[BTS#1055272] po-debconf://ocsinventory-agent/sv.po

Forwarded Message Subject: Bug#1055272: Acknowledgement ([INTL:sv] Swedish strings for ocsinventory-agent debconf) Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2023 11:45:04 + Thank you for filing a new Bug report with Debian.

Re: getting rid of "testing"

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 2019-06-25 09:46, Bastian Blank wrote: > On related notes: For Azure we currently plan (yeah, still not > finished as MS does not provide input, be we still need to change > it): - debian-10 - debian-11 - debian-sid And docker hub have some

diff-highlight (was: Re: Bug#925288: ITP: diff-so-fancy -- Good-lookin' diffs. Actually… nah… The best-lookin' diffs.)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 2019-03-22 15:34, Adam Borowski wrote: > There's an implementation of this in "git" itself already, named > diff-highlight. Alas, either I'm a complete idiot, or its > documentation is not quite adequate -- some time ago I wasted over > an hour

LXDE web page bashing thread Re: When do we update the homepage to a modern design? (was Re: Moving away from (unsupportable) FusionForge on Alioth)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 2017-05-19 15:00, Zlatan Todoric wrote: > Well Debian on its page doesn't mention it is Linux based > or has Linux kernel or at all word Linux. We have Linux, HURD and the FreeBSD kernel, though. I suspect the thought was

Re: Bug#861812: ITP: node-evp-bytestokey -- secure key derivation algorithm from openssl

Bastien ROUCARIES : > * Package name: node-evp-bytestokey > > EVP_BytesToKey() derives a key and IV from various parameters. type > is the cipher to derive the key and IV for. md is the message digest > to use. The salt parameter is used as a salt in the

Re: What's a safe way to have extensions in chromium in Debian?

On 2017-03-23 07:50, Sebastian Reichel wrote: > I wonder if we could just add a boolean debconf question for this. > It could setup /etc/chromium.d/remote-extensions based on the answer > and provide some (dis)advantages info for selecting either option. Probably hard to do that without violating

Re: Bug#850255: ITP: node-is-retry-allowed -- My prime module

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 2017-01-05 14:41, Stéphane Blondon wrote: > > I think it would be nice to send a pull-request to fix it > upstream. I did. https://github.com/floatdrop/is-retry-allowed/pull/1 - -- brother http://sis.bthstudent.se -BEGIN PGP

Re: Bug#850255: ITP: node-is-retry-allowed -- My prime module

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 2017-01-05 13:04, Christian Seiler wrote: > The official package description appears to be: > > "Is retry allowed for Error?" > > And while that is still a bit vague, it does at least give an > indication what the module does, while I have no

Re: Is anything in BTS tracking fixes to CVE-2016-5696

On 2016-08-23 17:14, Perry E. Metzger wrote: > I've tried searching BTS for references to CVE-2016-5696 (the recent > Linux TCP injection vulnerability) and I've come up empty. Is there > currently a bug in the system that is tracking fixes for it? Try this starting point:

Re: howto avoid "apt-get update" going guru?

On 2016-07-05 06:32, Harald Dunkel wrote: > Hi folks, > > this morning I found "apt-get update" getting stuck due to an > unresponsive host: > > # cat /etc/apt/sources.list > deb http://ftp.debian.org/debian sid main contrib non-free > deb-src http://ftp.debian.org/debian sid main contrib

Re: Let's abandon debian-devel.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 2014-11-11 12:25, Ben Finney wrote: But all Debian Contributors have their OpenPGP key in the project's keyring. No? Most certainly not. Parts where many people who is not DD nor DM takes part include docs, web, translations and graphics. -

Re: FFmpeg vs. libav packaging (was Re: Proposal: SystemD.pushers/forcers, et cetera)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 2014-02-13 14:43, The Wanderer wrote: I was not aware that the decision of whether to go with libav or with FFmpeg had involved any consideration at all of which one was better, only consideration of which one had someone available who was

