appear that NEW is blocked for some reason.
However, no changes in my upload are critical (at least none that I am
aware of), and there are no known security bugs, so I am not
complaining. Just curious.
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTE
m it is listed:
--- cut ---
Blocking bugs added: 355341 Request was from Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Full text and rfc822 format available.
--- cut ---
2. is it possible to list all bugs that are not blocked?
3. does blocking imply any action will automatically be taken
341
What does the "block" command do? I have never seen it documented
anywhere, including at http://bugs.debian.org/>. Did I miss
something?
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
drivers optional? If ndiswrapper moved to contrib would this package
have to move to?
I am not providing an opinion here, but I didn't notice these issues
being discussed earlier.
back to your regular program...
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
y, the shell isn't required, no splitting of the
parameters is required, and this makes the script more secure.
Unfortunately, it seems the same methods have yet to come to
rsh/ssh, etc. Hmmm. I think sudo supports it though:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo 'id; echo hi'
sudo: id; echo hi: comma
able this implicit shell, either with ssh
or rsh? I really don't like it. I would rather each parameter be
passed straight to the remote executable via exec without being parsed
by sh first. Then, if I want to use the shell, I can say so. I don't
like this business of the command line b
ail on the heimdal-discuss list...
I sent the message to heimdal-bugs.
Maybe heimdal-discuss would be more appropriate?
Unfortunately, my laptop computer is throwing one of its "I will not
power on unless you remove my power source and batteries for several
days" tantrum, so I can't dou
glob$U.lo and glob$U.o.
I asked upstream Heimdal and got no response.
Any help would be much appreciated.
Thanks.
PS. Source code is Heimdal in Debian experimental.
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe"
es on to trace SPAM (which have no cryptographic signature).
I also believe that the threat of somebody being tricked into
installing a Trojan package is a very real possibility, and we should
do everything we can do to aid our users prevent this from happening.
Notes:
[1] Assuming you have a car,
>>>>> "Marc" == Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Marc> Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> I've never seen dpkg-sig mentioned before, only debsigs,
>>> so I'm not familiar with
ges never uploaded to Debian,
maybe not).
* others I am too lazy to think of.
Matthew> I've never seen dpkg-sig mentioned before, only debsigs,
Matthew> so I'm not familiar with the tool itself, but the concept
Matthew> is one that needs a lot more exposure.
I would
pass SMTP
level SPAM controls, but taken to the extreme, you would have to also
do this to every server that forwards you email (perhaps even every
mailing list server?).
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
krb524 working with Heimdal.
I had to insert
enable-524 = true
in /var/lib/heimdal-kdc/kdc.conf (the man page for kdc lead me to
believe this was the default).
and add:
[login]
enable-524 = true
in /etc/krb5.conf
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ing duplicate symbols or using a version that is incompatible.
* Upload Heimdal.
* Rebuild above packages.
* If packages don't rebuild then it may be because it requires krb4
support => drop krb4 support (cyrus-sasl?), or entire package
(arla?).
* Drop kerberos4kth.
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>> "Russ" == Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Russ> Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> * Find out what is required to keep AFS support working
>> (assuming I don't already have it).
Russ> Well, what so
>>>>> "Eric" == Eric Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Eric> I wrote approx for exactly this purpose. It's now in
Eric> testing.
Is a back port available for sarge? If not, how feasible would it be
to create on? Does it depend on anything n
tunately, as I seem to be running behind with my own packages, I
don't think I can spare time to help with other packages at this point
in time.
I am glad to hear though that it is still being worked on.
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
all ?
AFAIK apt-listbugs only displays open bugs, if the bug is closed then
it won't get displayed.
Ideally apt-listbugs needs to be updated to support the new versioning
system in the BTS.
This could also solve the issue that the mirror you use might be
out-of-date and still have a buggy pack
-).
I don't think it should be too hard, I suspect the package needs to be
changed to use the wtmp API in libc6 (assuming my memory is correct
and such an API exists).
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
n after recompiling.
* Find out what is required to keep AFS support working (assuming I
don't already have it).
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
aving
difficulties without requiring the remote user run screen in multiuser
mode.
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ch means I can't rebuild my
package for sarge in order to see if it fixes a bug I encountered while
testing another piece of Debian software. ARgghh!
Thanks.
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
les to indicate where "/tmp" is. Not only that, but some
programs don't even give a clear understandable error if the directory
doesn't exist. So if you miss one, beware, you might get unpredictable
errors.
Can't we just pick one standard name for the environment variable and
stick to it?
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
");
$package = stdout(execute("apt-file","search",$file));
}
This infinite recursion will take several minutes (maximum) to
execute, I think (assuming the if test succeeds).
