-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 04 Jul 2019 19:03:41 +0200
Source: packagesearch
Architecture: source
Version: 2.7.11
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Benjamin Mesing
Changed-By: Benjamin Mesing
Closes: 930678
Changes:
packagesearch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2018 21:50:28 +0200
Source: packagesearch
Binary: packagesearch
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 2.7.10
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Benjamin Mesing
Changed-By: Benjamin Mesing
Description
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2018 16:32:54 +0200
Source: packagesearch
Binary: packagesearch
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 2.7.9
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Benjamin Mesing
Changed-By: Benjamin Mesing
Description
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 04 Nov 2017 19:52:14 +0100
Source: packagesearch
Binary: packagesearch
Architecture: source
Version: 2.7.8
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Benjamin Mesing <b...@debian.org>
Changed-By: Benjamin Mes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 01 Nov 2017 21:35:41 +0100
Source: packagesearch
Binary: packagesearch
Architecture: source
Version: 2.7.7
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Benjamin Mesing <b...@debian.org>
Changed-By: Benjamin Mes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 01 Oct 2017 22:49:32 +0200
Source: packagesearch
Binary: packagesearch
Architecture: source
Version: 2.7.6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Benjamin Mesing <b...@debian.org>
Changed-By: Benjamin Mes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2015 20:51:40 +0200
Source: packagesearch
Binary: packagesearch
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 2.7.5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Benjamin Mesing <b...@debian.org>
Changed-By: Benjamin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 23:20:11 +0200
Source: umlet
Binary: umlet
Architecture: source all
Version: 13.3-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Benjamin Mesing b...@debian.org
Changed-By: Benjamin Mesing b...@debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2014 21:08:15 +0200
Source: umlet
Binary: umlet
Architecture: source all
Version: 12.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Benjamin Mesing b...@debian.org
Changed-By: Benjamin Mesing b...@debian.org
-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Changed-By: Benjamin Mesing b...@debian.org
Description:
libautocomplete-java - Java library for auto-completion in text component
libautocomplete-java-doc - Java library for auto-completion in text component
(documentation
Closes: 619046
Changes:
autocomplete
...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Changed-By: Benjamin Mesing b...@debian.org
Description:
libjavaparser-java - Java library for parsing Java 1.5.
libjavaparser-java-doc - Java library for parsing Java 1.5.
Closes: 711109
Changes:
javaparser (1.0.8-1) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Initial release
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 17:27:02 +0100
Source: packagesearch
Binary: packagesearch
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 2.7.4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Benjamin Mesing b...@debian.org
Changed-By: Benjamin Mesing b
pkg-java-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Changed-By: Benjamin Mesing b...@debian.org
Description:
librsyntaxtextarea-java - Java library for syntax highlighting text component
librsyntaxtextarea-java-doc - Java library for syntax highlighting text
component (documentatio
Changes
pkg-java-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Changed-By: Benjamin Mesing b...@debian.org
Description:
librsyntaxtextarea-java - Java library for syntax highlighting text component
librsyntaxtextarea-java-doc - Java library for syntax highlighting text
component (documentatio
Changes
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Benjamin Mesing bensm...@gmx.net
This package is required by umlet 12.0beta1.
It seems to be no longer actively maintained.
