-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2015 13:34:04 -0700
Source: mairix
Binary: mairix
Architecture: source
Version: 0.23+git20131125-0.4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Benjamin Mako Hill <m...@debian.org>
Changed-By: Bradley M. Ku
Stefano Zacchiroli wrote at 03:14 (EDT):
So, I wonder, do we have any idea (due to them having already been
mentioned publicly elsewhere) about the craziest interpretation of
AGPL that the evil guys might come up with and, at the other end of
the spectrum, the most restrictive one?
AFAIK
of
course)
I'm curious, are there many of these?
On 03/07/13 16:34, Bradley M. Kuhn wrote: [...]
I know that some have complained that compliance with AGPLv3 may
require more work by Debian redistributors. That is a reasonable
concern, but I think the issue can be mitigated.
MJ Ray wrote at 07:00
Ondřej Surý wrote at 00:36 (EDT):
(d) Is it ok to switch 106 source packages and their reverse depends
to AGPLv3?
I think that might be stated a bit more clearly: you won't be changing
the license of the upstream works; you'd be changing the license of the
dowstream whole as it appears in
Many people off-list have been asking me to comment on this discussion,
because (like Richard Fontana) I'm a co-author of AGPLv3, and I also
(back in the early 2000's) invented the original licensing idea behind
the AGPLv1.
I thus care deeply about the license and believe it's an important
policy
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 15:15:31 -0500
Source: yocto-reader
Binary: yocto-reader
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.9.4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Loic Dachary (OuoU) l...@debian.org
Changed-By: Bradley M. Kuhn bk
6 matches
Mail list logo
