Re: Mass bugs filing: autopkgtest should be marked superficial (new list)

2020-09-19 Thread Sudip Mukherjee
HI Mattia, On Sat, Sep 19, 2020 at 8:58 PM Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > > On Sat, Sep 19, 2020 at 08:39:44PM +0100, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > > After discussing with few people, I now intend to file them with > > "severity: important" and I will also reduce the severity of the > > previously open simil

Re: Mass bugs filing: autopkgtest should be marked superficial (new list)

2020-09-19 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
On Sat, Sep 19, 2020 at 08:39:44PM +0100, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > After discussing with few people, I now intend to file them with > "severity: important" and I will also reduce the severity of the > previously open similar bugs to 'important'. That's good. But please also share your proposed te

Re: Mass bugs filing: autopkgtest should be marked superficial (new list)

2020-09-19 Thread Sudip Mukherjee
Hi All, On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 9:21 PM Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > > Hi All, > > If the test done in the autopkgtest does not provide significant test > coverage then it should be marked with "Restrictions: superficial". > Ref: > https://salsa.debian.org/ci-team/autopkgtest/-/blob/master/doc/READM

Re: Mass bugs filing: autopkgtest should be marked superficial (new list)

2020-09-19 Thread Sudip Mukherjee
HI Holger, On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 11:02 PM Holger Levsen wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 09:21:52PM +0100, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > > If the test done in the autopkgtest does not provide significant test > > coverage then it should be marked with "Restrictions: superficial". > > Ref: > > htt