Re: unattended-upgrade broken

Hi Alexandre, Alexandre Detiste ezt írta (időpont: 2023. dec. 17., V, 15:37): > > How to fix this in an unanttended way ? > > (even Salsa seems to have UU installed, > so maybe impact on infrastructure too) > > # unattended-upgrade --verbose > Traceback (most recent call last): > File

Bug#1026792: ITP: firebuild -- Automatic build accelerator

Package: wnpp Owner: Balint Reczey Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org * Package name: firebuild Version : 0.2.9 Upstream Author : i...@firebuild.com * URL : https://firebuild.com * License : Firebuild-license Programming Lang: C,

Bug#1003524: O: xxhash -- Extremely fast hash algorithm

Package: wnpp Severity: normal X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org Orphaning the package according to Norbert's request: https://github.com/norbusan/debian-xxhash/pull/7#issuecomment-1009760784 Thanks Norbert for maintaining the package for many years! Balint

Bug#999697: RFP: popcon-stats-data -- Debian's Popularity Contest statistics

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org Control: merge -1 999677 * Package name: popcon-stats-data Version : 0.2024 * URL or Web page : https://popcon.debian.org/ * License : Public Domain (data) Description : Debian's

Re: Need help with Multi-Arch in systemd

Hi Michael, Michael Biebl ezt írta (időpont: 2021. júl. 9., P, 22:42): > > Hi Guillem, > > thanks for your feedback > > Am 09.07.21 um 13:46 schrieb Guillem Jover: > > If the private library has no backwards or forward compatibility (due > > to the SONAME used) the time window where the library

Re: Disabling automatic upgrades on Sid by default?

Hi Sean, Sean Whitton ezt írta (időpont: 2020. dec. 28., H, 0:05): > > Hello, > > On Sun 27 Dec 2020 at 08:11AM GMT, Paul Wise wrote: > > > I think Debian stable users should enable automatic upgrades (IIRC > > that is the case now). Debian unstable/testing users should probably > > only enable

RFA: several packages around Kodi

Hi All, These packages are maintained officially by the Multimedia Team, but I'm the only uploader for them: crystalhd forked-daapd kodi-pvr-argustv kodi-pvr-dvbviewer kodi-pvr-hdhomerun kodi-pvr-iptvsimple kodi-pvr-mediaportal-tvserver kodi-pvr-mythtv kodi-pvr-nextpvr kodi-pvr-njoy

Re: Bits from the DPL (August 2019)

Hi, Sam Hartman ezt írta (időpont: 2019. szept. 18., Sze, 22:47): > > > Dear Debian: > ... > Init System Diversity > = .. > Honestly, I'm not entirely sure how to move forward. Perhaps it's just > that I haven't talked to someone I need to. Perhaps someone will read > this,

Re: Suite name for security updates changing with Debian 11 "bullseye"

Hi Ansgar, Ansgar Burchardt ezt írta (időpont: 2019. júl. 11., Cs, 22:02): > > Hi, > > over the last years we had people getting confused over -updates > (recommended updates) and /updates (security updates). Starting > with Debian 11 "bullseye" we have therefore renamed the suite including >

Bug#912303: RFA: libopenhmd

Package: wnpp Severity: normal X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org Hi, Due to trying to focus on other packages I'm looking for someone to adopt this package. It does not need a lot of attention and is in a good shape, I just did not start the project I wanted to use it for. Thanks,

Re: Auto-update for sid? Auto-backport?

Hi Guido, 2017-11-24 12:48 GMT+01:00 Guido Günther : > Hi, > On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 04:31:43PM +0100, Guido Günther wrote: >> Hi, >> On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 04:43:17PM +0100, Steffen Möller wrote: >> > Hello, >> > >> > my QA page or our blend's task page (like >> >

Re: [RFC] The PIE unholy mess

Hi Emilio, 2017-01-18 18:44 GMT+01:00 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort : > On 18/01/17 18:23, Matthias Klose wrote: >> At this point, I would prefer to revert the PIE changes for the release and >> discuss these after the release with all parties involved. > > It's not the time to revert

Re: [RFC] The PIE unholy mess

Hi, 2017-01-18 4:34 GMT+01:00 Guillem Jover : > Hi! > > I'd like to get some feedback from porters and package maintainers, > given that this affects at least both groups. Some background first. > > One of the reasons PIE has in the past not been enabled by default in >

Re: Test instance of our infrastructure

Hi, 2016-12-08 23:24 GMT+01:00 Paul Wise : > On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 8:04 PM, Ian Jackson wrote: > >> Should we not have public test instances of all these things ? > > If this will increase the bus factor of Debian services, that would be great. > If this will just be a time

Re: Migration despite an RC bug?