Re: translations.launchpad.net: how to get PO for updating Debian packages?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 2014-01-09 15:34, Nick Andrik wrote: I went here: https://translations.launchpad.net/ubuntu/saucy/+source/im-config/+pots/im-config and clicked on the download link in the upper right:

Re: Debian Developers team in Launchpad

On 2013-12-10 02:42, Tae Wong wrote: The account Tae-Wong SEO (seotaewong40) has been suspended under Launchpad. Here's a look at Ubuntu Users member photos: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-users/+mugshots?memo=1389start=1389 (The icon is an inactive user; not an active user...) And the

Re: Proposal: let’s have a GR about the init system

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 2013-10-25 17:04, Bastien beudart wrote: It seems that the tech committee is composed of two well known ubuntu developers. Correct. And five other members. Isn't that biased? Probably. But even if the two people vote in one direction they

Re: LXDE is dead in Debian?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 2013-07-31 15:02, Thomas Goirand wrote: My understanding was that Andrew needs to reinstall his server, and is waiting on someone else to provide that to him. I expect the issue to be solved during the next debconf. We've opted to put it on

Re: LXDE is dead in Debian?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 2013-07-31 11:17, Paul Wise wrote: Once the upstream situation is sorted out they may either get removed or updated, depending on the name of the project created from the merge of the two projects. It's very early ofc but as far as I can tell

Re: License for the Raspberry PI

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 2013-07-10 10:39, tobias.har...@dlr.de wrote: The Raspberry PI works with the software Raspbian and there is installed your operating system Debian. My question is: Do I need a license for the software to develop in a company? No but if you

Re: Interactive package management via aptitude

On 2013-04-09 11:05, Kevin Chadwick wrote: Aptitude installs all recommended packages by default which was rather annoying until I found that in the options menu as I ran out of space a couple of times. as does apt-get. -- brother http://sis.bthstudent.se -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Re: bugs.debian.org: something's wrong...

On 2013-03-20 19:17, Bart Martens wrote: Since you ask, I suggest to disable it now and enable it later only after opt-in. Maybe the do not track header could be honored. -- brother http://sis.bthstudent.se -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of

Re: idea -- apt-based init daemon

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 2013-01-15 10:49, hhm wrote: Hope this helps! http://m.mediapost.com/publications/13/No-Cookies-A22.jpg (this is one of the most obvious cases of please show the code I have seen to date) - -- brother http://sis.bthstudent.se -BEGIN PGP

Re: Debian should move away from MD5 (and at best also from SHA1) (in secure APT and friends)

On 2012-10-11 19:38, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote: On Thu, 2012-10-11 at 11:35 -0500, Peter Samuelson wrote: What makes sense is to use a hash that has the properties that are needed for a particular application. Well... I think that's only really required if performance is very critical,

Re: libfm and pcmanfm in debian

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 2012-09-03 00:10, Andrej N. Gritsenko wrote: Hello! Ansgar Burchardt has written on Sunday, 2 September, at 22:04: Andrej N. Gritsenko and...@rep.kiev.ua writes: Tell me, please, how I can achieve the inclusion of stable version of

Re: Change default PATH for Jessie / wheezy+1

On Wed, 8 Aug 2012, Andrew Shadura wrote: On Wed, 08 Aug 2012 19:44:25 +0200 Vincent Bernat ber...@debian.org wrote: arp can be replaced by ip neigh, ifconfig by ip addr or ip link, route by ip route, ipmaddr by ip maddr, mii-tool by ethtool, netstat by ss, nameif by ip link, iptunnel by ip

Re: [CTTE #614907] Resolution of node/nodejs conflict

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 2012-07-26 02:19, Filipus Klutiero wrote: The above is incorrect. The keyring only contains Debian developers which are packagers or members. Note that we have terminological issues on this front (the constitution equates Debian Developer

bitbucket is lock in? (was: Re: Packaging on GitHub ?)

On Tue, 29 May 2012, Brian May wrote: I don't see the problem, github is just a hosting provider. Unlike, say Bitkeeper, you are free to make git clones anywhere, entirely with open source software, and are in no way locked down to using github. Can you elaborate on the bitbucket case there?

