Hi Ansgar,
On Fri, Feb 24, 2023 at 08:02:35AM +0100, Ansgar wrote:
> The name is too specific and can be misread:
>
> - It is specific to -Werror, but other similar systems exist.
>
> - It can be easily read an "now error" (i.e., a warning
> should "now (be an) error").
Fair point. I am unima
Quoting Helmut Grohne (2023-02-24 07:19:41)
> As such, I propose a generic DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=nowerror modelled after the
> original observation, but meant to also match other checkers such as
> shellcheck. The general idea should be that a warning should that can be
> non-fatal should be non-fatal
On Fri, 2023-02-24 at 07:19 +0100, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> As such, I propose a generic DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=nowerror modelled after
> the original observation, but meant to also match other checkers such as
> shellcheck. The general idea should be that a warning should that can be
> non-fatal should b
Hi,
I observe a pattern repeated at least twice and probably more often in
packages.
* A package adds -Werror to the build. When a new toolchain version is
uploaded, it triggers a new warning and that makes the package FTBFS.
* A package runs shellcheck during build. When a new shellcheck is
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 24, 2023 at 7:38 AM Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>
> What to do when a package is blocked from getting updated due to it
> being itself?
>
> I have tried replying to FTPmasters as invited in the rejection message,
> but have been met with silence.
>
> I have tried filing bug#1030961 bu
The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested
through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the
last week.
Total number of orphaned packages: 1220 (new: 0)
Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 160 (new: 0)
Total number of packages reques
What to do when a package is blocked from getting updated due to it
being itself?
I have tried replying to FTPmasters as invited in the rejection message,
but have been met with silence.
I have tried filing bug#1030961 but have so far seen no response on that
either.
Will it make sense to reassi
Hello!
(Stop reading if you don't use MariaDB)
I am currently preparing the upload of MariaDB 10.11.2-2 to Debian
unstable and aim for the highest possible quality. I am currently
doing the bulk of the testing and packaging alone and to make sure
that the quality is top notch, I would be glad to
Wouter Verhelst writes:
> On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 08:20:27AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> Unfortunately, it's often against the upstream license.
>> Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
>> modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions
>
On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 08:20:27AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Daniel Baumann writes:
> > On 2/22/23 14:26, Peter Pentchev wrote:
>
> >> Wait, I may have been unclear. I did not mean that I want to omit the
> >> upstream copyright years *when they are there*.
>
> > I know you didn't mean that,
On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 03:33:15PM -0700, Sam Hartman wrote:
> >> A tool for glamorous shell scripts. Leverage the power of
> >> Bubbles (https://github.com/charmbracelet/bubbles) and Lip Gloss
> >> (https://github.com/charmbracelet/lipgloss) in your scripts and
> >> aliases wit
On 2023-02-22 23:12, Diane Trout wrote:
> | visidata | none | Build-Depends |
There seems to be no versioned depends or similar in the code.
Should be safe, but in doubt ask Anja (upstream).
Cheers
On 04/02/23 09:14 AM, Abhijith PA wrote:
>
> Debian is applying as a mentoring organization for the Google Summer
> of Code 2023 [1] as we have done in previous years.
Unfortunately we are not selected for this year's program as our
project idea list[1] was small. I should've announced adding pr
13 matches
Mail list logo
