: Debian Bitcoin Packaging Team
<pkg-bitcoin-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Changed-By: Anthony Towns <a...@erisian.com.au>
Description:
bitcoin-qt - peer-to-peer network based digital currency - GUI
bitcoin-tx - peer-to-peer network based digital currency - transaction tool
bitco
Maintainer: Debian Bitcoin Packaging Team
<pkg-bitcoin-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Changed-By: Anthony Towns <a...@erisian.com.au>
Description:
bitcoin-qt - peer-to-peer network based digital currency - GUI
bitcoin-tx - peer-to-peer network based digital currency - transaction to
: Debian Bitcoin Packaging Team
<pkg-bitcoin-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Changed-By: Anthony Towns <a...@erisian.com.au>
Description:
bitcoin-qt - peer-to-peer network based digital currency - GUI
bitcoin-tx - peer-to-peer network based digital currency - transaction tool
bitco
Maintainer: Debian Bitcoin Packaging Team
<pkg-bitcoin-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Changed-By: Anthony Towns <a...@erisian.com.au>
Description:
bitcoin-qt - peer-to-peer network based digital currency - GUI
bitcoin-tx - peer-to-peer network based digital currency - transaction tool
bitco
Maintainer: Debian Bitcoin Packaging Team
<pkg-bitcoin-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Changed-By: Anthony Towns <a...@erisian.com.au>
Description:
bitcoin-qt - peer-to-peer network based digital currency - GUI
bitcoin-tx - peer-to-peer network based digital currency - transaction to
: Debian Bitcoin Packaging Team
<pkg-bitcoin-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Changed-By: Anthony Towns <a...@erisian.com.au>
Description:
bitcoin-qt - peer-to-peer network based digital currency - GUI
bitcoin-tx - peer-to-peer network based digital currency - transaction tool
bitco
On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 01:42:58PM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> Please check if I forgot something obvious or if there is some big error
> in it. Patches/git trees to merge from/... are welcome.
dcut from dput-ng uses $login-$timestamp rather than "EPOCH" per se. Does
this actually matter, or is
On Sun, Sep 20, 2015 at 03:48:24PM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> > That's unusual. Is having multiple packages on a single header also
> > valid? eg:
> > Package: glibc, systemd, sysvinit
> > ?
> I think it's cleaner to have one per package tag, but its either that or
> only one line,
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 04:33:04PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
This now means that more and more users end up enabling non-free just
to be able to get at this firmware, which is a problem for many
reasons.
1. Split up non-free?
-
Yes - need to work out details.
(a)
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 11:15:08AM +0200, David Kalnischkies wrote:
On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 12:06:53PM +, Anthony Towns wrote:
The user interface improvement might be worth it anyhow, but selling
this as huge security improvement is just wrong, which is all I am
against.
I think it's
On Sat, Aug 15, 2015 at 12:47:42PM +0200, David Kalnischkies wrote:
I think my working assumption is anyone can register, and it's done
automatically. If you want to ensure the URL is owned by the register,
you could use a dummy DNS record (please add
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 11:23:19AM +0200, David Kalnischkies wrote:
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 11:12:05PM +, Anthony Towns wrote:
I'm not sure if the idea is PPAs can only be added to by DDs/DMs. [...]
There is a session about Debian PPAs at 2015-08-21 17:00..18:00
@ DebConf, so all
(Piling onto this after a dc15 dinner convo referencing it)
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 12:41:45AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
On Sat, Jul 25, 2015 at 07:27:21PM +0200, David Kalnischkies wrote:
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 10:14:21AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
(apologies if the identity of who's
required more RC bug fixes, how long it took for library transitions
to get in sync, etc) and get some ideas for those things. Otherwise,
nothing much jumped out at me...
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns a...@erisian.com.au
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 23:08:59 +1000
Source: beanbag
Binary: python-beanbag python3-beanbag python-beanbag-doc
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.9.2-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Anthony Towns a...@debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2015 14:58:56 +1000
Source: beanbag
Binary: python-beanbag python3-beanbag python-beanbag-doc
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.9.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Anthony Towns a...@erisian.com.au
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 01:16:19PM +0100, Vincent Danjean wrote:
Le 19/03/2015 10:11, Enrico Zini a écrit :
Hello,
the oauth2 part of our single signon system is in need of a team of people
to maintain it, and my experience so far has been that nobody seems to
understand oauth2[1].
