-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 11:01:55 +0200
Source: sendfile
Binary: sendfile
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.1-27
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Martin Schulze [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 27 May 2006 06:58:25 +0200
Source: manpages
Binary: manpages manpages-dev
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.29-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Martin Schulze
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 28 May 2006 06:59:20 +0200
Source: manpages
Binary: manpages manpages-dev
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.30-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Martin Schulze
Marco d'Itri wrote:
So, does anybody mind if I remove depmod from the module-init-tools init
script?
I guess it would be a time-saver to remove the depmod call.
However, since one cannot run depmod properly without the respective
kernel being installed, removing the depmod call will caus harm.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 09:06:11 +0200
Source: manpages
Binary: manpages manpages-dev
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.28-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Martin Schulze
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 11:07:52 +0200
Source: sysklogd
Binary: sysklogd klogd
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.4.1-18
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Martin Schulze [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 14:52:54 +0200
Source: dpkg-multicd
Binary: dpkg-multicd
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.20
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Martin Schulze [EMAIL
Raphael Hertzog wrote:
On Wed, 03 May 2006, Ondrej Sury wrote:
(added openldap2.2 + gnutls to SummerOfCode2006 page)
Status of sending notification mails:
[fr] PhilBat: (421, 'Too many concurrent SMTP connections; please try
again later.')
[en] PhilippKern, RaphaelHertzog, AlphaPapa,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 11:55:26 +0200
Source: manpages
Binary: manpages manpages-dev
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.28-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Martin Schulze
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 08:19:22 +0200
Source: manpages
Binary: manpages manpages-dev
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.27-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Martin Schulze
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 20:38:09 +0200
Source: dtaus
Binary: dtaus
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.7-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 21:04:39 +0200
Source: dbview
Binary: dbview
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.0.3-8
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 15:23:35 +0200
Source: manpages
Binary: manpages manpages-dev
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.26-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Martin Schulze
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 12:50:33 +0200
Source: manpages
Binary: manpages manpages-dev
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.25-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Martin Schulze
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 8 Apr 2006 09:19:38 +0200
Source: manpages
Binary: manpages manpages-dev
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.25-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Martin Schulze
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2006 08:56:53 +0200
Source: manpages
Binary: manpages manpages-dev
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.25-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Martin Schulze
David Weinehall wrote:
Upstream includes non-free manpages these days, so in reality, we have
already forked. Further Debian-specific changes are needed to address
bugs such as #295211 (upstream does not document our libc/kernel
combination).
What manpages in upstream are non-free? Do
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2006 21:49:31 +0200
Source: manpages
Binary: manpages manpages-dev
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.24-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Martin Schulze
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 2 Apr 2006 16:47:36 +0200
Source: manpages
Binary: manpages manpages-dev
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.23-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Martin Schulze
Ganesan Rajagopal wrote:
Christoph Berg [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I was ranting about that on irc before, and was told that this is 1)
considered to be a security risk and 2) not worth the effort. The
additional concern I had was that an automatic solution would put less
load on DSA.
[Sorry for the late response, I don't read -devel daily anymore.]
martin f krafft wrote:
As someone who has served (and continues to serve) on several core
teams within Debian, would you be able to give us some insights into
how the situation may be improved?
In theory the team needs to
Frank Küster wrote:
Moving this to -devel, it's off-topic for -vote; Cc to -admin.
Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At some place where it can be found even if you don't want to look up a
month-old announcement. What about http://db.debian.org/machines.cgi,
and the developers
Nathanael Nerode wrote:
It looks approximately as though nothing has been examined since a month ago.
Although that doesn't explain the packages listed up top.
DWN permanently lists new packages, have this always been false positives?
Regards,
Joey
--
The only stupid question is the
Nico Golde wrote:
Could be, but I believe I heard that most NEW processing is done by
one of the assistants while the mirror split is done by someone else.
I guess that one person got busy or demotivated. I suspect NEW
Well, that person is currently on the CeBIT and manning the
Nico Golde wrote:
Hi,
* Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-03-13 19:19]:
Nico Golde wrote:
Could be, but I believe I heard that most NEW processing is done by
one of the assistants while the mirror split is done by someone else.
I guess that one person got busy
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2006 01:03:45 +0100
Source: manpages
Binary: manpages manpages-dev
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.22-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Martin Schulze
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2006 10:47:34 +0100
Source: manpages
Binary: manpages manpages-dev
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.21-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Martin Schulze
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 23:34:50 +0100
Source: manpages
Binary: manpages manpages-dev
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.20-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Martin Schulze
Wolfgang Jeltsch wrote:
Am Montag, 6. März 2006 18:29 schrieb Martin Schulze:
The Debian project happily announces the re-availability of the
packages.debian.org service on a new machine. The system has been
donated by Schlund + Parner where it is hosted as well. It is a
DualCore
Henning Makholm wrote:
Scripsit Robert Lemmen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
really cool and thanks to schlund and partner, but the links to the
changelogs and the copyright file at the bottom of each packages page
don't work. probbaly just something really minor...
