-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2004 10:36:34 -0700
Source: audacity
Binary: audacity
Architecture: source powerpc
Version: 1.2.0-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Matt Brubeck [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Joshua Haberman [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 18:48:10 -0800
Source: audacity
Binary: audacity
Architecture: source powerpc
Version: 1.1.99pre3-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Joshua Haberman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Joshua Haberman [EMAIL
* Steve Greenland ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
To clarify: AFAICT, Python is perfectly happy with any sort of
indentation you choose, so long as it's consistent in any given block.
You want to use 'spacespacetab', fine. Just don't try to mix it
with 'spacetab' in the same block.
As a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2003 18:24:02 +
Source: audacity
Binary: audacity
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.1.99pre1-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Joshua Haberman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Joshua Haberman [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2003 20:15:07 +
Source: audacity
Binary: audacity
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.1.99pre1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Joshua Haberman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Joshua Haberman [EMAIL
* Branden Robinson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 03:38:18PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
On Jul 03, Petter Reinholdtsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I believe this whole case of RFC standards are not confirming to The
Debian Free Software Guidelines display a complete
* Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 01:42:01PM -0500, Joshua Haberman wrote:
* Branden Robinson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 03:38:18PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
On Jul 03, Petter Reinholdtsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I fully
* Branden Robinson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 01:42:01PM -0500, Joshua Haberman wrote:
I think non-free removal will seem more radical if it means that
Debian will no longer distribute RFCs on the basis that their
licensing is not permissive enough.
After years
* Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 03:02:59PM -0500, Joshua Haberman wrote:
If the separation between main and non-free is intended primarily as a
guarantee that everything in main is DFSG-free, and that no part of the
core distribution depends on non-free
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2003 01:33:47 +
Source: audacity
Binary: audacity
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.0.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Joshua Haberman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Joshua Haberman [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2003 23:14:17 +
Source: libsndfile
Binary: libsndfile1 libsndfile1-dev sndfile-programs
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.0.4-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Joshua Haberman [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 8 Dec 2002 23:56:03 -0800
Source: libsndfile
Binary: libsndfile1 libsndfile1-dev sndfile-programs
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.0.3-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Joshua Haberman [EMAIL PROTECTED
* Hugo van der Merwe ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2002-12-06
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: openscenegraph
Version : 0.9.2
Upstream Author : Robert Osfield [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://www.openscenegraph.org/
* Martin Schulze ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Your example lists:
Package: foo
Description: perform some function, do some task for
GNOME/KDE/WindowMaker/GNU/Linux
foo is a function program, designed to help
you task. more simple details about task. Written for
the environment, it
* martin f krafft ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
the author of gjay is troubled by
http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?pkg=gjayver=0.2.2-1arch=ia64file=log
and is looking for ways to troubleshoot this. short of letting him
access a debian developer machine running on IA-64 through my account -
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 1 Dec 2002 21:08:51 -0800
Source: libsndfile
Binary: libsndfile1 libsndfile1-dev sndfile-programs
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.0.2-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Joshua Haberman [EMAIL PROTECTED
is to just override the rule and not set CFLAGS;
the real solution is to fix the Makefile so that this works.
I had to do this for several Makefiles tonight; my strategy was to
change
CFLAGS = -Ithis -Ithat -g
into
override CFLAGS += -Ithis -Ithat -g
Josh
--
Joshua Haberman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
as a normal user.
Is there any way for non-porters to port their own packages using
Debian's machines? How should a person overcome the above obstacles?
Joshua
--
Joshua Haberman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
University of Puget Sound [EMAIL
18 matches
Mail list logo