* Package name: libjapa-javaparser-java
Version : 1.0.8
Upstream Author : Júlio Vilmar Gesser jges...@gmail.com
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 21:32:08 +0100
Source: umlet
Binary: umlet
Architecture: source all
Version: 11.3-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Benjamin Mesing bensm...@gmx.net
Changed-By: Benjamin Mesing bensm...@gmx.net
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2012 22:02:34 +0200
Source: umlet
Binary: umlet
Architecture: source all
Version: 11.3-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Benjamin Mesing bensm...@gmx.net
Changed-By: Benjamin Mesing bensm...@gmx.net
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 23:00:34 +0200
Source: packagesearch
Binary: packagesearch
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 2.7.3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Benjamin Mesing bensm...@gmx.net
Changed-By: Benjamin Mesing bensm
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 20 May 2012 11:45:28 +0200
Source: packagesearch
Binary: packagesearch
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 2.7.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Benjamin Mesing bensm...@gmx.net
Changed-By: Benjamin Mesing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2011 19:43:28 +0200
Source: umlet
Binary: umlet
Architecture: source all
Version: 11.3-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Benjamin Mesing bensm...@gmx.net
Changed-By: Benjamin Mesing bensm...@gmx.net
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 03 Jul 2010 21:31:05 +0200
Source: packagesearch
Binary: packagesearch
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 2.6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Benjamin Mesing bensm...@gmx.net
Changed-By: Benjamin Mesing bensm
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2010 12:25:35 +0200
Source: umlet
Binary: umlet
Architecture: source all
Version: 10.4-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Benjamin Mesing bensm...@gmx.net
Changed-By: Benjamin Mesing bensm...@gmx.net
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2009 12:47:03 +0100
Source: umlet
Binary: umlet
Architecture: source all
Version: 10.2-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Benjamin Mesing bensm...@gmx.net
Changed-By: Benjamin Mesing bensm...@gmx.net
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 18:12:49 +0200
Source: umlet
Binary: umlet
Architecture: source all
Version: 9.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Benjamin Mesing bensm...@gmx.net
Changed-By: Benjamin Mesing bensm...@gmx.net
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 11:01:06 +0200
Source: packagesearch
Binary: packagesearch
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Benjamin Mesing [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Benjamin Mesing [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 02 Mar 2008 10:20:28 +0100
Source: packagesearch
Binary: packagesearch
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 2.3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Benjamin Mesing [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Benjamin Mesing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2007 17:26:26 +0200
Source: packagesearch
Binary: packagesearch
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.2.6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Benjamin Mesing [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Benjamin Mesing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 11:30:15 +0100
Source: packagesearch
Binary: packagesearch
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 2.2.5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Benjamin Mesing [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2006 15:24:36 +0100
Source: packagesearch
Binary: packagesearch
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.2.4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Benjamin Mesing [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Benjamin Mesing [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 08:47:20 +0100
Source: packagesearch
Binary: packagesearch
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.2.3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Benjamin Mesing [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Benjamin Mesing [EMAIL
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Benjamin Mesing [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: umlet
Version : 7.0
Upstream Author : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://www.umlet.com
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: Java
Description : simple, text driven UML
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2006 18:29:29 +0100
Source: packagesearch
Binary: packagesearch
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.2.2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Benjamin Mesing [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Benjamin Mesing [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2006 20:23:21 +0200
Source: packagesearch
Binary: packagesearch
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.2.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Benjamin Mesing [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Benjamin Mesing [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 9 Oct 2006 23:00:45 +0200
Source: packagesearch
Binary: packagesearch
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Benjamin Mesing [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Benjamin Mesing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 10:59:31 +0200
Source: packagesearch
Binary: packagesearch
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.1.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Benjamin Mesing [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Benjamin Mesing [EMAIL
[It's been a while since this message hit the debtags-devel list, thus I
include an almost full quote as well as CCing the participants of the
discussion, please follow up on debtags-devel@ or CC it in responses]
[Response below]
On Mon, 2006-07-31 at 17:14 +, Thaddeus H. Black wrote:
The
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Benjamin Mesing [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: vos
Version : 0.23.0
Upstream Author : Peter Amstutz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://interreality.org/
* License : mostly LGPL, some GPL
Programming Lang: C
Hola,
sorry for writing in English, but I do not speak Spanish. I've decided
to write to this list anyways since, it is probably more of a target
audience for my request.
I'll be visiting Bilbao from the 6th of July to the 14th of July. I am
currently in NM and would like to seize this
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 1 June 2006 13:49:02 +0100
Source: packagesearch
Binary: packagesearch
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Benjamin Mesing [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Benjamin Mesing [EMAIL
Hello,
my comments as someone planning to enter NM during the next couple of
month follow.
Overall I find your analysis enlightening. I agree with those points I
do not discuss here.
1.2.1 Add more people
[Marc argues that this is not a long solution]
I disagree here up to a certain point. I
Sorry, the message was intended for d-p, please do not follow up here.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello,
I want to close #355625 which says that packagesearch crashes on startup
if debtags is not installed.
