"Miles Bader" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Enrico Zini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
adept is a package manager for KDE developed by Peter Rockai on top of
the libapt-front library[1]. It supports debtags natively, it's the
first application based on libapt-front,
"Frans Pop" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tuesday 11 October 2005 21:34, Daniel Burrows wrote:
No, because people like to turn off the installation of
recommendations
Or yes, because it offers more flexibility to people who have a basic idea
of what they ar
"Eduard Bloch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
would it not be simpler to have have apt just ask dpkg what the
dependencies of the passed .deb are and then install the dependencies
(and
their dependecies) and then just pass the deb directly to dpkg?
Hehe, it wa
I wonder why nobody did implement that feature before. I imagine
(without knowing much about APT's internals), the pseudocode would look
like that:
- install command gets the list
- if the package does not exist in the cache and the given string is a
file, then:
- read the metadata of this pa
"martin f krafft" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please choose a different name
You should really have suggested something.
I'm not sure, but perhaps 'hibernate-java' migh work.
Sounds like a java port of the current hibernate utility though.
--
To UNSUBSCRIB
"Thomas Petazzoni" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The rules in english are understandable. I would suggest the following
changes though:
Use 'capture' instead of take when refering to taking an oppenent's pawn.
Change 'do a take' to 'capture'.
Change 'taken out o
"Mark Brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
In an ideal world dynamic services would have a range of ports reserved
for them. We're quite a way away from an ideal world here.
There are ports for that.
All ports above 49151 are designated for local (i.e. client) or
"Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The same is true for other RPC servers. It's the libc that restricts the
port
numbers (look at glibc-2.3.5/sunrpc/bindrsvprt.c, currently, it seems
it's port = (PID % 424) + 600). And, as I've said,
- Original Message -
From: "Henning Makholm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Newsgroups: gmane.linux.debian.devel.general
Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2005 6:41 AM
Subject: Re: Fw: Bug#328053: configure on install problem: cannot add user
while name_regex don't match username "sympa"
Scripsit
Have we updated the GPL in debian with the FSF new address?
As the address is for informational purposes the change is legally a no-op,
and should be performed for convince. (Unless of course somebody objects to
effectively changing a non-normative part of their license.)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
parse error.
1. Yavor Doganov says something.
2. Wouter Verhelst: Yeah. _We_ know.
3. Yavor Doganov: Is suddenly "sad" that Wouter (seems to) agree(s).
WTF?
I assume that by 'preching to the choir' Wouter meant: the people you are
trying to convince already believe in what you are saying.
"Pierre Habouzit" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Human error, or poluted chroot/compilation env is more likely to happen
on the developper machine than in a buildd. Maybe this has already been
discussed once, but I think that binary uploaded packages (except the
b
Ok, I know just about nothing about this.
I currently have 2.6 kernel, hotplug, and udev.
If I replace hotplug with coldplug, everything should still work barring
unexpected bugs?
(Once the archive is updated of course, so that udev does not require
hotplug, and coldplug is actually included)
By the way, i386 does not make the cut according to the vancouver
prospect due to the number of buildds required. So are we left with 0
archs in etch? :) That will certainly speed up the release.
LOL.
Release NOW! Release now, damnit!
I think it will be our fastest and smoothest release ever.
T free. If it is not free, it has failed.
--
If Debian is not free, it has failed. - Joe Smith
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Peter 'p2' De Schrijver" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I think you misunderstood me here. The limit is a upper limit, not a
lower limit.
Perhaps i'm wrong but let me pull up the original message. ...
- the release architecture must have N+1 buildds where N is
Wait, if a reliable upstream wrt timely security fixes is
a recommendation or requirement, we might have to get of a *fair*
share of the archive... and that's not only the unmaintained
software!
Well i meant both security and other updates. In the case where no better
upstream exists, it is a
Also you need to have a more reliable upstream. ID is not suitable as they
will not release security updates, fixes, etc in a timely manner.I would
very strongy advise against5 being the upstream yourself.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble
"Bastian Venthur" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Bastian Venthur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: quake3
Version : x.y.z
Upstream Author : ID-Software
* URL : http://www.idsoftware.com/
* License
I'm sure it will be documented, however it is a new feature and they have
not had time to update the doumentation. In fact they probably wanted to
leave it undocumented temporarally allowing those who knew about it to make
sure it was working before making it publicly known.
--
To UNSUBSCRI
block 1234 with 1235 1236
--http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/blog/2005/08/12?seemore=y#2005-08-12-postdc5
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Basically this is a postscript file that is used more or less as a shared
library. It is debians policy to have shared libraies used by more thasn one
debian program to be seperated out into its own package, and linked against.
That is the goal of this. Terry is mainly asking if packaging this as
Dan Jacobson wrote:
One way of having some daemons not start at boot (e.g., if we only use
our printer once a year) is to remove certain /etc/rc?.d/ links.
Hmmm, does init respect policy-rc.d? If so, it'd be fairly easy to do it
that way...
How many rc.d managers are in Debian anyway?
p
How about if it meets the folowing critieria:
1. it has been in testing for 10 days (been in sid at least 20 days)
2. the version is sid is the same as in testing (the maintainer has not
found problems in the ten days since it entered testing)
3. and has no RC bugs (no rc bugs reported in the te
What is interesting is that this worm will not send to addresses that
contain:
berkeley
bugs
bsd
fsf.
gnu
kernel
linux
mozilla
unix
the.bat
root
sendmail
listserv
So it looks like the worm tries to avoid open source or free software sites.
The worm contains may other no-sends, in categogories l
The upstream folks are planning to split cogito and git into two separate
packages. I requested (and they seemed to agree) that they change the
package name from git to something else before then. Hopefully they'll
see the light and try to play nice with the rest of the world.
Hmm... It look
101 - 126 of 126 matches
Mail list logo