Didn't such things use to be
Joey Hess wrote:
Martin Schulze wrote:
The services in the backup are:
Are there any plans to add svn.debian.org / alioth to this set?
No.
Alioth will have its own backup facility.
(/me is glad he's still backing up his svn repos on his own..)
Good.
Regards,
Joey
--
Life
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2006 09:07:15 +0100
Source: dhcpdump
Binary: dhcpdump
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.7-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2006 01:05:20 +0100
Source: manpages
Binary: manpages manpages-dev
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.19-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Martin Schulze
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2006 00:30:52 +0100
Source: manpages
Binary: manpages manpages-dev
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.18-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Martin Schulze
Hi Henrique!
The debian/changelog file is a file to document changes in the
respective package and not an arbitrary file to collect letters to
the stable release manager or anybody else. The latter should be
reached via mail.
Also, talking to the release manager before uploading a package,
best
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 4 Mar 2006 22:35:30 +0100
Source: dhcping
Binary: dhcping
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.2-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 23:09:11 +0100
Source: newmail
Binary: newmail
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.4-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED
We could use some advice and help with the GnuTLS / libasn1 update
that would fix the vulnerabilities reported recently.
The fix for libasn1 adds arguments to exported function. However,
these functions are named _asn_* and should not be used outside of
this library.
Unfortunately GnuTLS is
Sandro Tosi wrote:
I looked at the homepage, and while this does appear useful, is it really
nescessary to be packaged all by itself?
Think about a collection package; I don't think debian should be overloaded
with tons of single-program packages.
I'm getting used to package software
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 17:55:21 +0100
Source: manpages
Binary: manpages manpages-dev
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.17-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Martin Schulze
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 12:28:34 +0200
Source: crip
Binary: crip
Architecture: source arm
Version: 3.5-1sarge2
Distribution: stable-security
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Martin Schulze [EMAIL
kooka kdegraphics kolourpaint kmrml kgamma kpovmodeler
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 4:3.3.2-2sarge1
Distribution: stable-security
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
kamera - digital camera io_slave
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2005 11:50:22 +0200
Source: gtkdiskfree
Binary: gtkdiskfree
Architecture: source powerpc
Version: 1.9.3-4sarge1
Distribution: stable-security
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2005 13:39:14 +0200
Source: libpam-ldap
Binary: libpam-ldap
Architecture: source hppa
Version: 178-1sarge1
Distribution: stable-security
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 10:18:31 +0100
Source: manpages
Binary: manpages manpages-dev
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.16-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Martin Schulze
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 16:33:34 +0100
Source: manpages
Binary: manpages manpages-dev
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.15-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Martin Schulze
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 15:41:22 +0100
Source: manpages
Binary: manpages manpages-dev
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.14-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Martin Schulze
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2005 06:59:12 +0100
Source: manpages
Binary: manpages manpages-dev
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.13-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Martin Schulze
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2005 07:27:22 +0100
Source: manpages
Binary: manpages manpages-dev
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.12-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Martin Schulze
Junichi Uekawa wrote:
Hi,
I'm looking for a 'loginfo' file configuration that works
for alioth.
I thought I have found a solution few days ago, but when
I came back, it no longer seems to work correctly:
CVSROOT/loginfo contains:
DEFAULT /usr/bin/cvs-mailcommit --mailto [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2005 07:05:44 +0100
Source: manpages
Binary: manpages manpages-dev
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.11-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Martin Schulze
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 08:33:40 +0100
Source: manpages
Binary: manpages manpages-dev
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.10-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Martin Schulze
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 07:42:01 +0100
Source: manpages
Binary: manpages manpages-dev
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.09-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Martin Schulze
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2005 07:46:45 +0100
Source: manpages
Binary: manpages manpages-dev
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.08-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Martin Schulze
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 07:43:53 +0100
Source: manpages
Binary: manpages manpages-dev
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.07-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Martin Schulze
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 11:30:47 +0100
Source: manpages
Binary: manpages manpages-dev
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.06-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Martin Schulze
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2005 09:31:02 +0100
Source: manpages
Binary: manpages manpages-dev
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.05-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Martin Schulze
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2005 06:55:01 +0100
Source: manpages
Binary: manpages manpages-dev
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.04-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Martin Schulze
Turbo Fredriksson wrote:
The following matrix explains which version in which distribution has
this problem corrected.
oldstable (woody) stable (sarge) unstable (sid)
openssl 0.9.6c-2.woody.8 0.9.7e-3sarge1 0.9.8-3
openssl 094
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2005 14:59:51 +0100
Source: manpages
Binary: manpages manpages-dev
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.03-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Martin Schulze
Stig Sandbeck Mathisen wrote:
After having read this - wouldn't it be easier to report the user
doing the spamming, and simply reverting all changes done by this
user.