I have implemented a solution that should fix this, but since Justin
said it is somewhat unreproducable once debtags was installed (pbuilder,
and tested with dancer's xnest recipe) and I
Hello
Usually people want the source package here. I see it is available on
your web page, but as the directory is not browsable, it's a bit
annoying to find.
Sorry about that.
The source package is available at:
http://www.mesing.de/packagesearch/packagesearch_2.1.tar.gz
And .dsc and
Hello,
I would say line 15 says it pretty clearly:
If you didn't upload those files, please just ignore this
message.
From that message I would deduce that things like this might happen from
time to time...
Best regards
Ben
--
Please do not send any email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Note that there was a discussion using debtags for license information
on debtags-devel/debian-legal.
http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2005/06/msg00016.html
is a good starting point.
Personally I believe, that if such an information should be available,
debtags is more suitable to express
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 11:34:02 +0100
Source: packagesearch
Binary: packagesearch
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.0.6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Benjamin Mesing [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Benjamin Mesing [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 16:43:19 -0500
Source: packagesearch
Binary: packagesearch
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.0.5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Benjamin Mesing [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Benjamin Mesing
Hello,
So please disregard my statement against testing
[..]
(In this case, xterm could have had a conflict with your package to
avoid screwing users over unnoticed; and we could (in future) have added
a note to the testing scripts to not allow upgrades of xterm until a
fixed version of
Hello,
However due to the QT library transition my package
which I fixed in unstable at once has not entered testing yet...
packagesearch | 2.0.4 | testing | source, alpha, ...
packagesearch | 2.0.4 | unstable | source, alpha, ...
You are right, the QT library
Hello
Secondly, you do not seem to understand how Debian works. Unstable is
called Unstable for a reason. It is the first stage of public testing.
Renaming it to Latest would not only falsely describe what it is, but
would simply be not true. If you want the latest, you download and
Hello
How on Earth would that be allowed into testing? I can imagine Serious
bugs slipping trough (because most are reported as Normal, after all),
but broken dependencies?
I admit I was imprecise, often it are conflicts (usually through library
stuff) that prevent packages from being
Please (re)check, if the package can be built by g++ 3.4
on [hppa/arm/m68k]?
Do I simply remove the explicit build dependency on g++,
upload the package and wait if it succeeds (and probably
create another package version with the build dependencies
re-added again if it still fails)?
Hello,
thanks for you comments.
A bug report is probably in order.
Done.
Best regards
Ben
--
Please do not send any email to the [EMAIL PROTECTED] - all email not
originating from the mailing list will be deleted automatically. Use the
reply to address instead.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 19:37:41 -0500
Source: packagesearch
Binary: packagesearch
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.0.4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Benjamin Mesing [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Benjamin Mesing [EMAIL
Hello,
today I've tried to address the issue raised by Steve Langasek regarding
inherited dependencies [1].
As I am unexperienced with the whole linking and dependency process I
was not able to deduce the consequences of this announcement for my
packaging.
As far as I have understood the email,
Description : ESense (ErlangSense) is a minor emacs mode which provides
features similar to IntelliSense or CodeSense in other editors.
This line seems to be too long to me. Also it refers to IntelliSense and
CodeSense where you cannot assume that they are known. Also do not start
your
Another thought:
* Package name: esense
A lot of emacs modes are named language-name-mode (haskell-mode,
asn1-mode,...) . In this fashion you might also consider naming it
erlang-mode.
ESense will help developers write Erlang programs more quickly by
helping them refer to the function
Only a thought that occured to me when reading this: Did you think about
how your approach will work once the proposed parallel boot script
execution is implemented?
Best regards Ben
--
Please do not sent any email to the [EMAIL PROTECTED] - all email not
originating from the mailing list will
I really hope [...] you can find a sponsor!
I don't really think he needs one. Look at the email address..
--
Please do not sent any email to the [EMAIL PROTECTED] - all email not
originating from the mailing list will be deleted automatically. Use the
reply to address instead.