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>> "Marc" == Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Marc> On Thu, 27 Oct 2005 08:54:18 +1000, Brian May
Marc> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> If the code "just" calls adduser, this would seem to be a bug,
>&g
>>>>> "Brian" == Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Brian> There have been increasing calls for me to drop krb4
Brian> support in Heimdal (first in bug #315059 and now by
Brian> upstream in bug #334632 - it would also solve #236851). It
efore
the network is configured - but it hasn't bothered me enough to
investigate why yet.)
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
expectedly receiving mail for a system
user that isn't even used (consider $HOME/Maildir), or any number of
other unwanted things.
However, this has to be done carefully, or you end up doing the wrong
thing. e.g. deluser -r $USER, in the past, has been pure evil if the
home directory has been changed to "/"!
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ow you damn well
Ben> better be." --Orson Scott Card, _Ender's Game_
According to upstream there is some sort of support for krb4 in
Heimdal 0.7.1, at least enough to make AFS happy. I haven't yet got my
package to compile yet so I don't know if this will be sufficient for
xed
them all.
The relevant patch file in debian/patches/012_sharedlibs, regenerate
the autoconf patch with debian/scripts/autotools. Requires automake
1.8.
There is also the issue of the versioned symbols patch not applying
cleanly.
Any help appreciated, Thanks.
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&
cting
with kerberos4kth, due to conflicts between shared libraries used.
Does this matter?
Is it time to think about removing kerberos4kth from the archive
anyway?
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
4.50)
id 1ETcoa-00032V-E1
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 23 Oct 2005 12:10:57 +0200
Received: by p9.dpk.berlin.fido (FIDOGATE 4.4.10)
id AA10674; Sun, 23 Oct 2005 12:02:19 +0200
Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2005 01:29:36 +0200
From: Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Drop KRB4 support fr
>>>>> "Brian" == Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Brian> What is the preferred way of closing bugs that are not bugs
Brian> (e.g. mistake by the submitter)? -- Brian May
Brian> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Has the "reassign" comma
ecure - I think the only
reason it was requested was because of AFS requirements - does that
reason still apply?
Thanks.
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
notification of the moderator's decision. If you would like to cancel
this posting, please visit the following URL:
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/confirm/pkg-openssl-devel/91facf25272f4a5492f6675f4d7e0611dd80f72e
--- End Message ---
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ey> include a "Version:" pseudo-header[2].
What is the preferred way of closing bugs that are not bugs
(e.g. mistake by the submitter)?
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
t would be possible to have both
packages implement the same ABI and become drop in replacements for
each other.
Oh, BTW, gnutls isn't a complete 100% solution either, IIRC packages
exist that require openssl because the license is GPL incompatible.
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
n't available in sarge.
Is this a known problem?
I think this might be because of a broken security update, so I have
CCed the security team too.
Thanks.
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ou don't like this, you would be able to change the config
manually.
Adding support for multiple IP addresses is an interesting idea, but I
am not convinced it is a requirement (especially if it adds
significantly to the complexity; I suspect it might).
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g
ate links) and starting it.
When a service is deactivated, the reverse happens.
Or perhaps a running some configurable script for each
activation/deactivation might be better, that way a package could
request deactivation mean "remove listen config option on this
port". Might be useful for p
include every server where multiple
implementations exist.
Is this really a good idea?
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
their Package files, will they?
There may be good reasons to install Linux even if you use The Hurd.
For example, consider emulators such as qemu (no I didn't check if
this one runs under The Hurd).
So omitting these packages from the Package index files on *BSD or The
Hurd (if/when this
licated example, see the
Heimdal libraries...
This may be important if you require a static version for any reason
or your platform doesn't support interdependencies between shared
libraries. I think there is at least one OS without good support for
shared libraries - what was its name again?
>>>>> "Domenico" == Domenico Andreoli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Domenico> unfortunately heimdal bug #316980 makes curl FTBS :(
patches to fix this welcome ;-)
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
d (such as mail
headers or SMTP session), and it doesn't protect against replay
attacks (unless you add some other mechanism, e.g. include the date
and time in the protected part of the message).
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
but it appears you have considered many
different situations.
Now my top wishlist is support for this new system in apt-listbugs
.
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
, etc}"
...as the first version doesn't blame XYZ in anyway.
Surely you don't need to provide details what happened?
(note: none of this is specific to anybody mentioned in this thread)
Notes:
[1] Who me? Watch to much Stargate? Never!
