Darren/Torin/Who Ever... [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Daniel Martin, in an immanent manifestation of deity, wrote:
My... it's been a while since I was investigating perl internals
(writing C code that was callable from perl) - at least two years,
which
Chris Fearnley [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, Jun 18, 1998 at 12:38:45PM -0500, Richard Kaszeta wrote:
Christopher J. Fearnley writes (Re: Serious performance bug in Perl):
to call it (instead of the default perl - 5.004.04-6). Performance
improved several hundred-fold. So I believe
Ben Gertzfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Daniel == Daniel Martin at cush [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Daniel It's a perl thing. I can almost guarantee it. The
Daniel problem is perl's shadow password support and it's getpw*
Daniel functions. Whenever these functions are called
Daniel Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ever have one of those days, when nothing goes right?
tkdesk 1.0p1-1 had some annoying packaging errors (most notably a
non-working menu file); annoying enough that I'm fixing them and
uploading yet another tkdesk.
Was I talking about having one of
Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
*** x11 Opt tkdesk 1.0b4-2.1 none
this package could use blt8.0-unoff
Actually, it can't, but that's because other bits of tkdesk are
incompatible with tcl/tk 8.0. As the upstream source of tkdesk comes
with its own blt, that's getting
I think someone already proposed this idea, and it was immediately
ignored, so I'm going to suggest it again:
What about a pine-installer package?
This would be similar to the netscape3 and netscape4 packages of old -
the user would be asked in the preinst to put the pine .orig.tar.gz,
the
Raul Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Daniel Martin at cush [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What about a pine-installer package?
This would be similar to the netscape3 and netscape4 packages of old -
the user would be asked in the preinst to put the pine .orig.tar.gz,
the .diff.gz
James Troup [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Michael Alan Dorman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Might I suggest that using it for source packaging would be
appropriate, though?
I seem to remember that there was some legal problem with using bzip2
in the US - software patent, that sort of thing. Is
Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
SNIP
Personally, I am inclined to think that if your release fixed
bugs, and introduced not too many new features, it should go
into frozen.
SNIP
And now it's just done that - 2.0.43b-4 is in incoming heading for
frozen, but you probably saw
Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
Daniel == Daniel Martin at cush [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Daniel I'd also recommend that people upgrading directly from bo
Daniel upgrade to this package instead of the one in frozen, as this
Daniel package's preinst cleans up the old bo
I had originally posted this to debian-private, but in the interest of
getting more feedback (and timely feedback, since if this is going
into frozen it needs to go *soon*) I'm re-posting it here. (It
probably belongs here anyway, as it's not really a closed
maintainers-only issue, but more of a
11 matches
Mail list logo