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Anthony Towns a...@erisian.com.au
* Package name: python-beanbag
Version : 1.9.1
Upstream Author : Anthony Towns a...@erisian.com.au
* URL : https://pypi.python.org/pypi/beanbag/
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: Python
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 10:10:58AM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
On Mon, 17 Nov 2014, Anthony Towns wrote:
Having a single tool that does the basic stuff admins and maintainers need
independent of init system seems like the right approach to me. *-rc.d
is a terrible name
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 11:05:13AM +0100, Bj??rn Mork wrote:
m...@linux.it (Marco d'Itri) writes:
On Nov 17, Steve Langasek vor...@debian.org wrote:
This is what many still (retorically) wonder about: we the systemd
maintainers did not reject that change,
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 02:38:04PM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
On Mon, 17 Nov 2014, Anthony Towns wrote:
If deb-systemd-* were to get merged in, it might be worth doing a name
change at the same time, I guess. Changing either before jessie doesn't
seem remotely plausible
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 09:22:39AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
Anthony Towns a...@erisian.com.au writes:
BTW, it occured to me that it seems like a wart that update-rc.d doesn't
respect policy-rc.d -- as it stands, policy-rc.d can prevent a service
from (re)starting during install/upgrade
On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 05:11:47PM -0500, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
I would, for example, have classified the discussions / arguments in the
systemd-sysv | systemd-shim bug ...
I was really confused that this needed to go to the TC; from what I
could tell, it had no downside systems using
On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 01:43:37PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
Can someone of the systemd maintainers please explain why this is being done
as a separate helper instead of integrating with the tools that are already
defined in policy and already part of the base system (e.g., invoke-rc.d)?
I
On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 03:52:39PM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
On Sun, 16 Nov 2014, Anthony Towns wrote:
I assume that RC bug was one blocker from the systemd maintainers'
POV, but that bug doesn't seem to have been considered by the
technical committee in its deliberations at all (at least
Hey Joey,
On Sun, Nov 09, 2014 at 06:12:13PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
Please take that message with a pound of salt. I was upset when I wrote
it, it's probably not accurate, and I've left[1] for reasons that are
much more broadly structural, and are certianly not the fault of the
technical
Group
pkg-haskell-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Changed-By: Anthony Towns a...@debian.org
Description:
gitit - Wiki engine backed by a git or darcs filestore
libghc-gitit-dev - Wiki engine backed by a git or darcs
filestore${haskell:ShortBlur
libghc-gitit-doc - Wiki engine backed
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 04:13:34PM +0100, David Kalnischkies wrote:
On Sat, Jan 04, 2014 at 07:34:07PM +0100, David Kalnischkies wrote:
So, I guess merging both could cross a lot of points of your list and
be relatively easily feed into unstable for proper field-testing.
(a upload of my
to make it a bit easier to download stuff
If anyone wants to poke around, please do!
Cheers,
aj
[0] https://lists.debian.org/deity/2009/08/msg00169.html
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2012/02/msg00411.html
--
Anthony Towns a...@erisian.com.au
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel
at it? :)
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns a...@erisian.com.au
performances
http://merkel.debian.org/~ajt/plots/buildd-2.html
-- architecture up-to-dateness
The box at the bottom right lets you do a rolling average, and you can
click and drag to choose a particular date range to view. I haven't
set it up to automatically update yet.
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony
error that trashes files
in /var/lib/dpkg/info/ can be inconvenient too)
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns a...@erisian.com.au
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http
resulting in bad checksums
Advantages of doing it when uploading:
- provides some sort of double check of what's being uploaded
- saves CPU time on users' machines
For me, I'd rather have dpkg generate the hashes.
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns a...@erisian.com.au
diff -urb dpkg-1.15.5.6/debian
On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 10:28, Goswin von Brederlow goswin-...@web.de wrote:
Anthony Towns a...@erisian.com.au writes:
Advantages of doing it when uploading:
- provides some sort of double check of what's being uploaded
- saves CPU time on users' machines
- avoids having bad checksums due
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 05:39:23AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 07:28:58PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
About freeze timing we think that DebConf should definitely not fall
into a freeze
We noticed that releases in the first quarter of the year
worked out quite well
is n-buildds * (1 - buildd-load).
