David Pashley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Do we really need this in the archive? Can we not add this to another
> package under games?
Er, why? This sounds like a great utility, it seems silly and
artificial to force it to be merged unless there's already a very
similar package to which it woul
Lionel Elie Mamane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Hmmm, why SSH1 and even telnet and not SSH2?
>
> You misread: There is NO telnet. As for SSH2, it works fine, but SSH1
> doesn't work. Probably a typo .
Does anyone still use ssh1? It seems quite common for it not to be
supported these days...
-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri) writes:
>> Spamhaus's rather irresponsible behavior in the past[*] hasn't left a
>> happy impression; have they cleaned up their act lately?
>
> Looks like you are confusing it with some other DNSBL.
Hmmm, looking thought old email I think you're right -- it was "s
Blars Blarson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I recomed using spamhaus SBL-XBL, or at least CBL (which is included in
> SBL-XBL).
Spamhaus's rather irresponsible behavior in the past[*] hasn't left a
happy impression; have they cleaned up their act lately?
[*] Extremely lax standards for listings,
Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What's painful about it?
>
> It stops a lot of viruses and spam, with no false positives. What's the
> problem?
"No false positives" seems a bit optimistic.
One problem I've encountered in the past is big mail providers (like
yahoo) who will send retr
Anthony Towns writes:
> Uh, so why hasn't the option of renaming (or just dropping) GNU
> Interactive Tools been discussed?
Given it's nature (it's not a command-line tool), it seems that renaming
the older executable/package to `git-shell' or something wouldn't be a huge
burden on its users.
-
Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm still using apt-get rather than aptitude because apt-get seems subtly
> but noticably faster. But I *am* using debfoster, which lets you get at
> some similar information. Maybe popularity-contest should pay attention
> to that as well?
Yeah, aptitu
astronut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I agree. The type of user who is likely to be using the ifconfig command
> on a regular basis is the type of user who probably already has sbin in
> their path. (Power user, sysadmin's nonprivleged account, etc.).
Yes. The great majority of users don't want
"Benj. Mako Hill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Without going down a semantic rathole, I'm happy to disagree here. In
> any case, it was meant more of a good-natured (if slightly vicious)
> jab against a program I love and am very critical of. I apologize if
> it came out wrong.
Er, no problem. I
"Bernhard R. Link" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> But the problem is that for this to work this way, you have to support
> downgrades. With a more complex scheme supporting redowngrades (i.e.
> upgrading and downgrading again when no user-made changes were done)
> would be needed.
> This has to be s
Will Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > Would you please contribute your suggestions (either improve bits at that
>> > page or somewhere else) of how to improve things. Thanks.
>>
>> What makes you think I have any?
>
> A lack of familiarity with your posts?
Not fair; asuffield is often needl
"Benj. Mako Hill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> IMHO, it's a bug if it doesn't work efficiently without specialized
>> assistance from shell completions.
>
> Absolutely. The fact that such a workaround is essential is a sign of
> serious problem. :) tla has those in force. :)
Geez can you be a bi
Stephen Birch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The question was really this, if Ubuntu created a better bug tracking
> program would Debian want to run the new software on the debian
> servers thus replacing the current bug tracking programs?
Is it better?
What I've read about Malone has been pretty
Bernd Eckenfels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
(B> Actually I am glad somebody is working public visible on the release issues
(B> and would not critisize him for that.
(B
(BPointing out a problem is nice, but doing so in an obnoxious manner
(Bhurts.
(B
(B-Miles
(B--
$B<+$i$r6u$K$7$F!"?4$r3+
Roger Leigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> debian-devel has acquired a reputation for being rather unfriendly and
> intimidating place, but there's no need to perpetuate that.
> Politeness doesn't take much more effort than being rude.
I don't think one should judge debian-devel based on this thoug
Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Well, there's nano -- and if you want the pine UI, most people recommend
> mutt with a .muttrc that contains pine-style keybindings.
>
> At least that's what I used when switching from pine to mutt...
Does that actually offer the "pine experience" thou
"Jaldhar H. Vyas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> We don't distribute it because we follow the letter of their
> license which unfortunately doesn't match their intentions and even more
> unfortunately they are not in a hurry to fix. But the authors of Pine
> don't mind at all. They even have a pag
Roger Leigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The only reason we don't have it is because of petty bickering and
> politics between the FHS folks (several years ago).
That seems a good description of the FHS in general...
