On Fri, 17 Dec 2004 22:30:02 +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Try to install xdebconfigurator,
URL:http://packages.debian.org/xdebconfigurator, and see if it work
for you? To test it, install the package and run
xdebconfigurator dexconf
This will replace your
On Thu, 16 Dec 2004 19:55:02 +1100, Hamish Moffatt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
WC -Sx- Jones
Dash Sx Dash must be hard to pronounce quickly..
LOL :-) Sx is an Action Verb.
And it's damn easy to find in search engines; however my first
mumblings into Usenet are likely deleted now -- I was on
On Wed, 15 Dec 2004 23:32:39 +1100, Hamish Moffatt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Dec 14, 2004 at 10:01:59AM -0500, Chasecreek Systemhouse wrote:
It would be nice if you included your name in your posts.
Lordy. :-) It *is* in my posts.
See below here ...
--
WC -Sx- Jones
http
http://buildd.debian.org/
How accurate is the information on buildd? I wonder because I am
using more recent versions than a few of those reported (at least
those I checked - like gcc)
http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=sparcpkg=gcc
???
--
WC -Sx- Jones
http://insecurity.org/
On Wed, 15 Dec 2004 17:00:02 +0100, Adeodato Simó [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
in buildd.d.o, you should specify a source package. try gcc-defaults,
and gcc-3.3. it seems that the 'gcc' source package existed for a very
short timeframe (?).
Yes, you are right. I forgot.
Or, better yet, an
Installing a source tree? (But NOT a CVS tree.)
OK, this is probably somewhat retarded -- because I cannot figure it
out and it very likely is simple and I am missing something basic: I
would like to install a software package that requires the PostgresSQL
development and source code tree -- so
On Wed, 15 Dec 2004 17:13:10 +, Steve Kemp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
'postgresql-dev'.
What's the name of the software you're trying to build?
I'm creating/documenting a quick Debian_Hints file at:
http://insecurity.org/ll3i11_j0n35/Debian_Hints
Have you read many of the
On Wed, 15 Dec 2004 18:35:40 +0100, Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What about apt-get source postgresql?
Yes I did, but that doesn't place/install it into the proper places --
what(where)ever they may be. I could have just as easily download the
source from postgressql website and
On Wed, 15 Dec 2004 18:55:53 +0100, Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
apt-get install sql-ledger
Um, that didn't work last night and I cannot find what command I used
when grep'ing history either ... Yep, thats my story.
OK, Im going back to my cave -- sorry for the noise.
(Thanks
On Wed, 15 Dec 2004 18:59:05 +0100, Florian Weimer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
LCC could concentrate on providing such a distribution-independent
execution environment, and perform the necessary integration tests for
commercially relevant distributions.
Just an idea. I think this is far more
Any commercial software company will tell you exactly the same thing
about software: testing is not free.
Testing is not free only in the sense that a *vendor*
might lose clients if said clients are the *testers*...
Historically, lots of clients are performed free testng for vendors.
I'm
To design software, all you need is a fully functional computer.
To design hardware, you need to create and test a prototype every once
in a while. That'll cost you.
Your logic doesnt follow.
Why, then, isn't Be (BeOS) still around ?
Plenty of fully functional computers around at the
[Please Note that I'm not trying to create a hardware holy war. Of
all the OSes I have used and upon all the architectures I have built -
both commercial and non-commercial -- Debian has consistently
delivered a great wholistic, as well as holistic, system solution.]
On 14 Dec 2004 09:03:20
On Tue, 14 Dec 2004 19:55:59 +0100, Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What's so private in these log files that they should not world
readable?
A local user can look at usage patterns and formulate a plan of
attack. A badly written CGI can leak server data across the public
Internet.
On Thu, 09 Dec 2004 13:59:10 -0500, Jim Gettys [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That being said, certainly UNIX's disunity was a major aid to Microsoft.
Repeating that history would not be good.
I must agree with Jim. From the stand-point that Debian is losing
developers to other Linux platforms and
On Sat, 11 Dec 2004 00:27:38 +, Martin Michlmayr - Debian Project
Leader [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
agreed to set up the machine, host it for a while and give interested
developers access. This box is not a general .debian.org
Is this by invitation only?
--
WC -Sx- Jones
It must be 4/20 already -- cuz this discuss makes me think everyone
is stoned out of the reality check minds.
--
WC -Sx- Jones
http://insecurity.org/
Regarding this thread - there are 240 articles posted into google NNTP
groups already.
-Sx-
On Thu, 2 Dec 2004 20:33:00 -0500, Daniel Burrows [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Depends: mail-transport-agent
Instead, you should write something like this:
Depends: exim4 | mail-transport-agent
Oh.
So, you are saying that all we need to do is cross reference all the
co-dependencies for
On Thu, 2 Dec 2004 21:18:12 -0500, Daniel Burrows [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't understand what this has to do with Gnome or anything I said.
Maybe its just me -- but your statement about selecting a preferred
package over any old package that provides [insert whatever] to
satisfy a
On Wed, 01 Dec 2004 13:16:11 -0200, Fernanda Giroleti Weiden
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
We need to discuss this point and find a technical way of solving the
first.
...
Years ago (MSDOS 5 days) I was writing a work-group computing series
for Datapro; the Microsoft representative I had been
21 matches
Mail list logo
