Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Brian Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Issues that lintian reports are, in most cases, bugs. Bugs that you
>> have fixed should be explicitly described in the changelog. After all,
>> lintian reports many di
Adrian Bridgett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Changes:
> tkdiff (1:3.08-4) unstable; urgency=low
> .
>* lintian fixes
Issues that lintian reports are, in most cases, bugs. Bugs that you
have fixed should be explicitly described in the changelog. After all,
lintian reports many different
Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, May 29, 2003 at 10:12:28AM -0700, Brian Nelson wrote:
>> I use subversion for some things, but I haven't moved my Debian
>> package repositories over yet because I've just had too many problems
>> w
"Marcelo E. Magallon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I was looking for some pointers about managing package sources with
> subversion. I've got a grasp of the basics and I have looked at a
> couple of examples (most notably Branden's SVN repository for the
> XFree86 packages). My main concern
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 12:15:37PM -0700, Brian Nelson wrote:
>
>> 1. To show others, especially NM's, what not to do. NM's mostly learn
>>by example, and I think it helps to ensure they don't follow bad
>
Christian Kurz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi Brian
>
> On [26/05/03 23:13], Brian Nelson wrote:
>> Anselm Lingnau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [...]
>> >* Closes: #159971, #124472, #147059, #70184.
>
>> Umm, no, the changelog is for listing
Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 08:39:50AM -0700, Brian Nelson wrote:
>> > Perhaps a separate, concise message to debian-devel-announce?
>>
>> I doubt it would help. I see changelog abuse as an act of laziness, not
>> ig
Paul Slootman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon 26 May 2003, Brian Nelson wrote:
>
>> Umm, no, the changelog is for listing changes (*change* log, get it?),
>> not for just closing bugs without any reason given whatsoever.
>>
>> Why do so many seem to have
Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 10:47:15PM +1200, Nick Phillips wrote:
>> If your changelog merely says "New upstream version, closes: #123 #456",
>> it's no help whatsoever, and I will (rightly) think that you suck.
>
> This is debian-devel: as
reopen 159971
reopen 124472
reopen 147059
reopen 70184
thanks
Anselm Lingnau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Format: 1.7
> Date: Tue, 27 May 2003 01:15:33 +0200
> Source: bwidget
> Binary: bwidget
> Architecture: source all
> Version: 1.6.0-1
> Distribution: unstable
> Urgency: low
> Maintainer: An
Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, May 22, 2003 at 10:10:28PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
>> * Francesco Paolo Lovergine ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030522 21:35]:
>> > Ugh, also this one. Do not use changelog for closing fixed bugs.
>> > Do it using BTS directly.
>>
>> The developers r
Bernd Eckenfels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, May 21, 2003 at 11:55:36PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
>> It's much more helpful to write this as:
>
> yes of course, but the question is where the line between helpfulness and
> usefulness is :)
>
> At least I think it is not a good idea to tal
Guido Trotter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, May 21, 2003 at 12:31:14PM -0700, Brian Nelson wrote:
>> > directory-administrator (1.3.5-1) unstable; urgency=low
>> > .
>> >* New Upstream Version (closes: #176227, #188308, #90276)
>>
>>
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, 21 May 2003 12:24:42 -0700, Brian Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
>> reopen 192068 thanks
>
>> John O'Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>>> Format: 1.7 Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2003 21:
Guido Trotter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Format: 1.7
> Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 17:31:23 +0200
> Source: directory-administrator
> Binary: directory-administrator
> Architecture: source i386
> Version: 1.3.5-1
> Distribution: unstable
> Urgency: low
> Maintainer: Guido Trotter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
reopen 192068
thanks
John O'Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Format: 1.7
> Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2003 21:40:18 +0100
> Source: ptkei
> Binary: ptkei
> Architecture: source all
> Version: 1.18.0-4
> Distribution: unstable
> Urgency: low
> Maintainer: John O'Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Changed
Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> From the amount of mail I've gotten I guess people will be
> interested. I've uploaded mozilla-firebird_0.6-1 to my personal apt
> repository at http://people.debian.org/~eric/debian/. Just add:
>
> deb http://people.debian.org/~eric/debi
reopen 193287
reopen 193286
thanks
Marco Presi (Zufus) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Format: 1.7
> Date: Wed, 14 May 2003 20:30:39 +0200
> Source: pointless
> Binary: pointless
> Architecture: source i386
> Version: 0.3-3
> Distribution: unstable
> Urgency: low
> Maintainer: Marco Presi (Zufus) <
Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> What are other developers' feelings on the matter these days?