Hi, 2016-12-30 12:53 GMT+01:00 Guillem Jover : > Hi! > > On Fri, 2016-12-30 at 09:25:20 +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >> On 29/12/16 23:36, Christoph Biedl wrote: >> > Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote... >> >> Unforunately, the BTS exported a broken/incomplete RC bug list,

Re: [RFC] Enabling bindnow by default in dpkg-buildflags?

2016-12-19 14:58 GMT+01:00 Julien Cristau <jcris...@debian.org>: > On 12/19/2016 11:37 AM, Bálint Réczey wrote: >> Thanks. If I could perform the autopkgtest run with bindnow this year would >> it >> be convincing enough given only a small amount of breakages to enable

Re: [RFC] Enabling bindnow by default in dpkg-buildflags?

Hi Guillem, 2016-12-19 1:34 GMT+01:00 Guillem Jover <guil...@debian.org>: > On Sat, 2016-12-17 at 09:20:40 +0100, Bálint Réczey wrote: >> 2016-12-17 3:14 GMT+01:00 Guillem Jover <guil...@debian.org>: >> > On Wed, 2016-12-14 at 14:05:44 +0100, Bálint Réczey wrote: &

Re: [RFC] Enabling bindnow by default in dpkg-buildflags?

Hi, 2016-12-17 10:17 GMT+01:00 Julien Cristau <jcris...@debian.org>: > On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 09:20:40 +0100, Bálint Réczey wrote: > >> >> >> Considering that we are already in the transition freeze I suggest >> >> >> going wit

Re: [RFC] Enabling bindnow by default in dpkg-buildflags?

Hi Guillem, 2016-12-17 3:14 GMT+01:00 Guillem Jover <guil...@debian.org>: > On Wed, 2016-12-14 at 14:05:44 +0100, Bálint Réczey wrote: >> 2016-12-13 9:29 GMT+01:00 Bálint Réczey <bal...@balintreczey.hu>: >> > 2016-11-27 23:11 GMT+01:00 Bálint Réczey <bal...@balint

Re: [RFC] Enabling bindnow by default in dpkg-buildflags?

Hi All, 2016-12-13 9:29 GMT+01:00 Bálint Réczey <bal...@balintreczey.hu>: > Hi Guillem, > > 2016-11-27 23:11 GMT+01:00 Bálint Réczey <bal...@balintreczey.hu>: >> Hi Guillem, >> >> 2016-11-23 2:30 GMT+01:00 Guillem Jover <guil...@debian.org>: >>&

Re: [RFC] Enabling bindnow by default in dpkg-buildflags?

Hi Guillem, 2016-11-27 23:11 GMT+01:00 Bálint Réczey <bal...@balintreczey.hu>: > Hi Guillem, > > 2016-11-23 2:30 GMT+01:00 Guillem Jover <guil...@debian.org>: >> Hi! >> >> This was discussed relatively recently, but it was not entirely clear >> to

Re: Let's stop using CVS for debian.org website

Hi Sean, 2016-11-28 23:23 GMT+01:00 Sean Whitton <spwhit...@spwhitton.name>: > Hello Bálint, > > On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 06:33:34PM +0100, Bálint Réczey wrote: >> It is not a subtree clone, but the result is practically the same > > It wouldn't permit making new com

Re: Let's stop using CVS for debian.org website

Hi, 2016-11-24 12:20 GMT+01:00 Jonas Smedegaard : > Quoting Holger Levsen (2016-11-24 10:43:40) >> As some people fear the size of the git repo, I've done a test: >> >> cloning took 5-6min (granted over a fast network connection) and requires >> 628mb of diskspace in the end. >>

Re: [RFC] Enabling bindnow by default in dpkg-buildflags?