There are a limited number of wiki which have this functionality.
Neither the current nor the new wiki have that, as far
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2005 11:50:22 +0200
Source: gtkdiskfree
Binary: gtkdiskfree
Architecture: source powerpc
Version: 1.9.3-4sarge1
Distribution: stable-security
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Martin
A while ago the services of nm.debian.org have been moved from klecker
to merkel. Even longer ago the services of qa.debian.org have been
moved from klecker to merkel. To finnish this the respective
developer accounts have been disabled on klecker as well.
The home directories have been moved
Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
| I'd like to have a debian-planet list that would receive blog postings
| from planet.debian.org.
|
| The main reason is that after postings expire on the planet website,
| it's very hard to find old postings if you cannot remember who wrote
| it. Think of there was
Benj. Mako Hill wrote:
quote who=Christoph Berg date=Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 05:08:58PM +0200
I'd like to have a debian-planet list that would receive blog
postings from planet.debian.org.
The main reason is that after postings expire on the planet website,
it's very hard to find old
Jason Chu wrote:
(I'm not a member of the list, so please CC me on any responses you want me
to see)
I'm a developer for a neighbour distro, Arch Linux, and I'm starting up a
site to discuss distro development issues.
The goal is to have a site that describes solutions to common distro
Raphaël Hertzog wrote:
I know Wichert is a bit disappointed because despite all the
money/sponsors we have, we're waiting for more than a year for a new
machine. The main problems appears to be DSA who must give an approval
that they're willing to admin the machine before we can decide to buy
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2005 13:39:14 +0200
Source: libpam-ldap
Binary: libpam-ldap
Architecture: source hppa
Version: 178-1sarge1
Distribution: stable-security
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Martin
kooka kdegraphics kolourpaint kmrml kgamma kpovmodeler
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 4:3.3.2-2sarge1
Distribution: stable-security
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
kamera - digital camera io_slave
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2005 15:21:59 +
Source: squirrelmail
Binary: squirrelmail
Architecture: source all
Version: 2:1.4.4-6sarge1
Distribution: stable-security
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Martin
Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
I have been corresponding with the developer and maintainer of httperf
[0], which I intend to adopt. The issue was that a libssl linking
exception was needed for the package. They are currently making
inquiries at HP as to how exaclty go about this from their end,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 12:28:34 +0200
Source: crip
Binary: crip
Architecture: source arm
Version: 3.5-1sarge2
Distribution: stable-security
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Martin Schulze [EMAIL
Steve Langasek wrote:
On Sun, Jun 19, 2005 at 12:31:23AM -0400, sean finney wrote:
please excuse this blatant cross-posting, i wouldn't do it if i didn't
think it were critical that i do so...
http://www.infodrom.org/~joey/log/?200506142140
say it isn't so!
It isn't so. It's true
Stephen Birch wrote:
On Wed, 2005-06-01 at 05:02 -0500, Christian Perrier wrote:
Quoting David Weinehall ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Indeed. The Nokia OSSO (Open Source Software Operations) that work on
this product consists of several DD's (myself being one), plus at least
one person in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2005 21:05:08 +0200
Source: ppxp
Binary: ppxp-tcltk ppxp ppxp-dev ppxp-x11
Architecture: source hppa
Version: 0.2001080415-11
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed
Debian Day @ LinuxTag 2005 / and additional talks
-
I'm happy to announce (even though I should have done this one week
ago already) the schedule for the Debian Day, the mini-conference of
the Debian project traditionally held during LinuxTag. It
, please send a mail to Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED].
Last updated 2005/05/27 20:55 MET
--
Computers are not intelligent. They only think they are.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 21 May 2005 08:44:44 +0200
Source: qpopper
Binary: qpopper qpopper-drac
Architecture: source powerpc
Version: 4.0.5-4sarge1
Distribution: testing-security
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 25 May 2005 20:10:31 +0200
Source: sysklogd
Binary: sysklogd klogd
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.4.1-17
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Martin Schulze [EMAIL
--
This list intends to help the ftp-masters releasing 3.0r6. They have the
final power to accept a package or not. If you want to comment on
this list, please send a mail to Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED].