>
> If we're doing "let's have a conf where we normally don't" how about we
> have it on the US's east coast aswell. I'd personally argue for the
> nothern Virginia are myself.
>
> Too many con
Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, May 16, 2003 at 10:40:10AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
>
>> On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 10:06:47AM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
>> > release
>> > (Or "released version", "baseline") A version of
>> > a piece of software which has been m
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Apr 25, 2003 at 08:51:41AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
>> Should Debian further support the i386 target, or make (at least i486)
>> the default for code generation? Asking because I'm unsure how to
>> provide the libstdc++5 package.
>
> Realist
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, 24 Apr 2003 15:26:46 -0700, Brian Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
>> I'm trying to implement ucf in a perl postinst script, but I'm
>> running into problems due to debconf's fuckage with the f
Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Format: 1.7
> Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2003 15:07:10 +0100
> Source: xt
> Binary: xt
> Architecture: source i386
> Version: 0.9.1-1
> Distribution: unstable
> Urgency: low
> Maintainer: Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Changed-By: Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTE
Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Format: 1.7
> Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2003 13:30:39 +
> Source: cyphesis-cpp
> Binary: cyphesis-cpp-mason cyphesis-cpp cyphesis-cpp-clients
> Architecture: source i386 all
> Version: 0.2.0+0.2.1rc1-4
> Distribution: unstable
> Urgency: low
> Maintainer: Mic
I'm trying to implement ucf in a perl postinst script, but I'm running
into problems due to debconf's fuckage with the file descriptors, I
think.
I call stop() as soon as I'm done interfacing with debconf, but that
doesn't seem to be good enough when I get to ucf. First, I tried
system("/usr/b
Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is anyone interested in adopting aethera (WNPP bug #152941)? The
> version in Debian doesn't work with KDE3 but there's a new upstream
> which only uses QT.
It looks completely non-free, AFAICT. No source, no license...
--
I don't know half of yo
Chris Cheney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I followed Release Managers request on how to deal with the libvorbis
> mess, if you have a problem with how it was dealt with bring it up on
> irc. You should know this already but a message was sent out a week in
> advance to the libvorbis breakage occu
Chris Cheney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Of course as you already know emacs includes so many thing unrelated to
> editing that anyone using it has already decided they don't mind the
> bloat. *OT* Really is there any argument that a psychoanalysis program
> in an editor is not bloat? By the wa
Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Matthias Urlichs writes:
>
>> Maybe it's time to force gcc-3.2 into testing..?
>
> No, it should go in after binutils gets into testing.
What has happened to Chris Chimelis? He seems to be missing since early
February, and the last 6 uploads of binut
Ari Pollak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Are there any plans to package the new GNU Aspell (0.50.x) for Debian?
Yes. In fact, you can find packages here if you wish to test it out and
see how it breaks gtkspell :) :
http://bignachos.com/~nelson/debian/
The main thing holding it back is I'm wai
Andrew Lau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Nov 29, 2002 at 06:36:06PM -0500, Colin Walters wrote:
>> On Fri, 2002-11-29 at 17:50, Ari Pollak wrote:
>> > Didn't you sponsor the upload?
>>
>> No, that was me...
>
> This Colin & Colin confusion has been quite contagious this season,
> hasn't i
"Noah L. Meyerhans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 08:41:43PM +0200, Riku Voipio wrote:
>> So, debian is coming the netbsd of Linuxes.. Sure a novel goal to
>> support rare hardware, but why does ot have to come at the expense
>> of commodity hardware owners?
>
> That's an i
Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 02:07:23PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
>> > Well, a likelihood is not a certainly. I, for one, certainly agree with
>> > him that kissing girls is a goodness that beats the hell out of card
>> > games...
>>
>> Not me!
heard
mail is/has been completely broken in cvs recently.
I've tried almost all the options mentioned in this thread (mutt +
mailsync, mozilla, gnus) and have settled on gnus. It's really nice
once you get it to behave.
--
Brian Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
101 - 134 of 134 matches
Mail list logo
