Re: cdrtools

2006-08-10 Thread Dale C. Scheetz
On Wed, 09 Aug 2006 15:44:57 +0200 Joerg Schilling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Stuff deleted for brevity All of this, without even taking into account your brain-dead licensing mix between CDDL and GPL - which are intentionally incompatible licenses, according to Sun guys. If you are so

Re: Successful and unsuccessful Debian development tools

2006-08-01 Thread Dale C. Scheetz
Stuff deleted I have cdebootstrap do create chroots, dchroot to use them, buildd/sbuild to test compile under true buildd conditions. Why would I want something else? I'm not sure I know, but now that I know about this pair, I will certainly look into it. After that, if I can answer your

Re: Ongoing Firefox (and Thunderbird) Trademark problems

2005-06-18 Thread Dale C. Scheetz
On Wed, 15 Jun 2005 02:16:18 -0400 Eric Dorland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * Marco d'Itri ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: On Jun 15, Eric Dorland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It's an important part in evaluating the balance between the priorities of our users and free software... And where

Re: Is Ubuntu a debian derivative or is it a fork?

2005-06-04 Thread Dale C. Scheetz
On Thu, 2 Jun 2005 00:25:01 -0400 Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: (To answer the thread leader, I consider Ubuntu to be more and more of a fork and less and less a derivative distribution. If Ubuntu doesn't start to re-converge with Debian significantly after sarge is released, and we end

Re: Is Ubuntu a debian derivative or is it a fork?

2005-06-04 Thread Dale C. Scheetz
On Sat, 04 Jun 2005 19:16:50 +0200 Daniel Holbach [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello Dale, Am Samstag, den 04.06.2005, 11:29 -0400 schrieb Dale C. Scheetz: From the first CD I installed, I realized it was a fork...and a disapointing one at that. (Pretty desktop on live CD didn't install

Re: More on icons for packages

2005-01-27 Thread Dale C. Scheetz
On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 09:52:48 +0100 Tim Dijkstra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 20:18:39 -0500 Dale C. Scheetz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thus it might be even better to define a policy the following way: 1. Put all XPMs for the use in Debian-Menu into /usr

Re: More on icons for packages

2005-01-26 Thread Dale C. Scheetz
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 08:15:38 +0100 (CET) Andreas Tille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 25 Jan 2005, Dale C. Scheetz wrote: It might be better to reserve /usr/share/pixmaps specifically for menu icons in xpm format and create /usr/share/icons for png gif and jpeg icon images. Why

Re: More on icons for packages

2005-01-25 Thread Dale C. Scheetz
On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 23:24:45 -0600 Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] (va, manoj) wrote: On Sun, 23 Jan 2005 19:35:42 -0500, Dale C Scheetz [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: This document is only indirectly referenced in the policy manual, so it isn't clear how much force it has. (it could be taken

Re: More on icons for packages

2005-01-23 Thread Dale C. Scheetz
but... Thanks for the feedback. Any pointers to other docs would be useful... Luck, Dwarf On Sun, 23 Jan 2005 21:20:44 +0100 Bill Allombert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, Jan 23, 2005 at 07:35:42PM -0500, Dale C. Scheetz wrote: Well, I finally found some documentation on icons in menu

Adding Icons to Spider

2005-01-19 Thread Dale C. Scheetz
I have recently created an icon for the spider program and I have several implimentation questions. 1. Am I permitted to place an icon in /usr/share/pixmaps? What is the practice with subdirectories under pixmaps? (I did RTFM so if I just missed it please give me a reference) 2. When you add