Hi Guillem, 2016-11-23 2:30 GMT+01:00 Guillem Jover : > Hi! > > This was discussed relatively recently, but it was not entirely clear > to me what was the conclusion, if there was any(?), about enabling > bindnow by default. > > And although this got enabled by default in

Re: Static linking and fPIC (Was: Re: "PIE by default" transition is underway -- wiki needs updating)

Hi Ian, 2016-10-31 14:19 GMT+01:00 Ian Campbell <i...@debian.org>: > On Mon, 2016-10-31 at 12:17 +0100, Bálint Réczey wrote: >> 2016-10-31 10:38 GMT+01:00 Ian Campbell <i...@debian.org>: >> > If possible I'd also prefer a solution which fixed qcontrol-static >>

Re: Static linking and fPIC (Was: Re: "PIE by default" transition is underway -- wiki needs updating)

2016-10-31 12:52 GMT+01:00 Henrique de Moraes Holschuh : > On Mon, 31 Oct 2016, Ian Campbell wrote: >> On Mon, 2016-10-31 at 10:27 +0100, Jérémy Lal wrote: >> > export DEB_BUILD_MAINT_OPTIONS = hardening=+all,-pie >> > ? >> >> Thanks, but that doesn't appear to help, I think the

Re: Static linking and fPIC (Was: Re: "PIE by default" transition is underway -- wiki needs updating)

Hi Ian, 2016-10-31 10:38 GMT+01:00 Ian Campbell : > On Mon, 2016-10-31 at 10:27 +0100, Jérémy Lal wrote: >> export DEB_BUILD_MAINT_OPTIONS = hardening=+all,-pie >> ? > > Thanks, but that doesn't appear to help, I think the issue is to do > with the changed default in gcc rather

Re: Doxygen has 3 RC bugs preventing packages to build - is droping documentation a sensible option?

Hi Andreas, 2016-10-28 13:41 GMT+02:00 Andreas Tille <andr...@an3as.eu>: > On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 01:27:27PM +0200, Bálint Réczey wrote: >> > What do you think about the "droping documentation since it breaks the >> > package build" idea? >> >>

Re: Doxygen has 3 RC bugs preventing packages to build - is droping documentation a sensible option?

Hi, 2016-10-28 13:09 GMT+02:00 Andreas Tille : > Hi, > > I really want to update cimg since a long time, missing several upstream > releases but I cimg does not build due to #836168. In the bug report it > was also suggested to use sphinx as doxygen replacement but I'm not sure

Re: "PIE by default" transition is underway -- wiki needs updating

Hi, 2016-10-27 4:03 GMT+02:00 Steve M. Robbins : > On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 05:26:24AM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: > >> My point was that, yes we have changed to generating relocatable code >> but that is still targetted for executables only, which preserves the >> current

Re: "PIE by default" transition is underway -- wiki needs updating

Hi Steve, 2016-10-25 5:31 GMT+02:00 Steve M. Robbins : > Hi, > > I haven't been paying close attention to the "PIE by default" [1] discussions, > so I may have missed the memo, but: it seems the transition is underway? GCC have been changed to enable PIE by default but dpkg has

Re: Bug#835533: dasher: Please package Dasher 5.0 beta

Hi, 2016-10-06 8:46 GMT+02:00 Scott Kitterman : > > > On October 6, 2016 2:04:36 AM EDT, Samuel Thibault > wrote: >>Paul Wise, on Thu 06 Oct 2016 11:40:12 +0800, wrote: >>> On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 12:53 AM, Samuel Thibault wrote: >>> > So if some of

Re: Exception for shipping shared libraries compiled with -fPIC for multiple packages

Hi, 2016-09-15 20:19 GMT+02:00 Raoul Borenius : > Hello all, > > On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 01:02:02AM +0200, Balint Reczey wrote: >> Dear People of Debian-Devel, >> >> Current Policy (3.9.8.0) mandates discussion on debian-devel@d.o >> before changing packages to ship static

Re: PIE and static libraries

Hi Markus, 2016-09-12 8:51 GMT+02:00 Markus Wanner <mar...@bluegap.ch>: > On 09/12/2016 01:47 AM, Bálint Réczey wrote: >> I have opened a bug to encourage PIC for static libraries in Policy, too.: >> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=837478 > > Tha

