Re: FW: Firewall Project

2000-08-21 Thread Kurt D. Starsinic
On Mon, Aug 21, 2000 at 11:51:00AM -0700, Brent Fulgham wrote: > The "technical" leadership at my wife's work are back-pedalling from > using a Linux firewall between an AS/400 system and remotely-connected > PC's based on the following argument: > > > To all Network Administrators: > > > > Probl

Re: Intent To Split: netbase

2000-08-14 Thread Kurt D. Starsinic
On Thu, Aug 10, 2000 at 03:22:43PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > On Thu, Aug 10, 2000 at 12:47:34AM -0400, Decklin Foster wrote: > > Anthony Towns writes: > > > Well, if you wanted half the people running unstable to just > > > blithely upgrade and have all their firewalling disappear, you could >

Re: ITP: Re: Must hand off XEmacs21 project!

1999-10-06 Thread Kurt D. Starsinic
On Wed, Oct 06, 1999 at 08:25:03PM +0900, Takuo KITAME wrote: > > On 02 Oct 1999 18:49:59 -0400 > > "Dres" == James LewisMoss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote... > Dres> So, to all on devel consider this a ITP on xemacs21 and I would > Dres> appreciate anyone who has a chance to test the packages.

Re: ITP: Re: Must hand off XEmacs21 project!

1999-10-04 Thread Kurt D. Starsinic
On Sat, Oct 02, 1999 at 06:49:59PM -0400, James LewisMoss wrote: > I'll take it back. I've already got packages made (look at > http://va.debian.org/~dres/xemacs21. They don't use your setup, but > they work. And you could have offered it back knowing I had already > made packages rather than po