Re: [Summary]: Another take on package relationship substvars

Niels Thykier: Hi It seems the discussion on this topic has settled, so I am now doing a summary of the discussion as I understand it.  * Generally, the original proposal seems to have been received    favorably at a conceptual level. [...] A follow up on this: * The proposal is now im

Re: Debian testing/unstable users: beware of Firefox critical CVEs

Hi, On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 2:18 AM Paul Wise wrote: > > On Sun, 2024-03-24 at 22:45 +, Samuel Henrique wrote: > > > I'm sending this to d-devel because there should be a lot of testing and > > unstable users on this list. If you're not running firefox 124.0.1 or > > firefox-esr 115.9.1esr-1,

Re: Debian testing/unstable users: beware of Firefox critical CVEs

On Sun, 2024-03-24 at 22:45 +, Samuel Henrique wrote: > I'm sending this to d-devel because there should be a lot of testing and > unstable users on this list. If you're not running firefox 124.0.1 or > firefox-esr 115.9.1esr-1, you should find a way of upgrading to those > versions. firefox

Bug#1067645: ITP: unicrypto -- Unified interface for some crypto algos

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Josenilson Ferreira da Silva X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, nilsonfsi...@hotmail.com * Package name: unicrypto Version : 0.0.10 Upstream Contact: Tamas Jos * URL : https://github.com/skelsec/unicrypto * License

Debian testing/unstable users: beware of Firefox critical CVEs

Hello everyone, Given our current time_t transition happening, which means packages are blocked from migrating to testing for weeks, and that unstable updates have become harder to apply, two critical CVE fixes for Firefox became impossible to get it through the official repositories: https://secu

Re: time_t progress report

Quoting Samuel Thibault (2024-03-24 18:20:30) > - making sure that the Debian release eventually only contains non-profile > builds should be relatively easy thanks to the buildinfo files (they > currently only contain them in the DEB_BUILD_PROFILES environment variable, > they could be added as pr

Re: time_t progress report

Simon McVittie, le dim. 24 mars 2024 16:45:02 +, a ecrit: > On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 at 13:09:02 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > Simon McVittie, le dim. 24 mars 2024 11:59:50 +, a ecrit: > > > For the specific example of pipewire, I've suggested temporarily > > > dropping that feature from pip

Re: Re: time_t progress report

On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 at 13:09:02 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Simon McVittie, le dim. 24 mars 2024 11:59:50 +, a ecrit: > > For the specific example of pipewire, I've suggested temporarily > > dropping that feature from pipewire on the affected architectures > >

Re: Re: time_t progress report

Simon McVittie, le dim. 24 mars 2024 11:59:50 +, a ecrit: > On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 at 12:56:52 +0500, Andrey Rakhmatullin wrote: > > 2. FTBFSing packages (those that block further work, anyway) > ... > > An example of a currently existing obstacle of this kind is snapd-glib > > (mainly because it

Re: Re: time_t progress report

On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 at 12:56:52 +0500, Andrey Rakhmatullin wrote: > 2. FTBFSing packages (those that block further work, anyway) ... > An example of a currently existing obstacle of this kind is snapd-glib > (mainly because it blocks pipewire). For the specific example of pipewire, I've suggested

Bug#1067594: ITP: golang-github-skeema-knownhosts -- Go SSH known_hosts wrapper with host key lookup

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Maytham Alsudany X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian...@lists.debian.org Control: block 1060701 by -1 * Package name: golang-github-skeema-knownhosts Version : 1.2.2 Upstream Contact: https://github.com/skeema/knownhosts/issu

Bug#1067593: ITP: golang-github-pjbgf-sha1cd -- SHA1 implementation with collision detection

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Maytham Alsudany X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian...@lists.debian.org Control: block 1060701 by -1 * Package name: golang-github-pjbgf-sha1cd Version : 0.3.0 Upstream Contact: Paulo Gomes * URL : https://githu

Re: Re: time_t progress report

On Sat, Mar 23, 2024 at 04:50:48PM -0500, Steven Robbins wrote: > Wondering about the current state of this transition. It's still in the stage of re-bootstrapping armel and armhf. https://buildd.debian.org/stats/armel.png https://buildd.debian.org/stats/armhf.png https://buildd.debian.org/stats/g