-Miles
--
In New York, most people don't have cars, so if you want to kill a p
Martin Waitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Should we change some of these to /usr/libexec?
>
> well, it would be against the FHS, I think.
>
> The BSDs use libexec but I don't really see a good reason why it exists.
GNU project stuff also uses libexec (by default; I don't know if that
location ge
Andreas Rottmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> tla-tools
>
> I can take this one, if noone else wants it.
If you do, could you update the debian package to the latest upstream
version?
Thanks,
-Miles
--
Next to fried food, the South has suffered most from oratory.
-- Wa
Miros/law Baran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The font is included in the tetex-base package, along with other Type1
> GUST-sponsored fonts (Antykwa ToruÅska etc.) - I think such a package
> will be redundant.
Somebody shouldn't have to install tetex (tetex-base alone is 81MB) to
get a ttf font!
Ross Burton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> For the record it isn't going to be the default, but the engine itself
> is a contender.
So what are they gonna change (for the default)?
-Miles
--
P.S. All information contained in the above letter is false,
for reasons of military security.
--
Daniel Burrows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> It's disheartening because while there seem to be other free ray-tracers
>> out there with even better rendering quality than povray, I've not found
>> one with anything like povray's wonderfully expressive input language --
>> most other projects seem
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri) writes:
>> I suppose I will start filing minor bugs against packages that do
>> this. I'd like to hear other people's opinions, though. (It occurs
>> to me that help output to stderr is arguably appropriate if an invalid
>> option is given). Part of the problem i
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Curious; maybe the FAQ is wrong?
It's been a while since I looked at it; maybe the maintainers, and thus
attitudes, have changed (for the worse). Alternatively, perhaps the
loudest mouths on the mailing list are not representative of the
project's long-term
On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 14:16:54 +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there any reason to outright insult random software developers here
> on a public mailinglist, where insults are offtopic anyway? (Hint: no).
> Please refrain from doing so, not only is it against list policy
Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> It's in non-free:
>
> Thus not in Debian.
Oh cool it's pedants' hour
-Miles
--
97% of everything is grunge
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Pascal Hakim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> That would be cool. At least one of the povray maintainers has a
>> giant stick up his butt about Debian, something along the lines of
>> "The version of povray in Debian stable is old, so DEBIAN SUX0RS IN
>> EVERY IMAGINABLE WAY!@&* YARGH#(*!!! LOL!"
>
Clément Stenac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm interested in maintainership of PovRay.
>
> I'm going to try to update the package to the latest upstream version
> and to work on some of the bugs
That would be cool. At least one of the povray maintainers has a
giant stick up his butt about Debia
Maybe there needs to be an "Advertisement:" header in the package
description...
-Miles
--
Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum viditur.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It's impossible not to be rude on written media. What's a harmless joke
> to one is an insult to another, and an attack to one's personality to a
> third one. You can't expect everyone to be happy with everything you
> might possibly write.
Of course n
Gunnar Wolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Well... DJB was not trying to be specially nice
Is DJB _capable_ of being nice?!?
-Miles
--
Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum viditur.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri) writes:
> It works as advertised, and the FAQ says that it should not be used to
> block mail.
Hmmm, I looked at the FAQ, and found this -- buried in the middle of a
paragraph: "SpamCop encourages SCBL users to tag and divert email,
rather than block it outright."
Russell Coker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If you have any serious point to make then it can be made without
> reference to such people. However all your messages recently have
> been ad-hominem attacks, trying to compare me to Rumsfeld and now
> claiming that I have a "problem with reality".
Um
"Marcelo E. Magallon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The other problem with aptitude is touted as a design feature: it tends
> to be all-or-nothing. Either you use it always or you don't (automatic
> removal thingie). This becomes a problem when multiple persons use
> different interfaces for
Florent Rougon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If you don't like dselect and don't fall in one of the cases I have
> mentioned, then we have a problem.
Ok, I'll be more explicit: I don't like dselect, and I don't fall into
any of your cases.
dselect is perhaps not as completely awful as some peopl
Florent Rougon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've always thought that people who say they hate dselect (or, worse,
> that dselect is crap) fall into one of the following cases:
>
> (a) allergic to text-mode interfaces
> (b) type or click without thinking
> (c) haven't used it for more than 5 yea
paddy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In which case, is there something fundamentally broken about the spamcop
> system ? Or is there some technically insoluble problem here ?