Release criteria are then something like buildd-speed = 50%,
idle-buildds = 1.
Cheers,
aj
#!/usr/bin/env python
# Copyright (c) 2009 Anthony Towns
#
# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
# it under the terms of the GNU General
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 05:39:23AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
So, http://release.debian.org/squeeze/arch_qualify.html lists kfreebsd-*
and m68k as not release candidates, and arm, ia64, mips and powerpc as
at risk in addition to alpha and hppa. Only m68k is listed as having
RM concerns
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 07:28:58PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
Architectures
=
As some of you might have noticed, we added the architectures
kfreebsd-i386 and kfreebsd-amd64 to testing. [...]
However, two architectures also have issues we need to bring to your
attention: We sent
Hello,
There seem to be some issues with the ftp mirror on merkel:
$ pwd
/srv/ftp.debian.org/ftp
$ ls -l dists/sid/Contents-powerpc.diff/ | tail -n2
-rw-rw-r-- 1 archvsync archvsync 2053 Jan 14 13:40 Index
?- ? ? ? ??
On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 10:03:20AM -0500, Theodore Tso wrote:
On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 03:02:41PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
Using the word software as the basis for the divide might be too much:
I'm not convinced that leaving important parts of Debian undocumented
over doctrinal disputes
On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 10:10:24PM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
But the way you wrote in 4 as we will make any private discussions
publically available at the earliest opportunity. is problematic since
it is 100% disclosure pledge. I suggest something along we will make
any private discussions
On Sun, Dec 28, 2008 at 12:04:43AM +, devo...@vote.debian.org wrote:
In the following table, tally[row x][col y] represents the votes that
option x received over option y.
Option
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
=== === === === ===
On Sun, Dec 28, 2008 at 09:08:04PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
Further discussion came sixth, beaten by between 95 votes (option 2),
and 11 votes (option 6), with Reaffirm the social contract last, defeated
by further discussion by 109 votes.
Oh, a further thought came to mind. One way
On Sun, Dec 28, 2008 at 08:45:16PM -0500, Theodore Tso wrote:
On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 12:48:24AM +, Simon Huggins wrote:
I wonder how many DDs were ashamed to vote the titled Reaffirm the
social contract lower than the choices that chose to release.
I'm not ashamed at all; I joined
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 10:55:00AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
On Mon, 2008-10-20 at 11:43 -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
Interesting; Manoj's post isn't in the -vote archives on master. I wonder
why that is?
Actually, I think we need a GR on the lines of
,
|
On Tue, Apr 01, 2008 at 08:05:06AM +0300, Guillem Jover wrote:
As per policy 3.5 I'm bringing this up here. I'd like to add lzma to
dpkg's Pre-Depends, so that we can use lzma compressed packages after
lenny w/o having to add an lzma Pre-Depends on each .deb package
compressed that way.
Hrm.
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 08:16:55AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 03/17/08 04:47, Philip Charles wrote:
[snip]
worrying about. Even then bluray disc(s) will take up about the same
space as a CD set.
21GB on CD is 21GB on Bluray. Physical space isn't an issue for us.
Cheers,
aj
--
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 01:39:40PM +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
[ /me sets the Reply-To: to debian-cd again... ]
But not Mail-Followup-To:...
At a bare minimum:
- installer - downloadable (business card)
- installer+base - downloadable (netinst)
- CD - disk 1
On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 11:59:52PM +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
2 small CDs per arch (business card, netinst)
~30 CDs per arch for a full CD set
~4 DVDs per arch for a full DVD set
(total 353 CDs, 51 DVDs, 426 GB)
Bluray image? Apparently there's been a winner in the format wars,
and we
.
For the record, Ian has been removed from the dpkg group on Alioth and
we asked for an UNACCEPT of his upload, but I'm not sure it will be done
on time as none of the ftpmasters responded yet to my queries on IRC.
The package got unaccepted by Anthony Towns.