Re: PIE and static libraries

Hi All, 2016-05-22 11:26 GMT+02:00 Christian Seiler : > On 05/22/2016 10:50 AM, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: >> On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 10:41:56AM +0200, Christian Seiler wrote: ... > >>> B. From a performance perspective, using non-PIC/PIE code is >>>faster, though not

FTBFS with PIE & bindnow (was: Re: Porter roll call for Debian Stretch)

Hi, First of all thanks to Lucas Nussbaum who ran the first test build! 2016-08-31 19:21 GMT+02:00 Steve Langasek : > On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 11:26:55AM +0100, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote: >> Hello, >> > Results are available at >> >

Re: Porter roll call for Debian Stretch

Hi, 2016-08-31 12:26 GMT+02:00 Dimitri John Ledkov <x...@debian.org>: > Hello, > > On 30 August 2016 at 23:07, Lucas Nussbaum <lu...@debian.org> wrote: >> On 22/08/16 at 19:12 +0200, Bálint Réczey wrote: >>> Hi Guillem, >>> >>> 2016-0

Re: PIE + bindnow for Stretch?(Re: Time to reevaluate the cost of -fPIC?)

Hi All, 2016-05-28 23:16 GMT+02:00 Bálint Réczey <bal...@balintreczey.hu>: > Hi, > > 2016-05-18 2:21 GMT+02:00 Guillem Jover <guil...@debian.org>: >> On Tue, 2016-05-17 at 12:08:09 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: >>> I'm not a fan myself for turning on ha

Re: Porter roll call for Debian Stretch

Hi Guillem, 2016-08-21 14:02 GMT+02:00 Guillem Jover <guil...@debian.org>: > Hi! > > On Sun, 2016-08-21 at 10:24:42 +0200, Bálint Réczey wrote: >> I'm testing a set of patches [2] for gcc and dpkg which enable bindnow for >> all >> arches and PIE for amd64, ppc6

Re: Porter roll call for Debian Stretch

Hi, 2016-08-21 8:22 GMT+02:00 Niels Thykier : > Kurt Roeckx: >> On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 10:05:06PM +0200, ni...@thykier.net wrote: >>> * If we were to enable -fPIE/-pie by default in GCC-6, should that change >>>also apply to this port? [0] >> >> If -fPIE is the default

Re: PIE + bindnow for Stretch?(Re: Time to reevaluate the cost of -fPIC?)

Hi, 2016-05-18 2:21 GMT+02:00 Guillem Jover : > On Tue, 2016-05-17 at 12:08:09 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: >> I'm not a fan myself for turning on hardening flags in the compiler itself, >> but if you do that, then dpkg issues like https://bugs.debian.org/823869 >> need to be

Re: PIE + bindnow for Stretch?(Re: Time to reevaluate the cost of -fPIC?)

Hi, 2016-05-16 13:09 GMT+02:00 Christoph Egger : > Hi! > > Iustin Pop writes: >> - that bug seems to have been opened in the context of custom patches to >> GCC, back in 2009-2012 >> - the CTTE seems to have made an informal decision (see last update >>

Re: PIE + bindnow for Stretch?(Re: Time to reevaluate the cost of -fPIC?)

Hi Niels, 2016-05-15 20:49 GMT+02:00 Niels Thykier <ni...@thykier.net>: > Bálint Réczey: >> Hi, >> >> [...] >> > > Hi, > >> I think making PIE and bindnow default in dpkg (at least for amd64) would be >> perfect release goals for Stretch.

PIE + bindnow for Stretch?(Re: Time to reevaluate the cost of -fPIC?)

Hi, 2016-05-15 4:11 GMT+02:00 Dimitri John Ledkov : > On 14 May 2016 at 21:12, Niels Thykier wrote: >> Marco d'Itri: >>> On May 03, Josh Triplett wrote: >>> While this doesn't make PIC absolutely free, it does eliminate almost

Progress on hardened1-linux-amd64 (was: Re: Proposing amd64-hardened architecture for Debian)

Hi All, 2014-04-15 18:15 GMT+02:00 Thomas Goirand : > On 04/15/2014 06:00 PM, Balint Reczey wrote: >> Hi, >> ... >> My proposal for serving those security-focused users is introducing a >> new architecture targeting amd64 hardware, but with more security >> related C/C++ features

