From: Hamish Moffatt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Mar 13, 2000 at 11:02:04AM -0500, Mark Mealman wrote:
I really don't like unstable either, but I've pretty much
abandoned the stable tree as too behind the times back when
slink was nearing freeze.
Here's a serious question for
From: Jacob Kuntz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
our biggest handicap is that we're always a year behind everyone
else. being a year behind is suicide in any industry. being a year behind
in an industry that moves as fast as open source software, is idiocy.
Agreed. With hardware changing as
From: Ron Farrer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Slink is called `stable' for a reason. It's not obsolete
for people who just want a stable distribution.
Of course, it is obsolete for people who want a nice GNOME
(or especially KDE) environment, or those who own Athlons or other
hardware
From: Joey Hess [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'd like to propose that we make a committment to getting an update to
potato out within a month of the release of the 2.4 kernel or
the release of potato, whichever comes last. (I did a similar thing for
slink in a 3 week time-frame, and so I think
4 matches
Mail list logo