--
To
Hello
assume that an update to a package brings in a changed conffile, and
because the local admin had changed the conffile, he is asked, and he
refuses to accept the changed version.
This brings up an issue that is bothering me as a user since a long
time. Whenever I change a config file, I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 10:14:11 -0400
Source: packagesearch
Binary: packagesearch
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.0.3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Benjamin Mesing [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Benjamin Mesing [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 13:09:35 +0200
Source: packagesearch
Binary: packagesearch
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.0.2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Benjamin Mesing [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Benjamin Mesing [EMAIL
What documentation is available on the subject of creating debian
packages ? What documents should I read before starting ?
http://www.google.com/search?hs=V9hl=enlr=client=operarls=enq=debian+packaging+maintainerbtnG=Search
And before
applying for NM ? I'm especially interested, for the
http://wiki.debian.net/?spamInWikiPages
http://wiki.debian.net/?DealingWithSpam
After having read this - wouldn't it be easier to report the user doing
the spamming, and simply reverting all changes done by this user
(probably the users spamming will not have add valuable content)?
Who is in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2005 12:15:14 +0200
Source: packagesearch
Binary: packagesearch
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.0.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Benjamin Mesing [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Benjamin Mesing [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2005 13:54:08 +0200
Source: packagesearch
Binary: packagesearch
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.0
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Benjamin Mesing [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Benjamin Mesing [EMAIL
Hello
Confirmed: libqt is still gcc3.
Given that libqt is gcc3 and libapt and libdebtags1 are gcc4, this means
that you are stuck until libqt migrates to gcc4. :(
Thanks for taking a look. Now I know at least some of your hassles...
It looks like a good time to do some work on the
Hello,
[Uh, my first message was not supposed to go to debian-devel, but was
intended as a rant on debtags-devel ;-) But now that it has reached
debian-devel I can as well provide some useful information]
I had the problem for some time now - I hope it will vanish with the
time...
OK, here is
HAYAYYY!!!
$ svn st|grep ^C
C debian/control
C README
C configure.ac
Small things easy to resolve. Wow! It's done!
This should have gone to debtags-devel I suppose :-)
--
Please do not sent any email to the [EMAIL PROTECTED] - all email not
originating from the mailing
Hello,
If the debtags also get searched when she does a simple search, then
great. This will depend on how seamlessly debtags get integrated into
package managers (like Synaptic's) search facilities (for example, a
simple search by default, then an Advanced button to expand the search
Hello,
I agree with you, that the documentation review team should have the
debtags approach in mind. Also debtags-edit being able to edit
descriptions would be desirable - however someone would need to
implement this, and Enrico is very busy ;-). Being able to edit the
package information in
Hello,
Several people probably faced the problem that after initial system bootup,
and startup of *dm, keyboard does not work.
Suggested workaround was to add implicit 'vtX' parameter to X server
command line in Xservers file.
I don't use a diplay manager, but I face the same problem when
Hello,
To get some indication on the order the bugs should be solved in? As
we have limited time and people, it is smart to start with the bugs
affecting most people.
I can only see usefulness for QA team (orphaned) packages. A properly
maintained package should have a thinking
Hello,
You claim that if someone spends just as much time translating Debian as
someone else does on packaging software, the first one shouldn't become a
DD and the second one does? I disagree firmly.
Packaging is the essential work and everyone involved into Debian must
be able to do
Hello,
my congratulation to the team too. However I was not as fortunate as the
Sean.
What about the xlibmesa-glu packages? Can we expect them to enter the
archive again? Else I have to remove some of my shiny GL applications
(crystalspace, freewrl, libdevil,...)
Greetings Ben
--
Please do
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2005 21:14:01 +0200
Source: packagesearch
Binary: packagesearch
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Benjamin Mesing [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Benjamin Mesing [EMAIL
I use both of these and would like to adopt them. I will upload next
week (via Anibal).
I think they are no longer maintained upstream.
Take a look at http://www.icewm.org/FAQ/IceWM-FAQ-11.html#tools4icewm
for more modern and supported alternatives.