Re: Clarifications about the alleged transition to FFmpeg

Hi Alessio, 2015-06-18 18:00 GMT+02:00 Alessio Treglia ales...@debian.org: Hello everybody, I am afraid that I have to inform you that Bálint's blog post [1] about the current status of libav's provided is untrue as there's still a discussion ongoing on the Debian Multimedia Maintainers'

Re: Clarifications about the alleged transition to FFmpeg

2015-06-18 18:30 GMT+02:00 Bálint Réczey bal...@balintreczey.hu: Hi Alessio, 2015-06-18 18:00 GMT+02:00 Alessio Treglia ales...@debian.org: Hello everybody, I am afraid that I have to inform you that Bálint's blog post [1] about the current status of libav's provided is untrue as there's

Re: Clarifications about the alleged transition to FFmpeg

Hi Alessio, 2015-06-18 19:25 GMT+02:00 Alessio Treglia ales...@debian.org: On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 5:30 PM, Bálint Réczey bal...@balintreczey.hu wrote: While the team has not announced a formal decision the majority of the team supports FFmpeg (which you don't ;-). I've never denied that: [1

Re: Facilitating external repositories

Hi Wouter, 2015-06-12 0:59 GMT+02:00 Wouter Verhelst wou...@debian.org: On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 12:38:29PM +0200, Bálint Réczey wrote: Hi Wouter, 2015-06-07 23:31 GMT+02:00 Wouter Verhelst w...@uter.be: On Sun, Jun 07, 2015 at 07:43:30PM +0200, Bálint Réczey wrote: I think this situation

Re: Facilitating external repositories

Hi Wouter, 2015-06-07 23:31 GMT+02:00 Wouter Verhelst w...@uter.be: On Sun, Jun 07, 2015 at 07:43:30PM +0200, Bálint Réczey wrote: I think this situation still allows maintaining the packages in Debian, when (if ever) your contract ends and you don't want to maintain the packages in your free

Re: Facilitating external repositories

Hi Wouter, 2015-06-07 11:08 GMT+02:00 Wouter Verhelst wou...@debian.org: On Fri, Jun 05, 2015 at 09:10:56AM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote: Wouter Verhelst wrote: At $DAYJOB, I'm maintaining a few repositories with ready-to-install packages for a number of distributions[1] Currently, the

Re: lowering severity of bugs not tracked by release team

mgilb...@debian.org: On Sat, Dec 20, 2014 at 7:52 PM, Bálint Réczey wrote: The proper severity of this bug is grave as set by Moritz IMO. I'm restoring it wearing my maintainer hat. It's not really constructive arguing over severity, so that's fine. I appreciate the work done by the Security

Re: lowering severity of bugs not tracked by release team

Control: severity -1 grave Hi Mike, 2014-12-20 20:57 GMT+01:00 Michael Gilbert mgilb...@debian.org: On Sat, Dec 20, 2014 at 6:15 AM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Sat, 2014-12-20 at 11:48 +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: [sent again, cc correct list address this time] Quoting Michael Gilbert

Being part of a community and behaving

Dear Josselin, I have just noticed your blog post on planet.debian.org: https://np237.livejournal.com/34598.html I would like to ask you to resist the temptation of publishing similar posts. It makes fun of part of our community which you are well aware of and it also shows corpses which

Re: Being part of a community and behaving

Hi Norbert, 2014-11-13 13:23 GMT+01:00 Norbert Preining prein...@logic.at: On Thu, 13 Nov 2014, Bálint Réczey wrote: I have just noticed your blog post on planet.debian.org: https://np237.livejournal.com/34598.html You lack any sense of humor, really! I clearly sensed the humor as I wrote

Re: Two years later and still no netatalk3 in jessie?