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
0-dev
linux-kernel-headers make patch perl perl-modules gnupg libbz2-1.0 libldap2
libreadline5 libusb-0.1-4 makedev libgnutls11 libsasl2 debconf libtasn1-2
libopencdk8 liblzo1 libgpg-error0 libgcrypt11 debconf-english $additional"
At the time aptitude wasn't recompiled, so no doubt thi
a task
that they may not want to do? Perhaps a more positive tone would help?
However, I read the article and didn't see anything negative in it. So
I don't see any need for Martin to delegate the press contact task.
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
time, regardless of
regular interruptions, that I am incompetent?
You must be perfect!
Which means the fact I could not have any definitions of [1] or [2] in
your message must be my fault.
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
don't think it will work from X-Windows when the system is too
bogged down to switch to a text console though...
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
x27;t
give you access to your newly created package.
4. Make dupload obsolete, and replace with dput. Make dput the default
in debrelease. I think dput would have prevented me uploading my
unsigned package.
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
quently went very slowly until it was
unusable. It took me two reboots of the computer before I finally
realized the DOS attack was from *my* own script! It took me another
reboot to fix the problem properly.
Sometimes it pays to use the full pathname to the executable...
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
counts as prior-art if you published it in some public
forum (not sure of the exact criteria).
If it was a private thing, then it doesn't count.
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ivist Network, said: "The fact that somebody, just by claiming
to own a word, can intimidate large companies and powerful law firms
shows the damage, to an extent, is already done."
In the movie realm, Stoller says that he wrote to Sony in March,
objecting to Columbia Pictures' plan t
an
application that uses this library in the one source, by the above
criteria I could rebuild the library but not the application, which
seems pointless.
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
in Debian be able to use klibc in Debian for all the user
tools (I believe there is already an ITP for klibc).
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ed assembling the RAID with the --update=super-minor option (as
well as all the other options), but it didn't seem to help.
In the end, I gave up and changed /etc/fstab to the new system.
I no longer have access this machine, the other machine doesn't seem
to have the problem anymore.
How
P server...
e.g. network tunnels and DNS servers both might need to be started
first before the NTP server can be contacted.
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Brian Mays doesn't seem to be watching this thread...)
My point though is that I could have taken my dodgy key into a
keysigning session, and people adhering to many standard keysigning
would not notice anything wrong, even if I couldn't intercept the mail.
This would mean:
* If I was a n
it with
Steve> a grain of salt for now. :)
Sounds like a much needed feature, IMHO.
Good like for getting your changes integrated into debhelper.
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
hs
behind. I don't think the bug reporter used hurd though.
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>> "Brian" == Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Brian> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# apt-cache show libc6 | grep MD5sum MD5sum:
Brian> ab0895ee6d8d2cf3b6906eb5228e5c25
Brian> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# md5sum
Brian> /var/cache/apt/archiv
ed, using what I believe to be the standard
process[1][2][3][4][...]:
1. I claim to be "Brian May". I have a passport that proves that I am
in fact "Brian May". I have a drivers license that proves that I am
"Brian May". The photos are identical to what I look l
t; there for only 1 symbol on 2.4; didn't check 2.6), and so on
Joey> might just make it work.
klibc? Not yet in Debian, is there any reason for this?
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/var/cache/apt/archives/libc6_2.3.2.ds1-20_powerpc.deb
69301110f8865edd7f2f93d79ad6a715
/var/cache/apt/archives/libc6_2.3.2.ds1-20_powerpc.deb
Then again, this package looks old, so maybe the entire mirror is old,
and no longer usable.
My point though that aptitude should tell you what went wrong
o very complicated networks.
The difficulty with supporting firewalls is that people will expect
"if I install package X, then it should automatically adjust the
firewall to allow it to work". I really do *not* want to go down this
path.
The firewall is up to the administrator to decide on, not the package
maintainers.
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and had mounted additional filesystems - the only solution I
could come up with was to stop the daemon in the chroot before
unmounting the file-system).
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
rnel-source version 2.6.8-16"?
Again, I think it would be much quicker, easier, and less prone to
errors if the DSAs where mentioned in the relevant kernel-image-change
too.
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
?
Does this mean people who want secure pre-compiled kernels have to
resort to unstable until the issue is fixed?
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
rect solution to fix the file system?
Disclaimer: I don't care too much either way. It is perhaps worth
noting that a package I maintain does use /usr/lib/$packagename/* for
inetd servers, and this reduces file conflicts with other packages.
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
what the point
would be.
Peter> You would put up with all *that* for a 6-megabyte savings
Peter> on your root filesystem?
It would be more then 6 megabyte savings on the root file-system if
/usr was moved to /. That was the original point I responded to.
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PRO
s kept accurate via some other
means.
You could argue based on this, /lib isn't designed to be shared, so
you still need to split it into /usr/lib and /lib. Alternatively you
could argue only /lib/modules isn't sharable, I guess.
