On Sun, Mar 06, 2022 at 09:25:45PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>...
> I think that we should reduce the number of packages using the 1.0 format, as
> (1) format 3.0 has many advantages, as documented in
> https://wiki.debian.org/Projects/DebSrc3.0 ; (2) this contributes to
> standardization of pac
"LeJacq, Jean Pierre" writes:
> There are standard best practices for forwarding support in SPF.
>
> http://www.open-spf.org/Best_Practices/Forwarding/
Well, if it only was that simple.
There is NO working SRS software/example config for sendmail in Debian
or anywhere else AFAICS.
The only thi
❦ 7 March 2022 18:33 +01, Adam Borowski:
>> lumin highlights matches to a specified pattern (string or regular
>> expression) in files, using color. This is similar to grep with
>> colorized output, but it outputs all lines in the given files, not
>> only matching lines.
>
> .--[ ~/bin/hl ]
On Mon, Mar 07, 2022 at 05:50:43PM +0100, Stephen Kitt wrote:
> * Package name: lumin
> Version : 1.0.0
> * URL : https://github.com/johnkerl/lumin
> Description : pattern match highlighter
>
> lumin highlights matches to a specified pattern (string or regular
> exp
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Stephen Kitt
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: gocc
Version : 0.0~git20211213.7ea6993
Upstream Author : Marius Ackerman
* URL : https://github.com/goccmack/gocc
* License : ASL-2.0
Programming
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Stephen Kitt
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: lumin
Version : 1.0.0
Upstream Author : John Kerl
* URL : https://github.com/johnkerl/lumin
* License : BSD-2-clause
Programming Lang: Go
Descri
On Mon, Mar 07, 2022 at 05:35:43PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 06, 2022 at 09:25:45PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > Wouter Verhelst
> >aspic
> >logtool
>
> Yeah, no. These will be reduced to "wishlist" and probably tagged
> "wontfix".
Both of these packages have no pat
On Mon, Mar 7, 2022 at 10:36 AM Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 06, 2022 at 09:25:45PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > Wouter Verhelst
> >aspic
> >logtool
>
> Yeah, no. These will be reduced to "wishlist" and probably tagged
> "wontfix".
>
> The packages work just fine, the source f
On Sun, Mar 06, 2022 at 09:25:45PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Wouter Verhelst
>aspic
>logtool
Yeah, no. These will be reduced to "wishlist" and probably tagged
"wontfix".
The packages work just fine, the source format is still supported, I
have better things to do with my time?
--
Hi,
On 06/03/22 at 22:24 +, Holger Levsen wrote:
> So I'd rather propose to file these bugs with severity 'normal' and then wait
> and then get policy updated, and then raise the severity further.
For reference, there's a debian-policy bug about deprecating 1.0 +
dpatch/quilt: #850157 (no act
On 06/03/22 at 22:25 +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Mar 06, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>
> > I think that we should reduce the number of packages using the 1.0 format,
> > as
> > (1) format 3.0 has many advantages, as documented in
> > https://wiki.debian.org/Projects/DebSrc3.0 ; (2) this contribute
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org,
pkg-apparmor-t...@alioth-lists.debian.net
Control: affects -1 src:apparmor
Hi,
I request assistance with maintaining the apparmor package.
AppArmor has been enabled by default on the Linux ports of Debian
since Buster.
12 matches
Mail list logo