Hi Adrian, 2014-11-09 10:48 GMT+01:00 Adrian Knoth a...@drcomp.erfurt.thur.de: On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 01:21:04PM -0400, Igor Bernstein wrote: - jessie freeze happens in 2 months Happened in the meantime :-/ 2014/8/4 - Adrian updated the package to 3.1.3 adi's package (currently @ 3.1.3):

Re: Internal compiler error

Hi Frederic, 2014-10-04 10:50 GMT+02:00 Colin Watson cjwat...@debian.org: On Sat, Oct 04, 2014 at 07:24:03AM +, PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel wrote: Hello, I got an FTBFS due to an internal compiler error. should I fill a bug against gcc ? Yes. Please see: /usr/share/doc/gcc/README.Bugs

Re: [bal...@balintreczey.hu: Accepted xbmc 2:13.2+dfsg1-2~exp0 (source all amd64) into experimental

Hi David, 2014-09-30 13:35 GMT+02:00 David Weinehall t...@debian.org: The latest upload of xbmc seems a bit botched; this is the changelog in its entirety: xbmc (2:13.2+dfsg1-2~exp0) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium . * Now, there is nothing wrong with terse and succinct changelogs, but

Re: Two-minute(!)-survey on motivation and free time contribution of open source developers

Hi, 2014-08-31 17:42 GMT+02:00 Paul Wise p...@debian.org: On Sun, Aug 31, 2014 at 6:53 AM, Stefan Kullack wrote: It would be fantastic if you could spend two minutes on three simple questions! Here is the link to the survey: https://de.surveymonkey.com/s/MFKXYLP You might get more

Re: JavaScript usage (was: Two-minute(!)-survey on motivation and free time contribution of open source developers)

Hi Octavio and All, 2014-08-31 19:21 GMT+02:00 Octavio Alvarez alvar...@alvarezp.ods.org: On 08/31/2014 10:03 AM, Bálint Réczey wrote: Hi, 2014-08-31 17:42 GMT+02:00 Paul Wise p...@debian.org: On Sun, Aug 31, 2014 at 6:53 AM, Stefan Kullack wrote: It would be fantastic if you could spend

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Reintroducing FFmpeg to Debian

Hi Nicolas, 2014-08-16 17:11 GMT+02:00 Nicolas George geo...@nsup.org: L'octidi 28 thermidor, an CCXXII, Bálint Réczey a écrit : Using Gerrit and file ownersip are not mutually exclusive. Gerrit can be configured to automatically invite the right people for review based on the changed path

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Reintroducing FFmpeg to Debian

Hi Russ, 2014-08-16 18:59 GMT+02:00 Russ Allbery r...@debian.org: Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org writes: Russ Allbery r...@debian.org (2014-08-16): None of this is why libav and FFmpeg can't both be in the archive. They can't both be in the archive because both the release team and the

Bug#758245: ITP: libcli-framework-perl -- standardized, flexible, testable CLI applications framework for Perl

Package: wnpp Owner: Balint Reczey bal...@balintreczey.hu Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org,debian-p...@lists.debian.org * Package name: libcli-framework-perl Version : 0.05 Upstream Author : Karl Erisman keris...@cpan.org * URL :

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Reintroducing FFmpeg to Debian

Hi, 2014-08-15 14:20 GMT+02:00 Michael Niedermayer michae...@gmx.at: On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 02:53:09PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote: On 08/14/2014 11:59 PM, The Wanderer wrote: On 08/14/2014 11:27 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote: On 08/13/2014 07:53 AM, Kieran Kunhya wrote: On 08/13/2014

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Reintroducing FFmpeg to Debian

2014-08-14 13:58 GMT+02:00 Stefano Sabatini stefa...@gmail.com: On date Wednesday 2014-08-13 16:27:20 +0200, Attila Kinali encoded: On Wed, 13 Aug 2014 00:30:05 +0200 Michael Niedermayer michae...@gmx.at wrote: I never understood why people who once where friends became mutually so hostile

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Reintroducing FFmpeg to Debian

Hi, 2014-08-08 20:06 GMT+02:00 Andreas Cadhalpun andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com: Hi Reinhard, On 08.08.2014 14:29, Reinhard Tartler wrote: On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 7:13 AM, Matthias Urlichs matth...@urlichs.de wrote: I intended to come up with a more timely full response, but I just

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Reintroducing FFmpeg to Debian

2014-08-09 13:41 GMT+02:00 Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk: Quoting Bálint Réczey (2014-08-09 11:38:54) XBMC works with Libav for most use-cases while it fails in the rest, notably it can not use VDPAU acceleration which is being (understandably) complained about very often (#742896). Another

Re: Re: people.debian.org will move from ravel to paradis and become HTTPS only

2014-07-17 2:20 GMT+02:00 brian m. carlson sand...@crustytoothpaste.net: On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 11:43:17PM +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote: Some sites (I mean, deployments) like to use a caching proxy, especially if many machines use the same resource, and/or bandwidth is scarce. Or even