Beyond that, any additional uploads
On Sun, Mar 09, 2008 at 10:38:44PM -0500, Steve Greenland wrote:
On 09-Mar-08, 19:30 (CDT), Daniel Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was going to ask on which grounds exactly you were judging the dpkg
team's competence (and that of iwj's: have you reviewed the branch
yourself? can you
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 01:53:17PM +, Jon Dowland wrote:
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 09:42:17AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum
wrote:
(1) Forbid DDs and people in the NM process waiting for
FD/DAM to apply as students.
What if we do this, and still do not get many new people
applying? How about a
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 06:23:28PM -0800, Daniel Burrows wrote:
Would it be possible to only re-order elements that were introduced by
a variable substitution? That would make the list deterministic without
changing what the maintainer wrote.
At best you could:
(a) sort substvar
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 11:45:45AM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
Hence I think we should push for source upload.
Stop pushing and start programming. A technical approach to this would
be implementing something along the lines of
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/07/msg00544.html
On Sun, Feb 03, 2008 at 04:30:09PM -0600, William Pitcock wrote:
Currently, the packages that are asking for wx2.8 are almost all available
and releasable in earlier versions, built against wx2.6. Uploading wx2.8 to
unstable implies that it's suitable for apps to build against, which by all
] DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION=Debian x.y Testing distribution - Not Released
Cheers,
aj
#!/usr/bin/env python
# Copyright 2007 Anthony Towns
# GPL v2 or later.
import apt_pkg, sys, os
apt_pkg.init()
def try_write(file):
try:
f = open(file, w)
except IOError:
f = sys.stdout
On Thu, Dec 27, 2007 at 04:21:20PM +0100, Adeodato Sim?? wrote:
* Anthony Towns [Thu, 27 Dec 2007 17:34:49 +1000]:
On Wed, Dec 26, 2007 at 11:53:25PM +0100, Adeodato Sim?? wrote:
*Personally*, I like the idea of Javier Fern??ndez-Sanguino expressed in
the mail linked above of keeping
On Sun, Dec 23, 2007 at 02:26:30PM +0100, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
1. Get wx2.4 out of the archive _soon_. There's a list in wiki.d.o about
the status of the last applications using wx2.4, if I remember right.
Their maintainers had more than enough time to et them migrated to 2.6
(or 2.8, if there
,
aj
#!/usr/bin/env python
# Copyright 2007 Anthony Towns
# GPL v2 or later.
import apt_pkg, sys, os
apt_pkg.init()
def get_installed():
vs = {}
i = open(/var/lib/dpkg/status, r)
p,v,x = None,None,None
for l in i.xreadlines():
l = l.rstrip()
if l.startswith(Package: ): p = l
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2007 00:31:16 +1000
Source: ifupdown
Binary: ifupdown
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.7~alpha3
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Anthony Towns [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Anthony Towns [EMAIL
On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 11:03:08PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
Frankly, I suggest we look at the list of Unix commands as
specified by the SUS -- which can also be seen at:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Unix_programs
So -- how many of the standard unix commands as
On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 08:25:05AM +0100, NN_il_Confusionario wrote:
Question: is there somewhere on the net a script (*) such that:
* it installs required/essential packages (_all_ of them but _only_
them) of such a release as a chroot in that directory
You could create a variant for
Kind of reviving an old thread, but anyway:
On Sun, Nov 11, 2007 at 07:12:35PM +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
I believe it to be one of the more important bits of a standard Unix
*desktop* installation - but this just reminds me of the fact that I'm
quite uncomfortable with keeping a
On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 07:42:06AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
Anthony Towns [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It also includes, but afaics, probably doesn't need to (anymore):
ispell, dictionaries-common, iamerican, ibritish, wamerican
m4, texinfo (???)
texinfo possibly for info and dating
On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 10:26:11AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
I'm not sure if there's any point to continuing to try to make sure
that nothing = optional conflicts with anything else = optional.
Hmm. Can you elaborate on this, please? Is it because it is too
hard to achieve
On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 05:09:36PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On Thu, 06 Dec 2007 13:34:10 -0800, Ben Pfaff [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I use time in benchmarking scripts.