It seems to be more that they just don't really give a crap:
(1) they trust users, (2) users are stupid, and (3) there's
Gergely Korodi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> From time to time I give a try to aptitude and synaptic, but always recoil
> in horror. I don't know what the fuss is about aptitude, IMHO it's way
> more complicated to use than dselect, and less clear as well.
Amazing
I used dselect a lot back
"Nikita V. Youshchenko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > IMHO it's somewhat silly to "stop the experiment now" and drop
>> > testing. Although there are problems with testing, there *are*
>> > well-known positives of having it.
>>
>> All the known positives are outweighted by the negative issues as
Jeff Teunissen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So do we. The names for GNUstep-based programs ARE unique -- no other free
> software is using (or, to my knowledge, has ever used) those names, and the
> names that "conflict" are named as they are for descriptiveness and for
> compatibility (Terminal,
Jeff Teunissen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Many "gnustep" apps OTOH, use absurdly generic names, and I can only
>> conclude that the developers do not think about mixed systems at all.
>
> I disagree in the first case, and you are incorrect in the second.
What can I say? You claim this, but th
Jeff Teunissen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> For me, I don't want GNUstep in the names of my programs because I am not
> connected to GNUstep and don't want to be. It is just a couple of libraries
> that I use to write my apps -- you wouldn't put "GTK+" in the name of your
> apps, would you?
Most
Marc Dequènes (Duck) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> BTW, if i'm not dead for GNOME 2.10, custom Debian menu is gonna die, as
> it is a bunch of unbrowseable nightmare stuff.
That seems a tad overwrought.
I usually prefer the debian menu because it's much more complete than
the gnome menu, and ofte
Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I guess that makes sense, if you interpret it as meaning something like
> > `Hard work is the partner of success' -- which sort of works with `apt'
> > too (partner of apt?).
>
> I don't think that derivation is correct. The `fu' really has no
> meaning
Cameron Patrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I seem to recall reading a number of complaints /from users/ in the BTS,
> requesting .desktop files precisely because they are i18nalised. Others
> have suggested expanding the current Debian menu definition to handle
> i18n. That, to me, sounds like
Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm afraid that although the character `fu' has many meanings, but
> style or technique isn't one of them.
Hmmm, you seem to be right, I was confused. :-(
I don't have a chinese dictionary, but my Japanese dictionary lists a
japanese version of kung-fu `ka
George Danchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> p.s. why Apt-Fu ? Is that 'APT Kung-Fu' or what ? Hmm, after apt-src,
> apt-build, and similar 'build that debian source package' tools, I've been
> expecting for 'apt-too' ;-)
FWIW, the `fu' in kung-fu means something like style or technique, so
apt
Sebastien Bacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm not sure that's a good idea. I'm using Gnome and I'd like to keep a
> simple applications' menu, not having hundred entries like in my
> debian's menu. Having too many entries in a menu is an usability problem
> imho (it's very annoying to search a
Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> One question to ask is "is this useful fonts?" If not, we have totally
> different ground to remove this package based on uselessness :-)
Are there any other good-looking japanese TTF fonts in debian?
I ttf-kochi-{gothic,mincho} and I remember every other
Adam Borowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Call me a wimp
wimp
> The problem lies not in the basic four directions (hjkl), but in the
> completely mad diagonals. They're plain unnatural and cumbersome to
> use
I _completely_ disagree -- I find the rogue diagonals astonishly smooth
and natural
BTW, another point is that the original layout is a fairly unique part
of rogue culture, and shipping with it turned off seems a bit like using
graphical tiles by default, or having emacs start up in wordpad-
compatibility mode -- one can perhaps understand the appeal for the
rawest of newbies, but
I definitely prefer hjkl -- the huge amount of extra hand movement
required by the number-pad layout is downright painful.
[and I'm a longtime emacs user!]
-miles
--
Occam's razor split hairs so well, I bought the whole argument!
Oliver Kurth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Specifying prefix on the make command line should work and not try to
> > install to /usr (though he appears to be using it incorrectly so
> > probably won't get what he wants).
>
> Using prefix is dangerous, because it may be compiled into the code or
James Michael Greenhalgh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > (cd build && $(MAKE) install prefix=$(CURDIR)/debian/gcc4arm/usr)
>
> Dunno about 'prefix=' ... I've always used 'DESTDIR='?
Specifying prefix on the make command line should work and not try to
install to /usr (though he appears to be usin
Scott James Remnant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> "Jerome demonstrated a clear understanding of the Social
>Contract and the Debian Free Software Guidelines."