Re: Bug#672695: wordpress: no sane way for security updates in stable releases

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 2012-05-13 14:54, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: Wordpress upstream doesn't seem to be able to support a stable branch long enough for us (and I don't blame them for that, we do know how painful it is). This pretty much sounds like the web browser

Re: Anything still not OK with apt 0.9.1?

On Thu, 19 Apr 2012, Svante Signell wrote: Hi, when apt-get update the following happens when updating from a port (that doesn't have a valid public key): This has been the case for years. Since secure apt got default at least. No problems before 0.9.x?? Ign http://ftp.debian-ports.org

Re: Packaging of new upstream (pre-)releases until wheezy

On Sat, 14 Apr 2012, Svante Signell wrote: It seems like many DMs package new releases/fixes bugs closer to the release than attending to that now. Of course it is a time/resource issue, but anyway. Why not package pre-releases in experimental, to squeeze bugs out before the new upstream

Re: Bug#653813: ITP: edgar -- The Legend of Edgar platform game

On 2012-01-26 11:51, Richard Sweeney wrote: After some reading, I can probably just leave the assets under the current license. I can simply just change it back since it's currently not released? If current license is GPL and someone make a fork based on that your license change in the future

Re: Bug#652464: ITP: aguilas -- A web-based LDAP user management system

On Thu, 5 Jan 2012, Luis Alejandro Martínez Faneyth wrote: After i correct all this issues, should i fill in another ITP? No. Update the current one. -- /brother http://martin.bagge.nu Bruce Schneier doesn't keep secrets -- they keep themselves out of fear. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Re: daily build 24/11/11

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 2011-11-25 06:35, Richard wrote: I was always under the impression it was worth checking with others before raising a bug, and keeping the volume of bug request down. You missed my point with doing proper bug reports. This is a good read on

Re: daily build 24/11/11

On Thu, 24 Nov 2011, Richard wrote: I noticed that it was unable to find a network and obtain an address with dhcp. the build on 20/11/11 was OK Either you do proper bug reports or you stop sending these things to debian-devel@. The proper bug reports you are planning to do; do not send

Re: On Sid and Experimental

On Sun, 2 Oct 2011, Manjul Apratim wrote: Therefore, from purely a user's perspective, I wonder about the daunting task of maintaining Testing/Sid/Experimental separately - with due respect, if Sid was itself Experimental, and Testing the stabler version of that (but Stable) which would

Re: How do I join the development team?

On Sun, 5 Jun 2011, Jason Hsu wrote: 2. A trash program: GNOME and KDE come with trash/recycle bins but ROX pinboard does not. PCManFM with libfm has a trashbin. Lightweight enough? -- /brother http://martin.bagge.nu On Bruce Schneier's birthday, a person standing at the very center of

Re: UDD access from Alioth(s children)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 2011-05-31 09:47, Christian PERRIER wrote: Quoting Tollef Fog Heen (tfh...@err.no): ]] Andreas Tille | I would like to repeat my question about UDD access from alioth (or | one / both of its successors): Is there anybody working to reenable

Re: Bits from the Release Team - Kicking off Wheezy

On Sun, 1 May 2011, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: weren't there. But as a matter of fact, chances are that those people wouldn't have been able to be Debian Developers today if it weren't for the GR. As I was the very first to apply under the GR (not in the first batch of accepts though) I just

only servers pfff (Was: Re: network-manager as default? No!)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 2011-04-13 10:53, Bernd Zeimetz wrote: Yes. For a distribution which is targeted to support servers properly, yes, definitely. For everything else there is Ubuntu. The universal OS is only running on servers. Check. - -- brother

Re: Location of Packages and Translation files seem to have changed since yesterday

as bz2. Did anything changed that should have been announced? It might. see this thread: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debian-l10n-devel/2009-February/000408.html -- Martin Bagge / brother Swedish l10n Mirror admin debian.bsnet.se -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