Re: how about telegram channel

On Tue, 19 Jul 2022 21:01:22 +0200 Bartosz Fenski wrote: > I created one > > https://t.me/debian_devel > > Of course I'm willing to give admin access to it to whoever we decide is > correct person / group to cover that. You created broadcasting channel. Only you and admins can post there. sign

Re: enabling link time optimizations in package builds

LTO significantly increase memory requirements for buildd machines. Do we have enough RAM and swap on each build server? > Link time optimizations are also at least turned on in other distros like > Fedora, OpenSuse (two years) and Ubuntu (one year). I know Ubuntu has builders with 8 GB RAM + 4

Re: Re: Debian choice of upstream tarballs for packaging

> git archive --prefix=$(DEBPKGNAME)-$(VERSION)/ $(GIT_TAG) \ > | xz >../$(DEBPKGNAME)_$(VERSION).orig.tar.xz I think you should add +ds version suffix or similar to indicate repacking for Debian. Does it still make sense provided that upstream does not care much of tarballs? signature.as

Re: Reconsider sending ITP bugs to debian-devel: a new list?

For the record, the latest digest of the debian-devel@ list #194 consists of 17 emails. 13 of them are ITP forwards, the remaining 4 emails are about ITP forwarding. And Evolution, due to a bug[1], opens the digest for 2 minutes 14 seconds. 😞️ If the ITP reports went to a different list, Evolution

Re: Disabling automatic upgrades on Sid by default?

On Вс, 2020-12-27 at 22:58 +, Lyndon Brown wrote: > As I envision it, we could have "rolling" and maybe "rolling-unstable" > (or "rolling-testing") with continual upgrades typically going directly > into "rolling", or with a 0-day migration from "rolling-unstable", with > the purpose of "rollin

Re: Proposal: use /usr/bin/open as an alternative for run-mailcap and others.

On Wed, 2020-10-07 at 19:17 -0400, Jeremy Bicha wrote: > On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 7:15 PM Jeremy Bicha wrote: > > You should be aware that Ubuntu implemented this idea 2 years ago. > > Oh, I misread. Ubuntu used /usr/bin/browse but 'open' sounds a lot better. In my view, both of these words, "brow

Bug#960544: ITP: vim-vader -- simple vimscript test framework

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Nicholas Guriev * Package name: vim-vader Upstream Author : Junegunn Choi * URL : https://github.com/junegunn/vader.vim * License : Expat (MIT-like) Programming Lang: VimScript Description : simple vimscript test framework

Bug#960543: ITP: vim-ale -- Asynchronous Lint Engine for Vim 8 and NeoVim

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Nicholas Guriev Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/dense-analysis/ale/issues/3160 * Package name: vim-ale Version : 2.6.0 Upstream Author : w0rp * URL : https://github.com/dense-analysis/ale * License : BSD-2