Re: Non-interactive install proposal

1998-06-04 Thread Andreas Degert
Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [...] Why can't you ask all the questions first? I am too thnking of the kernel image package. I can easily design a framework that gathers all the data a priori -- and yes, you have a point; Andreas because the questions depend on the

Re: Consesus on Linuxconf?

1998-06-04 Thread Andreas Degert
Shaya Potter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: --This might mean that Linuxconf will error out if it can't parse the file, if you've made private changes to it. That's the tradeoff, you take a risk that you won't be able to use linuxconf if you privately edit the file. We will work to improve

Re: Non-interactive install proposal

1998-06-03 Thread Andreas Degert
Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Drake On Tue, Jun 02, 1998 at 09:48:46PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: What is the benefit of keeping packages in an unconfigured state? DrakeIt's a reminder to me that I need to configure this package still. I prefer the

Re: Consesus on Linuxconf?

1998-06-03 Thread Andreas Degert
Shaya Potter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I was wondering if we have reached some sort of consesus on Linuxconf. The points that I see are *Linuxconf can't lose any info. --This might mean that Linuxconf will error out if it can't parse the file, if you've made private changes to it.