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUB
have the time or patience to learn that
awful-programming-language-that-requires-lots-of-nested-brackets... errr... I
mean LISP... right now. ;-)
However, this won't work anyway for people stuck using lesser MUAs
(e.g. mutt), fake MUAs (e.g. evolution), or worse (e.g. anything
written b
have any
downside.
Perhaps the only exception I can think of is if the account is locked
due to "too many login attempts" as opposed to "password expired" or
"account has expired" or some other predictable reason. Then, yes,
that would be a problem.
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
0:53 snoopy sshd[15846]: error: PAM: Authentication failure for jan
from localhost
[3] "Account deactivated" option in "LDAP Account Manager". I haven't
worked out how this is stored in LDAP yet. No messages displayed to
the user.
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
#x27;t want to use an initramfs to initialize it. Or if
you want /usr to be shared between computers but don't want to share
all of /.
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
as
Maciej> well?
It might be better to ask this question on debian-legal.
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
free software based there. Just look at the
ITPs here.
Unfortunately the website doesn't seem to be working right now.
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>> "Joerg" == Joerg Jaspert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Joerg> You know, our userdir-ldap manages ssh keys. You dont need
Joerg> to put them manually in .ssh dirs.
How do you set the ssh key in LDAP?
I can't see any settings in db.d
l packages in the filesystem structure of a
Jorge> remotely-booted machine.
If a package directly uses /etc/init.d/ in its scripts, file a
bug report.
It should use invoke-rc.d instead. man invoke-rc.d
It should work for chroots, and does work for pbuilder.
--
Brian May <[EMAIL
o far exclusively uses
mbox files.
Sure, these are implementation issues that could be solved, but
currently mbox wins.
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
essage). So what appears to be to separate messages contained in
mbox format in mutt can be interpreted as only one message by
formail (see bug #295604 for example).
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
lean target
Christoph> anyway, so it doesn't hurt to move instead of copying
Christoph> it.
A benefit of moving files, rather then copying, is that you get to see
at a glance what files your package left behind and missed in
debian/tmp (e.g. if upstream adds new files to the packages b
g users.
I consider that a bug.
If something like this is different, then not only should Debian
supplied documentation reflect the change, but a list of differences
should appear in README.Debian.
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
However, based on Robert's response it would appear that patent issues
have been considered for zsync and considered OK. I would speculate
this is because information is pre-calculated at the server and stored
in *.zsync files.
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
ile). Its a bit more
Goswin> complex algorithm but works even better than rsyncable
Goswin> files and rsync.
zsync looks suspiciously like it might have similar patent issues
which killed the rproxy project.
Then again I am no expert; Please tell me I am wrong...
--
Brian May <[EMAIL
Cut twice, measure once.
Ron> Google it!
Loose it!
Notes:
[1] I was debating putting a smiley face here, but then remembered
some recent court cases...
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>> "Brian" == Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
One question:
Brian> I asked about this a while ago on debian-devel and was told
Brian> (IIRC) that a major rewrite was happening in order to make
Brian> Povray DFSG compliant.
Bri
You obviously need to run "apt-get update && apt-get dist-upgrade" on
your car more often.
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
bout this a while ago on debian-devel and was told (IIRC)
that a major rewrite was happening in order to make Povray DFSG
compliant.
Is this still the case?
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
e
it will check the home directory for obvious directories that it
shouldn't delete.
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
art, whether
digital images, digital video, writing, etc.
I really think we need to draw the line somewhere.
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
nly part that means anything is "you can redistribute". No rights
to modify, implies non-DFSG.
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Chris> * URL : http://www.nemeton.com.au/sw/autoreply/
Chris> * License : BSD
Chris> Description : A safe, rate-limited autoresponder
Chris> Autoreply is a simple autoresponder useful for replying to
Chris> email upon receipt.
May I suggest that
removes all these potential nasty flame wars about the
pros/cons of various licenses.
I wanted to verify the license, but the upstream web page of
http://www.example.org/> didn't work for me. I suspect contacting
the upstream author at "Name <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" would
#x27;t observed anything like this behaviour with devfs, so I
suspect this is udev specific.
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
better to test rebooting first at
low-demand times. Or if you plan on being off-site for an extended
period of time.
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
he running kernel version is the right one doesn't mean the
system administrator isn't going to diagnose some serious problem with
the new version that requires a downgrade (hopefully this isn't too
frequent).
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROT
ot;out-of-the-box" with 2.6.11 and
LVM unless you compile your own kernel (one that doesn't require an
initrd image), or fix this initrd image.
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
401 - 500 of 875 matches
Mail list logo