I do not find the built in time to be a substitute for the good
old fashioned time command. Observe:
Why are
-By: Anthony Towns [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
debian-maintainers - GPG keys of Debian maintainers
Closes: 452011 452600 452605 452719 452861 452881
Changes:
debian-maintainers (1.5) unstable; urgency=low
.
[ Joey Hess ]
* Added Debian maintainer Aurélien GÃRÃME. Closes: #452600
-By: Anthony Towns [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
debian-maintainers - GPG keys of Debian maintainers
Changes:
debian-maintainers (1.0) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Add James Troup, Michael Beattie, Ryan Murray, Joerg Jaspert, Brian
Nelson, Marc Brockschmidt, and Christoph Berg to the Uploaders
-By: Anthony Towns [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
debian-maintainers - GPG keys of Debian maintainers
Changes:
debian-maintainers (0.07) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Update README advice on where to send advocacy mails.
Files:
9c971e077d8e4989039d89dca52b2ea9 718 misc extra debian
-By: Anthony Towns [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
debian-maintainers - GPG keys of Debian maintainers
Changes:
debian-maintainers (0.07) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Update README advice on where to send advocacy mails.
Files:
9c971e077d8e4989039d89dca52b2ea9 718 misc extra debian
-By: Anthony Towns [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
debian-maintainers - GPG keys of Debian maintainers
Changes:
debian-maintainers (0.06) unstable; urgency=low
.
[ Joey Hess ]
* Explicitly build-depend on gnupg rather than rely on jetring pulling it in,
since runtests uses it directly
-By: Anthony Towns [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
debian-maintainers - GPG keys of Debian maintainers
Changes:
debian-maintainers (0.01) unstable; urgency=low
.
[ Joey Hess ]
* Initial release.
* Added Debian maintainer Miriam Ruiz
.
[ Anthony Towns ]
* Added Debian maintainer Fathi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2007 23:50:29 +1000
Source: gzip
Binary: gzip
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1.3.12-3.2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Bdale Garbee [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Anthony Towns [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 03:38:54PM +0300, Faidon Liambotis wrote:
There's also --rsyncable which is appears mostly (if not only) on Debian
and unfortunately can't be figured out from the headers.
Multipart gzips would also not work even though I haven't yet find any.
Both these are cases
On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 04:15:44PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
BTW, the next release of pristine-tar will support generating pristine
gz files too, so will fully support pristine .orig.tar.gz. Regenerating
pristine gz files from small deltas is quite a lot trickier, and
currently works for about
On Thu, Sep 20, 2007 at 09:46:47AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
Le Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 01:08:40AM +1000, Anthony Towns a ?crit :
For what it's worth, we don't do that. References I'm aware of:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2003/05/msg00092.html
http://lists.debian.org/debian
On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 11:24:21PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
Le Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 03:35:15PM -0500, Peter Samuelson a ?crit :
I fully agree with what you write. Indeed what I support is not to ignore
the RFC or other similarly non-free, non-programmatic files, but to
document them in the
On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 02:07:55PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
What about adding clarifications, what about summarising parts of the RFC?
You don't need a free license to do either of those things, though, which
is part of the reason why...
It's more about the freedom to fix things or to use
(-kernel dropped)
On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 03:47:43PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On Wed, 12 Sep 2007 21:07:43 +0300, Faidon Liambotis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
Sune Vuorela wrote:
On 2007-09-12, Faidon Liambotis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You're not checking for copyright violations or
On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 06:26:45PM +0200, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
The Firefox monoculture is doing a lot of harm to our community.
So, I don't know what monoculture you're referring to.
Popcon gives 23000 for iceweasel, 500 for dillo, and 18 for netsurf.
(Correct me if I'm wrong, but I
On Wed, Sep 05, 2007 at 11:39:42AM +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote:
Michael Meskes wrote:
I have no idea what Daniel really did on the package.
I did about 90% of the inital packaging.
Which just left the last 90% of the packaging, I guess.
Patrick uploaded removed me from changelog in the two
On Wed, Sep 05, 2007 at 02:49:25PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
On Wed, 05 Sep 2007, Patrick Winnertz wrote:
This was no good work which was quicked hacked together.
I'm sorry, but when I upload a new upstream release of Django, I don't
check every new file.
It's all good that you do it,
On Wed, Aug 29, 2007 at 10:41:10PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
# Our priorities are our users and free software
I must have misunderstood, I thought this was what Debian was all
about.