>
> Perhaps you would care to re-read the Social Contract and DFSG? Your
> understanding seems to have wavered.
It's off to
On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 10:41:16PM +1000, Brian May wrote:
> > Indeed, it's looking likely that GregKH's `udev' will replace devfs
> > sometime in the future.
>
> Dare I ask the obvious question: what is udev? Why is it better then
> devfs?
It's mostly in user-space, lighter-weight, and more conf
Russell Coker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Devfs is getting less support now, it might not be the best time to start
> depending on it.
Indeed, it's looking likely that GregKH's `udev' will replace devfs
sometime in the future.
[It was amusing to see Christoph Hellwig's recent patch on the lkml
Sam Hocevar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Description : incredibly powerful and versatile software synthesis
> > program
>
>Mmmh, you really should get rid of the "incredibly powerful and
> versatile" part. Every program is incredibly powerful and versatile.
Actually I think that descri
Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Then they have no business using awk.
??? Awk is very friendly (friendlier than perl anyway).
-Miles
--
自らを空にして、心を開く時、道は開かれる
Mathieu Roy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It proves that the user interface of gawk is more friendly, nothing
> more.
Yeah; the thing about mawk is that it's a great little program, fairly
robust and wicked fast -- much faster than gawk for things I do -- but
the last time I checked, it hadn't re
David B Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> A fair numbe rof those apps you probably want were implemented in Debian
> before GNU made their own versions - install-info(8) is one of the ones
> most often griped about.
Careful... mentioning this issue invariably seems to generate all kind
of bile
Lukas Geyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am not really sure that "email" satisfies this criterion. Maintaining
> non-free packages is a hassle, it might be easier to write a free
> replacement in the time saved by messing around with non-free packages
> and getting special Debian redistribution
Daniel Burrows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The contract they gave me assigns copyright to any computer code I
> write this summer to NASA; since it's only for 2.5 months, I didn't
> bother making a fuss about it.
I understand your not making a fuss, but I think an offhand gripe or two
to your ma
Cameron Patrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I suspect that for anyone running unstable the Packages.gz and
> Sources.gz files will be the tip of the iceberg.
>
> For anyone running stable, the Packages.gz files rarely change and so
> apt-get update will not normally bother to download them again
David Weinehall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Fetching Packages.gz over modem is a pain in the arse. Having it
> only rsync the changes would be so nice.
Exactly.
I use `testing' via a slow modem link, and I'd like to update frequently,
to keep individual updates as small as possible (testing do
Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> (Not saying you're a nationalist, Manoj.)
Even worse, you're comparing him to Ayn Rand!
-Miles
--
"I distrust a research person who is always obviously busy on a task."
--Robert Frosch, VP, GM Research
"John H. Robinson, IV" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> this is entirely off topic for -devel, let's move it to -politics or
> -curiosa or somewhere else more appropriate.
But you just _had_ to get your bitter little rant in first, huh?
-Miles
--
Ich bin ein Virus. Mach' mit und kopiere mich in Dei
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> And I know of approixmatly zero Americans who have reason to boycott
> Canada.
Er, well. I doubt there's a government in existance that hasn't done
something objectionable enough to piss off a foreigner somewhere (e.g.,
recent european attempts to export t
Hi Greg,
Now that you've got this release out, have you given any thought to the
message I sent earlier about merging gdb server versions?
Here it is again in case you've forgotten:
Hi,
The current version of gdbserver in uClinux-dist only works on the m68k.
In my v850-specific version of uCli
Simon Law <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Please don't hold the conference in the U.S. I am a Canadian
> who has not stepped foot on American soil since your government declared
> it was at war.
You mean the iraq war? What's the point? How is avoiding the
U.S. going to help anything, regard
Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So unless you have a better reason
> then PCness, I'll use either as the mood strikes me :)
To be accurate, I don't think this is an example of PCness, but rather
of PR-speak, the same sort of thing that goes into press releases
(though I mean `public rel
Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've uploaded mozilla-firebird_0.6-1 to my personal apt
> repository at http://people.debian.org/~eric/debian/.
Looks good, but why the long binary name?
Wouldn't just `firebird' be nicer?
Thanks,
-Miles
--
Come now, if we were really planning to harm
"Matt Ryan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> sending HTML emails its a general comment on people usage of the Internet.
