but either way, id like to suggest again, we move forward and
rather discuss how we can improve the situation, do something about
the split and move toward un-doing it!
We look forward to seeing you in Dublin then.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
Also ive offered my resignation in the past.
I do still offer to resign from the FFmpeg leader position, if it
resolves this split between FFmpeg and Libav and make everyone work
together again. I never understood why people who once where friends
became mutually so hostile
The big elephant
On 10 August 2014 13:38, Michael Niedermayer michae...@gmx.at wrote:
On Sat, Aug 09, 2014 at 06:26:19PM +0100, Kieran Kunhya wrote:
[...]
... and was designed by a larger
group instead of libswresample which was basically one person (and
literally appeared in git out of nowhere).
http
Most forks cause additional work which, in the long term, is better spent
elsewhere. The ffmpeg/libav split is ample proof of that; in an ideal
world, you wouldn't need the mythtv fork either.
Debian's position is that we _really_ want to avoid having multiple copies
of essentially the same
On 9 August 2014 19:25, Andreas Cadhalpun
andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com wrote:
I can understand that statically linking is easier from an upstream point of
view, but it has important disadvantages for a distribution such as Debian
and thus should be avoided if possible.
It is also the
5 matches
Mail list logo
