not
> >> very
> >> strict
Hello,
On Sat 08 Sep 2018 at 07:31PM +0200, Ruben Undheim wrote:
> Yes, you are right, when I read it again. What I have been "reading" before
> is.
>
> "Two different packages must not install programs with different
> functionality
> but with the same filenames if they do not declare that t
Hello,
Le 08/09/2018 à 18:39, Sean Whitton a écrit :
> Hello,
>
> On Fri 07 Sep 2018 at 10:10PM +0200, Ruben Undheim wrote:
>
>> However, I think the policy gives us a lot of freedom to choose (it is not
>> very
>> strict in this case).
>
> I don't understand. This seems pretty strict:
>
>
Le 08/09/2018 à 07:31, Ruben Undheim a écrit :
> And it also means that the package pair "nodejs-legacy" and "node" was RC
> buggy when the packages were present (jessie I guess)
You may have a look at the TC ruling for a bit of context for node.
https://bugs.debian.org/614907
> Does anyone kno
Hi Sean,
> > However, I think the policy gives us a lot of freedom to choose (it is not
> > very
> > strict in this case).
>
> I don't understand. This seems pretty strict:
>
> Two different packages must not install programs with different
> functionality but with the same filenames.
(drop pkg-javascript-devel)
On Sun, Sep 9, 2018 at 12:52 AM Sean Whitton wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> On Sat 08 Sep 2018 at 10:02AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Sep 7, 2018 at 7:22 PM, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
> >
> >> Ok adding cc @security
> >>
> >> How will you handle security problem in sta
Hello,
On Sat 08 Sep 2018 at 10:02AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 7, 2018 at 7:22 PM, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
>
>> Ok adding cc @security
>>
>> How will you handle security problem in static
>> (browserified/webpacked) javascript library ?
>
> Same goes for the other languages that do s
Hello,
On Fri 07 Sep 2018 at 10:10PM +0200, Ruben Undheim wrote:
> However, I think the policy gives us a lot of freedom to choose (it is not
> very
> strict in this case).
I don't understand. This seems pretty strict:
Two different packages must not install programs with different
fu
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Pirate Praveen
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: node-chart.js
Version : 1.0.2
Upstream Author : Nick Downie
* URL : http://www.chartjs.org
* License : Expat
Programming Lang: JavaScript
Desc
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Rust Maintainers
* Package name: rustfmt
* URL : https://github.com/rust-lang-nursery/rustfmt
* License : MIT license and the Apache License
Programming Lang: Rust
Description : Find and fix Rust formatting issues
clang-form
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Rust Maintainers
* Package name: cbindgen
Version : 0.6.3
* URL : https://github.com/eqrion/cbindgen
* License : MPL
Programming Lang: Rust
Description : Generating C bindings to Rust code
23 matches
Mail list logo
