I refuse to continue this discussion on devel. Move it to -java where it
belongs.
On Fri, Aug 18, 2000 at 04:28:03PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> Good job Ean. You've done an excellent job of maintaining a quality
> package.
--
_
Well Ben, there are two reasons that I ignored the NMUs.
The first reason is that Kaffe revisions have been so long in coming that
the 1.0.6 source base bears little to no resembelence to the 1.0.5
source. Maintaining the patches that were done against 1.0.5 would be
difficult at best and I was mo
You can start by writing to our man on point with the LSB, Dale Scheetz.
It is noteworthy, however, that Dale hasn't already commented in this
thread. Are you still actively following the LSB, Dale?
On Mon, Jan 18, 1999 at 10:51:03PM -0800, Joseph Carter wrote:
> It has come to my attention that
On Mon, Oct 05, 1998 at 08:03:04PM +0100, Oliver Elphick wrote:
> I'm trying to rebuild libpgjava to depend on jdk1.1. Unfortunately, I'm
> getting segfaults when I run javac (from jdk1.1-dev), so I am currently
> unable to make a new version.
Another strange thing. When I try to use libpgjava fo
A very marginal packaging of the yet to be announced Kaffe beta 2 is
available on my web site at:
http://www.novare.net/~ean/kaffe
I have finally finished filling out my maintainer information and will
try to get it expidited. Considering that we already know what my account
on Master and my pref
This comes from the Apache-Jserv list.
Now, what I am wondering is if JServ continues to ignore free Java VMs
and Sun continues its irresponsible development of the Java "standard"
in the same "secret" way it has been, should JServ be considered non-free?
In other words, did we decide that if a D
6 matches
Mail list logo
