Re: CUPS should be the default print service in Debian/Sarge

2003-07-31 Thread Cyrille Chepelov
Le Thu, Jul 31, 2003, à 03:09:15PM +0100, Ross Burton a écrit: > On Thu, 2003-07-31 at 15:00, Cyrille Chepelov wrote: > > if only gnome-cups-manager wasn't leaking memory like a CPU leaks > > heat...) > > Terribly sorry about this. It's only gnome-cups-icon whi

Re: CUPS should be the default print service in Debian/Sarge

2003-07-31 Thread Cyrille Chepelov
Le Thu, Jul 31, 2003, à 09:44:17AM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz a écrit: > The last time I tried to use CUPS, I found it to be so user friendly > that I couldn't get it to do anything useful. Very pretty, less > functional; and the documentation was entirely inadequate. Well, while what you describe

Re: Bug#198158: architecture i386 isn't i386 anymore

2003-06-20 Thread Cyrille Chepelov
Le Fri, Jun 20, 2003, à 07:15:45PM +0200, Sebastian Kapfer a écrit: > > but dropping all Pentiums until Pentium II generation > > seems completely foolish. I hope I misunderstood your message. > > I'd drop the sub-pentiums (i.e. 386 and 486) entirely. Not that my vote > would count... Hmmm. Un

Re: Debian for x86-64 (AMD Opteron)

2003-04-10 Thread Cyrille Chepelov
Le Thu, Apr 10, 2003, à 03:33:39PM +0200, Wichert Akkerman a écrit: > That way you could do something like: > > # echo x86-64 >> /etc/dpkg/legal-archs > # dpkg -i libgtk2-2.0-1_i386.deb > # dpkg -i lib64gtk2-2.0-1_x8664.deb Will we have to also have lib64gtk2.0-dev? Wouldn't that have pretty bad

Re: Debian for x86-64 (AMD Opteron)

2003-04-10 Thread Cyrille Chepelov
Le Thu, Apr 10, 2003, à 10:40:47AM +0100, Hamish Marson a écrit: > I'm not sure how your logic works out that a 64 bit reg is going to be > faster than a 32bit one. Or do you mean simply you're expecting a speedu > because there are MORE 64 bit registers tahn 32 bit registers? Reg pressure is p

Re: g++ 3.2 on woody ?

2002-08-14 Thread Cyrille Chepelov
Le Wed, Aug 14, 2002, à 10:15:17AM -0400, Michael Stone a écrit: > On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 10:00:35AM -0400, Daniel Burrows wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 08:16:46AM +0200, "J.H.M. Dassen (Ray)" <[EMAIL > > PROTECTED]> was heard to say: > > > "The main point of the GCC 3.2 release is to have a

Re: franc,ais locale (was Re: A language by any other name)

2001-09-14 Thread Cyrille Chepelov
Le ven, sep 14, 2001, à 12:39:31 -0500, David Starner a écrit: > On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 06:02:45PM +0200, Cyrille Chepelov wrote: > > it looks like it's because your default locale is 8859-1. > > Nope. My default locale is UTF-8. As someone else said, your headers &g

Re: franc,ais locale (was Re: A language by any other name)

2001-09-14 Thread Cyrille Chepelov
Le ven, sep 14, 2001, à 09:39:55 -0500, David Starner a écrit: > On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 09:39:10AM +0200, Cyrille Chepelov wrote: > > (by the way, does the line mutt added at the very beginning of this post > > display completely on your screen ?) > > Here it does. The messa

Re: franc,ais locale (was Re: A language by any other name)

2001-09-14 Thread Cyrille Chepelov
Le ven, sep 14, 2001, à 08:54:40 +0100, Oliver Elphick a écrit: > Cyrille Chepelov wrote: > >Le ven, sep 14, 2001, 04:13:31 +0900, Junichi Uekawa a crit: > ... > >(by the way, does the line mutt added at the very beginning of this post > >display completely on

Re: franc,ais locale (was Re: A language by any other name)

2001-09-14 Thread Cyrille Chepelov
Le ven, sep 14, 2001, à 04:13:31 +0900, Junichi Uekawa a écrit: > On a very different topic, I cannot even type in > franc,ais in my system, and it seems to be a character not available > in the default locale which is C. C does not specify a charset outside ASCII, does it ? On my system, with L