Last updated 2005/05/20 06:07 MET
--
Computers are not intelligent. They only think
Christian Hammers wrote:
I could package the whole libsnmp source code into the Quagga file, and
simply compile it with --without-openssl and then link it statically
or something similar brute force and ugly.
FWIW: Please don't. This would mean creating a security-support nightmare.
Matt Zimmerman wrote:
Another option would be to leave the source package maintainer the same (to
retain proper credit, etc.), but override the binary package maintainer
during the build (to reflect that it is a different build, and also display
a more appropriate name in apt-cache show etc.).
James Treacy wrote:
On Sun, May 01, 2005 at 11:40:19AM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
I have to confess this is mainly because I maintain both
packages.debian.org and packages.ubuntu.com and just copied the code.
If anyone has suggestions how to improve the wording on the Ubuntu
part, my
Matt Zimmerman wrote:
Every Debian derivative I have seen does this the same way. There is some
inaccuracy in either case, but I think this is the lesser of the evils:
- Changing the maintainer field
- foo is taking credit for my work!
- Requires modification of every source package,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2005 19:07:07 +0200
Source: manpages
Binary: manpages manpages-dev
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.02-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Martin Schulze
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2005 20:43:55 +0200
Source: manpages
Binary: manpages manpages-dev
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.02-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Martin Schulze
Nico Golde wrote:
There is another thing that I don't understand often. Why
are there linda and lintian?
In my opinion this makes things difficulter. Both have to
coordinate themselves and keep their policy rules up to
date.
Why are there Vi and Emacs?
Why are there Perl and Python?
Why are
Andrew Pollock wrote:
On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 04:16:18PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
FWIW: This would mean to remove all of Mozilla and friends, since they
don't receive any security support upstream, and neither the maintainer
or the security team are in a position to backport all
Don Armstrong wrote:
This raises a valid point; maybe the maintainer can comment on
this? Since we already receive no security updates to php3 from
upstream, is it feasible security-wise to keep it in the
distribution for some years to come?
I think the opinion of the stable
Andrew Pollock wrote:
- sarge is around the corner, and keeping it in means maintaining
it for possibly another 2-4 years! if it's *already*
no longer maintained upstream...
This raises a valid point; maybe the maintainer can comment on this? Since
we already receive no
After gluck.debian.org started experiencing problems writing to its
disks on Sunday we have tried our best to get the machine back in
shape. As we have checked all files that we could and fixed all
services that had broken files, best to our knowledge, we have decided
to bring the machine back
Michelle Konzack wrote:
Hello Martin,
s/Martin/Joey/g
FWIW: That's not always the case. Below is a real-world example
from a woody system with XDM:
koulutie!joey(pts/4):~ w
19:28:13 up 29 days, 8:52, 6 users, load average: 0.02, 0.04, 0.06
USER TTY FROM
Andreas Tille wrote:
My point: We need the possibility to recreate the current Debian
infrastructure for proposing changes to the current situation.
Not only this, we need the possibility to setup an alternate machine quickly
in case of hardware problems. And we even have the solution inside
Andreas Tille wrote:
On Tue, 5 Apr 2005, Torsten Landschoff wrote:
I was thinking of packages for important parts of the Debian
infrastructure.
Sure.
I absolutely agree with the approach to package infrastructure. Once this
is done use FAI.
Feel free to start this effort. Debian
Andrew Pollock wrote:
On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 08:38:17PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
Andreas Tille wrote:
My point: We need the possibility to recreate the current Debian
infrastructure for proposing changes to the current situation.
Not only this, we need the possibility to setup
Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 05:50:23PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
[...]
- issues with space on ftp.debian.org and on mirrors
(especially hindering amd64)
It might be a better point to start moving non-released architectures
(GNU Hurd and sh) to a different
Adrian Bunk wrote:
The milestone that included the start of the official security support
for sarge was only 6 days after the announcement, but is was missed by
more than 6 months.
Whyever it was expected to get testing-security for sarge that quick, it
should have been obvious 6 days
Eduard Bloch wrote:
Also, bear in mind that if we'd have done that, then we would still be
where we are right now, but would not have the debian installer ready to
release with sarge.
Maybe. But AFAICS there are only few developers that have worked on
both, b-f and d-i. So how would
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The questions below were posted at long time in the DDTP-Coors list, but
weren't replied :(((
IMHO the ddts code needs a revision to correct bugs, I am wrong? This
revision is possible? I can help.
It needs a thorough source code review before it can be
Michelle Konzack wrote:
I asume your are using TESTING or UNSTABLE...
Under STABLE I get only something like
joss pts/0Mar 26 14:42
joss pts/1Mar 26 14:42
toto pts/2Mar 26 15:06
This is, why I have asked...
The test I must do, should work under WOODY
101 - 200 of 769 matches
Mail list logo
