Hi Frank,
Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[Cc'ing you 'cause I don't know whether you're subscribed to -devel]
I am subscribed.
Jörg Sommer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Package name: xindy
Version : 2.2-beta2-1
Upstream Author : Joachim Schrod [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL
Hi,
I would like to pack Xindy an index processing system like makeindex.
Xindy's source comes with clisp 2.33.2 and it is compiled at build time.
I've got it managed to build with the clisp package from Debian. But I
have little problem and saw the Debian package depends on X11. Upstream
do not
Hello Anthony,
Anthony DeRobertis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jeremy Stanley wrote:
This has to include a copyright year, also.
...and following additional discussion, the resolution is:
After considering the suggestion, I have decided to close this
bug.
The year really should
Hello Steve,
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Nov 20, 2005 at 11:50:55PM +, Joerg Sommer wrote:
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does not work with j2re1.3 means you should be depending on what it
*does*
work with, not trying to conflict with (unrelated
Hello sean,
sean finney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi joerg,
On Sun, Nov 20, 2005 at 10:23:58AM +, Joerg Sommer wrote:
I've got a bug report (#336527) my package bootchart-view do not work
with j2re1.3. But j2re1.3 is not in Debian. Can I set a conflict upon a
packages
Hi,
I've got a bug report (#336527) my package bootchart-view do not work
with j2re1.3. But j2re1.3 is not in Debian. Can I set a conflict upon a
packages that is not in Debian? But if it do not work with j2re1.3 it
should more than ever not work with older version. But I would assume
older
Hello Steve,
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Nov 20, 2005 at 10:23:58AM +, Joerg Sommer wrote:
I've got a bug report (#336527) my package bootchart-view do not work
with j2re1.3. But j2re1.3 is not in Debian. Can I set a conflict upon a
packages that is not in Debian
Hello Thomas,
Thomas Hood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://panopticon.csustan.edu/thood/readonly-root.html
I won't summarize the whole discussion here. I will just say that
I see good reasons for adopting /run as a standard location for the
storage of state information that needs to be
Hello Blars,
Blars Blarson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Blars Blarson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been working on the spam filtering for the BTS. We are getting
over 100,000 spams/day and about 50/day get through the filters.
Do you tried
Hello Blars,
Blars Blarson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have also noticed tickets submitted to the bug facility that are
spam. Can that facility be configured so that if the format (package
name, version, etc) is not followed; the bug will
Hello Steve,
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 09:11:31PM +, Joerg Sommer wrote:
It seems there is a misunderstanding. bootchart is a shell script that is
started as init (kernel prompt init=/sbin/bootchart), which then forks
the real init to start the real
Hello Adeodato,
Adeodato Simó [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Joerg Sommer [Mon, 29 Aug 2005 12:51:16 +]:
Do it and get enough things to use it. Then there is no stopping you.
Well, I add /run/ to the directories of my package and mount a tmpfs
there on startup. But I leave it mounted after
Hello Goswin,
Goswin von Brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joerg Sommer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Goswin von Brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Petter Reinholdtsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What about /run/? Can a new package simply use/create /run? I would add
/run to the directories
Hi Roger,
Roger Leigh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In this case, it looks like we should standardise on something like
/run. Has this been brought up with the FHS/LSB folks? This sounds
like something other distributions will also need to tackle, so if it
gets standardised, so much the better.
Hello Goswin,
Goswin von Brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Petter Reinholdtsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[Goswin von Brederlow]
Nothing is available before init is started, init is always the
first thing to start, even on initrd or initramfs (some archs call
init linuxrc though).
You
Hi,
I will start maintaining the packages bootchart (#321784) and have a
question. Bootchart collects data while booting. It is started before
init, which means there is no place in the file tree to write to.
The upstream package creates a directory in /mnt/ where it mounts a
tmpfs. But using a
martin f krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I will start maintaining the packages bootchart (#321784) and have a
question. Bootchart collects data while booting. It is started before
init, which means there is no place in the file tree to write to.
can't you hack the package to use RAM until
sean finney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Aug 27, 2005 at 12:53:09PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
/run/bootchart, but there seems to be some resistance to actually trying to
standardize on /run :)
what about /dev/shm?
sean
Is it available _before_ init is started?
Jörg.
--
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Aug 27, 2005 at 06:31:20PM +, Joerg Sommer wrote:
I will start maintaining the packages bootchart (#321784) and have a
question. Bootchart collects data while booting. It is started before
init, which means there is no place in the file tree
Marcelo E. Magallon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 08:51:31PM +, Joerg Sommer wrote:
I reported my wish #281892 to have a file in examples executable to
make it possible to create a symlink on it that is placed in the
PATH. Or that is to say I would like to have
Hi,
is it alright to make a file in /usr/share/PKG/examples executable?
I reported my wish #281892 to have a file in examples executable to make
it possible to create a symlink on it that is placed in the PATH. Or that
is to say I would like to have the file bogominitrain.pl in examples
Hi,
I found three packages in my system they name itself in the Depends
field: libbonoboui2-0, libgail-common and libtextwrap1
What's the reason for a package to depend on itself? This makes it hard
for deborphan to detect them as orphaned. Should check lintian on this?
Have a nice day, Jörg.
Hi,
can I use debconf to ask the admin what should be the default look and
feel for the editor jed? The developers-reference manual tells us to not
abuse debconf. Is this an abuse?
Jed can have the look and feel like emacs or the KDE editor. Can I ask
the admin, what should be the default?
Have
Hi,
in an old version of jed-common two conffiles 00site.sl and 99debian.sl
were included. But caused by some reason they aren't removed on upgrade.
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=266981
Becomes a conffile held if it was modified when it is removed in a new
package version?
Hi,
are there any X login manager independent scripts they were run after the
X session is closed? Is there a possibility for gconf, artsd and alike to
register to get called when the X session ends to bring down there
service?
I admin a linux pool for nearly 500 people. After two weeks uptime
Thomas Hood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 11, Joerg Sommer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
why ppp provides its own mechanism of telling programs when the
interface is coming up or down? Many programs register for the ppp
mechanism, but not for the network mechanism. Where is the difference
Thomas Hood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2004-10-14 at 00:21, Robert Collins wrote:
I think there is basically a general class of network event to represent
these, and if ifupdown is taught it, and then dhcp, ppp, whatever are
hooked into it, the result would be fanastic. That class is
Hi,
why ppp provides its own mechanism of telling programs when the interface
is coming up or down? Many programs register for the ppp mechanism, but
not for the network mechanism. Where is the difference and why both isn't
the same?
Bye, Joerg.
--
Real programmers don't comment their code.
begin Henrique de Moraes Holschuh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 22 Nov 2003, Joerg Sommer wrote:
I hope someone knows what policy-rc.d is and can comment my idea, because
the maintainer of file-rc will stay conform to sysv-rc, which uses
policy-rc.d.
http://people.debian.org/~hmh
29 matches
Mail list logo
