Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, jo...@debian.org
* Package name: debianutils-tempfile
Version : 4.11
Upstream Author : Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues
* URL : https://salsa.debian.o
On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 09:52:42AM +0100, Philip Hands wrote:
> I don't have anything like a design for how that should look in my head
> though -- I guess interested parties should get together and come up
> with a design _before_ we start trying to implement it :-)
This sounds like you need some
The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested
through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the
last week.
Total number of orphaned packages: 1223 (new: 5)
Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 188 (new: 3)
Total number of packages reques
On 1/20/22 8:04 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
On 1/19/22 20:34, Richard Laager wrote:
For people that want something more than systemd-timesyncd, e.g. to
get NTS, I think either are acceptable choices. It seems that the
consensus for new installs is towards chrony over ntpsec. But I don't
think we
On Thu, 20 Jan 2022 at 20:09:18 +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> Do we really need a dummy package for upgrades to work?
Yes, we do need transitional packages.
> Can't ntpsec binary package just add Provides: ntp (=$source:Version) ?
No, apt won't automatically replace a real package "ntp" with a
2022, ജനുവരി 19 5:27:28 PM IST, Paride Legovini ൽ എഴുതി
>Richard Laager wrote on 19/01/2022:
>> On 1/18/22 11:21 AM, Paride Legovini wrote:
>> > I'd prefer making ntp a dummy package depending on ntpsec rather than
>> > having src:ntpsec takeover bin:ntp.
>>
>> If I understand correctly, you'
On 1/19/22 20:34, Richard Laager wrote:
For people that want something more than systemd-timesyncd, e.g. to get
NTS, I think either are acceptable choices. It seems that the consensus
for new installs is towards chrony over ntpsec. But I don't think we as
the distro need to push either over sys
On Jan 19, Paride Legovini wrote:
> That's what I had in mind, but the other option:
>
> > Another option would be to have src:ntpsec build the bin:ntp dummy
> > package and remove src:ntp entirely.
>
> also looks sensible to me after all. No strong opinion.
I think that this would be better s
Bernhard Schmidt writes:
> - Since NTS leverages X.509, how does it work with a broken clock on
> boot that is ticking outside of the certificate validity period?
I don't know how it is intended to work, but it seems pretty obvious
that NTS certificate validation must ignore the validity perio
9 matches
Mail list logo