Re: people.debian.org will move from ravel to paradis and become HTTPS only

2014-07-15 21:39 GMT+02:00 Philipp Kern pk...@debian.org: On 2014-07-15 16:00, Thorsten Glaser wrote: Martin Zobel-Helas dixit: Furthermore, we will change the people.debian.org web-service such that only HTTPS connections will be supported (unencrypted requests will be redirected). […]

Re: Automatically dumping test-suite.log on make check failure

2014-05-08 20:49 GMT+02:00 Marcin Owsiany porri...@debian.org: 2014-05-08 19:33 GMT+02:00 Guillem Jover guil...@debian.org: Hi! On Thu, 2014-05-08 at 19:10:48 +0200, Marcin Owsiany wrote: Does anyone know a way to make the automake-generated test suite scripts cat the test-suite.log to

Re: Ghostscript licensing changed to AGPL

Hi, 2014-05-07 14:37 GMT+02:00 Thorsten Glaser t...@debian.org: On Wed, 7 May 2014, Ian Jackson wrote: Yes. But this isn't as bad as you think, because the source availability requirement exists only if you modify the AGPL'd software. Which you may want to do, in order to patch a security

Re: Proposing amd64-hardened architecture for Debian

2014.04.20. 7:47, Riku Voipio riku.voi...@iki.fi ezt írta: On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 02 On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 02:06:45PM +0200, Bálint Réczey wrote: Hi Riku, 2014-04-19 13:26 GMT+02:00 Riku Voipio riku.voi...@iki.fi: On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 12:00:33PM +0200, Balint Reczey wrote

Re: Proposing amd64-hardened architecture for Debian

Hi Riku, 2014-04-19 13:26 GMT+02:00 Riku Voipio riku.voi...@iki.fi: On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 12:00:33PM +0200, Balint Reczey wrote: Facing last week's Heartbleed [1] bug the need for improving the security of our systems became more apparent than usually. In Debian there are widely used

Re: Proposing amd64-hardened architecture for Debian

Hi Martin, 2014-04-16 14:53 GMT+02:00 Martin Wuertele mar...@wuertele.net: * Balint Reczey bal...@balintreczey.hu [2014-04-15 12:01]: (...) My proposal for serving those security-focused users is introducing a new architecture targeting amd64 hardware, but with more security related C/C++

Re: Proposing amd64-hardened architecture for Debian

Hi Aaron, 2014-04-16 13:49 GMT+02:00 Aaron Zauner a...@azet.org: Hi Balint, Balint Reczey wrote: Hi, I have posted the following idea on my blog [7] to get comments from people not on this list, but obviously this is the mailing list where the proposal should be discussed. :-) I

Re: Proposing amd64-hardened architecture for Debian

Hi Steve, 2014-04-15 20:07 GMT+02:00 Steve Langasek vor...@debian.org: On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 12:15:22AM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote: My proposal for serving those security-focused users is introducing a new architecture targeting amd64 hardware, but with more security related C/C++

Re: Proposing amd64-hardened architecture for Debian

2014-04-15 14:23 GMT+02:00 Paul Wise p...@debian.org: On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 8:15 PM, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote: I think that as of today it would help more to fix various upstream build tools to actually honor the build flags we (using dpkg-buildflags) set. This would benefit both the

Re: Debian default desktop environment

Hi Dmitry, 2014-04-03 23:18 GMT+02:00 Dmitry Smirnov only...@debian.org: On Thu, 3 Apr 2014 14:16:15 Undefined User wrote: The problem is that right now Debian project is changing its default desktop environment, and I think that this is not a good move. Of course, it all depends on where the

Re: contrib and nonfree distribs

Hi Solal, 2014-02-28 19:24 GMT+01:00 Solal Rastier solal.rast...@me.com: Le 28 févr. 2014 à 19:22, Octavio Alvarez alvar...@alvarezp.ods.org a écrit : On 02/28/2014 09:29 AM, Solal Rastier wrote: My mail client top-posting automtically. I don't compare Windows and Debian. Windows is

Re: [mass bug] New license problem/sourceless fil/privacy problems detected by lintian

Hi Bastien, 2014/1/15 Bastien ROUCARIES roucaries.bast...@gmail.com: Hi, I have just implemented a few new check in lintian: detecting non free file based on md5sum[1]. These file are non free. I have filled a few bugs and I plan to fill more on it, when I get more reports. Please send

Re: XBMC packaging (was: Re: Bug#732159: Should this package be removed?)

