Quoting Krzysztof Kajkowski [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I'm intending to move to SID from my woody box. I was wondering what
problems should I expect while building packages using new gcc 3.3. Does
kernel 2.4.21 build correctly? What about other progs like mplayer,
mozilla etc? Can I install gcc 3.2
On Sat, 30 Jan 1999, Bear Giles wrote:
I noticed in my slink snapshot (from last month) that 'cracklib2' exists,
'crack-dict' is suggested but *doesn't* exist (either as a package or
in the 'Packages' list), and 'crack' is nowhere to be seen.
I packaged cracklib2 and still plan on packaging
support.
Anyone interested should email me directly.
Thanks,
--
Jean Pierre LeJacq
CTO
Quoin Inc
1208 MASSACHUSETTS AVE STE 3
CAMBRIDGE MA 02138
voice: 617.492.6461
fax: 617.492.6861
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 20 Jan 1999, Ben Collins wrote:
Ok, after looking at this, I've decided that the cracklib support for
PAM would be best handled by having it in a seperate package. I want to
propose a naming scheme for module packages for PAM similar to how
apache modules are named, libpam-mod-foo,
On Tue, 19 Jan 1999, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
That said, I plan on cleaning up all the bugs for this package next
week.
There appears to be another problem with cracklib: it is missing a
script which means it can't be recompiled, which is clearly a
release-critical bug.
Your correct
On Wed, 20 Jan 1999, Ben Collins wrote:
On Wed, Jan 20, 1999 at 09:46:21AM +0100, J.H.M. Dassen wrote:
I think that there should be a release critical bug here, but I think it
should be #30862: libpam0g depends on cracklib2.
Yup. I've looked at it again, and the dependency is
On Wed, 20 Jan 1999, J.H.M. Dassen wrote:
On Wed, Jan 20, 1999 at 10:34:45 -0500, Jean Pierre LeJacq wrote:
Another Ack! I'd like to see cracklib support enabled in PAM. Can we
coordinate uploads here? I plan on a new upload of cracklib this weekend
which will close all existing bug
On Tue, 19 Jan 1999, BugScan reporter wrote:
Bug stamp-out list for Jan 19 00:02 (CST)
Total number of release-critical bugs: 50
Package: cracklib-runtime (main)
Maintainer: Jean Pierre LeJacq [EMAIL PROTECTED]
27511 crack_packer outputs numbers to stdout
On Tue, 19 Jan 1999, Robert Woodcock wrote:
Just wanted to let you know that tonight I plan to recreate the
cracklib-runtime build scripts (with debhelper) since they seem
to be missing a few things and also patch crack_packer so it produces no
output on a successful run, then repackage the
I recently uploaded linbot to master.debian.org which then was
installed on non-us.debian.org under
/pub/debian/dists/slink/main/binary-all. However, there is no
Packages file under this directory and the Packages file for
/pub/debian/dists/slink/main/binary-i386 doesn't include linbot.
Is there
I just upgraded to 0.0-11 of fakeroot and cannot get it to work. All
programs started with fakeroot with a segmentation fault.
Anyone else experiencing this problem?
--
Jean Pierre
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
On Thu, 16 Apr 1998, Bob Hilliard wrote:
Would you think that /usr/lib/dict is an appropriate directory for
the Wordnet database (the filenames didn't conflict!).
The old WordNet packages used usr/lib/wordnet/dict/. I believe
either /usr/lib/dict/ or /usr/lib/dict/wordnet/ (since
On Sun, 12 Apr 1998, Nils Lohner wrote:
I am looking to package Nessus, a ...free, open-sourced and easy-to-use
security auditing tool.
Do you have a URL to any documentation on Nessus?
--
Jean Pierre
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
On Thu, 8 Jan 1998, Edmund P. Morgan wrote:
1. Does Debian 1.3.1 support the 3Com 3c905 NIC in 100 Mbps mode?
Yes, I've been running it without any problems for over a year.
2. Does Debian support the above NIC without any kernel patches (native)?
Yes. I'm not sure if the precompiled
On 11 Jun 1997, Kai Henningsen wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Philip Hands) wrote on 11.06.97 in [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
The problems that need to be solved are:
unpacking all the request scripts early enough to run them all before the
first pre-inst;
and making the request scripts able
I know the pcmcia package documentation says that all
100baseT cards are unsupported. But ... has anyone had
success using such cards? Does anyone know if there is work
in progress to support 100baseT?
Thanks,
--
Jean Pierre
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word
Not sure this helps, but ...
I ran into a problem with compiling serial.o as a module.
At boot, I configure my serial ports using /boot/0setserial.
Unfortunately, when kerneld reloads serial.o, it
reinitializes the serial ports to a default setting which is
inconsistent with my hardware. Could
I just ran across this problem as well. I have a PCI bus
with a DPT RAID board and a 3COM ethernet board trying to
share IRQ 11. There were no software options or hardware
jumpers to change the IRQ selection.
To solve the problem, I moved the ethernet board to a
different empty slot. TA DA! It
On Mon, 19 May 1997 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 19 May 1997, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
Less blather this time. Yes, ther reason is that /boot
contains other useful information about the kernels ensconced there,
(like System.map, and psdatabase) but is missing one piece: exactly
19 matches
Mail list logo