Greetings Ben
--
Please do not sent any
If your X configuration is broken and your X won't start then that is
effectively the same thing as the proposed run level 3 anyway. So
what is the point?
Well, I used to have problems with my graphiccard that hard locked the
system on startup. Being able to do boot into runlevel (RL) 3
On Tue, 2005-06-07 at 19:30 +0300, Meelis Roos wrote:
JFSP - Separate runlevels: 2 for multi, no net, 3 for multi no X, 4 for X,
4=5
Why? Display manager as a normal service that can be started and stopped
like other services is very natural. No need to confuse the users with
more
Hello,
Is it already used in any package management tools? Or is the debedit
GUI currently the only program using the preliminary database?
As far as I know it is hidden deep into synaptic, but I don't know if
the support is currently broken or not. Also there is a cool search
application
Hello
the right thing to do would be to switch from sections, to keywords, so
that kmplayer could live in sound + video + kde, instead of multimedia
that is not very informative.
Now this, I'd second :)
(OTOH, I'm not volunteering to implement support for this, I don't care
You would rather have silence than know why you are being ignored?
Then silence you shall have.
Well, its the tone that makes the music we use to say here in Germany.
Certainly there would have been ways to tell Bluefuture that his mail
was hard to read/understand without becoming offensive.
Manual edit of /etc/apt/sources.list and apt-get update ; apt-get
dist-upgrade. [NOTE: I'm fairly sure the archive layout changed for
non-US/main between Woody - Sarge and I had problems here. Could be a
show stopper as not immediately obvious what to change]
As far as I've read the list
Hello
* Package name: soundconverter
Version : 0.7.1
Upstream Author : Gautier Portet kassoulet gmail com
* URL : http://soundconverter.berlios.de/
* License : GPL v2
Description : convert sound files to other formats
What about converts between
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 11:07:09 +0100
Source: packagesearch
Binary: packagesearch
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Benjamin Mesing [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Benjamin Mesing [EMAIL
Hello,
I have a package which I develop on my own and which is debian native.
However due to historical reasons, I have a CHANGELOG file which is not
the debian/changelog file.
How should I handle this case? I am in favour of handling it like an
upstream package, meaning
1.
Hello,
The Vancouver proposals satisfy all of these, potentially at the cost of
removing some architectures from the set released by Debian. If we want
to avoid that cost, can we come up with another proposal that solves the
same problems in a way that satisfies the release team?
There was
Hello,
as a non-DD I am not so tuned into the Debian project as many of you
are. However I would like to make a proposal about the hot topic.
As I have noticed, most people ojecting against dropping architecures
feared for the coherence of the systems. They wanted to be able to have
the *same*
I really like this suggestion and in fact I had the same idea too, but I
found your post only when I was ready with writing. You can find my
proposal at http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/03/msg01647.html.
It goes a little more into detail, but is based on basically the same
idea.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2005 11:19:20 +0100
Source: packagesearch
Binary: packagesearch
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Benjamin Mesing [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Benjamin Mesing [EMAIL
Well, my point was to have a common predefined way of doing it: once you
install kdm (or someone else), or move to xdm or whatever, you still can
disable the start of X by putting nox in the command line, instead of having
to erase the links in rc2.d.
Acutally there should be no link in
Thats not true. Read the Debian Policy. Its just that some other
distributions use runlevel 2 for console mode. In Debian thats all up to
the user/administrator of the system. Of course we can change this but
its not true currently.
Sorry, consider me spoiled by SuSE which I am forced to use
see
http://www.linuxbase.org/modules.php?name=specrevurl=http://www.linuxbase.org/spec//booksets/LSB-Core-generic/LSB-Core-generic/set1.html
for what the LSB has to say about the subject
So its seems SuSE was following LSB recommendations.
Just wondering if Debian should switch to LSB
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 16:13:13 +0100
Source: packagesearch
Binary: packagesearch
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.0.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Benjamin Mesing [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Benjamin Mesing [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2004 14:04:01 +0100
Source: packagesearch
Binary: packagesearch
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.0
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Benjamin Mesing [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Benjamin Mesing [EMAIL
95 matches
Mail list logo