Hi Andreas, 2013/12/23 Andreas Tille andr...@an3as.eu: Hi Balint, On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 08:39:17PM +0100, Balint Reczey wrote: Thank you for the invitation. I don't know the full story behind XBMC and the Multimedia Team, thus I would like to start maintaining it outside of the team, then

Re: XBMC packaging (was: Re: Bug#732159: Should this package be removed?)

2013/12/23 Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk: Quoting Bálint Réczey (2013-12-23 12:21:28) 2013/12/23 Andreas Tille andr...@an3as.eu: On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 08:39:17PM +0100, Balint Reczey wrote: Thank you for the invitation. I don't know the full story behind XBMC and the Multimedia Team, thus

Re: Bug#732159: Should this package be removed?

Hi Reinhard, 2013/12/16 Reinhard Tartler siret...@gmail.com: On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 5:27 PM, Bálint Réczey bal...@balintreczey.hu wrote: Regarding xbmc please don't remove it. It works with libav to some extent and I'm tyring to convince upstream to let me join the team responsible

Re: Bug#732159: Should this package be removed?

2013/12/16 Mathieu Malaterre ma...@debian.org: On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 11:01 AM, Bálint Réczey bal...@balintreczey.hu wrote: Hi Reinhard, 2013/12/16 Reinhard Tartler siret...@gmail.com: On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 5:27 PM, Bálint Réczey bal...@balintreczey.hu wrote: Regarding xbmc please

Re: Bug#732159: Should this package be removed?

2013/12/15 Reimar Döffinger reimar.doeffin...@gmx.de: On 14.12.2013, at 23:53, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de wrote: On 12/14/2013 11:07 PM, Reinhard Tartler wrote: On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 4:28 PM, Moritz Muehlenhoff j...@debian.org wrote: Package: mplayer Severity:

Re: Bug#732159: Should this package be removed?

2013/12/15 John Paul Adrian Glaubitz glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de: On 12/15/2013 10:11 PM, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: Bálint Réczey bal...@balintreczey.hu schrieb: How about introducing the ffmpeg shared libraries with libffmpeg prefix instead of libav prefix? No way. Keeping up with security

Re: Berkeley DB 6.0 license change to AGPLv3

2013/7/4 Ondřej Surý ond...@sury.org: On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 6:51 PM, Bradley M. Kuhn bk...@ebb.org wrote: 2) We need to pick the Berkeley DB version compatible with all packages that use the library. I think this is roughly the same issue as (1), unless you mean a technical rather than

Re: DM upload permission

Hi, 2013/3/5 Arno Töll a...@debian.org: Ho Carlo, On 05.03.2013 07:42, Carlo Segre wrote: 1. made a file called segre-0001.dak-commands with the following contents Action: dm Fingerprint: 8CCC1BA8590FF029D17C708FC1BCD3C72AA28B6B Allow: nexus You missed the header. While the Uploader

Re: Bug#690544: ITP: xts -- GNU R package for time series analysis

2012/10/15 Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org: On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 20:13:33 +0800, Lifeng Sun wrote: Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Lifeng Sun lifong...@gmail.com X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-scie...@lists.debian.org * Package name: xts Version

Re: Wheezy release: CDs are not big enough any more...

Hi, 2012/5/14, Marco d'Itri m...@linux.it: On May 14, Adam Borowski kilob...@angband.pl wrote: Ie, the problem is not in d-i, but in running debootstrap on foreign systems. And that's indeed not easily fixable :( Do we actually have an official debootstrap package for foreign systems? We

Re: The archive now supports xz compression

Hi, 2011/8/15 Eduard Bloch e...@gmx.de: #include hallo.h * Roger Leigh [Sun, Aug 14 2011, 11:01:11PM]: On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 09:19:02PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: On 11/08/11 at 19:52 +, Philipp Kern wrote: Wouldn't it be better to get more buildds for those archs, then? That