Which is fine, but the problem is there's so many ways of working on
those priorities that nobody can
On Fri, Aug 17, 2007 at 05:05:28PM -0500, Peter Samuelson wrote:
I'd opt for dpkg generating the checksums upon _extracting_ the .deb
file. [...]
Where's the code for that?
Changing write_filelist_except to update a new .md5 control file ought to
be possible. You'd probably want to add a
On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 10:13:38PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 06:54:49AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
diversions are far from being atomic.
True, but it is persistent across upgrades and doesn't require any
particular support from the package.
Is it a bug (or a missing
On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 06:00:21PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 12:53:03PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
OTOH, specifically using something else than /bin/sh for a fast
POSIX-with-the-extensions-Debian-mandates shell (i.e. forget posh, but dash
is good)
On Sun, Jul 29, 2007 at 08:25:58AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
On Sat, Jul 28, 2007 at 09:28:46PM -0400, Ricky Zhou [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ricky Zhou [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: smolt
Version : 0.9.8.3
Upstream Author
On Sun, Jul 29, 2007 at 03:59:13AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
On Jul 29, Russ Allbery [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So is anything ever valid other than openbsd-inetd | inet-superserver as a
dependency? I keep getting confused on the rules around using virtual
packages. Would rlinetd |
On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 12:02:32AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
People really do use both package priorities and sections still for
selecting packages in the package management tools, and it would be great
to have them fixed.
Seconded. I tried once to install all optional packages at the
On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 01:44:04PM -0400, Anthony Towns wrote:
On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 02:48:34PM +0200, Daniel Leidert wrote:
Can someone tell me, why ftp.debian.org is lacking behind?
Apparently it's out of disk :(
This is now fixed. Thanks for the report.
Cheers,
aj
signature.asc
On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 02:48:34PM +0200, Daniel Leidert wrote:
Can someone tell me, why ftp.debian.org is lacking behind?
Apparently it's out of disk :(
(250G for the current archive, 44GB for archived suites, 11G for an old
packages.d.o, and the remaining 15G or so looks like it's used in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 15:47:21 +0100
Source: ifupdown
Binary: ifupdown
Architecture: source powerpc
Version: 0.7~alpha2
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Anthony Towns [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Anthony Towns [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 15:47:21 +0100
Source: ifupdown
Binary: ifupdown
Architecture: source powerpc
Version: 0.7~alpha1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Anthony Towns [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Anthony Towns [EMAIL
On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 11:08:39PM +0200, Frank K?ster wrote:
Anthony Towns [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
See, given that as an ftpmaster I'm one of the folks who actually
implements the policy on what's accepted into main or not, it's not my
loss at all.
I think that Debian would very much
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 06:28:53PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
Le Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 10:09:07AM +0200, Michael Hanke a ?crit :
My question is now: Is it reasonable to provide this rather huge amount
of data in a package in the archive?
An alternative to a dedicated package would be to
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 12:07:52PM +0200, Frank K?ster wrote:
You could ask Anthony whether you're allowed to publish his reasons on
-legal. That would do the project a great favor.
You could just ask me directly you know...
] I thought choice-of-venue is non-free by default?
]
] Via Simon
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 09:08:31AM +0200, Frank K?ster wrote:
That's true, as an ideal. In reality, you can't expect every DD or even
maintainer to subscribe to -legal except when they've got a particular
problem to discuss.
Sure, but you don't need or want that. All you need is an
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 02:09:06AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
Why doesn't it matter? If I've been sued because of something I've actually
done that infringed the license, then surely the DFSG and Debian shouldn't
be concerned with that (other than the question of whether what I've done is
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 03:58:08PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
IMO it would be worth it if we could split out gigabytes of data from the
main archive and thus significantly reduce the bandwidth needed for
mirror syncs. Especially if that data is only used by an extremely small
subset of
On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 07:55:18PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
On Mon, 4 Jun 2007 19:30:36 +1000 Anthony Towns wrote:
And I mean, I know what a GR is for, why are you telling me? It's
still not a *good solution* for deciding these things; it's a last
resort, and the only other options we
1 - 100 of 832 matches
Mail list logo