> If you can limit yourself to contacts who are technical enough to understand
> the arguments why you don't like it then you can maintain the pretence that
> it doesn't exist. Those
Filip Van Raemdonck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Gpdf is just one binary, and some GNOME specific support files.
> the interface, font rasterizing and rendering canvas are all changed to
> use GNOME facilities.
Looking forward to it then -- xpdf is a pretty good program, but its
font rasterizing
Steve Greenland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In standard typography, it is to have extra space after a period ending
> a sentence. For fixed-width fonts, this often shows up as two spaces,
> as is fairly ugly.
Of course, that's simply an opinion, and depends a lot on exactly
_which_ fixed fonts
Colin Walters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> your upstream's Makefile isn't properly
> coded to keep other flags like -I around when CFLAGS is set.
>
> the real solution is to fix the Makefile so that this works.
Human users will also appreciate such a fix...
-Miles
--
`Life is a boundless sea o
Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 04:05:51PM -0500, Matthew C. Tedder wrote:
> > ...whines...
>
> *plonk*
Whoa, the first intelligent post in this thread!
-Miles
--
Next to fried food, the South has suffered most from oratory.
-- Walter
Michael Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >Well, see, now Manoj would say that none at all were funny. What
> >statistical conclusions am I to derive from that?
>
> That you're not as funny as you think you are?
Still, he is often very funny (and on target), and to be honest, I think
he's quit
Colin Walters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > What's especially cool is that it hardwires the British (or Australian,
> > in this case, I guess) spelling of `disc' as part of the UI
>
> The idea that devfs hardwires anything seems to be very popular. It is
> also completely wrong. You can use th
Erich Schubert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> But if it is reliable i would recommend using it. It makes lot of things
> much easier and probably is much more intuitive for beginners as well.
> (just thinking of /dev/discs/disc0/part1 and /dev/cdroms/cdrom0 )
What's especially cool is that it hardw
Jon Eisenstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I recently filed a bug report (80092) against the nmh package regarding
> the location of its program files. It installs files into /usr/bin/mh,
> which isn't in the path, making running the program difficult until the
> reason is found.
>
> A suggestio
Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What is the real problem with the large package files? They take a long
> time to download, but so do emacs and other bloatware.
Yeah, but how often do you download emacs?
The packages file gets downloaded _every single time_ you do an update,
and for
Goswin Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> PS: Why not change the Solaris version to be compatible with the
> widely used linux version? I'm sure there are more people and tools
> out there for linux using -I then there are for solaris.
One point the maintainer has made on the gnu mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Philip Brown) writes:
> I guess YOUR mailreader is "too old or disfunctional to be worth
> discussing"
>
> I did not request you to Cc me.
> But you replied to the list AND me.
Because that is the most useful action for mail followups in the absence
of other information. If yo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Philip Brown) writes:
> As opposed to the current scheme, which also requires "annoying manual
> editing of addresses" to reply to the list, if your mailreader does the
> reasonable thing and assumes you want to reply to the original sender of
> the message, in liu of a reply-to
Riku Voipio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Which reminds me, why doesn't this list just set:
> reply-to: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Because it's completely wrong.
Doing so takes the choice of who to reply to (the sender or the list)
out of the hands of the reader [at least without annoying man
Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Now maybe if we were using the RBL, DUL, and RSS lists... :-)
>
GNU mailing lists (supposedly) use RBL, but in a mode where `spam' isn't
deleted, but rather just gets a header added saying `this message is
considered suspicious'. That allows indivi
"Carl B. Constantine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Yo ppl, it's not hard to archive a closed list, most list software supports
> archive directly. Sheesh! You make it sound like it's the end of the world
> for crying out loud. Give me a break!
I was complaining about not being able to post to the
"Carl B. Constantine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm getting tired of getting spam through mail lists I subscribe to
> that have an open post policy. Can we please close the debian-devel
> and other such lists that "should" be closed. I don't think trademark
> domains is doing anything for deb
Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ok folks, why is Debian called "GNU/Linux" instead of simply "Linux"?
To annoy all the uptight "Linux" fanboys. Duh.
Cheers,
-Miles
--
Love is a snowmobile racing across the tundra. Suddenly it flips over,
pinning you underneath. At night the ice
Jacob Kuntz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> i think this tread started with someone wanting the sbin directories in the
> normal user's path by default. i see your point that moving those binaries
> would break a lot of scripts. i don't think appending to the default path
> would break anything. anyo
201 - 292 of 292 matches
Mail list logo
