On Friday, March 16, 2012 16:30:35, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 03/17/2012 03:16 AM, Chris Knadle wrote:
> > On Friday, March 16, 2012 13:13:30, Patrick Ouellette wrote:
> >> Resampling could be termed a derivative work, not a backup copy since
> >> you are throwing aw
On Friday, March 16, 2012 13:13:30, Patrick Ouellette wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 08:20:22PM -0400, Chris Knadle wrote:
> > On Thursday, March 15, 2012 16:11:00, Patrick Ouellette wrote:
> > > On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 09:48:02AM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
> > > >
r/message/20100810.221410.d56b9d14.en.html
[2] http://lists.debian.org/debian-multimedia/2010/02/msg00013.html
[3] http://lists.debian.org/debian-multimedia/2010/03/msg00015.html
-- Chris
--
Chris Knadle
chris.kna...@coredump.us
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lis
would be nice to have some clear instructions on how to set up a Pin to
lower the priority in apt for d-m.o packages. Will the following do the
trick?
Package: *
Pin: origin "www.debian-multimedia.org"
Pin-Priority: 100
-- Chris
--
Chris Knadle
chris.kna...@co
On Monday, August 15, 2011, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Aug 2011, Chris Knadle wrote:
> > > After all, it isn't called gzless.
> >
> > Actually, that's not far off. Right now these functions are
> > spread across 4 different binaries, eac
ent package.
File Package
== ===
/bin/bzless -> bzmorebzip2
/bin/bzmore bzip2
/bin/zless gzip
/usr/bin/less -> /bin/less less
/bin/lessless
/usr/bin/xzless xz-uti
rtunity for the startup
script to give a useful message that the daemon wasn't started, and where to
look to change that.
I don't know how well this idea scales, and of course it would require a lot
of repackaging work, but it seemed to be worth mentioning, as it seems some
packages
101 - 107 of 107 matches
Mail list logo
